logo
The future of our region's economy depends on the power of our partnerships

The future of our region's economy depends on the power of our partnerships

As the government jobs and contracts that have long been the center of gravity in our region continue to undergo reductions and elimination, our local economy is facing profound disruption.
In the next few years, this presents significant challenges for the well-being of an enormous number of our neighbors. In the longer term, it may ultimately present opportunities for creating a more inclusive economy. In both cases, the extent to which we can mitigate harm today and capitalize on the potential for future transformation depends heavily on our ability as a region to lean deeply into the power of cross-sector partnerships.
Addressing the immediate need
Though we're still in the early phases of this new economic reality, its effects are already evident. Many of the 400 regional nonprofits through which the Capital Area Food Bank (CAFB) distributes the food for over 60 million meals each year are seeing more people come to their doors for help. These individuals include former federal employees and contractors, and an even greater proportion of people who are economically 'downstream' — for instance, workers in service industries who have experienced cutbacks to hours or wages because of the job loss (or fear of it) of their clients and customers. As more furloughs turn into unemployment and families' savings run out, we anticipate that these impacts will continue to grow.
This is all coming at a time when our region was already experiencing high levels of food insecurity: CAFB's most recent Hunger Report revealed that 37% of our neighbors – 1.5 million people – didn't always know where their next meal would come from at some point in 2023. It is also coinciding with reductions in many federal supports just when they are needed the most. The food bank has already seen nearly $1 million trimmed from some of its federal sources of food, and another $1 million-plus reduction to a program that supported its ability to purchase from local farmers. Meanwhile, looming changes to government nutrition programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) stand to erode assistance further.
The result is a widening gap between the need for services and the resources required to supply them that the food bank, and other nonprofit organizations doing critical work, simply cannot fill on our own.
expand
A staff member at one of CAFB's multiple pop-up food distributions serving federal workers, contractors, and others impacted by layoffs and funding cuts.
Courtesy photo
More than ever, we need the partnership and investment of the private sector, along with that of governments at the county and state levels, local and national foundations, and the broader philanthropic community. Working together, we can stave off the worst impacts of the current economic turmoil on the hundreds of thousands of people across the area who are the first and hardest hit in a shaky economy (and often, statistically, the last to recover).
Supporting our neighbors now pays multiple dividends. In addition to creating positive outcomes at an individual level, it also helps to lay the groundwork for enabling the growth of the workforce our region needs to succeed — today and most certainly as we re-envision our future economy.
Building a new, more inclusive economy for the future
In the midst of the rapid changes happening around us, and the immediate need to respond to them, it could be easy to miss that this moment also presents an enormous opportunity to re think the longer-term economic picture of our region, and the ways it can be constructed to benefit far more people than it does today. It is an opportunity we must not ignore.
In recent months, leaders from across our area have begun to accelerate discussions about what the new economic engines of the DMV might include, and how we can spur them on. Ideas include everything from enhancing infrastructure like public transit and investing in technologies like AI to growing the regional presence of the aerospace and life science industries.
The potential is significant. And in every scenario, an essential component of the vision is a labor pool with the skills to do the jobs.
Certainly, this new workforce should and will include those who held previous jobs as federal employees or contractors, and there are initiatives underway to stem outward migration by facilitating those kinds of sector transitions. There is also work being done to support the recruitment of talent from across the country.
But this moment also provides the chance to enhance or create structures and systems that will allow people who are already living in our region, but currently on the sidelines of our economy, to more fully engage and bring their talents to bear.
We know that that the desire for greater employment opportunities is there. In a survey conducted for one of our recent Hunger Reports, we saw that while 76% of those facing food insecurity in our region are working, 70% of those same individuals are looking for a job that pays higher wages, and 59% are interested in acquiring new skills and training to excel in their current job or get into a new field.
expand
Hunger Report found that many people facing food insecurity also have a strong desire to gain new job skills and enter new fields of employment.
Capital Area Food Bank
Building the pipelines that will enable this will not just happen — it will require intention, support structures, and partnerships between sectors, often among actors we may not think of as natural collaborators.
Fortunately, we have existing models.
For instance, we are partnering with multiple regional institutions of higher learning to provide food that enables people to remain in school or training programs. The knowledge and skills they acquire through these programs help to prepare them for the jobs of the future, fueling their own economic advancement while supplying our local talent pipeline.
The food bank is also partnering with local hospitals and medical centers like the University of Maryland Medical Center, Unity Health Care, and Children's National (which serves patients up through college age) to help people get the nutrition they need to improve their health and manage diet-related illness, allowing for greater workforce readiness.
expand
College leaders speaking at the Regional College Hunger Conference, hosted by CAFB and the Consortium of Universities of the Metropolitan Washington Area. The food bank partners with institutions of higher learning across the region.
Alyssa Schukar
None of this is occurring in a silo: crafting these types of programs has required significant collaboration and support across sectors in our region. And scaling more initiatives like this to build our new regional economy in ways that benefit more people will take even more of us working together. But there has never been a more important time to lean into these kinds of partnerships.
In the current environment, transformation is not optional; for our region's survival, it is now required. Fortunately, while this is a time like no other that we've faced, the COVID-pandemic has very recently shown us that we can rise to any occasion if we evolve rapidly by working together.
We can make it through this moment — and emerge stronger from it — by partnering to meet the immediate needs of our neighbors and finding new ways to help all people in our region thrive.
To learn more about the Capital Area Food Bank and how you can get involved in its work to provide food and opportunity for people across the DMV, visit capitalareafoodbank.org.
The Capital Area Food Bank annually provides more than 60 million meals-worth of food to people in need by supplying food to hundreds of regional nonprofits. It also partners with area organizations to address hunger's root causes by pairing food with critical services such as education and health care.
Radha Muthiah is the president and CEO of the Capital Area Food Bank, overseeing the organization's work to help people across greater Washington thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sales tax hike dumped in favor of 1% grocery tax by Naperville council
Sales tax hike dumped in favor of 1% grocery tax by Naperville council

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Sales tax hike dumped in favor of 1% grocery tax by Naperville council

The Naperville City Council reversed course Tuesday on how it would replace the lost income from the soon-to-be-defunct state grocery tax, abandoning plans to increase the city's home rule tax in favor of a local 1% grocery tax. Councilman Benny White, who previously supported increasing the home rule sales tax to compensate for the $6.5 million loss in state grocery tax money, said he had a change of heart after concluding a hike in the sales tax would place a heavier burden on local business owners and those struggling to afford items like diapers and basic cleaning supplies. 'In my opinion, the grocery tax, by keeping it where it is … I think it doesn't affect our residents,' White said. 'I think they're used to paying that particular tax so to have our businesses pick up the slack, I'm struggling with that.' The council had been scheduled to take a final vote on escalating the city's sales tax before a motion was made to swap it with the local grocery tax. Last month, the council voted 5-4 to raise the city's sales tax by 0.25%, which it can do without voter approval because it is a home rule municipality. The tax increase would have applied to restaurant meals and store purchases, including clothing, electronics and personal care products. By increasing the home rule sales tax, the city also would have been required to decrease the downtown food and beverage tax by the same percentage, per a city ordinance. Naperville's current downtown food and beverage tax is 1.75%. Gov. JB Pritzker repealed Illinois' 1% grocery tax last year, saying it hit poorer families harder than others. However, because revenue from the tax goes directly to municipal governments rather than to the state government, towns were granted the ability to levy their own 1% tax on groceries by Oct. 1. Many communities in Illinois have already opted to implement a local grocery tax. Finding a replacement for the state-wide grocery tax is crucial for Naperville, which collects $6.5 million annually from the income source. Naperville Finance Director Raymond Munch said at a previous council meeting that the grocery tax and the home rule sales tax currently bring in about the same amount of revenue, but the local grocery tax is a more stable form of revenue. The vote on reinstating the local grocery tax was 5-4, with Mayor Scott Wehrli and council members Josh McBroom, Nate Wilson and Allison Longenbaugh joining White in voting yes. Council members Ian Holzhauer, Ashfaq Syed, Mary Gibson and Patrick Kelly voted against it. Holzhauer reiterated the same points he made at last month's council meeting, emphasizing that a grocery tax combined with cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) under President Trump's tax bill could harm people who are already struggling. City staff previously noted that SNAP recipients would not feel the effects of the grocery tax, but would see the impact of a home rule sales tax increase. 'There is only so far that we can push that social safety net before it breaks,' Holzhauer said. 'If we have the opportunity to take a vote to make food more affordable for people whose lives just got a lot harder, I think we need to do that.' McBroom, however, argued that the volatility of the home rule sales tax could put people at risk by impacting essential city services should it bring in less money than expected. 'If we're worried about vulnerable people, vulnerable people need police, vulnerable people need fire departments to come to their neighborhood,' McBroom said. 'We are going to have an economic contraction at some point, and that's going to put a future city council in an impossible political position to raise property taxes to pay for our essential services.' McBroom also serves as the liaison to the Naperville Financial Advisory Board, which voted 5-1 in May to recommend the adoption of the grocery tax over increasing the home rule sales tax.

10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill
10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill

Millions of Americans could soon see their food assistance slashed. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' introduced large cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that will affect families across the country. Check Out: Learn More: According to the Urban Institute, over 22 million families are expected to lose some or all of their SNAP benefits, with over 5 million affected households losing an average of $146 per month. The bill also introduces a new requirement: States must begin covering 5% to 25% of SNAP costs starting in 2028, depending on their payment error rates. This cost-sharing model means that states with higher administrative errors will face deeper cuts. A Commonwealth Fund analysis projects that by 2029, some states will see significantly reduced federal SNAP funding, noting that the bill was designed to cut funding disproportionately in certain states. Based on this analysis, these are the 10 states that are facing the deepest SNAP cuts. Also see states where people are most likely to benefit from the SALT changes in Trump's bill. New Mexico Funding loss: $479 million Relative reduction: -43.9% Also See: Explore More: West Virginia Funding loss: $262 million Relative reduction: -43.6% See More: Georgia Funding loss: $1.49 billion Relative reduction: -43% Delaware Funding loss: $112 million Relative reduction: -41.6% New Jersey Funding loss: $846 million Relative reduction: -41.4% Mississippi Funding loss: $367 million Relative reduction: -41.1% Take Our Poll: Indiana Funding loss: $603 million Relative reduction: -39.6% Michigan Funding loss: $1.29 billion Relative reduction: -39.6% Oklahoma Funding loss: $628 million Relative reduction: -39.3% Missouri Funding loss: $630 million Relative reduction: -39.3% Editor's note: Data was sourced from The Commonwealth Fund. More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value This article originally appeared on 10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill Solve the daily Crossword

Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs
Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs

Axios

time13 hours ago

  • Axios

Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs

About 360,000 Illinois residents risk losing SNAP benefits under provisions of the " big, beautiful bill," which could also saddle the state with $700 million in additional SNAP costs previously covered by the feds, according to Gov. JB Pritzker's office. Why it matters: The cuts could have far-reaching effects on hunger as well as spending in the local economy. This year, Pritzker's office says, the new provisions could cost Illinois an additional $80 million just to meet administrative requirements at a time when the state is under intense pressure to bail out basic services. Zoom in: About 15% of state residents, or 1.9 million people, receive SNAP benefits in Illinois. The new rules require Illinois to expand work requirements (proof of 80 hours of work a month) to SNAP recipients who are: Able-bodied adults ages 55-64 Adults with dependents who are over 13 years old Adults who had been exempt under Illinois' 4.8% unemployment rate. New rules restrict the exemption to counties with unemployment of 10% or higher. Between the lines: Illinois can avoid the additional $700 million in SNAP payment responsibility if it reduces its "payment error rate" (PER) from 11% to under 6%. The PER measures underpayment or overpayment usually driven by administrative or applicant mistakes. It does not include fraud. Illinois has the 10th worst error rate in the nation, but is on par with most big states. The intrigue: Alaska has an error rate of 20% but Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski worked out a deal to exempt her state from the requirement to reduce it. What they're saying: "While the state government will be doing everything in its power to lower the so-called error rate, we cannot gloss over the fact that this provision was intentionally designed as a craven mechanism to deny states funding and feed fewer people in need," Pritzker spokesperson Matt Hill said in a statement. The other side: " We are incentivizing states to administer the SNAP program more efficiently and effectively, protecting taxpayers and prioritizing limited resources for those who truly need the benefit," Republican Rep. Darin LaHood tells Axios.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store