Revealed: The common texting mistake that could explain your unhappy relationship
But there's one texting mistake that could be fuelling an unhappy relationship, a study has found.
Researchers discovered that the simple act of using emojis can boost feelings of closeness and relationship satisfaction within a couple.
So if you're adverse to using the small icons, it could be a good time to start including them in your messages.
The team, from The University of Texas at Austin, recruited 260 adults aged between 23 and 67 to take part in their study.
They were randomly assigned to read 15 text message exchanges – all of which contained the same text but half included emojis while the other half had none.
Participants were instructed to imagine themselves as the sender of each message and to focus on their partner's replies.
Analysis revealed that people rated partners who used emojis as more responsive than partners who communicated through text alone.
The text exchange (right) that includes emojis was more likely to prompt feelings of closeness and relationship satisfaction compared to exchanges without emojis (left)
Emoji use was also linked with an increase in closeness and relationship satisfaction.
Surprisingly, there was no significant differences between the use of face and non-face emojis – for example, a smiley face and a love heart - suggesting that the type of emoji used may be less critical than previously thought.
Instead, it may be that the simple presence of emojis drives the perception of improved responsiveness and better relationships, the researchers said.
They explained that emojis may serve not only as expressive devices but also as signals of attentiveness and engagement.
Writing in the journal PLOS One they said: 'The study revealed that emojis can boost relationship satisfaction by signaling emotional attentiveness.
'Interestingly, it's not the type of emoji but simply their presence that makes people feel closer to their partner.'
They said their findings may be explained through the fact that emojis convey emotions that can be difficult to express through text alone, making messages feel more personal and thoughtful.
Emojis can also enhance the emotional appeal of messages, they explained, evoking stronger emotional responses and making conversations livelier and more engaging.
Finally, they can help clarify the tone and intent of a message, reducing the risk of misunderstandings.
'Adding a heart, smiley face or other simple emoji can make messages feel more personal and engaging,' they wrote.
'Simple symbols like thumbs-up or sparkles can effectively convey positivity and engagement, even in casual conversations.'
Experts recently warned against sending the smiley face emoji to certain people.
While Millennials and older generations see the smiley face as an expression of happiness, Gen Z – aged between 13 and 28 – tend to interpret it as a sign of sarcasm or irony.
Erica Dhawan, author of Digital Body Language: How to Build Trust and Connection, No Matter the Distance, older generations tend to read emojis as representing the objects they literally portray.
That means a smiley face is a happy smile, a snowflake means that it is snowing, and an aubergine is referring to a type of vegetable.
But for those who grew up messaging over social media, emoji often have other meanings that have built up over time, she said.
Another emoji that can come across as sarcastic is the 'sparkle' emoji.
Older users often use these cute sparkles to express positive emotions such as gratitude or excitement.
However, for Gen Z, it is more likely to mean that a statement has a sarcastic tone, just like members of older internet messaging boards used to add '/s' after a statement.
The same is true of the 'thumbs up' emoji, which is used to express positive affirmation by older users but is often seen as sarcastic by Gen Z.
ARE EMOJIS RUINING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE?
Emojis may be a fun form of communication but they are destroying the English language, a recent study by Google has revealed.
Smiley faces, love hearts, thumbs up and other cartoon icons - rather than words - are the preferred method of communication by teenagers, who are considered the worst offenders regarding the decline in grammar and punctuation.
More than a third of British adults believe emojis are the reason for the deterioration in proper language usage, according to the study commissioned by the Google-owned site YouTube.
Of the two thousand adults, aged 16 to 65, who were asked their views, 94 per cent reckoned English was in a state of decline, with 80 per cent citing youngsters as the worst offenders.
The most common errors made by Brits are spelling mistakes (21 per cent), followed closely by apostrophe placement (16 per cent) and the misuse of a comma (16 per cent).
More than half of British adults are not confident with their command of spelling and grammar, the study also found.
Furthermore, around three-quarters of adults rely on emoji to communicate, in addition to a dependence on predictive text and spell checking.
The use of emojis has seeped into our culture to such an extent that the Oxford Dictionary's 'Word of the Year' in 2015 wasn't actually a word at all - it was the Face With Tears emoji, which shows just how influential the little graphic images have become.
They were first used by Japanese mobile phone companies in the late 1990s to express an emotion, concept or message in a simple, graphic way.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘The American system is being destroyed': academics on leaving US for ‘scientific asylum' in France
It was on a US-bound flight in March, as Brian Sandberg stressed about whether he would be stopped at security, that the American historian knew the time had come for him to leave his home country. For months, he had watched Donald Trump's administration unleash a multipronged attack on academia – slashing funding, targeting international students and deeming certain fields and even keywords off limits. As his plane approached the US, it felt as though the battle had hit home, as Sandberg worried that he would face reprisals over comments he had made during his travels to the French media on the future of research in the US. 'It makes you think about what your status is as a researcher and the principle of academic freedom,' he said. 'Things have really changed … The entire system of research and higher education in the United States is really under attack.' Soon after, he became one of the nearly 300 researchers to apply for a French university's groundbreaking offer of 'scientific asylum'. Launched by Aix-Marseille University, the programme was among the first in Europe to offer reprieve to researchers reeling from the US crackdown on academia, promising three years of funding for about 20 researchers. Last week, Sandberg was revealed as one of the 39 researchers shortlisted for the programme. 'The American system is being destroyed at the moment,' he told the 80 reporters who turned up to meet the candidates. 'I think a lot of people in the United States and as well as here in Europe have not understood the level to which all of higher education is being targeted.' As reports began to emerge of funding freezes, cuts and executive orders targeting institutions across the Atlantic, institutions across Europe sprang into action, announcing plans to lure US-based academics. At Aix-Marseille University, hundreds of applications came in from researchers tied to institutions such as Johns Hopkins University, Nasa, Columbia, Yale and Stanford. Three months after they launched their programme – named Safe Place for Science – the university said it had received more than 500 inquiries. It was a glimpse of the 'historic' moment the world was facing, said Éric Berton, the university's president. 'More than 80 years ago, as France was under occupation and repression, America welcomed exiled researchers, offering them a helping hand and allowing them to keep science alive,' he said. 'And now, in a sad reversal of history, some American scientists have arrived in France in search of a space for freedom, thought and research.' Last week, the university opened its doors, allowing reporters to meet a handful of the Americans who were in the final running to join the programme. As high-profile battles play out between universities such as Harvard and the White House, all of them asked that their institutions not be named, citing concerns that their employers could face reprisals. Some declined to speak to the media, while others asked that their full names not be used, offering a hint of how the Trump administration's actions are sowing anxiety among academics. 'The worry is that we've already seen that scientists are being detained at the border. Granted they're not US citizens, but they're even saying now that if you speak out against the government, they will deport you,' said a biological anthropologist who asked to be identified only as Lisa. 'And so I don't need anything against me at the moment until I can officially move here with my family.' Together the researchers painted a picture of a profession that had been plunged into uncertainty as the US government slashes spending on research grants and dismantles the federal institutions that manage and hand out funding. Months into Trump's second presidency, politics is increasingly blurring into academia as the government works to root out anything it deems as 'wokeism' from the post-secondary world. 'There's a lot of censorship now, it's crazy,' said Carol Lee, an evolutionary biologist, pointing to the list of terms now seen as off-limits in research grant applications. 'There are a lot of words that we're not allowed to use. We're not allowed to use the words diversity, women, LGBTQ.' Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion While the swift pace of change had left many nervous about what may lie ahead, many were not taking any chances. 'People are moving, for sure,' said Lee. 'A lot of top people have already moved to China. And China is laying out the red carpet. If people are getting an offer from Canada, people are moving to Canada.' For Lisa, the biological anthropologist, the reality of dismantling her life in the US and moving her husband, a schoolteacher, and their two kids across the Atlantic was starting to sink in. 'It's excitement, but it's nerve-racking,' she said. She knew she had to get out when it became clear that Trump had won a second term. Months later, she has found a potential path to do so, but is still wrapping her head around all that taking part in Aix-Marseille University's programme would entail. 'It is a big pay cut,' she said. 'My kids are super gung-ho. My husband is just worried that he won't find a job. Which is my worry too, because I don't think I'll be able to afford four of us on my salary.' But for her, and several others on the shortlist, the view was that there were few other options. 'It's a very discouraging time to be a scientist,' said James, a climate researcher who asked that his full name not be used. 'I feel America has always had a sort of anti-intellectual strain – it happens to be very ascendant right now. It's a relatively small proportion that doesn't trust scientists, but it's unfortunately a very powerful segment.' His wife had also been shortlisted for the same programme in southern France, leaving the couple on the brink of uprooting the lives and careers they had spent decades building in the US. 'I have very mixed feelings,' he said. 'I'm very grateful that we'll have the opportunity, but really quite sad that I need the opportunity.'
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
I'm a top astrobiologist – here's why I am convinced aliens DID live on Mars…and they could have been smarter than us
David Rivers Published: Invalid Date, ASTRONAUTS visiting Mars could unearth a museum of alien fossils that may have belonged to an intelligent civilisation. Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe backed NASA 's plan to send humans to Mars in the 2030s and Elon Musk's bid to colonise the planet. 5 5 The Buckingham Centre for Astrobiology astrobiologist thinks alien life 'unquestionably' existed on the Red Planet. And he's even suggested explorers could unearth fossils pointing to alien life, possibly more intelligent than us. Prof Wickramasinghe told The Sun: 'I think it is entirely plausible that Mars, sometime in the past, was a green planet full of life. 'Then something happened that made it a virtually dead planet or nearly a dead planet. 'This could have happened after impact. An episode of comet asteroid impacts could have destroyed all life that existed on it if it did exist on Mars. It could have destroyed it just as on the Earth. 'If there was a huge protracted episode of asteroid comet impacts, then this planet would be a dead planet. 'The fact that Mars and Earth are very similar, geologically very similar, have seasons and they have very similar patterns of oscillation of temperature and so on makes it entirely possible that, in the past, Mars was the home of life. 'I don't rule out intelligent life. He added: 'I think astronauts will explore all those fossils discussed by Barry DiGregorio, examine them more carefully and decide whether they're artifacts or real fossils. 'They would encounter bacteria and I think they would find a planet that is very easy to terraform, to make it a living planet like the earth. Hidden ocean on Mars found that 'could cover entire planet with a mile of water' and 'should be able to sustain life' 'If you go with enough resources, you could build houses and build a civilisation on Mars, and I don't think that's impossible. 'I can't rule out an intelligent civilisation.' Asked what that life may have looked like, he said: "It's speculation. It could have been as intelligent as you or I or maybe even more intelligent. "Who knows? I think evidence has been virtually stamped out of existence possibly through an impact episode, if it did exist." DiGregorio had claimed alien fossils had been discovered by NASA's Curiosity rover in 2018. He accused NASA of failing to investigate properly so it could boost publicity for a manned mission to Mars. 5 5 NASA said it believed the images likely showed signs of crystal growth, not alien fossils. Billionaire Musk has long signalled his intent to colonise Mars through his SpaceX company. Last year, the X owner even suggested humans could land there in four years and be living in a self-sustaining city in 20. NASA says on its website it intends to send humans to Mars in the 1930s. In 1976, NASA landed two Viking landers on Mars. NASA scientist Gilbert Levin ran an experiment to test the soil and concluded there were positive signs of life through the presence of radioactive gas. NASA and its other scientists disagreed, and separate experiments from Viking concluded the soil did not show signs of life. But Levin spent the rest of his life claiming he'd found signs of alien life until his death in 2021. Prof Wickramasinghe said: 'We have unquestionably found microbial life on Mars, the most secure discovery was the Gilbert Levin discovery in the 1970s when they did the Viking land experiments.' NASA's mission to Mars NASA hopes to send astronauts to Mars as early as the 2030s. The space company has been working to advance its technologies in a bid to send a human crew to the Red Planet. It would take astronauts up to nine months to reach Mars - which even at its closest is 33.9 million miles away. Astronauts could then spend up to 500 days on the planet's surface before returning to Earth - which would take another nine months. The crew would spend their time on the planet collecting data and assessing the planetary alignment that would allow the spacecraft to land and depart from Mars on the same orbit. Last year, the agency completed a year-long simulated mission that saw four crew members out in a replica habitat in Houston, Texas. They logged 378 days in the 1,700-square-foot, 3D-printed habitat called Mars Dune Alpha. He added: 'That result was overwhelmingly positive. They got the result that they wanted. 'So almost immediately Levin, who I'd known for a long time, made the announcement on behalf of NASA that we have discovered life on Mars. 'This was a step too far for the NASA establishment, and they then revoked that statement.' On its website, NASA says: "Mars remains our horizon goal for human exploration because it is one of the only other places we know where life may have existed in the solar system. "What we learn about the Red Planet will tell us more about our Earth's past and future, and may help answer whether life exists beyond our home planet. "Like the Moon, Mars is a rich destination for scientific discovery and a driver of technologies that will enable humans to travel and explore far from Earth." Mars facts Here's what you need to know about the red planet... Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun It is named after the Roman god of war The landmass of Mars is very similar to Earth, but due to the difference in gravity, you could jump three times higher there than you can here. Mars is mountainous and hosts the tallest mountain known in the Solar System called Olympus Mons, which is three times higher than Everest Mars is considered the second most habitable planet after Earth. It takes the planet 687 Earth days to orbit the Sun The planet has a diameter of 4,212 miles, and has an average distance from Earth of 140 million miles Martian temperatures can vary wildly, reaching as high as 70F/20C or as low as -225F/-153C
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mysterious interstellar object caught on camera as scientist says it could be an alien spacecraft
A mysterious interstellar object hurtling through the solar system has been caught on camera for the first time. First spotted by on July 1, scientists from around the world have now confirmed that this unexpected visitor has travelled through space from a distant star. Officially titled 3I/ATLAS, the rare interloper is 12 miles (20km) long and hurtling towards the sun at 135,000 miles per hour. Now, using a powerful telescope in Hawaii, the European Space Agency (ESA) has captured the first video of 3I/ATLAS as it journeys through space. The short video shows that the object is extremely bright, which means it is either many times larger than any other interstellar object or has another source of illumination. Most experts agree that this extra illumination is caused by the fact that 3I/ATLAS is an active comet, producing a glowing 'coma' of ice and gas as it approaches the sun. However, one Harvard professor claims that the light might not be able to be explained by natural means. Professor Avi Loeb, a physicist at Harvard University, told MailOnline: 'If it is not a comet, then its large brightness would be a big surprise and potentially signal a non-natural origin, perhaps from artificial light.' 3I/ATLAS was detected as a faint speck of light by NASA's Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescope. Since then, professional and amateur astronomers around the world have scrambled to gather more data. Scientists quickly combed older data to find observations of the object that had previously been missed, in a process called precovery. Combining these with hundreds of new observations, scientists were able to officially confirm that 3I/ATLAS is an interstellar object. Currently 420 million miles (670 million kilometres) away from Earth, 3I/ATLAS's trajectory and incredible speed mean it must be passing through our solar system after being ejected by its own star. NASA predicts that it will reach its closest point to the sun on October 30, at a distance of 130 million miles (210 million km) - passing just within the orbit of Mars. Thankfully, the object poses no threat to Earth and will pass harmlessly at around 150 million miles (240 million km) away at its closest point. This is only the third time that scientists have managed to spot an interstellar object passing through the solar system. The first interstellar object was Oumuamua in 2017, followed by Borisov in 2019. When Oumuamua was first detected, certain irregularities in its spin and velocity prompted Professor Loeb and his co-author, Dr Shmuel Bialy, to suggest that it could be alien in origin. Professor Loeb said: 'Oumuamua exhibited a large non-gravitational acceleration which was anomalous given its lack of evaporation.' Similarly, Professor Loeb now suggests that 3I/ATLAS could be a similar type of alien craft. While experts say there is no evidence to support this idea, some researchers say we can't rule out the possibility just yet. Professor Michael Garrett, Director of Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics said: 'More observations are definitely needed.' Asked whether the object could be an alien craft, Professor Garret responded: 'Who knows - it could be - that's why it will be important to make as many different measurements as possible to test all hypotheses. 'It's unlikely that it is, but that doesn't mean to say we shouldn't check. We don't know much about these interstellar objects, so we learn more each time we encounter one.' However, Professor Garret added that there is currently no evidence the object is alien in nature, and it is more likely to be 'an icy body that has escaped from another planetary system and wandered by the solar system by chance'. Currently, the overwhelming majority of evidence points to the fact that 3I/ATLAS is a comet. This is because astronomers have spotted a nebulous envelope of gas and dust known as a coma surrounding the object as it is heated by the sun. Based on these observations, both NASA and ESA are now confident enough to confirm that 3I/ATLAS is an interstellar comet. Dr Mark Norris, an astronomer from the University Of Central Lancashire, said: 'If there's a coma, it by definition is a comet, because this means that it is outgassing. 'This thing is still quite far from the sun, so you can expect, therefore, as it gets closer, you should get a bigger cloud of material; and that should become clear as we get more observations going forward.' However, by the time the comet reaches its closest point to the Earth, it will be hidden behind the sun, so astronomers will need to wait until it reemerges in December to catch the best observations.
