Stocks diverge after Trump's latest tariff warning
London (AFP)Major stock markets diverged and the dollar largely steadied Monday after President Donald Trump's latest trade war salvos that saw him threaten to hit the European Union and Mexico with 30% tariffs.Trump's move followed his warnings last week of potential 50% levies on copper and Brazilian goods, 35% on Canadian goods, and a possible 200% charge on pharmaceuticals.While observers warn the measures could deal a hefty blow to the global economy, investors are largely optimistic that governments will hammer out agreements before the White House's August 1 deadline.Eurozone stock markets declined in midday trading Monday after leading Asian indices closed mixed. London climbed with Britain no longer part of the European Union, while comments from Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey hinting at more cuts to UK interest rates boosted sentiment."Investors are lurching from hopes that Trump's (tariff) threats are just a big negotiating tactic, to fears that his impatience will turn more vengeful and big hikes will come into force in August," noted Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown.Traders were awaiting news following Trump's meeting due Monday with NATO chief Mark Rutte in Washington after the president teased a "major statement" on Russia's war in Ukraine, with senior Republicans preparing an arsenal of sanctions against Moscow. The prospect of additional sanctions on Russian crude sent oil prices climbing 1.5%.Meanwhile bitcoin struck a record-high above $123,000.
Tariffs reaction Regarding tariffs, Trump on Saturday cited Mexico's role in illicit drugs flowing into the United States and a trade imbalance with the European Union.The move threw months of painstaking talks with Brussels into disarray.European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen has insisted the bloc still wants to reach an accord -- and on Sunday delayed retaliation over separate US duties on steel and aluminium as a sign of goodwill.EU officials threatened in May to impose tariffs on US goods worth around 100 billion euros ($117 billion), including cars and planes, should talks fail.Heading into Brussels talks with EU trade ministers Monday, the bloc's trade chief Maros Sefcovic said despite Trump's latest threat he "felt" Washington was ready to continue negotiating -- and he planned to speak with his US counterparts later in the day.Analysts pointed out that the levies against Mexico and Canada come even after Trump agreed a trade deal with the two during his first administration.Tensions, meanwhile, have eased between the United States and China.Official data Monday showed Chinese exports jumped more than expected in June after Washington and Beijing agreed a tentative deal to lower swingeing levies on each other.That included a 32.4% surge in shipments to the United States, having dropped in May.Traders are also keeping a nervous eye on the Federal Reserve as Trump continues to berate boss Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates soon enough, saying Sunday "I hope he quits", and adding "He should quit".Reports also said the president's allies were targeting the Fed chief over his handling of an expensive renovation at the bank's headquarters, with some suggesting they were building a case to have him removed over it.
However, strategists warned that such a move would bring the independence of the central bank into question and send US Treasury yields soaring and the dollar plunging.
Stock Markets
Continue full coverage
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
23 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Pakistani TV channels withdraw reports on Trump visit after White House comment
Two leading Pakistani television news channels withdrew reports on Thursday that US President Donald Trump planned to visit the South Asian nation, with one of them issuing an apology. The White House dismissed the reports. "A trip to Pakistan has not been scheduled at this time," a White House official said. Geo and ARY news channels had said earlier on Thursday that Trump was expected to visit Pakistan in September. But both later withdrew their reports. A senior management official at ARY told Reuters it backtracked after the foreign office said it had no knowledge of a visit. George W. Bush was the last US president to visit Pakistan in 2006. US-Pakistan relations saw a major boost when Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House last month in an unprecedented meeting.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
What will happen if Donald Trump tries to fire Fed's Jerome Powell?
Tension between the White House and the Federal Reserve is reaching a boiling point, with US President Donald Trump increasing his attacks on chairman Jerome Powell in recent days. Fears that the US President could fire Mr Powell rose on Wednesday after reports that Mr Trump had indicated to House Republicans that he would be open to the move. Mr Trump confirmed that he polled Republicans on the issue on Tuesday night but denied that he was planning to fire Mr Powell. The episode prompted whiplash in US markets. Sacking the Fed chair could lead to a constitutional crisis that would probably upset financial markets, shatter decades of historical norms and lead to significant uncertainty in the US economy. Here is what could happen if Mr Trump does try to fire the Fed chairman. Federal Open Market Committee in question Unlike most federal agencies, the Federal Reserve enjoys broad independence from the White House. The Federal Reserve Act states that the Fed can make monetary policy decisions without interference from the executive or legislative branches. Fed officials can only be fired 'for cause', which is generally thought to mean malfeasance or neglect of duty. No Fed chair has ever been fired. Mr Powell maintains that Mr Trump has no authority to fire him – 'not permitted under the law', he said in November – and that he will serve out his term as Fed chairman until May 2026. He has not indicated if he will serve out his term as Fed governor, which is up in 2028. 'Powell would almost certainly sue against any removal in court,' Derek Tang, an economist at LHMeyer/Monetary Policy Analytics in Washington, wrote to clients. Should that happen, the case would probably go before the Supreme Court. The court signalled in a May ruling that, unlike other independent agencies, a president cannot fire a Fed official over a policy dispute. Mr Trump said he wants a 'low interest' person to helm the Federal Reserve after Mr Powell. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are considered to be the front-runners for the job. Fed Governor Christopher Waller is believed to be a possible contender, but a long shot. Mr Bessent, who is leading the replacement search, told Bloomberg on Monday the process to pick a new Fed chair has begun. But replacing Mr Powell with someone who backs Mr Trump's low-interest rate regime would not guarantee lower interest rates. The president appoints only eight of the 12 members on the Federal Open Market Committee. Regional Fed banks appoint their own presidents who serve rotating terms on the committee. The New York Fed, which has a permanent vote on the committee, also selects its own president. Minutes released from the Fed's most recent meeting showed that only a couple Fed officials would support a rate cut this month. Public comments from officials show that they support Mr Powell's wait-and-see approach. 'Firing Powell alone would not satisfy Trump's ideal, but the mere discussion certainly undermines independence. The damage might be done,' Mr Tang wrote. A financial market meltdown? The integrity of the Federal Reserve's independence will also be closely monitored by financial markets. The Fed's independence is seen as sacrosanct, with officials' staggered terms designed to ensure that monetary policy decisions are made with a long-view approach rather than for short-term political gains. 'We have all been schooled in the independence of the Fed,' said Peter Andersen, founder of Andersen Capital Management in Boston. 'If that were to be somewhat more nuanced and maybe a grey area … I think that would weaken the confidence that capital markets have in the Federal Reserve system.' US markets gave Mr Trump something of a preview of what would happen if he were to fire Mr Powell. We have all been schooled in the independence of the Fed Peter Andersen, Andersen Capital Management The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 both fell 0.6 per cent after reports that Mr Trump was moving closer to firing the Fed chairman, only to rebound after he said such an action was unlikely. The two-year Treasury yield fell to 3.892 per cent while the yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 4.48 per cent before settling at 4.46 per cent. The two-year Treasury is more sensitive to Fed rate moves, while the 10-year is more influenced by inflation expectations and future policy decisions. It could also call into question foreign investment in the Treasury market at a time when Mr Trump's tariff policy has already brought fears of the possible reallocation of global capital. The US market has for decades been considered one of the most stable investment destinations, with the 10-year Treasury considered to be a safe-haven asset. 'It could have ripple effects in that foreign markets tend to hold on high esteem US Treasuries and the Treasury market,' said Mr Andersen. 'If that were to be questioned, even a subtle basis of the independence and how that would impact the overall impact of the Treasury, and the fact it is the highest calibre of currency in the world, that would come under some stress.' US banking executives this week have voiced support for the Federal Reserve's independence, with JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon saying that interfering with the Fed could have 'adverse consequences'. Goldman Sachs chief executive David Solomon told CNBC that the Fed's independence is critical. 'Stability in the Fed seat, I think, is important,' he said. Bank of America Group chief executive Brian Moynihan also told CNBC that the Fed's independence is 'critical' to the US.
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
US House Green‑Lights First Stablecoin Regulation
The U. S. House of Representatives has approved the GENIUS Act, the inaugural federal regulatory framework targeting fiat‑backed stablecoins, with a decisive 308–122 bipartisan vote on 17 July 2025. With Senate approval secured in June by a 68–30 margin, the legislation now advances to President Trump's desk for signature, anticipated as early as tomorrow. The GENIUS Act mandates that issuers—including banks, credit unions, fintech firms, and select non‑bank entities—maintain one‑to‑one reserves in cash or low‑risk assets such as U. S. Treasury bills, with mandatory monthly public disclosures of reserve composition. It also institutes anti‑money laundering controls, requires issuance organisations to obtain licences from federal or state financial regulators, and prohibits paying interest directly to stablecoin holders. The legislation forms part of a broader 'Crypto Week' effort in the House, which also included passage of the CLARITY Act—allocating oversight of digital asset classification between the SEC and CFTC—and the Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act, barring the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Both now await Senate consideration. ADVERTISEMENT Advocates argue that the GENIUS Act addresses long-standing regulatory uncertainty, providing market stability and consumer safeguards within a $260 billion-plus stablecoin ecosystem. Senior figures from institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, Walmart, and Amazon have reportedly expressed interest in issuing stablecoins under the new regime. Market sentiment reflects optimism: crypto‑linked equities and assets rose when the House vote was finalised, with Bitcoin nearing record highs above $119,000. Nonetheless, critics highlight significant concerns. Consumer advocates emphasise that stablecoins remain outside FDIC protection and could pose redemption risks or obscure hidden fees. Others express unease over potential weak guardrails: the SEC's Paul Atkins cautioned that regulatory innovation must still ensure sufficient market safeguards. Ethics debates spotlight former President Trump's extensive ties to the crypto industry, including investments in World Liberty Financial and a meme coin touted as generating over $300 million in related revenues. Opponents claim this raises conflict‑of‑interest questions and risks favouring Trump‑linked enterprises, though the White House has asserted asset segregation via a family trust. In Congress, both Democratic and Republican proponents defended the legislation for delivering much‑needed structure. Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer remarked that introducing 'some rules of the road' was preferable to having none. Opposing voices like Rep. Maxine Waters cautioned that the law might 'signal tolerance for corruption' without closing presidential exemptions from conflict‑of‑interest prohibitions. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats, including Richard Blumenthal, criticised the bill's failure to eliminate loopholes or demand stronger consumer protection standards. Beyond federal oversight, the GENIUS Act introduces a layered supervisory model: federal agencies will regulate larger issuers and interstate entities, while state regulators handle smaller players—those issuing under $10 billion annually. The legislation sets out implementation timelines, including one‑year deadlines for rule‑making and an 18‑month effective date, with a three‑year transition period before enforcement on custody and transaction restrictions. Industry stakeholders anticipate dramatic market growth. Scott Bessent, Treasury secretary, projected the stablecoin market could swell from around $195 billion to over $2 trillion following the GENIUS Act's implementation. Christian Catalini of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab predicted fierce competition as banks and fintechs join traditional issuers with consumer trust bolstered by regulation. The crypto sector, stung by past regulatory setbacks under the prior administration's enforcement actions, now views the GENIUS Act as a turning point. Major players like Circle and Coinbase backed the measure after directing substantial lobbying resources toward lawmakers. Jennifer Nolan, head of the Blockchain Association, described it as a 'defining moment in the evolution of U. S. digital asset policy'. With presidential signature expected imminently, the GENIUS Act is poised to redefine the U. S. approach to stablecoins—ushering in regulated issuance, enhanced transparency, and heightened institutional involvement. Its progress also spotlights ongoing debates about market oversight, political influence, and financial stability in an increasingly digital economy.
