Trump's BRICS warning to India adds new twist to trade deal
Trump said Tuesday that India could face an additional 10% tariff alongside other members of BRICS — a bloc of emerging economies he has labeled "anti-American.' The remarks came just a day after the U.S. leader said he was close to finalizing a trade deal that New Delhi hopes would give it reprieve from 26% reciprocal tariffs.
The latest threat by the U.S. president followed a two-day BRICS summit in Brazil, in which leaders agreed on a joint statement that criticized trade-distorting tariffs. But while Brazil and South Africa have blasted Trump separately for his comments, India has refrained from responding publicly, a sign that it's treading a fine line in maintaining its relationship with Washington.
Officials in New Delhi say they're not overly alarmed by Trump's latest threats for now. The U.S. leader's view is that BRICS is seeking to undermine the dominance of the U.S. dollar, which is not India's goal, the officials said, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private. India doesn't support moves for a single BRICS currency, and any participation in local currency trade arrangements are aimed solely at reducing risks, they said.
India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't respond to an email seeking comment. Senior Indian diplomat P Kumaran said at a press briefing on Tuesday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had "no discussion' on Trump's tariff threats during the Indian leader's state visit there. "We didn't have an opportunity to discuss that.'
With India set to assume the BRICS chairmanship in 2026, it will need to differentiate itself from members like China and Russia, who are seeking to build the bloc as a stronger opposition voice to the U.S.
India would be banking on its strategic value and neutral currency stance to be treated differently by Washington.
"Trump is unhappy with some BRICS members who have been talking about an alternate reserve currency,' said Mohan Kumar, a former Indian envoy and lead negotiator at the World Trade Organization, who now teaches at OP Jindal Global University. "India has time and again differentiated between local currency trade and de-dollarization and therefore doesn't fall in that category.'
India has been cultivated by several U.S. administrations over the years as a strategic partner and key regional counterweight to an increasingly assertive China. As recently as April, U.S. Vice President JD Vance remarked that the fate of the 21st century "is going to be determined by the strength of the United States and India partnership.'
Those ties have recently come under strain, though, after Trump took credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May. Modi has pushed back at Trump's claims he used trade as a bargaining tool to secure a truce. The Trump administration has also made overtures to Islamabad, including its powerful army chief, in the aftermath of the conflict, a source of concern in New Delhi.
Much is riding on the success of the India-U.S. trade deal, which both countries have pledged to finalize by the fall of this year. Shashi Tharoor, an opposition lawmaker who has led India's diplomatic outreach since the Pakistan conflict, said a trade deal would signify the strong ties between the two countries.
"The relationship with the U.S. is in a good shape,' he said in an interview in London on Tuesday. If the terms of the trade deal are agreed, "that will be a very, very healthy sign.'
After months of talks, Indian trade negotiators have put forward their best offer to the Trump administration and are now awaiting a response.
The latest tariff threats from Trump may also be a bargaining tool to secure more concessions from New Delhi. Trump has previously threatened to slap 100% levies on BRICS if they ditch the dollar in bilateral trade.
"We need to distinguish between President Trump's narrative and his action,' Kumar said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
7 minutes ago
- Japan Today
State of play in Trump's tariffs, threats and delays
US President Donald Trump is set to raise tariffs on dozens of trading partners come August 1, if they do not reach deals with Washington By Beiyi SEOW Dozens of economies including India, Canada and Mexico face threats of higher tariffs Friday if they fail to strike deals with Washington. Here is a summary of duties President Donald Trump has introduced in his second term as he pressures allies and competitors alike to reshape US trade relationships. Global tariffs US "reciprocal" tariffs -- imposed under legally contentious emergency powers -- are due to jump from 10 percent to various steeper levels for a list of dozens of economies come August 1, including South Korea, India and Taiwan. The hikes were to take effect July 9 but Trump postponed them days before imposition, marking a second delay since their shock unveiling in April. A 10 percent "baseline" levy on most partners, which Trump imposed in April, remains in place. He has also issued letters dictating tariff rates above 10 percent for individual countries, including Brazil, which has a trade deficit with the United States and was not on the initial list of higher "reciprocal" rates. Several economies -- the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines -- have struck initial tariff deals with Washington, while China managed to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties. Certain products like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber are excluded from Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs, but may face separate action under different authorities. This has been the case for steel, aluminum, and soon copper. Gold and silver, alongside energy commodities, are also exempted. Excluded too are Mexico and Canada, hit with a different set of tariffs, and countries like Russia and North Korea as they already face sanctions. Canada, Mexico Canadian and Mexican products were hit by 25 percent US tariffs shortly after Trump returned to office, with a lower rate for Canadian energy. Trump targeted both neighbors over illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking, also invoking emergency powers. But trade negotiations have been bumpy. This month, Trump said Canadian goods will face a higher 35 percent duty from August 1, and Mexican goods will see a 30 percent level. Products entering the United States under the USMCA North American free trade pact, covering large swaths of goods, are expected to remain exempt -- with Canadian energy resources and potash, used as fertilizer, to still face lower rates. China focus Trump has also taken special aim at China. The world's two biggest economies engaged in an escalating tariffs war this year before their temporary pullback. The countries imposed triple-digit duties on each other at one point, a level described as a trade embargo. After high level talks, Washington lowered its levies on Chinese goods to 30 percent and Beijing slashed its own to 10 percent. This pause is set to expire August 12, and officials will meet for further talks on Monday and Tuesday in the Swedish capital Stockholm. The US level is higher as it includes a 20 percent tariff over China's alleged role in the global fentanyl trade. Beyond expansive tariffs on Chinese products, Trump ordered the closure of a duty-free exemption for low-value parcels from the country. This adds to the cost of importing items like clothing and small electronics. Autos, metals Trump has targeted individual business sectors too, under more conventional national security grounds, imposing a 25 percent levy on steel and aluminum imports which he later doubled to 50 percent. The president has unveiled plans for a 50 percent tariff on copper imports starting August 1 as well and rolled out a 25 percent tariff on imported autos, although those entering under the USMCA can qualify for a lower rate. Trump's auto tariffs impact vehicle parts too, but new rules ensure automakers paying vehicle tariffs will not also be charged for certain other duties. He has ongoing investigations into imports of lumber, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals that could trigger further duties. Legal challenges Several legal challenges have been filed against the tariffs Trump invoked citing emergencies. The US Court of International Trade ruled in May that the president had overstepped his authority, but a federal appeals court has allowed the duties to remain while it considers the case. If these tariffs are ultimately ruled illegal, companies could possibly seek reimbursements. © 2025 AFP
Japan Times
37 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Freezing rent is easy. Making NYC housing affordable isn't.
Among the campaign promises that helped propel Zohran Mamdani to the Democratic nomination for mayor of New York City, his pledge to "freeze the rent' is at once the most radical sounding and the easiest to accomplish. In fact, it's been accomplished multiple times over the past decade. The mayor chooses the nine members of the city's Rent Guidelines Board, which every year determines the allowable rent increase for the city's nearly 1 million rent-stabilized apartments. The members' terms are staggered, so a new mayor can't replace them all immediately, but with the two tenant representatives certain to favor a freeze, it would take only three of the five members appointed to represent the public to get to a majority (there are also two owner representatives, who would, of course, oppose a freeze). During Bill de Blasio's tenure as mayor, the board voted for no rent increases on one-year leases in 2015, 2016 and 2020 — as well as 0% for the first six months and 1.5% for the last six in 2021. So, yes, Mamdani could deliver a rent freeze. Whether he should requires a longer answer. This year's Rent Guidelines Board deliberations, which resulted in a vote earlier this month to allow a rent increase of 3% on one-year leases starting from October 2025 to September 2026, and 4.5% on two-year leases, provide a fascinating window (which one can gaze through on YouTube) into the crosscurrents buffeting tenants and landlords in New York. On average, New York's rent-stabilized landlords appear to be raking it in, with net operating income up 12.1% — 8% after adjusting for inflation — in 2023, the most recent year for which the board's staff has compiled income and expense data. But those averages mask a lot of variation and testimony about the struggles of nonprofit affordable housing providers since the pandemic seems to have been crucial in bringing about the 3% increase. The appointees of the next mayor, whoever he turns out to be, will confront the same dilemma. New York City rents have been regulated since 1943, with the rent-stabilization system — and Rent Guidelines Board — dating to 1969. As of the most recent New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey, conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2023, rent stabilization covered 779,000 occupied rental apartments in buildings constructed before 1974 (apartments covered by the pre-1969 system of rent control pass into rent stabilization when the tenant moves out or dies) and 181,700 in newer buildings that accepted rent regulation in exchange for tax breaks or other subsidies. Together that amounts to 48% of the city's occupied rental apartments and 28% of occupied housing units overall. This makes rent stabilization by far the city's (and the nation's) biggest affordable-housing program, with almost six times as many rent-stabilized units as there are apartments in the New York City Housing Authority's public housing projects. A 2023 study by economists Ruoyo Chen, Hanchen Jiang and Luis E. Quintero estimated that the monthly rent-stabilization discount in New York City averaged $450 a unit in 2017. Multiply by 960,700 apartments, and that's a $5.2 billion annual subsidy from New York City's landlords to its rent-stabilized tenants. That has surely grown since 2017 as market rents have outpaced stabilized rents. This is, economically speaking, an extremely inefficient way to keep housing affordable. By reducing the return on housing investment, rent regulation reduces investment in housing. Politically, though, it has proved much more achievable than the outright subsidies that economists recommend. The city's annual contribution to its second-biggest affordable-housing program, NYCHA, is not much more than $200 million (the federal government has been chipping in close to $3 billion a year, but that is likely to fall). The job of the Rent Guidelines Board, then, is to balance affordability for rent-stabilized tenants with enough income for landlords to keep their buildings in good condition. Avoiding the fate of NYCHA, where decades of underinvestment have left buildings in grave disrepair, is an oft-mentioned priority. For owners of many rent-stabilized buildings in affluent parts of the city, bringing in enough rent revenue to cover costs became a lot easier after the state legislature voted in 1993 to remove apartments from rent stabilization when the rent passed a threshold ($2,000 at the time, higher in subsequent years) and the apartment became vacant or the tenants' household income exceeded $250,000 (later dropped to $175,000). Over the next 27 years, this deregulation removed 177,048 apartments from the rent-stabilized rolls, 69% of them in Manhattan. High-rent deregulation came to an end with the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019, approved by a state legislature that Mamdani had not yet joined (he was elected to the state Assembly in 2020) and signed into law by none other than the governor at the time, Andrew Cuomo, who after losing to Mamdani in the Democratic mayoral primary announced that he would run as an independent in the general election. The bill's passage (and especially Cuomo's decision to sign it) came as a shock to real estate investors who had been piling into rent-stabilized buildings in hopes of cashing in as more apartments were deregulated — Bloomberg's Patrick Clark and Prashant Gopal did a great job last year of depicting the market turmoil that has resulted. The deregulation of the previous three decades, meanwhile, left the city's rent-stabilized housing stock bifurcated between a bunch of buildings concentrated in Manhattan south of Harlem ("Core Manhattan' in Rent Guidelines Board parlance) where most of the apartments are market rate and the 50% of rent-stabilized buildings citywide where 100% of the apartments are regulated. Which brings us back to the dilemma faced by the Rent Guidelines Board. Over the years, the board has tried to keep rent increases in line with increases in operating costs, which generally rise with inflation. Rent was frozen in 2015 and 2016 because costs weren't rising — the nonshelter consumer price index for the New York area actually fell both years. But the increases approved by the Rent Guidelines Board in 2021 and 2022 fell far short of inflation and the increases since then have only more or less kept up. Rents on market-rate apartments in the city have risen faster than inflation since just before the pandemic, in part because the 2019 rent law cut off what had been a steady stream of newly unregulated apartments coming on the market each year. As a result, rent-stabilized buildings in Core Manhattan — most of which, remember, are majority market rate — experienced a whopping 23.1% gain in net operating income in 2023. In the Bronx, where 75% of rent-stabilized buildings have only rent-stabilized units, net operating income rose just 0.8%, a decline in inflation-adjusted terms. On average, even the 100% rent-stabilized buildings in the Bronx still turned a monthly operating profit of $325 a unit, but 476 buildings there, 12.7% of the total, reported negative net operating income in 2023. These financial struggles are accompanied by increasing signs of physical decay, with the average number of maintenance deficiencies in pre-1974 rent-stabilized buildings up 45% since 2017, according to the Housing and Vacancy Survey. This is not just a tale of greedy landlords: Representatives of two large affordable-housing nonprofits, the Community Preservation Corporation and Enterprise Community Partners, told the Rent Guidelines Board that the New York City buildings they're involved with are increasingly struggling to keep up. Nearly 60% of the 160 buildings in Enterprise Community Partners' New York City Low-Income Housing Tax Credit portfolio were "cash-flow negative' in 2023, senior director Tania Garrido said, up from 20% in 2019. One big reason these buildings are struggling is that, while insurance costs are up for real estate owners nationwide, for less-than-clear reasons they rose a shocking 103% from 2019 to 2023 for owners of affordable housing in New York City. Another is that the share of tenants paying their rent on time fell in 2020 and 2021 and hasn't fully recovered. The COVID-19 pandemic hit working-class New Yorkers especially hard, with employment in construction, retail, leisure and hospitality in the city is still below pre-pandemic levels. Raising rents doesn't seem like the optimal solution to a problem caused in part by people not being able to afford the rent. But it's the only arrow the Rent Guidelines Board has in its quiver. The city and state have more arrows. In his campaign literature, Mamdani stresses reforming New York's property tax system, which taxes apartment buildings much more heavily than single-family homes but also gives inexplicably large tax breaks to some high-end condominiums and coops. He wants to "put our public dollars to work' building 200,000 new rent-stabilized apartments over the next decade, offering a set of wonky suggestions for how to fund this and has some interesting ideas for pooling rental assistance funds currently distributed as vouchers to tenants (or not distributed; utilization rates are quite low) to support struggling affordable buildings directly. None of these is as catchy or easy to deliver as freezing the rent. It's understandable why Mamdani chose this as a campaign pledge, and probably inevitable that the Rent Guidelines Board will deliver at least one 0% annual rent increase if he is elected. Whether he succeeds in making housing more affordable in New York City, though, will depend on what else he does. Justin Fox is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering business, economics and other topics involving charts.
Kyodo News
2 hours ago
- Kyodo News
Kyodo News Digest: July 28, 2025
TOKYO - The following is the latest list of selected news summaries by Kyodo News. ---------- SDF request led to nuclear threat scenario in Japan-U.S. exercise TOKYO - The Japanese Self-Defense Forces strongly urged the U.S. military during a joint command post exercise last year to mirror any nuclear threat made by China with one of its own, government sources said Sunday. The United States ultimately complied with the request in the simulation exercise that envisioned a potential invasion of Taiwan by Beijing, raising concerns that Japan's push to invoke nuclear deterrence could exacerbate tensions between the United States and China. ---------- U.S., EU clinch trade deal setting 15% tariff on most European goods TURNBERRY, Scotland - The United States on Sunday clinched a trade agreement with the European Union, setting a 15 percent across-the-board tariff on cars and most other goods from the 27-member bloc, President Donald Trump said, calling the deal "very satisfactory to both sides." Under the agreement, the EU will buy $750 billion worth of American energy and invest an additional $600 billion in the world's largest economy, Trump said following a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. ---------- Baseball: Ichiro reflects on legendary career in Hall of Fame speech COOPERSTOWN, New York - Ichiro Suzuki, the first Japanese member of the U.S. Baseball Hall of Fame, shared his inspiration to play in the majors while thanking his family and teammates in his induction speech Sunday. The former Seattle Mariners outfielder began his speech in Cooperstown, New York, by calling himself a third-time rookie, now as a member of the hall, after being a rookie in Japan in 1992 and a major league rookie in 2001 at age 27. ---------- Nobel panel, A-bomb survivors urge youth to carry torch of peace TOKYO - The Norwegian Nobel Committee and Nihon Hidankyo, Japan's leading group of atomic bomb survivors, jointly urged younger generations at an event Sunday in Tokyo to "carry the torch" for peace by listening to the stories of survivors and keeping up the momentum for nuclear disarmament. "The nuclear taboo is under threat, and the hibakusha (atomic bomb survivors) are aging. In not too many years, we will no longer have the testimonies of those who were there, those who could tell this story," said Norwegian Nobel Committee chair Jorgen Watne Frydnes. ---------- 3 suspected drones intruded on premises of Japan nuclear complex TOKYO - Three bright objects believed to be drones intruded on the premises of the Genkai nuclear power complex in southwestern Japan, the country's nuclear watchdog said Sunday, correcting its statement the previous day that drones had been spotted. The Nuclear Regulation Authority said Saturday it was informed of the incident by Kyushu Electric Power Co., the operator of the four-reactor Genkai Nuclear Power Station. ---------- U.S. brokers cease-fire after Cambodia, Thailand border clashes WASHINGTON/BANGKOK - The leaders of Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to meet immediately and work on a cease-fire following cross-border attacks, U.S. President Donald Trump said Saturday after speaking with them by phone. Clashes between Thailand and Cambodia in a disputed border area have continued since Thursday, leaving several people dead including civilians. Each side has accused the other of initiating the fighting. ---------- Video: Fireworks light up summer skies over Tokyo's Sumida River
