logo
The British editor who stood her ground in face of furious Trump

The British editor who stood her ground in face of furious Trump

The call between Tucker and Trump was tense, The Telegraph understands. After the story was published, Trump fired off a lengthy denial on Truth Social, his own media platform.
The 79-year-old accused Tucker of running a 'false, malicious, and defamatory story' and filed a $US10 billion ($15 billion) lawsuit against the WSJ, naming Murdoch and the reporters who wrote the story as defendants.
Holding her nerve has earned Tucker the wrath of the US president and many of his loyal followers. The Epstein story is the type of reporting Tucker made a name for on Fleet Street in London and now in the US, those close to her say.
For months, Trump has been angered by the WSJ 's coverage of his policies as the newspaper has continued to refuse to shy away from criticising his policies.
While NewsCorp's media outlets the New York Post and Fox News often portray the president in a positive light, the WSJ has not attempted to curry favour with the White House.
Media executives such as Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos have appeared to try to appease the US president, but the WSJ has stood out for critical pieces, at times skewering his policies.
In May, when a reporter from the newspaper attempted to ask Trump a question on Air Force One, he denounced the paper as 'rotten' and as having 'truly gone to hell'.
However, the WSJ has maintained its influence. Last month, JD Vance, the vice-president, travelled to Murdoch's Montana ranch to speak to the media mogul, his son Lachlan and other Fox News executives.
Tucker, 58, was selected by Murdoch as the newspaper's first female editor-in-chief, replacing Matt Murray in February 2023 in a bid to shake up the publication.
Born in London in 1966, she grew up in Lewes, Sussex, before going to study philosophy, politics, and economics at University College, Oxford, where she edited the university magazine Isis.
After joining the graduate trainee programme at the Financial Times, where she met her close friend Rachel Johnson, Boris Johnson's sister, she went on to work in the newspaper's Berlin and Brussels bureaus.
In 2020, she became the first female editor of The Sunday Times in more than a century. Former colleagues describe her as tenacious.
Asked about the run-in with Trump, John Witherow, the former editor of The Times, told The Telegraph of his former deputy: 'I know she's tough.'
Within weeks of arriving at the WSJ, Tucker demonstrated her determination to back her reporters in the campaign to release WSJ journalist Evan Gershkovich, who had been detained in Russia.
But while she received praise for her campaign for Gershkovich's release, her arrival was not welcomed by everyone. Many staff were abhorred by job cuts, restructuring and a push to digital-first to attempt to bring an edginess back to the publication.
Last year, more than 100 journalists staged a protest against the changes, covering the walls of her office in Post-it notes with comments such as 'the cuts are killing morale'.
Tucker told Vanity Fair that while the cuts 'may look callous, it's so that we get it right, so I don't have to do it over again'.
She has also come under fire for coverage from both sides of the political aisle. The WSJ was the first newspaper to report on Joe Biden's mental fitness, which was denounced by some left-leaning publications at the time.
She also clashed with Murdoch. Reports suggested he was 'livid' with her after the WSJ described a newsletter launched by a former CNN reporter as a 'must-read'.
Loading
Tucker has also been outspoken about standing up to the Trump administration. Responding to claims by the CEO of Elon Musk's X that her newspaper had run a fake news story about the platform, she said: 'Many of the stories we publish do upset political leaders or CEOs, but we can't, you know, we have to be thinking about the validity of the story.'
Tucker will probably face Trump in court in some form as her paper defends the $10 billion lawsuit. Whether full details of the alleged birthday card will come to light is not yet clear.
Unlike the two reporters who brought her the story, and Murdoch, she is not named in Trump's legal action.
Since parts of the letter were published on Thursday, the Trump administration has already promised to release more transcripts from the investigations into Epstein.
But the scandal shows little sign of going away.
The release of the grand jury documents may fall short of what many of Trump's supporters have sought.
On Sunday, one of Epstein's former lawyers called on the US Justice Department to release additional investigative records from its sex-trafficking investigation, and urged the government to grant Ghislaine Maxwell – Epstein's former girlfriend and former British socialite – immunity so that she can testify about his crimes.
Loading
In an interview on Fox News Sunday, Alan Dershowitz said the grand jury transcripts that Attorney-General Pam Bondi asked a federal judge on Friday to unseal would not contain the types of information being sought by Trump's supporters, such as the names of Epstein's clientele.
'I think the judge should release it, but they are not in the grand jury transcripts,' Dershowitz said on the program. 'I've seen some of these materials. For example, there is an FBI report of interviews with alleged victims in which at least one of the victims names very important people,' he said, adding that those names have been redacted.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese and Rudd will have to sell very different messages on US beef ban's end
Albanese and Rudd will have to sell very different messages on US beef ban's end

Sydney Morning Herald

time15 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Albanese and Rudd will have to sell very different messages on US beef ban's end

If the way to a man's heart is through his stomach, as the anachronistic saying goes, could Donald Trump's love of beef be the key to a tariff exemption for Australia? Anthony Albanese will be hoping so, but the decision to end import restrictions on beef from the United States presents his government with a delicate communications challenge. He must convince Australians the decision is entirely science-based while simultaneously leading Trump to believe the move is a response to his forceful advocacy for US cattle exporters. The hamburger-scoffing president had beef on the brain when he stood in the White House Rose Garden in April to announce his liberation day tariffs. Australians, Trump said, were 'wonderful people' but 'they won't take any of our beef'. 'They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and you know, I don't blame them, but we're doing the same thing right now starting at midnight tonight, I would say,' Trump fumed. Trump's comments sparked fears of an imminent US ban on Australian beef that did not eventuate, but his grievance with Australian import rules permeated his administration. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick blasted biosecurity measures that stopped American agricultural exports as 'nonsense', saying: 'One-point-four billion people in India and we can't sell them corn, Europe won't let us sell beef, Australia won't let us sell beef.' Loading Cattle ranchers are a key part of Trump's voting base. He is an avid beef eater who once marketed his own brand of steaks. He delights in eating McDonald's aboard his presidential jet. The US has technically been able to export beef to Australia since 2019, but beef sourced from Canada or Mexico, and slaughtered in the US, had been banned because of disease concerns. The integrated nature of the US supply chain meant that little beef made its way to Australia (before even getting into the issue of whether Australians want to buy grain-fed American beef rather than our own grass-fed meat). That rule has now been scrapped.

Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges
Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges

Sydney Morning Herald

time15 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges

Washington: Scott Morrison says a planned AUKUS shipbuilding facility in Western Australia should become a joint base with the US to help address the Trump administration's 'legitimate issues' with the submarine deal he designed and announced as prime minister in 2021. The controversial idea, with advocates in both Canberra and Washington, would allow the upgraded facility at Henderson, south of Perth, to host and repair American submarines, not just Australian ones, and give the US direct access to the Indian Ocean, a strategic asset. As the Pentagon reviews the AUKUS agreement to see if it fits with President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda, one of the key issues is whether the US can part with the three nuclear-powered submarines Australia is due to buy. The slow rate of production is a problem, as is a severe maintenance backlog. Australia has paid $US1 billion (about $1. 6 billion) to the US maritime industrial base so far, with another $US1 billion due by year's end. Morrison - who now provides strategic advice for corporations, including defence industry clients - said the US appreciated and valued AUKUS, 'but that doesn't mean there aren't issues'. Loading 'The issues that [US defence undersecretary] Elbridge Colby has been raising, he's been raising those for years, and they're legitimate issues, and they go to the US's capability to produce submarines,' he said. 'There are many ways you can get more subs out at sea, and it's not just about how quickly you build them; it's also how you maintain them. Australia, through Henderson, has a real opportunity to add to that.' Asked if he meant maintaining US boats at the facility, he said yes. 'That would significantly add to the capability of the US to do what it needs to do.'

Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges
Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges

The Age

time15 minutes ago

  • The Age

Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges

Washington: Scott Morrison says a planned AUKUS shipbuilding facility in Western Australia should become a joint base with the US to help address the Trump administration's 'legitimate issues' with the submarine deal he designed and announced as prime minister in 2021. The controversial idea, with advocates in both Canberra and Washington, would allow the upgraded facility at Henderson, south of Perth, to host and repair American submarines, not just Australian ones, and give the US direct access to the Indian Ocean, a strategic asset. As the Pentagon reviews the AUKUS agreement to see if it fits with President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda, one of the key issues is whether the US can part with the three nuclear-powered submarines Australia is due to buy. The slow rate of production is a problem, as is a severe maintenance backlog. Australia has paid $US1 billion (about $1. 6 billion) to the US maritime industrial base so far, with another $US1 billion due by year's end. Morrison - who now provides strategic advice for corporations, including defence industry clients - said the US appreciated and valued AUKUS, 'but that doesn't mean there aren't issues'. Loading 'The issues that [US defence undersecretary] Elbridge Colby has been raising, he's been raising those for years, and they're legitimate issues, and they go to the US's capability to produce submarines,' he said. 'There are many ways you can get more subs out at sea, and it's not just about how quickly you build them; it's also how you maintain them. Australia, through Henderson, has a real opportunity to add to that.' Asked if he meant maintaining US boats at the facility, he said yes. 'That would significantly add to the capability of the US to do what it needs to do.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store