Nuclear power offers Colorado communities a lifeline
(Stock photo by)
As Coloradans, we share a commitment to clean air and a sustainable future. But the state's current energy plans — the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Roadmap 2.0 and Pathways to Deep Decarbonization — risk leaving us with an unstable grid, soaring bills, and missed opportunities for real economic revitalization. Let's examine the flaws in our renewables-only approach and explore a better path forward.
Colorado's goal of 95% wind and solar ignores a critical fact: These sources are intermittent. When the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining, grid operators scramble to fire up backup gas plants. Xcel Energy's own 2021 study revealed that wind integration costs rise sharply as reliance grows, requiring expensive grid upgrades and reserve gas capacity.
Meanwhile, Colorado's existing coal plants — slated for closure by 2031 — currently provide stable, 24/7 power. Replacing them with weather-dependent renewables risks repeating Germany's mistakes, where electricity prices spiked to $1,025 per megawatt-hour during calm, cold spells in 2024.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Proponents claim wind is 'zero-emission,' but this ignores reality. Wind turbines require gas-powered plants to stabilize the grid during low-wind periods. A 2021 study of Colorado's grid found that balancing wind with coal plants increased sulfur dioxide emissions by 23% and nitrogen oxides by 27%. Even Xcel's system relies on gas for 29% of generation today — a dependency that will grow as coal retires. Wind isn't cheap either. While turbines have low operating costs, their total system expenses — transmission, storage, and balancing plants — are staggering. Xcel's $15 billion proposal for new wind and solar in 2023 came with a $628/month projected average bill by 2040.
Germany's 'Energiewende' — a renewables-focused transition — offers a cautionary tale. In December 2024, a week-long 'dunkelflaute' caused wind output to plummet to 3 gigawatts (versus an average of 19 GW). The electricity price surge forced industries to halt production and households to brace for unaffordable bills.
Building interstate transmission lines, as proposed in Colorado's Pathways plan, won't solve this. During regional calm periods — common in winter — interconnects spread scarcity, as seen in Europe's 2024 price crisis. Do we want California causing our prices to spike?
Nuclear energy offers what wind and solar cannot: 24/7 clean power at stable costs. South Korea's APR-1400 reactors — like those at the Shin Hanul plant — cost $3,571/kW to build, far below the U.S. average of $5,833/kW. These reactors deliver power at $29/MWh, matching Xcel's current wind contracts. Critics claim nuclear construction is too slow, but South Korea built four APR-1400 units in the UAE in 10 years — faster than Colorado's 17-year timeline for wind/solar builds. Retired coal plants like Craig and Comanche already have transmission lines and skilled workers, making them ideal sites.
Nuclear isn't just about electrons — it's about jobs. A single APR-1400 reactor creates 900 construction jobs and 300 permanent roles paying $80,000–$120,000 annually. These are union-compatible, career-track positions, unlike temporary wind/solar gigs. For Pueblo, Craig, and Hayden — communities facing coal closures — nuclear offers a lifeline. South Korea's recent $17.4 billion contract to build reactors in the Czech Republic proves this model works globally. Colorado can replicate this success.
Colorado's energy plans are at a crossroads. We can continue betting on unreliable renewables, rising bills, and destabilized grids — or pivot to nuclear:
Reliability: Nuclear provides 'always-on' power, eliminating blackout risks.
Affordability: Stable 80-plus-year plant lifespans lock in low costs.
Jobs: Replace lost coal jobs with high-wage nuclear careers.
The Legislature should amend its low carbon goal to explicitly exclude electricity generation that requires carbon emitting backup. And with that change the Colorado Energy Office should then amend the Roadmap and Pathways to stop further wind (solar has a useful role) and use nuclear for our base load. Let's learn from Germany's mistakes, not repeat them. By embracing proven nuclear technology, Colorado can achieve true decarbonization — without sacrificing reliability or burdening families. Our energy future is too important to leave to outdated ideologies. Let's choose pragmatism over dogma and build a grid that's clean, reliable, and inexpensive.
Otherwise we continue down our present path to expensive, unreliable, carbon emitting energy.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
The ‘experts' you've never heard of inspiring Rachel Reeves's disastrous economic policy
A little like the Chagos Islands giveaway and, more recently, the apparent Gibraltar sell out, it's almost impossible to work out the motivations behind each and every idiotic decision this Labour Government takes. There's a palpable sense of incredulity spreading across Britain as the Prime Minister and Chancellor continue to insist that everything is going swimmingly despite most key markers showing precisely the opposite is true. Take the economy. In Wednesday's Spending Review, Rachel Reeves boasted that she had 'wasted no time' removing the barriers to growth. Less than 24 hours later, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that UK GDP had shrunk by 0.3 per cent in April. Labour continues to splurge taxpayers' hard-earned cash despite the national debt sitting at around 96 per cent of GDP, the budget deficit more doubling in the past seven years, and public spending being on a par with the profligate Labour government of the 1970s, which almost bankrupted the country. Back then, taxes as a share of GDP were around 33 per cent. Forecasts suggest that, by 2027, they could reach 37.7 per cent. Unemployment is at its highest level in four years, UK payrolls have lost 276,000 employees since the autumn Budget, and a millionaire is reportedly leaving the UK every 45 minutes under Labour. Still, no one in the Cabinet appears able to rule out further tax rises, with Paul Johnson, the outgoing chief of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) concluding that 'council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05.' Who is advising Reeves on tax policy, and her relentless assault on our wallets? Readers may not have heard of Arun Advani and Andy Summers, but these little known academics may have been the inspiration for Labour's seemingly never-ending tax grab. They run the Centre for the Analysis of Taxation (CenTax), which some credit for Labour's farm tax. Advani, who is associate professor in the economics department at the University of Warwick, called for inheritance tax 'loopholes' on farms to be scrapped in two reports for the Institute for Fiscal Studies, as well as writing a further report for CenTax making the same arguments for changes to both Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR) last October. After Advani boasted at the Labour Party Conference that he was 'optimistic' because the Labour government is 'genuinely listening' to his ideas, Reeves announced in the Budget that the availability of 100 per cent relief for agricultural and business property would be capped at £1 million. So far, so predictable, you may argue. What's the harm in tapping up Left-wing think tanks for radical tax ideas? Do Conservative governments not rely on the research of free market institutes? Well, some have alleged the Treasury relied solely on CenTax's projection that the changes would raise £520 million, without doing its own calculations. As it conceded in response to a Freedom of Information request: 'H M Treasury does not hold a disaggregated cost projection for the revenue raised from the measure announced at Autumn Budget 2024 to restrict these reliefs. This is a combined policy across the reliefs, rather than separate policies for each relief.' Even more problematically, the £520 million figure has been challenged. The OBR itself said it was uncertain how much would be raised as a result of behavioural responses, whilst CBI Economics calculates that the new tax on both family firms and farms will actually cost the Treasury £1.9 billion over the next five years. Advani claimed that only around 500 farms would be affected by the tax. As the Adam Smith Institute points out, however, 'the government's much-quoted '500' a year is really 15,000 a generation.' The true number of farms could be more than 40,000. Separate research, commissioned by Ashbridge Partners, found that one in 10 farmers surveyed said they will face an IHT bill of more than £1 million due to the inheritance tax hike, with 31 per cent expecting to pay more than £500,000. Why didn't Labour listen? Treasury minister James Murray, who referenced back in 2022 how many Zoom meetings he'd held with Dr Summers, even hosted CenTax's official launch in Parliament last November when he declared his desire 'to make sure that collaboration between CenTax, Treasury and HMRC continues for many years into the future.' Advani and Summers also influenced Labour's pledge to scrap non dom status with Treasury ministers again seeming to unquestioningly swallow their claim that it would raise £3.2 billion, a figure repeatedly cited by the Government. The trouble is, that number was also based on some misguided premises, perhaps including Advani and Summers' quite ludicrous prediction that out of 70,000 non-doms, only 77 would leave. As other economists later pointed out, the projection did not take into account the impact of abolishing non-dom inheritance tax protections. Even the OBR assumed that the changes would likely lead to a loss of 25 per cent of non-doms with trusts, which could cost the UK more than £12 billion during the course of the parliament. Still the Government swallowed the £3.2 billion figure hook line and sinker despite some now estimating that 10 per cent of non-doms may have already left the UK. A report by the CEBR predicts the ongoing exodus could reach 40 per cent – costing the Treasury a self-defeating £7.1 billion over this parliament. This combined with the £1.9 billion revenue lost as a result of the farm and family firm tax could mean the Government is down £9 billion thanks to listening to these nitwits. CenTax also wrongly predicted that increasing the tax rate on carried interest to 45 per cent would raise additional revenue of £0.8 billion per year. Labour settled on 32 per cent – but a January 2025 estimate by the OBR suggests that only £100 million will be raised and since then Reeves has watered it down. Labour claim to be a 'party of business'. So why are they seemingly listening to two economists who are laying the intellectual groundwork for an expansion in taxation that could come to look like Corbynism on steroids. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hamilton Spectator
a day ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Jewish teachers say they are fearful of speaking out as antisemitism in their schools is ignored
Some Jewish educators across Ontario say they are feeling increasingly unsupported, and fearful of speaking up about antisemitism in schools, with some teachers taking leaves of absence amid mounting tensions. These teachers have reported a surge in antisemitic incidents and what they describe as inadequate, often dismissive, responses from school administrations, boards, and unions. Many say the issues they face are being overlooked, leaving them feeling vulnerable and alone. The teachers The Canadian Jewish News interviewed requested anonymity, fearing repercussions if their identities were revealed. Many described environments in which expressing concerns about antisemitism could jeopardize their employment. One Jewish teacher, an equity group leader in an Ontario school board, expressed deep frustration at the lack of institutional support. 'Most of the Jewish teachers I've spoken with just feel like they won't be heard,' he said. 'It's useless, it's pointless. They feel that we need to suffer in silence.' He cited an incident from January when a high school teacher discovered a swastika drawn in the snow on her car. 'There wasn't anything on any other car… presumably she was targeted because she's Jewish,' he said. Instead of receiving meaningful support, he said the teacher was told by her principal, 'This is the most common form of graffiti we have… we should be used to this by now.' 'She was traumatized by this,' he continued. 'What you should be saying is, 'Do you need to go home now? What can I do to support you?' But instead it was just: 'It's not that big a deal, but I'll deal with it.'' The CJN spoke to numerous Jewish teachers across Ontario—including those in the Upper Grand, Peel, Ottawa and Toronto school boards. One Jewish teacher described a hostile climate at her former school, which ultimately led her to take a leave of absence. She recounted that antisemitic incidents were largely minimized or ignored. In one instance, a swastika was graffitied on school property. In another, a student submitted an image of Hitler to her. The student was moved to another classroom, but there were no further consequences, she said. Another Jewish teacher said the lack of support extends to the union itself. 'We are afraid to do things because we know that no matter what we do, we actually will not be backed up by our union.' The CJN reached out to the Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario and Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation for comment on this story, but did not receive a reply. In May, one teacher cited a fear of including any Jewish content in her classroom. 'So for example, it's Jewish History Month right now, right? I'm not touching it. Because I don't want to be seen as indoctrinating. And if I am seen as indoctrinating, my union will not back me up.' She added: 'I know of Jewish teachers that have been accused of horrific things. And they are at home on suspension, for accusations of APR (anti-Palestinian racism) even though there's no actual definition of what APR means. And the union is not doing their job to protect them.' 'I know personally three Jewish teachers that are currently suspended because of accusations regarding anti-Palestinian racism.' Tamara Gottlieb, co-founder of the Jewish Educators and Families Association (JEFA), confirmed that similar stories have reached her desk from across the province. She said Jewish teachers are increasingly taking leaves of absence, feeling 'totally unseen or unsupported or sidelined by the school board.' Gottlieb also mentioned reports that some Jewish and non-Jewish teachers have been investigated or suspended for alleged 'Anti-Palestinian Racism'—a term that lacks formal definition within board policies. 'Jewish teachers are going out of their way to hide their Jewish identity, and there's other Jewish teachers who feel that they are unduly the victims of investigations on unreasonable grounds driven by the fact that they're Jewish,' Gottlieb told The CJN. In 2024, the Toronto District School Board added anti-Palestinian racism as a form of discrimination to their policy on combatting hate in the classroom. Last month, the board passed a motion calling for mandatory professional development for trustees and senior staff on both antisemitism and anti-Palestinian racism, developed in collaboration with community groups. The board also voted to accelerate the board's anti-racism strategy, setting a deadline of October 2025 for a work plan focused on anti-Palestinian racism. Notably, the board has yet to formally define what anti-Palestinian racism entails—a gap that drew concern from Trustee Shelley Laskin, who cautioned that, without a clear definition, the term risks being used to target any supporters of Israel. According to numerous Jewish teachers, this concern is precisely what's occurring behind closed doors. As one Toronto teacher put it, 'any whiff of Zionism is essentially painting a target on your forehead. Any support of Israel can be seen as anti-Palestinian, or, if that's too far of a stretch, Islamophobic.' Shari Schwartz-Maltz, media relations manager and chair of the Jewish Heritage Committee at the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), said she cannot confirm or deny an uptick in Jewish teachers leaving due to antisemitic incidents. However, she did acknowledge a shift in how Jewish staff are feeling this year. 'I have heard from some educators that particularly this school year, they have felt excluded from school life, whereas they didn't have that feeling before,' she said. She also said that principals and members of the board's Jewish Heritage Committee are ready to offer support and resources when needed. TDSB's Jewish Heritage Committee currently has around 350 members, but Schwartz-Maltz noted that there is no reliable data on how many Jewish teachers are currently employed in the system. A teacher within the TDSB described feeling on high-alert from the moment she walks into her school building. 'I have to watch my words, I have to measure my reactions to things people say, far more than ever in my twenty-year career as an educator with the TDSB.' She added that a growing number of Jewish public school teachers are withdrawing their own children from the system. 'We believe in public education, but we are pulling our children out because we see what's coming, and what's coming is even worse than what we're seeing now.' Although she is not a teacher, one of the most prominent examples of a Jewish professional leaving the public education system has been Nili Kaplan-Myrth, who resigned June 3 as a trustee of the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board (OCDSB) after what she described as years of escalating institutional antisemitism and harassment from both inside and outside the board. 'It's just a scary time. It's a scary time to be a Jewish educator. I mean, teachers are faced with whether or not they'll lose their jobs if they speak out,' she said, in an interview with The CJN. 'Every time students came and families came to delegate and to speak to us about antisemitism, they were met literally with silence. I was the only person who would put up my hand.' According to Kaplan-Myrth, the OCDSB has refused to take reports of antisemitism seriously 'for years.' In an email response to The CJN, the OCDSB denied that it had not taken Kaplan-Myrth's concerns seriously. 'We acknowledge the concerning external threats faced by Trustee Kaplan-Myrth during her time as an OCDSB trustee. The Board took several steps to assist her with these challenges at that time, including the creation of a safety plan for entry and exit to and from the board office, which demonstrated our commitment to the safety and well-being of our trustees,' a spokesperson for the board wrote in an email. 'Over the past three years, we have provided targeted training and professional development for school leaders, senior staff, and trustees. This includes impactful workshops with the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and specialized, antisemitism-specific learning delivered directly by respected leaders within the Jewish community.' Kaplan-Myrth, who is from Israel, describes herself as progressive. Her work has helped LGBTQ students, students with disabilities and Muslim and Jewish students alike, she said. 'My career has been about supporting everybody and standing up against hate…Instead of being able to use that strength, (I've been) demonized.' In her resignation letter, Kaplan-Myrth cited what she described as an 'unrelentingly toxic environment' that made it impossible for her to continue serving in good conscience. She framed her decision not as a retreat, but as a warning. 'This is a cautionary tale,' she wrote, 'about the ways in which antisemitism and anti-Zionism are allowed to fester in public school boards in Canada and in society more broadly.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Alamosa senator picked as new Colorado Senate Minority Leader
DENVER (KDVR) — On Thursday, the Colorado Senate Republican Caucus elected a new Senate Minority Leader after the resignation of Paul Lundeen earlier this week. Lundeen left the position effective Monday to take on the role of president and CEO of the American Excellence Foundation, a national investment nonprofit that supports conservative causes. Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take national position On Thursday, Senate Republicans elected Sen. Cleave Simpson of Alamosa to replace Lundeen. According to his biography on the Colorado Senate Republicans website, Simpson serves as the general manager of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and was elected to Colorado's 6th Senate District in 2024 and 2020. 'I'm honored by the trust my colleagues have placed in me to lead the Senate Republican Caucus,' Senator Simpson said in a Colorado Senate Republican Caucus release. 'I want to thank Senator Paul Lundeen for his years of steadfast leadership and principled service to this caucus and to the people of Colorado. His guidance has strengthened our team and helped lay the foundation for the work ahead. Coloradans are facing real challenges: rising costs, public safety concerns, and a growing sense that their voices aren't being heard at the Capitol. During this interim and going into next year's session, this caucus will remain committed to standing up for hardworking families and offering real, common-sense solutions. I'm proud to lead this dedicated team as we fight for a stronger, safer, and more affordable Colorado.' The caucus also elected Sen. Lisa Frizell, of Castle Rock, to be the next Assistant Senate Minority Leader. Frizell was elected as Douglas County Assessor in 2014 and 2018, and was elected to the Colorado House of Representatives in 2022 where she represented Colorado's 42nd House District. In 2024, she was elected to represent Colorado's 2nd Senate district. 'I am deeply honored to serve the Republican Caucus as Assistant Minority Leader,' Frizell said in the caucus' release. 'It's time for our caucus to begin a new chapter, and I believe that by working together and with intention our future is a bright one.' The Senate Minority Caucus Chair will remain Byron Pelton, of Sterling; the Senate Minority Whip will remain Janice Rich, of Grand Junction; and Barbara Kirkmeyer of Weld County will remain a Joint Budget Committee Member. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
