Police clampdown thwarts Pakistan's plan; Bhagwant Mann govt breaks back of drug traffickers
CHANDIGARH: Pakistan has long attempted to smuggle drugs and weapons into Punjab using drones, but in recent years, the Punjab Police has successfully dismantled the drone-based narcotics network.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
As a result, the number of drones crossing the border has steadily declined. To eliminate drone-based
completely, the Punjab Police is now deploying anti-drone technology.
In recent years, the use of drones for drug and arms trafficking has surged — with 2 drones caught in 2019, 7 in 2020, and just 1 in 2021. However, after the Bhagwant Mann government came into power in 2022, there was a dramatic spike in interceptions: 28 drones were seized in 2022, 121 in 2023, a record 294 in 2024, and 138 drones by July 15, 2025.
In total, 591 drones have been confiscated by Punjab Police since 2022.
During this period, under the "War Against Drugs" campaign, over 22,000 drug traffickers have been arrested — a testament to the government's on-ground crackdown. This comprehensive framework to curb drones, drugs, weapons, and traffickers shows that the Mann government is not only vigilant on the security front but is also sending a strong message of zero tolerance towards drugs and smuggling.
The scale of contraband dropped via drones is chilling — over 932 kg of heroin, 263 pistols, 14 AK-47 rifles, 66 hand grenades, and nearly 15 kg of RDX have been recovered.
For the first time, the Mann government has laid down a security net from the borders to the villages, effectively neutralizing the efforts of traffickers and terrorists. The credit goes to Punjab's unique and highly effective anti-drone system — a model that no other Indian state has yet implemented.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In 596 border villages, a surveillance system comprising local residents, retired soldiers, and police personnel has been created to monitor the borders around the clock. Any suspicious activity is immediately reported and acted upon. Villages have been digitally mapped into three categories, with detailed data on road networks, lists of suspicious individuals, and their specific security needs.
Police officers now use "beat books" to log every activity, and all protection teams are connected via WhatsApp.
Security is no longer confined to police stations — it's embedded in every village.
Moreover, the Punjab government is investing ₹51 crore to procure nine advanced anti-drone systems for border deployment. Together, the BSF and Punjab Police are using technology, forensic investigation, and communication analysis to track every drone.
Today, districts like Gurdaspur, Amritsar, Tarn Taran, Firozpur, and Fazilka — once notorious for drone smuggling — are now setting new benchmarks in security. Villages such as Khemkaran, Khalra, and Ajnala are no longer just in the headlines, but now play a central role in India's national security strategy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
4 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Football: No. Xavi Hernandez, Pep Guardiola didn't apply for India coaching job. It was a hoax, says AIFF
The All India Football Federation (AIFF) confirmed on Saturday that a job application attributed to former Barcelona manager and Spain midfielder Xavi Hernandez for the India head coaching role was a AIFF's national team director told The Times of India on Thursday that Xavi's name was on the list of applicants. The report also quoted an AIFF technical committee member saying the his candidacy was deemed too expensive to men's football team drops six places to 133rd in FIFA rankings, worst in nine years."The AIFF received an email furnishing the applications from Spanish coaches Pep Guardiola and Xavi Hernandez. The authenticity of their applications could not be confirmed, and it has since emerged that the email applications were not genuine," the AIFF said in a great Xavi Hernandez's application surprises AIFF, but coaching job set to go to an had not been previously reported that the AIFF had also received an application purporting to be from Manchester City manager AIFF Technical Committee said it had reviewed 170 applications for the Indian men's head coach role, narrowing the list to 10 before short-listing three AIFF sacked former India manger Igor Stimac in June last year before appointing Spaniard Manolo Marquez, who left the job this month and returned to his role as coach of Indian Super League team FC Goa.
Hans India
4 minutes ago
- Hans India
Kangana Ranaut hails government's OTT ban to protect culture and youth
Actress-turned-politician Kangana Ranaut has voiced strong support for the Centre's recent crackdown on OTT platforms accused of streaming sexually explicit content. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) has directed Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block public access to 25 such platforms, including Ullu, ALTT, Desiflix, and others like Big Shots App, Boomex, Kangan App, and Mojflix. Kangana, known for her outspoken views, lauded the move as necessary to safeguard Indian cultural values and the well-being of future generations. 'In order to preserve the overall culture of our country and the future path of our youngsters, and so that our society does not collapse completely, this step was much awaited and is now much appreciated,' she said. 'The action taken against these apps, especially the illegal ones, is highly appreciated.' The blocked platforms were reportedly in violation of multiple Indian laws, including Section 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000; Section 294 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023; and Section 4 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. The government has also requested the Department of Telecommunications to ensure swift compliance by the ISPs in disabling these platforms. This decision follows a petition filed in the Supreme Court earlier this year seeking a ban on sexually explicit content on OTT and social media platforms. While the Supreme Court stated that it was not within its domain to act, it emphasized the need for executive intervention—prompting the present move. Ranaut's endorsement adds weight to the cultural debate surrounding digital content regulation in India.
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Does being patriotic Indians mean we can't protest the horrors in Gaza?
When the Bombay High Court scolded petitioners seeking permission to hold a protest over the Gaza conflict this week, stating that they should 'look at their own country,' it did more than just deny a plea. To mourn for children in Gaza is not to betray India. To protest the unjust killing of innocents abroad is not to ignore injustice at home. It is to declare, as our freedom fighters once did, that truth has no borders and conscience no passport. At the heart of this matter lies Article 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantee to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to assemble peaceably and without arms. These are not minor provisions. They are foundational to the democratic life of the Republic. Protest, in this framework, is not a disruption of order — it is the music of democratic breathing. It is the only means by which ordinary citizens, powerless in the machinery of state, can voice their hope, grief, and resistance. To deny permission for a peaceful protest mourning deaths in Gaza — under the reasoning that it does not concern India — is to misunderstand the very idea of Indian constitutionalism. The Supreme Court, in Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan vs Union of India (2018), has made it clear: 'Citizens have a fundamental right to assemble peacefully and protest against governmental action.' And in Amit Sahni vs Commissioner of Police (2020), while dealing with the Shaheen Bagh protests, the Court emphasised that protest must be balanced with public order — but it did not deny the right itself. That distinction matters. Courts are not to extinguish the flame of protest but to ensure that it does not burn others' homes. Even earlier, in the landmark Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978), the Court warned against arbitrary state action: 'Any restriction on fundamental rights must pass the test of reasonableness and fairness. Arbitrary denial erodes the very fabric of liberty.' What was the crime here? A candlelit gathering. A moment of collective grief. A people who could not remain indifferent. The Indian tradition does not shy away from this impulse — it sanctifies it. From the Mahā Upanishad's declaration of vasudhaiva kutumbakam — 'The world is one family' — to the Isha Upanishad's invocation: 'He who sees all beings in himself and himself in all beings… he never turns away from it,' Indian thought has always affirmed that compassion is a civic virtue. Even our national poet, Rabindranath Tagore, warned against the dangers of closed sympathies: 'Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high/ Where the world has not been broken up into fragments/ By narrow domestic walls.' The judge's remarks — to 'look at your own country' — seem to invoke a narrow nationalism that betrays this expansive inheritance. Indeed, Mahatma Gandhi himself said: 'My patriotism is not an exclusive thing. It is all-embracing… I want the cultures of all the lands to be blown about my house as freely as possible.' In that spirit, a gathering for Gaza is not un-Indian. It is Indian in its deepest moral sense. Great civilisations not only permit dissent — they preserve it. And great poets, through centuries, have told us what silence costs. Kabir, the weaver-saint, wrote: 'Dard ke dāman se jo lipta, soī to insān hai/ Dusre ke dukh se jo dukh paaye, vahī Bhagwān hai.' (One who clings to the cloak of sorrow is truly human/One who grieves another's grief — that is God.) Sa'adi of Shiraz, whose words are etched into the walls of the United Nations building in New York, said: 'Human beings are limbs of one another/ Created from the same essence/ When one limb is afflicted with pain/The others cannot remain at peace.' And lest we forget the price of selective empathy, we must remember the warning of Pastor Martin Niemöller, who survived Nazi prisons: 'First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out — because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me —and there was no one left to speak for me.' This poem is not history, it is prophecy. And we forget it at our peril. By reprimanding citizens who seek to protest global injustice, we do not 'look at our own country'. We blindfold it. When we tell people to silence their grief for others, what we're really saying is: 'Let injustice grow, as long as it's not at your door.' But injustice, like fire, spreads unseen through silence. This is not a Gaza issue. It is not a Muslim issue. It is not even a foreign affairs issue. It is an Indian constitutional issue. For it is we, the people — not robes, not gavels — who breathe life into our Constitution. In the end, history will not ask whether we obeyed orders, but whether we saw clearly — and stood in solidarity with whoever in our universal family was suffering. For again, we are the people who emphasised at the G20 we hosted recently that India's abiding value is vasudhaiva kutumbakam. The writer is President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's Grain from Ukraine Ambassador for South Asia. He has worked at the United Nations on all five continents and is also a multilingual award-winning poet
