
Sports Illustrated Swimsuit model reveals how breast reduction surgery helped ease chronic health condition
Gigi, 27, explained she had a breast reduction to help with her debilitating pain due to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
'I was diagnosed with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome at around 10 or 11 and that was really challenging,' she told The New York Post.
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a group of rare genetic disorders that affect the body's connective tissues including skin, joints, and blood vessels, per NHS.
It is usually marked by overly flexible joints, chronic soft and stretchy skin that can easily bruise, frequent joint dislocations, and chronic pain.
'I grew up with chronic migraines, chronic fatigue, pain, brain fog — a lot of different symptoms — and by the time I got to college, I really realized how much of an impact living with a chronic illness had on me,' she shared.
The swimsuit model said the surgery 'was never a cosmetic thing.'
'My goal was not to get a breast reduction to be smaller or to lose weight,' she explained.
The model, who was a Sports Illustrated Swim Search finalist in 2022, had the surgery to reduce her size from a 34E down to a 34B (post-surgery)
'My goal was rooted in my desire to overcome chronic illness.'
Gigi said she fits into size 4 or 6, but had to size up to a 10 or 12 just to fit her bras under her clothes pre-surgery.
The model, who was a Sports Illustrated Swin Search finalist in 2022, had the surgery to reduce her size from a 34E down to a 34B.
'I could not exercise without a lot of pressure in my neck and my shoulders and my back,' Gigi said.
'And getting imaging and trying things like acupuncture and cupping, cold plunge, sauna — all those things have helped me with my pain and fatigue, but it was so specific to my upper abdominals and upper body.'
In 2022, the model had surgery to help with her chronic pain and switched to an organic diet, but her neck and shoulder pain still lingered.
'That's when I really made the decision to go forward and consider a breast reduction,' she detailed to the outlet.
'I had three or four different consults and all the doctors said, "We think you could benefit from this."
'And I think the only regret I have — like many other women — is I wish I did this sooner.'
When she had the surgery earlier this year, Gigi said doctors told her they were unsure what size she would be after the procedure.
'They have a certain amount of tissue that they have to keep alive and keep in order to make your body still function the right way,' she explained.
'But what she can confirm is that 'things fit way different than they used to — in a good way.'
In January, she confirmed her size was now 34B in a before and after TikTok video.
'The 34E to 34B shift is wild to me. I'm so happy. Can't wait to be on this journey with you,' her caption read.
In the clip, Gigi wore the same work-out set before and after the surgery to show the difference.
After the surgery, the model wanted to share a message for people who think that if you want a breast reduction, you should 'just lose weight.'
'You have to think about the limitations that people living with a larger chest and/or a chronic illness may be suffering,' she said.
'Losing weight is not necessarily a great option. It also perpetuates the idea that you're getting a breast reduction because you wanna be smaller.'
She also wanted to be transparent that the surgery was only a two- to four-hour outpatient procedure.
'The doctor comes in marks you up with a sharpie and shows you kind of where he's going to cut — my doctor said, "It's like we're doing origami, but with your boobs" and then you go into the room, and then you wake up in the outpatient room and obviously you are coming out of anesthesia so you're a little loopy,' she shared.
Gigi said the drains on the side of her breasts, which are small tubes in the incision site to drain liquid - were the only painful part.
Though she admitted 'the first week was hard,' she felt fine after the first five days.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
UnitedHealth jumps after 'vote of confidence' from Warren Buffett
Aug 15 (Reuters) - Shares of UnitedHealth Group (UNH.N), opens new tab surged more than 11% in premarket trading on Friday after a fresh investment from billionaire Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab boosted investor confidence in the troubled health conglomerate. The company is dealing with multiple challenges that have emerged in the last two years, including rising costs, a federal investigation into its government-backed health plans, a cyberattack at its technology unit that affected the personal information of over 192 million Americans, and the murder of its insurance unit chief in December. Long hailed as a reliable earnings performer, UnitedHealth missed Wall Street's profit expectations for the last two quarters, and its shares have dropped nearly 46% in 2025, making it the worst-performing stock on the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab this year. The shares were last up 11% at $301.42 in premarket trading. Buffett has swooped in with big investments in companies, in which he sees a long-term strategic value, during their periods of struggle. He invested heavily in Occidental Petroleum (OXY.N), opens new tab in 2019 as it tried to finance a merger with Anadarko Petroleum and has kept adding to his stake despite the company's weak stock performance. He famously took a stake in investment bank Goldman Sachs (GS.N), opens new tab at the height of the global financial crisis in 2008. "Buffett's purchase is a psychological reassurance to many investors that saw UnitedHealth as 'untouchable,' given the massive turbulence in the stock over the past few months," said Kevin Gade, chief operating officer at UnitedHealth investor Bahl & Gaynor. Berkshire owned 5.04 million UnitedHealth shares worth about $1.57 billion as of June 30, it said in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Thursday. Several other prominent hedge funds, including David Tepper's Appaloosa Management, Lone Pine Capital and Two Sigma Investments, also bought UnitedHealth's shares, regulatory filings showed on Thursday. While the "vote of confidence" from Buffett's investment validates the long-term value of UnitedHealth shares, the "management needs to regain trust and credibility with investors, and get back to its beat and raise reputation of the past," said James Harlow, senior vice president at Novare Capital Management. In May, CEO Andrew Witty abruptly stepped down amid rising operational and financial pressures, and Stephen Hemsley, who had run the company from 2006 to 2017, took over. Last month, the company projected full-year adjusted earnings per share of at least $16, well short of analysts' already lowered estimate of $20.91. UnitedHealth's shares are currently trading at about 15.8 times forward earnings estimates, below their five-year average of 19. "While UnitedHealth still faces elevated uncertainty, it is good to see that this renowned investment firm also believes the market is discounting assumptions that are too pessimistic for the long term, which is similar to our view," said Morningstar analyst Julie Utterback. Shares of rivals Centene (CNC.N), opens new tab, Humana (HUM.N), opens new tab and Molina Healthcare (MOH.N), opens new tab gained between 1.5% and 4% in premarket trading. Berkshire on Thursday also disclosed new stakes in steel maker Nucor (NUE.N), opens new tab, security products provider Allegion (ALLE.N), opens new tab and outdoor advertiser Lamar Advertising (LAMR.O), opens new tab. Nucor jumped 5.8% to $152.80.


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Meghan's perfect Instagram image falls as fans spot insect crawling on her cookies in posed up video
Meghan Markle has shared another aesthetic video to promote her lifestyle brand As ever - but royal fans soon spotted a slightly disturbing detail. The Duchess of Sussex, 44, this week released the new trailer for the second season of her Netflix show - With Love, Meghan - as well as sharing photos and videos displaying a selection of homemade treats made using ingredients from her brand. In one video, shared as a story to her Instagram account @aseverofficial, Meghan could be seen making a cup of tea next to a plate of shortbread cookies with jam and flower sprinkles alongside sprigs of foliage. But as eagle-eyed royal fans shared the clip to social media, they soon noticed what appeared to be a tiny insect crawling around near a flower cookie at the bottom of the plate. The bug could be seen moving around the biscuits for a few seconds, before disappearing from view. One person wrote on X/ Twitter: 'There's literally a BUG crawling around on the plate! You think Meghan would notice this BEFORE posting!' Another added: 'Ewwww! I see it.' A third said: 'OMG…there IS a bug! I had to look really hard but it is definitely there!' while a fourth noted: 'Oh my god there is a creepy crawly on the plate.' Others noted that while insects are to be expected when eating outside in the summer, especially with homemade goods, it was more surprising that it could still be spotted in the Instagram brand photos. One person said: 'When I serve biscuits in the garden, something like that can happen quickly. But when I'm filming to publish, I check every little detail.' Another added: 'It most likely came from the greenery she elevated the table with.' The clip is no longer available to view on the As ever Instagram account as stories expire after 24 hours. The team also posted a similar photograph to their permanent feed, again featuring cookies with flower sprinkles. It was captioned: 'The As ever team getting creative in the kitchen with our shortbread cookie mix, flower sprinkles, and delicious fruit spreads. Perfect for tea time…or anytime.' The new trailer for With Love, Meghan was released on Tuesday and showed Meghan hosting a fresh batch of celebrities and influencers at the rented California house close to her and Prince Harry's Montecito mansion. With Love, Meghan was renewed for a second season just as season one was released in March. All the episodes were filmed at the same time, it is understood. Guests on season two will include Chrissy Teigen and Jamie Kern Lima, the trailer revealed. In the one-minute, 27-second teaser, Meghan is seen eating cheese, prepping snacks and drinks with friends and even reveals the food her husband Prince Harry doesn't like. 'Do you know who doesn't like lobster? My husband,' she says as she prepares the seafood. As the trailer comes to an end, Meghan reveals: 'I love these moments of discovery and beauty. So let's be curious together.' Meghan's lifestyle show failed to break into Netflix 's top 300 programmes for the first half of 2025 and was even thrashed by multiple seasons of Suits. The numbers watching were 'dismal', an insider at the streamer reportedly said. Meghan has also filmed a Christmas special for broadcast in December, in a potential clash with the Princess of Wales ' annual carol concert at Westminster Abbey. The first series showed the former Suits star, 44, inviting friends and famous guests to a California estate, where she shared cooking, gardening and hosting tips. But it was panned by many reviewers who called it 'sensationally absurd and trite' with the Duchess of Sussex called 'tone-deaf' and punting a show that 'vibrates with vacuous joylessness'. Meghan in the new trailer for the second season of her lifestyle and cooking show In the one-minute, 27-second teaser, Meghan is seen eating cheese, prepping food and drink with friends and even reveals the food her husband Prince Harry doesn't like: lobster It has an IMDB rating of 3.2 out of 10 and a 38% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, indicates that the TV show is considered 'rotten'. Meghan was also lampooned for putting pretzels from the packet into a plastic bag, chiding one guest for using Markle as her surname instead of Sussex and one viewer threatened to sue claiming her recipe for homemade bath salts burned her skin. Meanwhile, outraged fans criticised the Duchess and Netflx after it was revealed American model Chrissy Teigen is among the guests on the second season of With Love, Meghan. Her inclusion has cast a shadow over the second installment of With Love, Meghan - even before its release - after social media users highlighted the former Sports Illustrated model's bullying row. In 2021, John Legend 's wife Chrissy faced severe backlash after abusive tweets by the star - dating back to 2011 - resurfaced online. In one, she told then-16-year-old Courtney Stodden - who identifies as they/them - to kill themselves. While the star has since apologised, it appeared fans have yet to fully forgive Chrissy for the disparaging tweets towards Courtney after they spotted her laughing and joking in the kitchen with Prince Harry's wife. The appearance of Chrissy in the show is all the more baffling, given Meghan's propensity to distance herself from pals who find themselves at the centre of controversy. Despite the bullying controversy, however, Chrissy has been close with the Duchess, especially after the Sussexes relocated to California in 2020. Now, her cameo on the forthcoming season of With Love, Meghan has called their friendship into question after several people highlighted how the Duchess has championed for stricter online safety regulations while speaking out against cyberbullying. Last October, Meghan reportedly described herself as being 'one of them most bullied people in the world' during a meeting with teenage girls at the youth leadership organisation Girls Inc in Santa Barbara. Earlier that year in August, Harry and Meghan's Archewell Foundation launched the Parents' Network in support of 'parents who have first-hand knowledge of the pain and destruction caused by social media use '. Netflix viewers highlighted the irony of roping in Chrissy, who said she was 'ashamed and completely embarrassed' by the tweets in her public apology to Courtney, for the show helmed by Meghan - who has consistently spoken out about children's digital safety. 'She advocates against online bullying then has Chrissy Teigen it make sense Netflix,' one X user wrote. Another message read: 'How can Meghan Markle associate with Chrissy Teigen, a self-confessed online bully and troll who purports to suport the Parents Network who are campaigning against this very thing?' 'This round may destroy her,' one X user added. 'Chrissy Teigen guests this season. WTF thought she was a good idea?' A similar comment read: 'You couldn't make it up, I wonder if it will help support the parents of the people Chrissy Teigen has bullied?' 'How do you have a charity for the parents of children who took their lives due to social media bullying but be besties with Chrissy Teigen and feature her in your show? I'm truly baffled.' Courtney incurred relentless bullying both publicly and in private from Chrissy, who tweeted at the then-teen in 2011: 'My Friday fantasy: you. dirt nap. mmmmmm baby', followed by: 'go. to sleep. forever.' Old tweets from 2013 have also resurfaced in which she described nine-year-old Oscar nominee Quvenzhané Wallis as 'cocky' and called Teen Mom star Farrah Abraham, then 21, a 'wh*** '. And ironically enough, Chrissy had stated that she was leaving Twitter before the scandal erupted because she was experiencing too much 'negative' abuse. 'This no longer serves me as positively as it serves me negatively … I've always been portrayed as the strong clap back girl but I'm just not,' she said. After the barrage of tweets came to light and people called for the model to be 'cancelled,' she issued an apology to Courtney - who was catapulted into the spotlight as the teen bride of the much older Green Mile actor Doug Hutchinson. 'Not a lot of people are lucky enough to be held accountable for all their past bulls**t in front of the entire world. I'm mortified and sad at who I used to be. I was an insecure, attention seeking troll. I am ashamed and completely embarrassed at my behavior but that is nothing compared to how I made Courtney feel,' she began. 'I have tried to connect with Courtney privately but since I publicly fueled all this, I want to also publicly apologize. I'm so sorry, Courtney. I hope you can heal now knowing how deeply sorry I am,' she wrote. It came as experts claimed that the Sussexes' new Netflix deal is a 'downgrade' on their previous $100million five-year tie-up and more 'we'll call you' than 'here's the chequebook'. The couple signed a new 'multi-year, first look deal for film and television projects' with the streaming giant - understood to be worth less for the pair than their previous contract. The 'first-look' arrangement means Netflix can say yes or no to new film or television projects before anyone else - allowing them to pick and choose what they invest in. PR expert Mark Borkowski described the new deal as a 'downgrade', claiming it falls a long way from the jackpot figure of Harry and Meghan's original contract in 2020. He told the Daily Mail: 'I think Netflix has done a very neat job of pivoting away from two very expensive people who didn't deliver, and they've taken that deal off the table, and they've given them a modest one. 'It's not like they're gradually uncoupling – it's a downgrade. Netflix are not going to expose themselves to those budgets again. It's Netflix saying, 'Let's have a look at your content, but we'll pick and choose, mate'.' The couple's new output will include a second season of the Duchess's 'With Love, Meghan' lifestyle show later this month, as well as a Christmas special in December. The Sussexes are also working on 'Masaka Kids, A Rhythm Within' - a documentary about orphaned children in Uganda, where the 'shadows of the HIV/Aids crisis linger'. There is also 'active development' on other projects with Netflix which 'span a variety of content genres', including an adaptation of romantic novel Meet Me At The Lake. Netflix has already released the first series of With Love, Meghan as well as Polo, Heart of Invictus, Live to Lead and the couple's bombshell documentary Harry & Meghan as well as being a business partner on Meghan's lifestyle brand, As Ever. Five years ago, Harry and Meghan secured a lucrative contract thought to be worth $100million (£74million) with Netflix after quitting as senior working royals in 2020. The renewed deal was described by the Sussexes - who made the announcement with Netflix - as 'extending their creative partnership' through Archewell Productions. But the new terms are understood to be worth less for Harry and Meghan than their previous contract, according to a person familiar with the deal, and represent Netflix loosening its ties with the couple. In a statement, Meghan said: 'We're proud to extend our partnership with Netflix and expand our work together to include the As Ever brand.' Netflix chief content officer Bela Bajaria said: 'We're excited to continue our partnership.'


The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rare ‘brain-eating amoeba' detected in drinking water supplies in Australia
One of the world's most dangerous water-borne microorganisms, commonly called a 'brain-eating amoeba ', has recently been detected in two drinking water supplies in south-west Queensland. Both affected towns are about 750 kilometres west of Brisbane: Augathella (population roughly 300) and Charleville (population 3,000). During an analysis of water samples commissioned by Queensland Health, Naegleria fowleri was detected in the water systems of two health facilities, one in Charleville and one in Augathella, as well as in the incoming town water supply at both facilities. The Shire Council of Murweh, which takes in the two affected locations, issued a health notice for residents and visitors on August 7, warning of the detection of N. fowleri in the water supplies. So what is this organism? And how significant is the risk likely to be in these Queensland towns, and elsewhere? It's rare – but nearly always fatal The N. fowleri amoeba is a microscopic organism found around the world. It only lives in warm freshwater, generally between 25 and 40°C. This can include ponds, lakes, rivers, streams and hot springs. If someone is infected with N. fowleri, it causes what's called primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, a serious infection of the brain. Symptoms include a sore throat, headache, hallucinations, confusion, vomiting, fever, neck stiffness, changes to taste and smell, and seizures. The incubation period of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis – the time between infection and symptoms appearing – typically ranges from three to seven days. Tragically, this illness is nearly always fatal, even if someone receives medical attention quickly. Death typically occurs about five days after symptoms begin. Fortunately, though, cases are very rare. In the United States, there were 167 reported cases of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis between 1962 and 2024, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Only four survived. A global review of the disease up to 2018 reported that, of 381 known cases, Australia accounted for 22, the fifth highest number, after the US, Pakistan, Mexico and India. Some 92% of people died. So how does someone get infected? The route of infection is very unusual and quite specific. N. fowleri infects the brain through a person's nose. The amoeba then passes through a protective membrane called the nasal epithelium. This is an important physical barrier and allows the amoeba to travel to the brain through the olfactory nerve, which is responsible for our sense of smell. The infection then kills brain tissue and causes swelling of the brain, termed cerebral oedema. Infections occur in people when infected water travels up their nose. Most cases involve children and young people who have swum in infected waters. The majority of cases occur in males, with an average age of 14. Even water sports in affected waterways can be dangerous. A person is currently in intensive care in Missouri after it's believed they became infected while water skiing. Regarding the recent detection in Queensland water supply systems, the source of the infection has not been reported. It's possible a fresh waterway, or groundwater, which feeds into the affected drinking water systems, was contaminated with N. fowleri, and the amoeba travelled from there. But this will likely be determined with further investigation. How dangerous is N. fowleri in drinking water? First, it's important to note you can't get primary amoebic meningoencephalitis from drinking contaminated water. But any activity that allows infected water to enter a person's nose is potentially dangerous. This can happen during a bath or a shower. Some people flush their nasal passages to clear congestion related to allergies or a viral infection. This has been linked to infections with N. fowleri. If you're going to flush your nasal passages, you should use a sterile saline solution. Even young children playing with hoses, sprinklers or water activities could be at risk. A 16-month-old child was fatally infected following an incident involving a contaminated water 'splash pad' in the US in 2023. Splash pads are water-based recreation activities, primarily for young children, that involve splashing or spraying water. So what's the risk in Queensland? Regarding N. fowleri, Australian drinking water guidelines advise: If the organism is detected, advice should be sought from the relevant health authority or drinking water regulator. The guidelines also provide recommendations on how to disinfect water supplies and control N. fowleri, using chlorine and other chemical compounds. All public town water supplies across Australia are regularly tested to ensure that the water is safe to drink. We don't yet know the exact cause of the detection of the amoeba N. fowleri in these Queensland towns' water supplies. But drinking or cooking with water contaminated with this amoeba will not cause an infection. Any activity that allows potentially contaminated water to go up the nose should be navigated carefully for now in the affected areas. Contamination of a town's drinking water supply from this amoeba is very rare and is unlikely in other Australian town water supplies. How about swimming? To reduce your risk in potentially infected warm, fresh waters, you should keep your head above water while swimming. And don't jump or dive in. You can use a nose-clip if you want to swim with your head under water. The amoeba cannot survive in salt water, so there's no risk of swimming in the ocean. Also, properly maintained swimming pools should be safe from the organism. New South Wales Health advises that the amoeba cannot survive in water that is clean, cool and adequately chlorinated. Ian A. Wright is an Associate Professor in Environmental Science at Western Sydney University.