logo
Noraid: ‘They started to run it down from the early 1990s – They said I had an image as an IRA supporter'

Noraid: ‘They started to run it down from the early 1990s – They said I had an image as an IRA supporter'

Irish Times18 hours ago
Ernie O'Malley's pub on East 27th Street in Manhattan, between Lexington and Third, is where those of Irish birth or lineage gather to watch GAA matches from a place many still call 'home'.
Next Wednesday, July 9th, however, the pub will be crowded not to watch GAA, but for
RTE's
latest documentary,
Noraid
: Irish America and the IRA, the story of Republican fundraising in the United States during the Troubles.
Now ageing, the group will include Martin Galvin, Noraid's public face for decades; New York cab-driver, newspaper editor and radio presenter John McDonagh; and Father Pat Moloney, jailed for four years for a 1993 Brinks Mat heist, which he still denies.
The documentary, directed by Kevin Brannigan, evocatively captures New York in the 1970s and 1980s, and the controversies surrounding an organisation blamed by the Irish and British governments, and by Washington, for raising money for IRA weapons.
READ MORE
Throughout the two-part documentary, the organisation's members agree on a few points – the proper title of the organisation was never Noraid but, rather, Irish Northern Aid and it never bought IRA guns.
Irish-American members of Noraid protesting in New York in the 1980s
Few outside the organisation have ever, or will ever, call it Irish Northern Aid, however, while few among two generations of Irish, British and US police and intelligence figures will ever accept its denials about weapons.
Galvin adamantly rejects the allegations, however, pointing out that it was investigated repeatedly by the FBI and others: 'I would have been put in jail, if that was the case,' he tells The Irish Times.
Equally, British intelligence had its own eyes inside Noraid since Sinn Féin figure, Denis Donaldson, outed nearly two decades later as a British informer, worked with it in New York in the early 1990s.
Martin Galvin in New York in 2024. Photograph: Faolan Carey
'[He] had our books open. If we were sending money back, or it was being diverted to IRA, that would have been passed on,' Galvin goes on, insisting that the money raised went, as it always said it did, to families of those affected by the Troubles.
IRA figures involved in buying US weaponry, such as Gabriel Megahey or John 'The Yank' Crawley – who was later jailed for the foiled 1984 arms smuggling attempt on board the Marita Ann trawler – agree. If anything, they were told to stay away from Noraid because it would bring them to attention.
Donaldson, killed later at a cottage in Donegal by people unknown, features frequently in conversation with Galvin: 'I complained about him. I could see even then that he was an informer. But I was told he had impeccable credentials.'
Galvin had quickly suspected him: 'He told people I was a particular target. Then, he'd disappear for a few days and try to undermine anybody associated with me. Then, he was seen drinking with FBI people.'
The first episode traces how 1920s anti-Treaty IRA men who quit, or fled, Ireland after the Civil War infused New York's Irish-American community with strong Republican feelings brought to life later with The Troubles.
Remembering people such as Michael Flannery, who fought in 1916, John McDonagh says: 'Their hatred of the Free State knew no bounds. It was always, 'Free State', and 'bastards' wasn't long after it.'
The second episode traces the impact of the 1981 hunger-strikes and Noraid-organised visits of Irish-Americans to Northern Ireland in the mid-1980s that radicalised opinion across Irish-America.
Graphic for RTE documentary on Noraid
It tracks, too, Sinn Féin's entry into the top strata of US politics, including White House visits – a process that was first pressed by Noraid calls for a Northern special envoy and a visa for then party leader Gerry Adams.
It also maps the volleys of criticism from Garret FitzGerald, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and others on both side of the Atlantic and in the press, with Noraid supporters often labelled as misguided, deluded or simply supporting evil.
'We always got a fair shot from The Irish Times and [the newspaper's Washington Correspondent until 1992] Sean Cronin [who was the IRA's Chief of Staff during part of the 1950s Border Campaign],' Galvin says.
Today, Noraid is a pale shadow of its former self. People still give it 'money in their wills', says Galvin, which is used for a few student bursaries and to help anyone 'being victimised today because of their involvement in the struggle'.
Blacklisted for years, Galvin and others now get invited to official Irish Government events hosted by the Irish Consulate-General in Manhattan and get briefings from the Department of Foreign Affairs.
[
Irish unification would cost €152m annually to give Northern Irish civil servants pay parity, report says
Opens in new window
]
If, however, relations with 'official' Ireland have warmed, ties with Sinn Féin have gone in the other direction – with Noraid pushed into the background and replaced by its New York-headquartered Friends of Sinn Féin.
Galvin tries not to sound hurt but it is clear that he is: 'They started to run it down from the early 1990s. I was told that I was to stand back. 'We want to go in a different direction,' they said.
'They told me that I had an image as a supporter of the IRA, which I had, and that they wanted to go in a different direction,' he says. 'It was actually more difficult to step back than it had been to step forward.
'No individual is that important,' he says, with a shrug.
Looking back, one senses regret in Galvin, not in his interest in Northern Ireland, his support for the IRA or his involvement in Noraid since the 1970s but, rather, at the cost it inflicted on his own life.
He had joined Noraid hoping that he would not attract 'a lot of publicity' because he was then 'an assistant district attorney, a prosecutor, if you will'.
He goes on: 'That was a path to a judgeship. That's what I wanted to do.'
If Galvin is diplomatic, John McDonagh is not. For years, he interviewed Sinn Féin figures on his New York radio show when they were not allowed on the airwaves in the Republic of Ireland or the UK, along with editing The Irish People newspaper.
One of the first signs of changing winds from Ireland came, he says, when Sinn Féin ordered an Irish pipe band in Philadelphia who had long worn berets, black ties and black jackets that they could not 'dress like that any more'.
'Sinn Féin came over, shut down everything. They traded in Irish Republicans in New York for Wall Street Republicans. They're the only Republicans that Sinn Féin want to hear about. They don't want to hear about Irish Republicans.'
People who had 'carried the movement during good and hard times in New York were just jettisoned right off the bat', says McDonagh, who speaks with humour in his voice but the bitterness underneath is palpable.
Neither is convinced that a United Ireland is coming soon or, perhaps, at all. Galvin wants a referendum but not one in 2030, while the British now just 'smile indulgently as if this is something that is never going to happen'.
If it does, Galvin is not convinced that it would be fairly fought, believing that nationalist voters would be threatened with the loss of pension benefits and other losses if they vote for unity.
Typically, McDonagh is blunter.
[
'People don't care that much': Frustrated sighs audible as students asked the 'British or Irish' question
Opens in new window
]
'Listen, I've been listening to bulls**t in New York since the 1990s. Joe Cahill [the late IRA chief of staff] told me personally: 'We're getting the prisoners out and we're going to have a united Ireland in about five, 10 years.' He came and went.
'Then, Martin McGuinness said: 'We're going to have it in the next 10 years.' That went nowhere. Then, Gerry Adams said it would be in 2016, on the 100th anniversary of the Rising. That didn't happen.
'Now, we've Mary Lou coming out. Now, it's not a United Ireland because the tone has changed. It's a shared or an agreed Ireland. That's the semantics and the wording now. Everything's getting very fuzzy.
'The one thing I have found out is you can't defeat human nature. The people who get into power turn exactly into the people they just turfed out.'
So, would he do it all again if he had the chance to roll the clock back 50 years? Just for a moment, he pauses, before recalling a conversation with senior IRA bomber and hunger-striker, the late Brendan 'Dark' Hughes.
'I asked him the same question as you have. 'Brendan, would you have got involved knowing how it ended?' He said, 'I wouldn't have got out of bed'.
'There are a lot of people who feel that way,' he goes on.
Do Noraid people meet up now? 'At a freaking funeral home on Queens Boulevard, when they die. They're the only meetings you're going to get,' he replies, drily.
Bar Ernie O'Malley's on Wednesday.
Noraid: Irish America & the IRA begins Wednesday, July 9th, 9.35pm on RTÉ One
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's big, beautiful Bill means massive, ugly tax cuts for American aristocrats
Trump's big, beautiful Bill means massive, ugly tax cuts for American aristocrats

Irish Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Trump's big, beautiful Bill means massive, ugly tax cuts for American aristocrats

On July 4th, in a mockery of the best American democratic traditions, Donald Trump signed into law his signature piece of domestic legislation. His so-called 'big, beautiful Bill' offers massive tax cuts, mostly to the benefit of the very rich: today's American aristocrats. Yet, while it might be good news for the luxury yacht industry, it will leave an estimated 12 million without health insurance through cuts to the Medicaid programme. Trump's ability to pass such ugly legislation through a tightly divided Congress reflects his political power, and yet it could well lead to his undoing in the 2026 mid-term elections. The more the Republican Party changes, the more it stays the same. For all the talk about the party appealing to the working class, it remains fundamentally committed to a regressive agenda that puts the interests of the very rich above those of ordinary Americans and future generations. This legislation is ripped straight from the playbook of Ronald Reagan. Reagan reduced the tax rate on the highest earners from 70 per cent to 28 per cent, inaugurating a new era of massive upward redistribution of wealth. He did so by slashing programmes benefiting the poorest Americans: child nutrition, housing assistance and payments to single mothers. READ MORE Trump's Bill also resembles Reagan's agenda in another respect: it is as irresponsible as it is cruel. The most expensive social welfare programmes in the US – social security (old age pensions) and Medicare (health insurance for those over the age of 65) – are too popular to cut. Trump, like Reagan has also increased the budget for the major area of American spending: the military. Reagan justified his cuts with the fantasy of supply-side economics, claiming that slashing taxes would generate so much economic growth that it would actually result in increased government revenue. Republicans today justify their irresponsible spending with the accounting trick that, because they only extended tax cuts due to expire, they aren't really adding to the deficit. When Reagan left office, the federal debt had tripled. Trump's Bill is set to increase the federal deficit by more than $3 trillion. Trump's Bill was not much loved by many of the Republicans who voted for it. Deficit hawks worried about adding to the national debt; they like the tax cuts, but would have preferred more social spending cuts to finance them. Elon Musk's criticism of the Bill on these grounds led to his public falling out with Trump. Moderate Republicans, meanwhile, worried that cuts to Medicaid would hurt the party's chances in 2026. Thom Tillis, one of only three Republican Senators to vote against the bill , wondered how he could face his voters 'when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there anymore'. Trump's ability to pass such legislation reflected his considerable political muscle. He could only afford to lose three out of 53 Republican votes in the Senate (he lost three, with vice-president Vance breaking a 50-50 tie) and, even more challenging, only three of 219 Republican votes in the House of Representatives (he lost only two). Trump held his party together by threatening Republicans who voted against the Bill that he would support primary challengers against them. For decades, the Republican Party has been distorted by the fact that most of its politicians are elected from heavily Republican districts or states. As a result, the threat to their re-election lies in primary challenges from the right rather than in winning the general election against a Democrat. Yet Trump was able to exploit this fact like no previous leader. His personal hold on the party means that his endorsement of a primary candidate all but ensures their success. Yet the thing about being at the pinnacle of your power is that everything is downhill from there. The passage of Trump's beautiful Bill may well lead to an ugly Republican defeat at the polls in 2026. Polling shows that only 29 per cent of Americans support it. It seems likely that Republicans will lose their slim majority in the House of Representatives. But it also seems possible that Democrats might re-take the Senate, even though they face a very challenging map there. Tillis, after voting against Trump's bill, announced that he would not seek re-election rather than face a primary challenge. The forced retirement of a popular incumbent increases the chances that Democrats can win his vacated seat in North Carolina. This bill is so extreme and irresponsible that it will enable Democrats to win back moderate voters in contested electoral districts. But perhaps more importantly it will enable them to make the case that Bernie Sanders and others have been pushing: that whatever they say, the Republicans are the party of the billionaires, and the Democrats can be the party of working Americans. Still, the massive federal deficit the Bill creates has planted a ticking time bomb for Democrats. If, and when, they do regain control of the federal government, they will be hampered in pursuing an ambitious agenda because they will be forced first to clean up the Republicans' mess. That, too, is part of a pattern in American politics evident since the Reagan era. How can Republicans retain popularity when their agenda so clearly favours the few at the expense of the many? As they have done since Reagan, they will double down on culture war politics to distract from their economic agenda. Expect to see ramped up assaults on trans rights and racialised attacks on migrants. Republicans will promote misinformation so that Americans don't realise what they're really doing. And, finally, if push comes to shove, Trump may employ authoritarian measures to retain his hold on power. Even so, the biggest legacy of Trump's big, beautiful Bill might be that it shatters Republicans' credibility as the party of working Americans.

Donald Trump doesn't want much - just a Nobel Prize and his face on Mount Rushmore
Donald Trump doesn't want much - just a Nobel Prize and his face on Mount Rushmore

Irish Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Donald Trump doesn't want much - just a Nobel Prize and his face on Mount Rushmore

Donald Trump was in ebullient form last Friday. It had been a good week: Iran put in its place, Nato brought to heel, and at a White House ceremony, the signing of 'his' deal to stem the 30-year war in Democratic Republic of Congo . The deal would see Rwanda withdraw and it would secure, in Trump's words, 'a lot of mineral rights' for the US . 'A Great Day for Africa and, quite frankly, a Great Day for the World!' he boasted on social media, but 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this ... I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran ... but the people know, and that, is all that matters to me!' Right! An official, passing the treaty to the two foreign ministers, said 'we'll call it the Washington Treaty'. 'Why not the Trump Treaty?' Trump interrupted, startling his guests. 'I'm joking.' With Trump, you can't tell. There's no typeface for irony, and no limit to his righteous certainty that his historic role is criminally underappreciated. Most 'jokes' require flagging by aides. READ MORE We know, however, that Trump has coveted a Nobel at least since Barack Obama won it , and friends have repeatedly, unsuccessfully nominated him. No role, it seems, is beyond our hero – days before Pope Francis died Trump posted an AI-generated picture of himself in a white cassock with gold crucifix and mitre, his finger pointed at the sky, and said he would 'like to be pope'. A 'joke,' officials confirmed. [ The Irish Times view on the central African deal: an uncertain peace Opens in new window ] Nothing better, however, illustrates his folies de grandeur than his 'dream' to join George Washington, Abe Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and Theodore Roosevelt on Mount Rushmore. A Florida congresswoman has duly moved a bill to 'direct the secretary of the interior to arrange for the carving of the figure of president Donald J Trump' on the monument. 'They definitely have room,' the secretary says. Not so, says the National Parks Service which oversees it. 'You wouldn't add another face to … Mount Rushmore, just like you wouldn't add one to da Vinci's Last Supper,' complains former monument superintendent Dan Wenk. Its fragility means a new face next to Lincoln might cost Abe his nose. But surely Trump could delete one of the four to take his place? Trump has also long had a royal fixation. It speaks volumes to his determination to rule unconstrained by Congress, judiciary or anyone, and to be held in awe. King Charles's invitation to Buckingham Palace to the royalty-struck Trump appeared key to fawning PM Keir Starmer's success in wooing him. An overnight in the Dutch royal palace was the highlight of his recent 'historic' Nato trip. [ New US ambassador to Ireland takes office, thanking friend Donald Trump Opens in new window ] While Trump may not yet be seeking a crown for his head, he is going about claiming the unfettered regal right to control the executive branch the way he sees fit, supported by last year's Supreme Court ruling that former presidents are immune from prosecution for official acts. His mantra, he has proclaimed, is Napoleon's 'he who saves his country does not violate any law'. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissenting, warned that 'the president is now a king, above the law.' Rule by presidential fiat is the order of the day. As former US secretary of Labour Robert Reich wrote recently, Trump's so-called 'big beautiful bill' will also remove the courts' newly limited ability to hold executive officials in contempt and will undermine efforts to stop the administration. 'Trump will have crowned himself king,' Reich warned. At his recent inauguration, Trump spoke of how he 'was saved by God to make America great again', echoing the divine right of kings. King-like, he started to rename territory and laid claim to independent states … Panama, Greenland, Canada, Gaza, mineral rights in Ukraine. In one of his first decrees, he abolished New York's congestion pricing. Then, delighted with his power, he posted 'CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!' After the 'No Kings' protests against him last month, he backtracked, complaining that unlike a king he was constrained: 'I don't feel like a king. I have to go through hell to get things approved ... No, we're not a king. We're not a king at all.' Note the royal 'we'. Trump particularly delights in his pardon power, described by constitutionalists as the most kingly element of a president's authority, one that cannot be challenged or overturned. Among other things, he wiped away the charges and convictions of about 1,600 supporters who rampaged through the Capitol five years ago. The pardon is an odd monarchical power tucked into the constitution, whose framers clearly had another sort of president in mind. [ Trump's first hours: With each stroke of the pen came seismic hammer blows Opens in new window ] Alexander Hamilton, in the Federalist Papers, wrote optimistically that affording the president an undivided pardon power by 'sole fiat' would 'naturally inspire scrupulousness and caution'. King Trump does not do either.

The Irish Independent's View: Democracy demands political parties ensure presidential choices
The Irish Independent's View: Democracy demands political parties ensure presidential choices

Irish Independent

timean hour ago

  • Irish Independent

The Irish Independent's View: Democracy demands political parties ensure presidential choices

Iowa became the first by accident. The Democrats liberalised the candidate selection procedures following the 1968 election. Iowa just happened to become the first state to schedule its contest. Candidates and the media flocked to Iowa for the 1972 caucus, spending plenty of money, so the state kept its first-in-the-nation status. There is no similar moment in our own presidential election. Names tend to float about in the years running up to a presidential election. Some rule themselves out, others are happy to be talked about. Come the summer of a presidential election year, the field starts to take shape. The runners and riders become clear in the autumn ahead of a November polling date. The first of the big caucuses kicks off today when Fine Gael's candidate nomination process opens. Prospective candidates have until next Tuesday to be nominated by securing the signature of 20 TDs, senators and MEPs in the parliamentary party, 25 party councillors and five members of the party's ruling body. At the moment, former European commissioner Mairead McGuinness is the frontrunner to become the Fine Gael candidate, but she has yet to break cover and officially declare her interest. Ireland South MEP Seán Kelly, a former GAA president, is also showing an interest but hasn't confirmed one way or another. All will become clear in the next eight days. If there is a contest, the party will spend the rest of the summer playing out that process. So far, Fine Gael is the only party to confirm it will be contesting the presidency – an office it has never held. The list of significant figures to rule themselves out of contention includes Heather Humphreys, Frances Fitzgerald, Barry Andrews, Michael McDowell and Frances Black. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to signal their intentions, but are expected to run their own candidates. The Labour Party, the Social Democrats and the Green Party have talked about putting up a unified left-wing candidate, but have thus far failed to identify anyone who fits the bill. Independent TD Catherine Connolly has yet to declare her intentions. The new Independent senator Aubrey McCarthy says he is available to run if a political party wants him. The bruising nature of previous presidential elections has unquestionably put off seasoned politicians from entering the fray. Political novices have found, to their cost, the presidential election is not the ideal contest for dipping their toe into waters of elected office. Nonetheless, there is an obligation on the parties, big and small, to ensure the electorate are presented with choices in this election. It is unusual to have parties say they are not going to engage in politics. The lack of enthusiasm for this election is not acceptable. There is a responsibility on their part to put forward candidates and participate in the democratic process.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store