Some tech gadgets are near worthless the day after you open the box: 7 devices with low resale value
Short support cycles: Devices become less useful when software updates stop.
Low buyer interest: Secondhand markets often overflow with the same product.
Design limitations: Disposability and hygiene issues reduce appeal.
Wear and tear: Smaller, personal gadgets age quickly with regular use.
Earbuds like the AirPods and other truly wireless models are notorious for losing value within months. Most have sealed batteries that degrade quickly, and hygiene concerns make buyers wary of used pairs. Software updates and new generations come thick and fast, further undercutting resale prices.
Wearables depreciate almost immediately, and resale is hurt by missing straps, worn-out batteries, and the fact that many people prefer these new for hygiene reasons. Even flagship models from major brands rarely hold their worth after a year or two.
While all smartphones see a drop after purchase, Android devices suffer the steepest falls due to more limited software support and rapid turnover of models. Oversupply, especially from budget brands, further drags down pre-owned prices.
Gadgets like smart speakers lose value quickly. Rapid hardware refreshes, app compatibility changes, and minimal interest in secondhand devices keep resale values low. Buyers often prefer getting a new one bundled with discounts or offers.
Cheaper laptops and even mid-range models tend to be disposable, with low resale value after a year or so. Limited specs, short battery life, and a flood of similar models on used markets make selling them barely worth the effort.
Android and cheap branded tablets are among the worst performers for retaining value. Apple iPads fare better, but most Android tablets see major value drops and sell for very little secondhand.
VR advances rapidly, and older headsets become obsolete fast. Used units, especially those without current software support or with missing accessories, fetch a fraction of their original price. Hygiene worries make VR resales even tougher. Research resale patterns: Before you buy, check how similar models are faring on resale platforms.
Keep everything: Original boxes and accessories can help you get a marginally better price.
Time the sale: Depreciation is sharpest in the first 12–18 months - don't wait too long.
Trade-in options: Sometimes manufacturer programmes or retailer buyback schemes offer more value and less hassle than private sales.
While not all tech is meant to keep its value, being aware of the fastest depreciators can save you regret when it's time to upgrade. Sometimes the best move really is to use these gadgets (and enjoy them) until their lifespan runs out, rather than banking on resale.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Appears in Leaks, Highlights Reduced Notch Size
Samsung's next-generation high-end Android tablets are about to launch. WinFuture has published Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra leak, which show a significant change to its display. Samsung's 'Ultra' tablet has always been a monster of a device. A 14.6-inch display makes it supersized but also svelte and thin, all while packing a punch with its performance. A notable feature that has been carried over in every generation of Samsung's largest tablet is its display notch. While every other device in the lineup has shunned the notch, Samsung tablet notch has included one in its design for years. The notch has always featured two front-facing cameras. WinFuture has now acquired and published Galaxy Tab S11 images, and it is immediately clear to see the same general Tab S11 Ultra design language that Samsung uses for its supersized tablets. Per the report, the Ultra will be powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processor, and come with 16GB of RAM and an 11,600 mAh battery while shipping with Android 16 / One UI 8. All of this will be wrapped in a device that's just 'around' 5mm thick. The only noticeable difference in these leaked images, however, is the display notch. Samsung tablet 2025 has been slimmed down and isn't as pronounced as previous models. The notch is also rounded and more closely resembles a half-circle cut into the display rather than the distinct notch of its predecessors. The reason for the reduction is simple, as Samsung has removed one of the two front-facing cameras included in the tablet. Previous models came with both a standard lens and an ultrawide, but the Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra will only house one of these two cameras. It could ultimately prove to be a net positive for users, even if it remains jarring to see a notch of any kind on such a large tablet.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Amazon looks to ditch homegrown software for Android in Fire tablet revamp
By Greg Bensinger SAN FRANCISCO: Amazon is plotting a big change to its Fire tablet lineup following years of escalating gripes from consumers and app developers over the company's homegrown operating system. As part of a project known internally as Kittyhawk, Amazon plans to release a higher-end tablet as soon as next year offering the Android operating system software for the first time, according to six people familiar with the matter. Since the Fire tablet's introduction in 2011, Amazon has used what is known as a "forked" version of Android with custom modifications that make it work like a unique operating system. Amazon has long sought to undercut hardware rivals with inexpensive tablets and other devices that serve as a doorway to the firm's digital content, like e-books, videos and music. The devices have typically sold at or near manufacturing cost. But the focus on simplicity has held back sales, particularly among consumers who seek higher-performing devices. The multiyear project to switch to Android marks a philosophical change for the online retail giant, which has eschewed third-party operating systems and software in favor of its own. As a result, Amazon has offered its own app store requiring developers to make separate versions of their apps for Fire tablets, limiting the store's variety. If Kittyhawk is successful, Fire tablets could be more desirable for consumers who crave compatibility with other Android devices, the people said. They cautioned that Kittyhawk could be delayed or cancelled over financial or other concerns. Amazon declined to comment, saying it does not respond to rumors or speculation. "Consumers have always expressed a concern about not having access to the latest Android versions, not having access to some of their apps because Amazon used their own store," said Jitesh Ubrani, a researcher at IT advisory firm IDC. "It's meant more work for developers in this day and age of largely free apps or services." Ubrani noted that Amazon has nonetheless sold many millions of the tablets. Amazon has forfeited profits on the devices themselves in favor of making money on selling their associated services, like streaming movie rentals. But such inexpensive devices typically come with compromises like lower screen quality or battery life compared with pricier options. Amazon is the world's fourth-largest tablet seller, with 8% of the market, just behind Lenovo's 8.2%, according to second-quarter IDC data. Apple and Samsung were the market leaders with 33.1% and 18.7%, respectively. PRICIER TABLET The first Amazon Android tablet, slated for next year, will be pricier than current models, the people said. One of them said Amazon had discussed a $400 price tag, nearly double the cost of its current higher-end $230 Fire Max 11 tablet. IPads, by comparison, range from $350 to $1,200. Reuters could not learn additional specifications for the planned Amazon tablet, such as screen size and speaker quality or memory capacity. Amazon historically has avoided using software or other products from third parties, preferring to develop the services in-house or, barring that, to acquire a competitor. The Fire Phone smartphone championed by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and released in 2014 failed to win over buyers in part because of its reliance on Fire OS, as well as its high price tag. Amazon canceled the device and took a $170 million writedown. But the Seattle retailer has more recently shown a willingness to use rivals' services, particularly through its investment in startup Anthropic, whose Claude artificial intelligence software is the primary underpinning of Amazon's Alexa+ voice assistant and a chatbot used by employees known as Cedric. The new Fire tablet, the people said, will use the open-source version of Android, meaning it does not require direct coordination with Google and can be customized. Amazon is planning to roll out some lower-priced tablets with its Linux-based Vega operating system now in some Fire TV devices, some of the people said. The full slate of tablets will eventually be powered by a version of Android, the people said. The Fire project's internal code name of Kittyhawk seems to derive from the North Carolina town near where the Wright brothers conducted the first powered flight in 1903. But it is also the name of a failed flying car startup backed by Google co-founder Larry Page that burned through hundreds of millions in cash. Amazon declined to discuss the meaning behind its Kittyhawk project name.
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Google agrees to $36 million fine over Android search deals
Google has agreed to pay a Aus$55 million (US$36 million) penalty for striking "anti-competitive" deals to pre-install only its own search engine on Android mobile phones sold by two leading Australian telecoms firms. Australia's competition authority said it had launched proceedings in the Federal Court and jointly submitted with Google Asia Pacific that it should pay the fine. The court would now decide whether the agreed penalty and other orders were "appropriate", the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement released on Monday. Also read Looking for a smartphone? To check mobile finder click here. "Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers," said the commission's chair, Gina-Cass Gottlieb. Google had cooperated with the competition commission and admitted reaching the deals with telecoms firms Telstra and Optus, which were in place from December 2019 to March 2021, the body said. In return for only installing Google's search engine, Telstra and Optus had received a share of the resulting advertising revenue, the commission said. "Google has admitted in reaching those understandings with each of Telstra and Optus it was likely to have had the effect of substantially lessening competition," it said. Google said it was pleased to have resolved the regulator's concerns over the provisions, adding that they had not been in its commercial agreements for "some time". "We are committed to providing Android device makers more flexibility to preload browsers and search apps," a Google spokesperson said. Telstra and Optus entered court-enforceable agreements last year not to make new agreements to pre-install Google search as the default on Android devices, the competition watchdog said.
