India is an 'exceptionally important' partner
Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov has stressed the importance of the Russia-India partnership, noting that Moscow's long-term friendship with New Delhi extends into the military-technical sector.
Belousov held talks with his Indian counterpart, Rajnath Singh, on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Qingdao, China on Thursday.
"India is an exceptionally important strategic partner for us, a traditional friend - including in the military and military-technical spheres," Belousov said at the meeting. Singh stated: "We had insightful deliberations on boosting India-Russia defense ties."
India's military currently relies heavily on Russian-origin equipment, with around 60% of its arsenal being of Russian make. During the recent conflict with Pakistan, the effectiveness of India's air defenses was bolstered by the Russian-made S-400 mobile surface-to-air missile systems, which was recently highlighted by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who praised its performance during the standoff.
New Delhi, however, has been pushing to indigenize its defense sector, under the 'Make in India' initiative led by Modi. Russian defense companies have taken part in a number of joint ventures in India over the last two decades. BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles are manufactured by India's Defense Research and Development Organization and Russia's NPO Mashinostroyeniya, and have been in service in the Indian Armed Forces since June 2007.
Last month, India inaugurated a new production unit for the BrahMos missile in Uttar Pradesh. According to Defense Ministry officials, this facility will enable India to boost its defense stockpiles, which is crucial given the current volatile security environment.
New Delhi's long-standing defense ties with Moscow have irked Washington. Earlier this month, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said India's relations with Russia are a point of contention in its relationship with the US, especially with the increasing sanctions on Russian entities. During the meeting on Thursday with Singh in Qingdao, Belousov expressed his condolences over the recent crash of an Air India aircraft, which killed 270 people. The Russian defense minister conveyed words of sympathy and support to the families and loved ones of the victims.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fibre2Fashion
a few seconds ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Trump's penalty talks create unease in Indian textile industry
In what many see as a major escalation of trade tensions, US President Donald Trump on July 30 announced a sweeping 25 per cent tariff on all goods imported from India even as India's competitors, including Pakistan, Vietnam, Bangladesh and Turkiye, were levied lower tariffs of 15-20 per cent. The move has sparked concerns across sectors in India, especially after Trump also mentioned of an additional, unspecified penalty related to India's ongoing trade relations with Russia, specifically its purchases of crude oil. US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on all Indian imports. The move is compounded by Trump's warning of an unspecified penalty tied to India's ongoing trade relations with Russia, particularly its purchase of crude oil. The lack of clarity around the unspecified penalty has created unease in Indian business circles, especially among apparel exporters. While the announcement was made without detailing the nature of the additional penalty, industry leaders and policymakers are concerned over its ramifications and long-term implications. Reacting to the latest development, India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry issued an official response, as reported by various media outlets. The statement emphasised that the Indian Government is closely examining the implications of the US President's announcement. 'The Government is studying its implications. India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective,' the ministry reportedly underlined. The statement also reassured stakeholders that national interests would be protected. 'The Government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs. The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements, including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK,' the ministry reportedly added. Adding another dimension, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, just a day after Trump's tariff announcement, underlined Washington's dissatisfaction with India's continuing imports from Russia, as reported in certain sections of the media. 'India's purchase of oil from Russia is most certainly a point of irritation,' Rubio reportedly said speaking to a radio channel. Experts are thus viewing Trump's tariff imposition not just through the lens of protectionism, but as part of a broader geopolitical agenda. Some analysts believe the punitive measures reflect the US' discomfort with India's increasing strategic autonomy and its deepening economic engagement with Russia. Of particular concern to Indian exporters is the ambiguity surrounding the 'unspecified penalty' mentioned by Trump. The lack of clarity on this additional measure has created unease in the business circles. Sudhir Sekhri, chairman of the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) , reflected this sentiment, stating, 'The penalty is a grey area, and we hope the Government of India (GOI) will negotiate this with the US…' Echoing similar concerns, Rajeev Gupta, joint managing director of RSWM Ltd, earlier told Fibre2Fashion , 'Indian entrepreneurs and manufacturers are resilient, and we are confident that business momentum will be consistently rising with planned strategies. What remains crucial is clarity on the tariff position against China,' even as he added, 'A more pressing concern is the undefined penalty clause linked to India's ties with Russia, which adds a layer of uncertainty.' The timing of this development is critical, as both countries have been actively engaged in negotiations for a mutually beneficial trade agreement. India's recent efforts to diversify trade relationships, including the signing of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with the UK, many feel, signals a broader strategy to reduce dependence on any one market even as they added the US nonetheless remains one of India's largest trading partners, and any disruption in this relationship could have far-reaching implications for key export sectors such as textiles. 'The Free Trade Agreement with the UK opens up varied opportunities and is a welcoming move,' claimed an industry player interacting with Fibre2Fashion, who expressed apprehensions over the penalty ramifications if not sorted out soon. However, as things stand now, the Indian exporters seem to be adopting a cautious approach, a wait and watch policy to see how things unfold in the days to come as the steep duty imposed by US could hurt nearly half of India's exports, as per some estimates, adding to which is now the threat of additional penalty. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DR)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
Oil falls $2 a barrel on worries about Opec+ supply, US jobs data
Oil prices $2 a barrel on Friday because of jitters about a possible increase in production by Opec and its allies, while a weaker-than-expected US jobs report fed worries about demand. Brent crude futures settled at $69.67 a barrel, down $2.03, or 2.83 per cent. US West Texas Intermediate crude finished at $67.33 a barrel, down $1.93, or 2.79 per cent. Brent finished the week with a gain near 6 per cent, while WTI rose 6.29 per cent. Three people familiar with discussions among Opec members and allied producers said the group may reach an agreement as early as Sunday to boost production by 548,000 barrels per day in September. A fourth source familiar with Opec+ talks said discussions on volume were ongoing and the hike could be smaller. The US Labour Department said the country added 73,000 jobs in July, lower than economists had forecast, raising the national unemployment rate to 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent. "We can blame US President Donald Trump with the tariffs or we can blame the Federal Reserve for not raising interest rates," said Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group. "It looks like the Fed misjudged their decision on Wednesday." On Wednesday, the Fed voted to keep interest rates unchanged, drawing criticism from Trump and a chorus of Republican legislators. Oil traders have focused for much of the week on the potential impact of US tariffs, with tariff rates on US trading partners largely set to take effect from next Friday. Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing tariffs ranging from 10 per cent to 41 per cent on US imports from dozens of countries and foreign territories that failed to reach trade deals by his Aug. 1 deadline, including Canada, India and Taiwan. Partners that managed to secure trade agreements include the European Union, South Korea, Japan and Great Britain. "We think the resolution of trade deals to the satisfaction of the market - more or less, barring a few exceptions - has been the key driver for oil price bullishness in recent days," said Suvro Sarkar at DBS Bank. Prices were also supported this week by Trump's threats to impose 100 per cent secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers as he seeks to pressure Russia into halting its war in Ukraine. This has stoked concern over potential disruption to oil trade flows and the removal of some oil from the market. On Thursday, JP Morgan analysts said Trump's threatened penalties on China and India over their purchases of Russian oil potentially put 2.75 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian seaborne oil exports at risk. China and India are the world's second and third-largest crude consumers respectively. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Economic Times
a few seconds ago
- Economic Times
Secondary tariffs on Russian oil buyers: A new shockwave for global energy markets
Understanding Secondary Tariffs Global Oil Production and Consumption Landscape Live Events Potential Market Impact Geopolitical Ramifications (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel In a bold geopolitical move, US President Donald Trump has reiterated his intent to impose secondary tariffs on countries that continue purchasing oil from Russia. This move, aimed at pressuring Moscow into a ceasefire in Ukraine, could significantly disrupt global oil markets, intensify geopolitical tensions, and reshape energy tariffs are punitive measures not imposed directly on Russia, but against third-party nations that engage in trade with Russia—particularly in oil, gas, and uranium. The proposed tariffs could be as high as500%, targeting imports from countries that violate US sanctions. This strategy is designed to isolate Russia economically by deterring its trading partners, but it risks collateral damage across global supply of mid-2025, global oil production stands at approximately 101 million barrels per day (bpd), with consumption closely matching at 100.5 million bpd, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). The top producers include the United States (12.9 million bpd), Saudi Arabia (10.5 million bpd), and Russia (9.8 million bpd). Russia remains a critical supplier, especially to China, India, and parts of Eastern Europe, which have increased imports since the Ukraine war Russian oil flows were completely banned, replacing its supply would be extremely challenging for global markets as it contributes roughly 10% of global supply. Even in an optimistic scenario, the world could replace 5–6 million bpd, leaving a shortfall of 3–5 million secondary tariffs are enacted, they would likely lead to a sharp price increase, global inflation, energy rationing in vulnerable economies and accelerated investment in renewable energy and gas Russian oil indirectly through its buyers could reduce global supply, especially if major importers like India and China face pressure to cut back. This supply shock could push Asian Brent crude prices to exorbitant highs, raising worries over inflation dependent on Russian oil may scramble for alternatives, increasing demand for Middle Eastern and U.S. oil. This could strain existing production capacities and lead to regional energy shortages, particularly in Asia and Eastern the proposed tariffs are not just economic tools—they're geopolitical weapons. If President Trump enforces this tariff on China and India—two of Russia's largest energy customers—could face significant economic and strategic challenges. These tariffs would not only raise the cost of imports but also strain diplomatic ties with the US, forcing both countries to recalibrate their energy and trade in such a high tariff environment, China and India may adopt a multi-pronged strategic approach as a response to the US. Both countries could accelerate deals with Middle Eastern supplies and may find new suppliers from Africa and Latin America. China may boost Yuan based trade to bypass dollar-based sanctions. In addition, diplomatic measures, enhancing renewable investments and boosting domestic production may also expected Trump's proposed secondary tariffs represent a high-stakes gamble. While they aim to pressure Russia into peace talks, the global repercussions could be severe—fuelling inflation, disrupting energy markets, and reshaping geopolitical alliances. As the world watches, the decision could mark a turning point in both the Ukraine conflict and the future of global energy diplomacy.: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
