logo
China has stopped exporting rare earths to everyone, not just the U.S., cutting off critical materials for tech, autos, aerospace, and defense

China has stopped exporting rare earths to everyone, not just the U.S., cutting off critical materials for tech, autos, aerospace, and defense

Yahoo14-04-2025
After President Donald Trump unveiled his so-called reciprocal tariffs on 'Liberation Day,' China retaliated with its own duties and export controls on rare earth minerals, which are critical to the tech, auto, aerospace, and defense sectors. So far, those export controls have translated to a halt across the board, cutting off the U.S. and other countries, according to the New York Times.
China is exploiting a highly lopsided advantage it has in global trade as it hits back against President Donald Trump's tariffs: rare earths.
After Trump unveiled his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on April 2, China retaliated on April 4 with its own duties as well as export controls on several rare earth minerals and magnets made from them.
So far, those export controls have translated to a halt across the board, cutting off the U.S. and other countries, according to the New York Times.
That's because any exports of the minerals and magnets now require special licenses, but Beijing has yet to fully establish a system for issuing them, the report said.
In the meantime, shipments of rare earths have been halted at many ports, with customs officials blocking exports to any country, including to the U.S. as well as Japan and Germany, sources told the Times. China's Ministry of Commerce issued export restrictions alongside the General Administration of Customs, prohibiting Chinese businesses from any engagement with U.S. firms, especially defense contractors.
While the Trump administration unveiled tariff exemptions on a range of key tech imports late Friday night, China's magnet exports were still halted through the weekend, industry sources told the Times.
Beijing's export halt is notable because China has a stranglehold on global supplies of rare earths and magnets derived from them.
They also represent an asymmetric advantage in that rare earths constitute a small share of China's exports but have an outsize impact on trade partners like the U.S., which relies on them as critical inputs for the auto, chip, aerospace, and defense industries.
China's U.S. embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett addressed the situation on Monday, acknowledging concern and saying, 'Rare earths are a part of lots of the economy.'
'The rare earth limits are being studied very carefully, and they're concerning, and we're thinking about all the options right now,' he told reporters outside the White House.
China's export restrictions also put Trump's attempts to gain control of Greenland in a fresh light. The self-governing Danish island possesses one of the world's largest known rare earth deposits.
Vice President JD Vance visited Greenland earlier this month, despite repeated pushback from Denmark against U.S. rhetoric.
'We need Greenland for national security and even international security, and we're working with everybody involved to try and get it,' Trump said in an address to Congress last month.
Meanwhile, Trump has also been pursuing a deal with Ukraine to develop rare earth supplies. He said in February he wanted 'the equivalent of, like, $500 billion worth of rare earths.' Those talks are ongoing.
Last month, Trump signed an executive order that directed federal agencies to identify mines and government-owned land that could help increase rare earth production.
The Trump administration is also drafting another executive order to clear the way for stockpiling deep-sea metals to offset China's control of rare earth supply chains, sources told the Financial Times.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should You Buy the Post-Earnings Dip in Under Armour Stock?
Should You Buy the Post-Earnings Dip in Under Armour Stock?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Buy the Post-Earnings Dip in Under Armour Stock?

It has been a rocky season for sportswear makers caught in the ever-shifting tariff crossfire of President Donald Trump's administration. Under Armour (UAA) is taking some heavy hits. Back in April, the Maryland based firm, famed for its high-performance athletic gear, joined 75 other companies urging Washington to spare footwear from reciprocal tariffs, warning the hit would land squarely on consumers. Under Armour sources roughly 30% of its products from Vietnam and 15% from Indonesia, both of which are now facing steep U.S. levies. That exposure could mean millions of dollars in added costs this year alone. A year into its restructuring plan, sales remain soft, margins are under pressure, and demand has yet to rebound. Supply-chain snags and potential price hikes are adding more friction to Under Armour's recovery push. More News from Barchart Why This Cannabis Penny Stock Could Be Wall Street's Next Meme Trade Breakout Apple Stock Is Gaining Momentum, Is AAPL Stock a Buy? Peter Thiel-Backed Bullish Is About to IPO. Should You Buy BLSH Stock? Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Plus, last week's first-quarter earnings report only added to the pressure — shares sank in the high teens as management struck a cautious tone, warning that tariffs are expected to squeeze margins and slash profitability by roughly half in the current fiscal year. So, is this post-earnings selloff a golden buying opportunity, or a trap for bargain hunters? About Under Armour Stock Under Armour, founded in 1996, sprinted from a small idea to a global sportswear force, crafting gear built to make athletes better. From compression tees to loose-fit hoodies, running shoes to cleats, and gloves to backpacks, it blends innovation with style. Beyond apparel, it plays in footwear, accessories, and digital ventures, currently boasting a $2 billion market capitalization. Shares of the sports apparel maker have been getting hammered lately, hitting a low of $4.83 on Aug. 12 — just a hair above its 52-week low of $4.62 in April. Shares of Under Armour are down 23% for the past five days, leaving UAA stock 54% below its 52-week high of $10.62. Over the past 52 weeks, UAA stock has declined 37%. The RSI recently slid into oversold territory near 26, hinting at exhaustion, while volume exploded past 61 million shares on Aug. 8, a sign of heavy pressure that could either mark capitulation before a rebound or an indication that the bears still have the upper hand. Under Armour Dips After Its Q1 Earnings Report Last Friday, the athletic gear maker released its Q1 2026 earnings report — solid in some spots, shaky in others — and Wall Street sent UAA stock sliding over 18%. Revenue came in at $1.1 billion, down 4% year-over-year (YOY), but still a hair above Wall Street's expectations. North America, its biggest market, declined by 5% annually, while international revenue slipped 1%. Digging deeper, EMEA revenue rose 10%, Asia-Pacific sank 10% annually, and Latin America tumbled 15%. Meanwhile, wholesale revenue dropped 5% and direct-to-consumer sales slid 3%. Within that, owned stores sales inched up 1% but e-commerce sales cratered 12%, now just 31% of the DTC mix. By product category, apparel dipped by 1%, footwear plunged by 14%, and accessories climbed 8%. Margins weren't all bad news. Gross margin improved 70 basis points (bps) to 48.2%, helped by 'favorable foreign exchange, pricing, and product mix,' partially offset by channel mix issues and higher supply-chain costs. Meanwhile, adjusted EPS landed at $0.02, missing estimates, while adjusted operating income tripled to $24.4 million. The company's cash reserve is stronger now, with $911 million in cash and equivalents. For Under Armour's ongoing restructuring plan, announced in May 2024, restructuring and impairment charges totaled $71 million, with $39 million in other transformation costs in Q1. In total, the plan is expected to cost between $140 million and $160 million. The outlook for Q2 is where the headwinds stiffen. Management expects revenue to decline by 6% to 7%, with North America down in the low double digits, EMEA up in the high single digits, and Asia-Pacific dropping in the low teens. Tariffs are the main storm, set to cut gross margin by 340 bps to 360 bps through supply-chain disruptions and an unfavorable channel mix. However, some of that pain will be softened by foreign exchange and pricing benefits. Operating income is anticipated to be between a $10 million loss and breakeven, while adjusted operating income could land somewhere between $30 million and $40 million. Adjusted EPS is estimated to be between $0.01 and $0.02. Under Armour's road ahead is lined with headwinds, as both CEO Kevin Plank and CFO David Bergman acknowledged. Plank noted the sting of $100 million in new tariff costs and softer demand for fiscal 2026, warning profitability could drop to about half of last year's figure. Still, he framed it as just another headwind in the company's history of overcoming bigger storms, stressing that the mission — strengthening the brand, elevating prices through innovation, and winning with athletes — remains locked in. The CEO's confidence is matched by a clear playbook — premium products, sharper brand positioning, and a compelling price-to-value proposition. Bergman echoed the realism, projecting adjusted operating income to be roughly half of fiscal 2025 levels, with EPS further pressured by higher interest expenses and a steep jump in tax rate. Yet, the tone from the top stays steady, focused on brand power over short-term turbulence, determined to push the transformation forward. Analysts tracking the company anticipate fiscal 2026 EPS to fall 68% YOY to $0.10, before rising 140% annually to $0.24 in fiscal 2027. What Do Analysts Expect for Under Armour Stock? Analysts had plenty to say after Under Armour's Q1 results, and the mood was far from uniform. Evercore ISI trimmed its price target to $5 from $6, sticking with an 'Underperform' rating, and slashing forecasts. Q2 EPS expectations plunged to $0.02 from $0.24, and full-year 2026 dropped to $0.26 from $0.42. The concern is weak pricing power, not enough innovation to drive growth, tougher competition fighting for shelf space, and the looming hit from tariffs. Stifel analyst Jim Duffy played the optimist, reiterating a 'Buy' rating and $10 target. Q1 numbers came in roughly as expected, with revenue $2 million above their call and EPS just $0.01 light. Still, Q2 guidance was soft, $50 million below Stifel's revenue forecast and EPS off by $0.25 at the midpoint. The brokerage firm views EMEA as a bright spot but acknowledges North America's continued drag. Jefferies took a middle-of-the-road stance, lowering its target to $6 from $7 and maintaining a 'Hold.' Analysts noted that Q1 results were roughly in line, but the market balked at the steep Q2 guidance reset, especially the sharp drop in operating income. Analysts are cautious about UAA stock's potential. Among the 23 analysts covering the stock, the consensus rating is a 'Hold.' That's based on three analysts recommending a 'Strong Buy,' 17 staying on the sidelines with a 'Hold' rating, and the remaining three having a 'Strong Sell.' With shares sliding after earnings, UAA stock's mean price target of $5.80 hints at 19% rebound potential from where shares trade now. The Street-high target of $10 implies the stock could rally as much as 84%. On the date of publication, Sristi Suman Jayaswal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on

Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive
Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive

By Josh Kosman Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan may be a marked man in the White House and not just because his bank would not take President Trump's money, sources said. Trump on August 7 signed an executive order mandating banking regulators to investigate whether banks have discriminated against conservatives and certain industries. President Trump is targeting Brian Moynihan The President said August 5 on CNBC's Squawk Box that BofA and JPMorgan would not accept his deposits after his first term in office. But there may be more to the story. Trump sung the same tune Jan. 23 with Moynihan right next to him on a World Economic Forum stage. 'I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America,' the President said. 'I hope you're going to open your banks to conservatives, because what you're doing is wrong.' He was likely referring to when BofA stopped banking private prison company GEO Group, BofA insiders said. Photo by Ye Jinghan on Unsplash 'This is what Trump was pissed about,' a BofA source said. 'Trump needs GEO.' BofA in June 2019 was the last of the big banks to cut off future funding for private prison companies including GEO. 'They did not want to be the last bank standing,' a source with direct knowledge of the situation said. GEO now processes more than one-third of the people ICE detains, 20,000 beds, at 21 facilities, according to GEO. The firm also owns prisons and jails. But back in 2019 there was a big fight within the bank whether to stop doing more business with GEO after one of GEO's other big lenders JPMorgan in March 2019 said it would no longer fund private prisons. A GEO facility according to the company's website Wells Fargo was also pulling back. BofA Vice Chair Anne Finucane argued for staying the course and was very vocal about it, a source said, causing some at the bank to panic, the source said. There were meetings between top bank executives where what to do about lending to private prisons was fiercely debated. Ultimately, BofA's Global Head of ESG Andrew Plepler had the final word and BoA stopped future funding of private prisons, the BofA source said. 'The private sector is attempting to respond to public policy and government needs and demands in the absence of long standing and widely recognized reforms needed in criminal justice and immigration policies,' BofA said in a June 2019 statement to USA Today. 'Lacking further legal and policy clarity, and in recognition of the concerns of our employees and stakeholders in the communities we serve, it is our intention to exit these relationships.' Attorney General Pam Bondi used to work for lobbying firm Ballard Partners. GEO Group Chair George Zoley on June 26, 2019 commented publicly on BofA's decision to no longer extend financing to correctional and rehabilitation services providers. He said he expected there would be no impact on its $900 million revolving line of credit that did not mature until May 17, 2024. 'For over thirty years, we have provided high-quality services to the federal government under both Democrat and Republican administrations. To be clear, The GEO Group has never managed any facilities that house unaccompanied minors, nor have we ever managed border patrol holding facilities,' Zoley said at the time. GEO in 2020 sold shares of its common stock to raise money. ICE arrests a man from Guatemala, according to ICE website President Biden on January 26, 2021 issued an executive order to not renew contracts with for-profit prisons though it made an exception for immigration detention facilities. GEO Group's shares fell to below $6 a share. Under President Trump, with the ban lifted, the price roared to over $36 though it has now fallen to just over $21. Bank of America in Dec. 2023 changed its outright ban on banking private prison companies to a case-by-case assessment. CoreCivic, a GEO rival, now has a BofA deposit account, Semafor reported in June. People in today's Trump White House are likely fully aware of what transpired. Attorney General Pam Bondi was reportedly a GEO lobbyist, and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick's Cantor Fitzgerald during Biden's term helped GEO sell its shares, sources said and public filings show. Omeed Malik Former BofA Exec Omeed Malik was pushed out in 2018 for personal conduct in violation of firm standards before the GEO ban, and he too is close to the White House. Malik in 2018 filed a $100 million claim against BofA with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and reportedly settled later that year for more than $10 million. In 2022 he formed 1789 Capital to invest in anti-woke companies adding his very close friend Donald Trump Jr. as a partner. CorpGov does not know if Malik has said anything critical about BofA to The White House. Bank of America and Malik spokespeople declined comment. The White House, GEO Group, Anne Finucane and Andrew Plepler (neither of which is still at BofA) did not return calls. Read more from Josh Kosman at Contact: joshpkosman@ Never Miss our Weekly Highlights Click to follow us on LinkedIn The post Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive appeared first on CorpGov. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

I asked Truth Social AI to fact-check Trump
I asked Truth Social AI to fact-check Trump

USA Today

time15 minutes ago

  • USA Today

I asked Truth Social AI to fact-check Trump

This newsletter, Translating Politics, was created to help readers sift through Donald Trump's always chaotic and often deceitful rhetoric during his second term as president. Today, we have a little high-tech help for that task, thanks to a new AI chatbot that started operating last week on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. I used this tool, known as Truth Social AI, to fact-check posts Trump made this week on Truth Social. But first, let's ask our chatbot assistant if Trump has a history of lying. 'Yes,' Truth Social AI responded, 'Multiple major fact-checking organizations and news outlets have documented a sustained pattern of false or misleading public statements by Donald Trump over many years, including during campaigns, his presidency, and post-presidency.' Now let's turn to Trump's claims on Truth Social, where he posted on Aug. 11 that 'Tariffs are making our country strong and rich!!!' Truth Social AI didn't agree, telling me 'Broad tariffs do not make a country 'strong and rich' in the aggregate; they redistribute costs and benefits—raising revenue and protecting some industries while increasing prices, reducing real wages, and risking slower growth over time, according to economic analyses and recent data on the new U.S. tariffs.' Trump on Aug. 11 posted that he was 'nominating highly respected economist, Dr. E.J. Antoni, as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.' Antoni would replace the last BLS commissioner, who Trump fired on Aug. 1 for issuing an accurate report on job growth. Truth Social AI isn't as impressed with Antoni as Trump, calling him 'a partisan policy economist known for media commentary and work at the Heritage Foundation, but he is not widely recognized in academia as a highly cited or field‑leading economist.' Trump also posted on Aug. 11 that 'the murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogotá, Colombia,' while trying to justify his absurd mobilization of the National Guard to patrol in our nation's capital. Truth Social is working with Perplexity, an AI search engine, which has said Trump's website is a customer and has control over issues like which information sources get cited. Truth Social AI told me, based on available data, that Washington's murder rate would be lower than Bogotá's, not higher. The chatbot also knocked down Trump's false claim that crime is on the rise in Washington, noting that 'the Metropolitan Police Department is reporting a roughly 26% decrease in violent crime so far in 2025.' So for now, you can get accurate information from Truth Social, but not the website's largest stockholder. Read more from me and my colleagues:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store