logo
Stanley Fischer, economist who tackled global crises, dies at 81

Stanley Fischer, economist who tackled global crises, dies at 81

Boston Globe9 hours ago

After all, he was, in the words of The New York Times, 'the closest thing the world economy has to a battlefield medic.'
Dr. Fischer, who served as head of Israel's central bank and as vice chair of the Federal Reserve Board in addition to his IMF time crafting bailouts for stuttering economies from Thailand and Indonesia in Far Asia to Russia to Brazil, died May 31 in Lexington. He was 81.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The cause was complications of Alzheimer's disease, his son Michael told The New York Times.
Advertisement
For all the bold line entries on his CV, Dr. Fischer's influence perhaps was greatest in developing a generation of economists, policy makers, and deep thinkers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The roster of students he taught and advised included Ben S. Bernanke, who would go on to become Fed chair and called Dr. Fischer his mentor; Mario Draghi, a future European Central Bank president and prime minister of Italy; Greg Mankiw, who would lead President George W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers; Christina Romer, chair of the council in the Obama administration; Kazuo Ueda, named Bank of Japan governor in 2023; and IMF chief economists, including Olivier Blanchard, Ken Rogoff, and Maurice Obstfeld.
Advertisement
Countless other college undergraduates were introduced to the dismal science by 'Macroeconomics,' the textbook Dr. Fischer wrote in 1978 with his MIT colleague, Rudi Dornbusch.
'No one had more cumulative influence on the macroeconomic policy makers of the last generation than Stanley Fischer,' Lawrence Summers, who as a Harvard student would audit his classes, told Bloomberg News. 'All of us were shaped by his clarity of thought, intellectual balance, personal decency, and quality of character.
'People all over the world who never knew his name lived better, more secure lives because of all that he did through his teaching, writing, and service to make policy better,' said Summers, who served as Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton and president of Harvard University.
'In one lifetime, he did the work of many.'
With the Teton Mountains behind them, Ben Bernanke, then Federal Reserve chairman, chatted with Dr. Fischer outside of the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium in 2012.
Ted S. Warren/Associated Press
Dr. Fischer was known for his genial, consensus-seeking style. Yet his prescriptions at the IMF included austerity measures that hit heavily on the poor and working class in beleaguered nations.
'Look, I know we've become everyone's favorite whipping boy,' Dr. Fischer told the Times in 1998. 'But remember that in most cases governments call us in only after they discover they are in a mess, usually because they didn't do things they needed to do long ago. If the problems were easy to solve, they'd do it themselves.
'And it's our job to convince people to do things that we believe, and they probably know, are good for them. Even if those things are politically unpopular -- and they usually are.'
Advertisement
The cures Dr. Fischer pushed for financial crises were broadly in line with the Washington Consensus, a set of 'best practices' compiled in 1989 by John Williamson, a British economist. They were also dubbed the 'Massachusetts Avenue Consensus,' referencing the influence of its promulgators at MIT and Harvard.
Those guidelines called for openness to free markets, global trade, and foreign investment.
In a 2003 lecture on globalization, Dr. Fischer generally defended the IMF's approach by arguing that opening up to foreign trade and investment had lifted multitudes out of poverty in China and India.
In many ways, he was the intellectual heir to British economist John Maynard Keynes, whose calls for government intervention to steer the economy resonated from the 1930s through the 1960s but came under harsh attack in the 1970s.
Dr. Fischer's research in the 1970s focused on that split among economists. If unemployment was too high, the Keynesians argued, central banks could stimulate the economy by priming the money supply. Critics countered that such stimulus would prompt workers to expect higher inflation and demand pay increases; the result would be faster inflation and no sustainable rise in employment.
Dr. Fischer argued that wages were 'sticky' because of long-term contracts and didn't adjust immediately when a central bank changed its policy. Thus, he wrote in an influential 1977 paper, a well-timed stimulus program could boost job creation in the near term without igniting inflation.
'MIT economists tend to believe governments can do a variety of things well and can improve the situation versus a pure laissez-faire policy,' he told Institutional Investor in 1994.
Advertisement
In addition to serving as the No. 2 officer at the International Monetary Fund from 1994 to 2001, the head of Israel's central bank from 2005-13, and vice chair of the Fed from 2014-17, Dr. Fischer was chief economist of the World Bank in the late 1980s and vice chair of Citigroup in the early 2000s.
He was influential partly because of his diplomatic nature, Blanchard, one of his former students and later a colleague at MIT, wrote in 2023. Even when the field of macroeconomics 'was going through wars of religion, there was no sense of 'us versus them' but instead an openness to alternative views,' Blanchard wrote.
Dr. Fischer, then vice chair of the Federal Reserve, spoke with Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen during an open meeting in Washington in 2016.
Cliff Owen/Associated Press
Stanley Fischer was born into a Jewish family on Oct. 15, 1943, in Lusaka, Northern Rhodesia, then a British protectorate, which became Zambia after independence in 1964. He grew up partly in Mazabuka, a town southwest of Lusaka, where his parents operated a general store. His father, Philip Fischer, was an immigrant from Latvia. His mother, Ann (Kopelowitz) Fischer, was of Lithuanian descent. The family moved to Southern Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe, when Stanley was about 13.
He joined a Jewish youth group and in 1960 visited Israel as part of a program for young leaders.
At the London School of Economics, Dr. Fischer earned bachelor's and master's degrees in economics. For his doctoral studies, he moved to MIT, in part to study with one of his intellectual heroes, Paul Samuelson, who would earn the Nobel in economic science.
Dr. Fischer married Rhoda Keet in 1965. They had met as teenagers in a Jewish youth group. He left the Fed in 2017 partly to take care of his wife, who had Lewy body dementia. She died in 2020. In addition to his son Michael, Dr. Fischer leaves two other sons, David and Jonathan, and nine grandchildren.
Advertisement
After earning his doctorate at MIT in 1969, Dr. Fischer moved to the University of Chicago as a postdoctoral researcher and assistant professor. 'At MIT you did the mathematical work,' he told the Times in 1998, 'and at Chicago you asked the question of how this applies to the real world.'
His work in Chicago gave him a clearer understanding of that school's free-market theories and critique of Keynesian economics.
He returned to MIT in 1973 as an associate professor. Gradually, he became a magnet for graduate students.
'Stan had acquired near-guru status,' Blanchard said in an MIT statement.
Blanchard would recall how Dr. Fischer would help them with their work while they jogged alongside the Charles River.
'Fischer is rightly remembered as an unparalleled scholar, policy maker, and teacher. But it was his empathy, humanity, and thoughtfulness that stick with me,' said Obstfeld, one of those former students. 'He apparently kept all of his students' doctoral dissertations long after they graduated. When he moved from New York to Israel — surely with many better things to do — I received mine in the mail with this note from Stan: 'For the grandchildren.''
Michael J. Bailey of Globe staff contributed to this obituary. Material from The New York Times and Bloomberg News was also used.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stanley Fischer, economist who tackled global crises, dies at 81
Stanley Fischer, economist who tackled global crises, dies at 81

Boston Globe

time9 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Stanley Fischer, economist who tackled global crises, dies at 81

After all, he was, in the words of The New York Times, 'the closest thing the world economy has to a battlefield medic.' Dr. Fischer, who served as head of Israel's central bank and as vice chair of the Federal Reserve Board in addition to his IMF time crafting bailouts for stuttering economies from Thailand and Indonesia in Far Asia to Russia to Brazil, died May 31 in Lexington. He was 81. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The cause was complications of Alzheimer's disease, his son Michael told The New York Times. Advertisement For all the bold line entries on his CV, Dr. Fischer's influence perhaps was greatest in developing a generation of economists, policy makers, and deep thinkers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The roster of students he taught and advised included Ben S. Bernanke, who would go on to become Fed chair and called Dr. Fischer his mentor; Mario Draghi, a future European Central Bank president and prime minister of Italy; Greg Mankiw, who would lead President George W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers; Christina Romer, chair of the council in the Obama administration; Kazuo Ueda, named Bank of Japan governor in 2023; and IMF chief economists, including Olivier Blanchard, Ken Rogoff, and Maurice Obstfeld. Advertisement Countless other college undergraduates were introduced to the dismal science by 'Macroeconomics,' the textbook Dr. Fischer wrote in 1978 with his MIT colleague, Rudi Dornbusch. 'No one had more cumulative influence on the macroeconomic policy makers of the last generation than Stanley Fischer,' Lawrence Summers, who as a Harvard student would audit his classes, told Bloomberg News. 'All of us were shaped by his clarity of thought, intellectual balance, personal decency, and quality of character. 'People all over the world who never knew his name lived better, more secure lives because of all that he did through his teaching, writing, and service to make policy better,' said Summers, who served as Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton and president of Harvard University. 'In one lifetime, he did the work of many.' With the Teton Mountains behind them, Ben Bernanke, then Federal Reserve chairman, chatted with Dr. Fischer outside of the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium in 2012. Ted S. Warren/Associated Press Dr. Fischer was known for his genial, consensus-seeking style. Yet his prescriptions at the IMF included austerity measures that hit heavily on the poor and working class in beleaguered nations. 'Look, I know we've become everyone's favorite whipping boy,' Dr. Fischer told the Times in 1998. 'But remember that in most cases governments call us in only after they discover they are in a mess, usually because they didn't do things they needed to do long ago. If the problems were easy to solve, they'd do it themselves. 'And it's our job to convince people to do things that we believe, and they probably know, are good for them. Even if those things are politically unpopular -- and they usually are.' Advertisement The cures Dr. Fischer pushed for financial crises were broadly in line with the Washington Consensus, a set of 'best practices' compiled in 1989 by John Williamson, a British economist. They were also dubbed the 'Massachusetts Avenue Consensus,' referencing the influence of its promulgators at MIT and Harvard. Those guidelines called for openness to free markets, global trade, and foreign investment. In a 2003 lecture on globalization, Dr. Fischer generally defended the IMF's approach by arguing that opening up to foreign trade and investment had lifted multitudes out of poverty in China and India. In many ways, he was the intellectual heir to British economist John Maynard Keynes, whose calls for government intervention to steer the economy resonated from the 1930s through the 1960s but came under harsh attack in the 1970s. Dr. Fischer's research in the 1970s focused on that split among economists. If unemployment was too high, the Keynesians argued, central banks could stimulate the economy by priming the money supply. Critics countered that such stimulus would prompt workers to expect higher inflation and demand pay increases; the result would be faster inflation and no sustainable rise in employment. Dr. Fischer argued that wages were 'sticky' because of long-term contracts and didn't adjust immediately when a central bank changed its policy. Thus, he wrote in an influential 1977 paper, a well-timed stimulus program could boost job creation in the near term without igniting inflation. 'MIT economists tend to believe governments can do a variety of things well and can improve the situation versus a pure laissez-faire policy,' he told Institutional Investor in 1994. Advertisement In addition to serving as the No. 2 officer at the International Monetary Fund from 1994 to 2001, the head of Israel's central bank from 2005-13, and vice chair of the Fed from 2014-17, Dr. Fischer was chief economist of the World Bank in the late 1980s and vice chair of Citigroup in the early 2000s. He was influential partly because of his diplomatic nature, Blanchard, one of his former students and later a colleague at MIT, wrote in 2023. Even when the field of macroeconomics 'was going through wars of religion, there was no sense of 'us versus them' but instead an openness to alternative views,' Blanchard wrote. Dr. Fischer, then vice chair of the Federal Reserve, spoke with Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen during an open meeting in Washington in 2016. Cliff Owen/Associated Press Stanley Fischer was born into a Jewish family on Oct. 15, 1943, in Lusaka, Northern Rhodesia, then a British protectorate, which became Zambia after independence in 1964. He grew up partly in Mazabuka, a town southwest of Lusaka, where his parents operated a general store. His father, Philip Fischer, was an immigrant from Latvia. His mother, Ann (Kopelowitz) Fischer, was of Lithuanian descent. The family moved to Southern Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe, when Stanley was about 13. He joined a Jewish youth group and in 1960 visited Israel as part of a program for young leaders. At the London School of Economics, Dr. Fischer earned bachelor's and master's degrees in economics. For his doctoral studies, he moved to MIT, in part to study with one of his intellectual heroes, Paul Samuelson, who would earn the Nobel in economic science. Dr. Fischer married Rhoda Keet in 1965. They had met as teenagers in a Jewish youth group. He left the Fed in 2017 partly to take care of his wife, who had Lewy body dementia. She died in 2020. In addition to his son Michael, Dr. Fischer leaves two other sons, David and Jonathan, and nine grandchildren. Advertisement After earning his doctorate at MIT in 1969, Dr. Fischer moved to the University of Chicago as a postdoctoral researcher and assistant professor. 'At MIT you did the mathematical work,' he told the Times in 1998, 'and at Chicago you asked the question of how this applies to the real world.' His work in Chicago gave him a clearer understanding of that school's free-market theories and critique of Keynesian economics. He returned to MIT in 1973 as an associate professor. Gradually, he became a magnet for graduate students. 'Stan had acquired near-guru status,' Blanchard said in an MIT statement. Blanchard would recall how Dr. Fischer would help them with their work while they jogged alongside the Charles River. 'Fischer is rightly remembered as an unparalleled scholar, policy maker, and teacher. But it was his empathy, humanity, and thoughtfulness that stick with me,' said Obstfeld, one of those former students. 'He apparently kept all of his students' doctoral dissertations long after they graduated. When he moved from New York to Israel — surely with many better things to do — I received mine in the mail with this note from Stan: 'For the grandchildren.'' Michael J. Bailey of Globe staff contributed to this obituary. Material from The New York Times and Bloomberg News was also used.

Today's NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for June 8, #1450
Today's NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for June 8, #1450

CNET

timea day ago

  • CNET

Today's NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for June 8, #1450

Looking for the most recent Wordle answer? Click here for today's Wordle hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands puzzles. Today's Wordle puzzle isn't too tough, especially if your first guesses are heavy on vowels. If you need a new starter word, check out our list of which letters show up the most in English words. If you need hints and the answer, read on. Today's Wordle hints Before we show you today's Wordle answer, we'll give you some hints. If you don't want a spoiler, look away now. Wordle hint No. 1: Repeats Today's Wordle answer has one repeated letter. Wordle hint No. 2: Vowels There are two vowels in today's Wordle answer, but one is the repeated letter, so you'll see it twice. Wordle hint No. 3: First letter Today's Wordle answer begins with L. Wordle hint No. 4: Ending Today's Wordle answer ends with a vowel. Wordle hint No. 5: Meaning Today's Wordle answer refers to a contract where someone is given the right to use something for a specific time and payment. TODAY'S WORDLE ANSWER Today's Wordle answer is LEASE. Yesterday's Wordle answer Yesterday's Wordle answer, June 7, No. 1449 was REUSE. Recent Wordle answers June 3, No. 1445: ADMIN June 4, No. 1446: CEASE June 5, No. 1447: DATUM June 6, No. 1448: EDIFY

Veteran analyst says stock market rally not 'real' until this happens
Veteran analyst says stock market rally not 'real' until this happens

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Veteran analyst says stock market rally not 'real' until this happens

Veteran analyst says stock market rally not 'real' until this happens originally appeared on TheStreet. Investors are feeling good about the stock market's rally from April lows created after the bottom fell out when tariff plans were first announced. Yet as investor emotions show a little more positivity, they are also more vulnerable to the idea that the rebound is nothing more than a bear-market rally, a brief bounce that could go away when the headlines change. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index – which entered the year just under 5,900 -- set a record close at 6,144.15 on February 19 as it reacted to the release of minutes from the Federal Reserve Board's late-January index—the most common proxy for 'the stock market'—had fallen from that level by the time President Trump announced his tariff plans on April 2. This sent the index reeling toward bear-market territory, nearly down 20% from its peak. As tariff plans changed and morphed and were delayed, the market rebounded, recapturing its loss on the year by the middle of May. Since then, however, the stock market has failed to break through to new record levels, and a long-time technical analyst, Willie Delwiche, says stocks will stay stuck in a volatile range—and potentially re-test lows—unless we see a crucial signal that the rally will be lasting. Willie Delwiche runs Hi Mount Research. He is a business professor at Wisconsin Lutheran College and spent more than two decades as an investment strategist at Baird. He has seen rapid rebounds before, and he says they are meaningless without follow-through. In a market with limited bandwidth, investors are caught in the middle of their range of latest AAII Sentiment Survey, released June 4, showed that neutral sentiment – an expectation that stock prices will remain largely unchanged over the next six months – was up this week, to nearly 26%. While bearish sentiment leads the way with more than 40% of investors, the negative and flat sentiment shows investors don't trust the rally wholeheartedly. 'We have seen instances in the past where we've had big drawdowns, then huge rallies that failed just shy of new highs, that then cascade lower months later,' Delwiche said in an interview on 'Money Life with Chuck Jaffe.' 'So, breaking out to new highs would be the best sign of strength in the market. 'New highs are the most bullish thing that stocks can do,' he added. 'And if we see that, it confirms that we are still in a bull market, not just some sort of very protracted, very exaggerated bear-market bounce.' Delwiche says that the market is currently stuck in a wide and volatile range, below the previous peak of nearly 6,200 on the S&P 500, but above its 200-day (long-term) moving average of roughly 5,800. He warned that a breakout to the downside could quickly send the market back to the April lows, particularly if the market takes it as a sign that the rally is over. One positive sign Delwiche points to is the strength of international markets, which hints that the current rally is broader and not entirely based on the Magnificent Seven stocks, the largest of the U.S. giants. Delwiche pointed to data showing that 55% of global markets finished May at new highs, but the United States was not among them. He said that more international markets are making new highs than there are single industry groups of domestic companies trading at peak levels. 'While we talk a lot about what the US is doing, we're also seeing international leadership, international strength, which is something that most investors -- if you look back over the past 10 years -- haven't seen much of at all,' Delwiche said. 'That's encouraging on two fronts. We see global leadership, and then we also see broad participation within the U.S.' Delwiche has plenty of positives to point to based on both technical and fundamental analysis. He noted that the picture is hyper-dependent right now on the risks of the daily news cycle. 'The market is hostage to headlines right now, unlike any point I can remember in my career,' said Delwiche, whose interview aired on the June 6 edition of Money Life. More Experts Fed official sends strong message about interest-rate cuts Billionaire fund manager sends surprising message on trade deficit Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming Greece 'Not that the rest of the world is all unicorns and roses or whatever, but everyone is crowded into the U.S.,' Delwiche said. 'If something has changed in the US from a political perspective or from a news perspective, I think at the margin that makes investors a little less complacent to stick around in the U.S.,' making the market more volatile and sensitive to news. One possible play with the market in a trading range would be gold, which is up nearly 30% in 2025. Delwiche said that, unlike commodities, which have not performed well, gold has not yet exhausted its upside potential. 'If there was a time that you would be interested in gold, this would be the time to have gold in your portfolio. is an absolute uptrend and it is trending higher relative to US stocks. Commodities overall are not holding up well. Gold specifically is and There are periods where you want to have gold and there are periods where you don't want to have gold,' Delwiche said. 'If ever there was a time when you should be interested in gold, this would be it.'Veteran analyst says stock market rally not 'real' until this happens first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store