CJI to deliver lecture on Constitution at OU
Justice Gavai will speak on the crucial theme, "Constitution of India: The Contribution of Dr B R Ambedkar," at 3:30 PM in the Tagore Auditorium. This highly anticipated event marks a significant moment for Osmania University, offering an unparalleled opportunity for the academic community and the public to engage deeply with the visionary legacy of Dr B R Ambedkar and the foundational principles of the Indian Constitution.
Prof Kumar Molugaram, Vice-Chancellor of Osmania University, on behalf of the Executive Council, faculty, staff, and students, expressed immense pride and extended a heartfelt invitation to all stakeholders to witness this momentous occasion. 'We are incredibly privileged to host the Chief Justice of India,' stated Prof Kumar Molugaram. 'His address will undoubtedly be a profound source of inspiration for faculty, non-teaching staff, scholars, legal professionals, and students, reinforcing the enduring values enshrined in our Constitution.'
On Tuesday, the Vice-Chancellor of Osmania University (OU) met with Chief Justice of the Telangana High Court, Justice Sujay Pal, and extended an invitation for him to attend an upcoming event as the guest of honour. During their meeting, the Vice-Chancellor explained the details of the event. Justice Sujay Pal responded positively to the invitation, confirming his attendance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Electoral Rolls Can't Remain Static": Top Court On Bihar SIR Row
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said electoral rolls cannot "remain static" and were bound to be revised as it disagreed with the submission that special intensive revision (SIR) of voter list in poll-bound Bihar had no basis in law and ought to be quashed. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi was informed by NGO Association of Democratic Reforms that the exercise should not be allowed to be carried out pan-India. Aside from the NGO, leaders of opposition parties including Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Congress have challenged the electoral roll revision drive of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in Bihar. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the NGO, said the ECI notification on SIR ought to be set aside for want of legal basis and never being contemplated in law. He, therefore, contended it couldn't be allowed to go on. The ECI can never conduct such an exercise since inception and it is being done for the first time in history and if allowed to happen only God knows where it will end, he added. "By that logic special intensive revision can never be done. One-time exercise which is done is only for the original electoral roll. To our mind, the electoral roll can never be static," the bench noted. "There is bound to be revision," the top court said, "otherwise, how will the poll panel delete the names of those who are dead, migrated or shifted to other constituencies?" The bench went on to tell Sankaranarayanan that the ECI had residual power to conduct such an exercise as it deemed fit. It referred to Section 21(3) of the Representation of the Peoples Act (RP Act), which says "the Election Commission may at any time, for reasons to be recorded, direct a special revision of the electoral roll for any constituency or part of a constituency in such manner as it may think fit." Justice Bagchi further asked Sankaranarayanan, "When the primary legislation says 'in such manner as deemed fit' but the subordinate legislation does not... will it not give a residual discretion to ECI to dovetail the procedure not completely in ignorance of rules but some more additives than what the rules prescribe to deal with the peculiar requirement of a special revision?" Sankaranarayanan submitted that the provision only allowed revision of the electoral roll for "any constituency" or "for part of a constituency" and the ECI couldn't wipeout the rolls of an entire state for fresh inclusion. "Actually, it is a battle between a constitutional right and a constitutional power," Justice Bagchi said. The residuary power of the ECI flows from Article 324 of the Constitution and the RP Act mentions both summary revision and special revision and the ECI in the instant case has only added the word "intensive", that all, the judge noted. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, also appearing for the NGO, alleged the ECI played "mischief" and removed the search feature from the draft roll and the list of 65 lakh people whose names were deleted for being dead, migrated or shifted to other constituencies. "This happened just a day after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi did a press conference pointing out over lakh people as fake voters," he added, arguing an ordinary person was denied the right to search their name on the draft roll whether dead or alive or migrated to another place. Justice Kant said he was unaware of any such press conference but when it comes to the Registration of Electors Rule of 1960, Section 10 mandates the election commission to publish a copy of the draft roll at the office in the constituency. "They have to publish the draft roll at the office in the constituency. That's a minimum threshold under the law. However, we would have liked it if it was published on the website for wider publicity," Justice Bagchi said. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the ECI, said the petitioners claimed the rural population of Bihar was not tech savvy and now they were talking about the inability of the same people in searching online. During the hearing, the bench also told senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for petitioners, that the 11 documents required to be submitted by an elector for Bihar's SIR as opposed to seven documents in summary revision conducted previously showed the exercise was "voter friendly". It said despite petitioners' arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar was exclusionary, it appeared the large number of documents was "actually inclusionary". "The number of documents in summary revision conducted earlier in the state was seven and in SIR it is 11, which shows it is voter friendly. We understand your arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar is exclusionary but a high number of documents is actually inclusionary," the bench said. The hearing will continue on Thursday. On August 12, the top court said inclusion and exclusion of citizens or non-citizens from the electoral rolls was within the remit of the Election Commission and backed its stand to not accept Aadhaar and voter cards as conclusive proof of citizenship in the SIR of voters' list in Bihar.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
DMRC gets HC's notice over sanitary pad machines
New Delhi: Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought a response from Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) on a plea alleging that sanitary pad vending machines at metro stations across the capital are either faulty or non-functional, causing inconvenience to women commuters. Hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Nikhil Goyal, a bench of chief justice D K Upadhyaya and justice Tushar Rao Gedela issued notices to DMRC, Delhi govt, and other concerned authorities. The court gave DMRC two weeks to respond and directed it to provide details on the number of vending machines and disposal units installed across metro stations — and how many of them are currently operational. While expressing confidence in the DMRC's overall work, the bench emphasised the need to address the issue of menstrual hygiene infrastructure in public transport. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi The plea urged the court to direct authorities to ensure the immediate installation and proper functioning of sanitary pad vending machines and disposal facilities in all women's toilets at Delhi Metro stations. Highlighting that lakhs of women rely on the metro for daily commuting, the PIL argued that their health, dignity, and fundamental rights are compromised due to the inadequate availability of menstrual hygiene facilities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dementia Has Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It? Memory Health Click Here Undo It claimed that despite the scale of female ridership, only a small number of women's toilets at metro stations are equipped with sanitary pad vending machines. "The state's obligation to ensure menstrual hygiene cannot be diluted by offering partial measures. The right to sanitation is recognised as a fundamental human right both internationally and under the Indian Constitution," the petition said. It added that merely recognising sanitation as a right is ineffective unless supported by accessible infrastructure and inclusive policies. The petition also called for a comprehensive menstrual hygiene policy for public transport systems, along with establishment of a grievance redressal mechanism for menstrual health-related issues within Delhi Metro system. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Maharashtra govt not interested in deciding who eats what: CM Fadnavis
MUMBAI: On a day the Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation reiterated it would not withdraw its order to shut slaughterhouses and meat shops on Aug 15, more corporations - Kolhapur, Ichalkaranji, Nashik and Jalgaon - issued similar directives. Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis said the decision was not taken by the Mahayuti govt but by an earlier govt in 1988 and that everyone was free to eat what they wanted. "The state govt is not interested in deciding who eats what. We have lots of issues before us," he said when asked about opposition to the Independence Day slaughter ban. Protests have grown, with Dy CM Ajit Pawar also saying it wasn't right. Fadnavis said a govt resolution on slaughter bans on certain days was issued in 1988 and had been in force since. "Even I did not know about it till I read about it in the media," he said, calling the issue overblown. He said municipal corporations told him they take this decision every year, including when Uddhav Thackeray was CM. Referring to a remark by Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut that the CM was making Maharashtra "impotent" with such a ban, Fadnavis said without naming him, "Some people have started calling those eating vegetarian food impotent. This foolishness must stop. Each one can eat what he wants. Our Constitution has given the right to everyone to live. " BJP chief spokesperson Keshav Upadhye said the policy was first implemented when Sharad Pawar was the CM, and asked if the opposition would question him.
