logo
After the Spike by Dean Spears and Michael Geruso review – the truth about population

After the Spike by Dean Spears and Michael Geruso review – the truth about population

The Guardian2 days ago
As a member of the 8.23 billion-strong human community, you probably have an opinion on the fact that the global population is set to hit a record high of 10 billion within the next few decades. Chances are, you're not thrilled about it, given that anthropogenic climate change is already battering us and your morning commute is like being in a hot, jiggling sardine-tin.
Yet according to Dean Spears and Michael Geruso, academics at the University of Texas, what we really need to be worried about is depopulation. The number of children being born has been declining worldwide for a couple of hundred years. More than half of countries, including India, the most populous nation in the world, now have birthrates below replacement levels. While overall population has been rising due to declining (mainly infant) mortality, we'll hit a peak soon before falling precipitously. This apex and the rollercoaster drop that follows it is the eponymous 'spike'.
Most people's lives today are better than they ever were in human history, thanks to the progress, prosperity and brilliant ideas that have come with all those people. The more of us there are, the more human ingenuity there is – 'the ultimate renewable resource'. Spears and Geruso argue that future people who live alongside only a couple of billion others will have significantly worse lives than we have today. Stabilisation, not depopulation, they argue, is the right path for humanity. For that to happen, we need to be having more babies.
After the Spike knocks down assumptions like skittles. Population fearmongers from Malthus to Paul Ehrlich are refuted, and evidence laid out to show what worldwide fertility is not linked to: changes in wealth, the invention of contraception or women's rights. Nor can government policies that force people to have, or not have, children do much to change long-term trends. This is as true for China's one-child policy as it is for Ceaușescu's banning of abortion in Romania, which only had short-term effects. Even when non-coercive governments support parents with childcare and comparatively generous parental leave, as in Sweden, these policies have not shifted the needle. Sweden will start to shrink in 2051.
The strongest commonsense belief the authors tackle is the idea that lower birthrates are a good thing because the planet is burning and more people means worse climate change. In fact, climate change is such an urgent issue that depopulation will kick in far too late to make any serious impact. Not only that, but the difference between the contribution to climate change made by the current population versus the population at the top of the spike is not significant. Depopulation won't help the climate, then, but it will mean that there are far fewer of us left to deal with part two of cleaning up humanity's mess on Earth: removing excess greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Creating a good life – whether that's finding cures for disease or ways to reverse environmental damage – relies on the ideas, work and progress produced by large, interconnected societies.
Why, then, are we increasingly choosing to have fewer children? The answer is likely to be a combination of cultural, biological, economic and social factors, but the best unifying theory in After the Spike is to be found in a satirical headline from the Onion: 'Study Finds American Women Delaying Motherhood Because the Whole Thing Blows'. As life on Earth has come to offer more and more rich and interesting options for how to spend our time, the opportunity cost of parenting has become increasingly less attractive. There are now more ways to make a meaningful life with fewer or no kids, even if you did want them, as gen Z is well aware.
If we agree that we ought to make life good for our descendants, and that this means supporting a stable, sizeable human population, how can we achieve this? The solution proposed by Spears and Geruso is no less than a total restructuring of society around care, in which parenting is so well supported socially, culturally, economically and medically that it is seen as a joy, not a relentless struggle. Were this to have been my reality a decade ago, I might have had the football team of tumbling, laughing babies I sometimes feel a pang for. Whether humanity can achieve anything like it in time to avert depopulation seems doubtful, but if there's one thing After the Spike leaves us with, it's the impulse to back ourselves.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
After the Spike: The Risks of Global Depopulation and the Case for People by Dean Spears and Michael Geruso is published by Bodley Head (£20). To order a copy go to guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shark depredation bill passed by Senate Committee
Shark depredation bill passed by Senate Committee

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Shark depredation bill passed by Senate Committee

A US Senate committee has passed the SHARKED Act, a bill aimed at addressing shark depredation, which involves sharks removing hooked fish from fishing lines. The act establishes a task force to study shark behavior, improve coordination among fisheries management and research communities, and develop strategies to tackle depredation. Wildlife advocacy groups express concern that the bill does not explicitly prohibit the task force from recommending shark culls or population reductions, despite global shark populations declining significantly due to overfishing, climate change, and pollution. Critics also highlight that the task force's specified representation fails to include Indigenous, tribal, and native people, who consider sharks sacred. The task force is mandated to report its findings to Congress within two years of the bill's enactment, with experts noting that depredation is a complex issue reflecting ocean ecosystem health and increased competition for resources.

Trump accused of 'selling out' to Big Tech with bold plan for a 'new private health tracking system' sparking data leak worries
Trump accused of 'selling out' to Big Tech with bold plan for a 'new private health tracking system' sparking data leak worries

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump accused of 'selling out' to Big Tech with bold plan for a 'new private health tracking system' sparking data leak worries

President Donald Trump is being criticized for a plan that would have Americans share their personal health data with private tech companies. In the East Room on Wednesday, Trump hosted a 'Making Health Technology Great Again' event that unveiled the proposal. The Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services is securing commitments from top tech companies including Amazon, Apple, Google and OpenAI to start building a 'digital health ecosystem.' The goal would be that Americans could upload their health records to an app that could be easily shared across doctors' offices. 'For decades America's healthcare networks have been overdue for a high tech upgrade - and that's what we're doing,' the president told the crowd. 'The existing systems are often slow, costly and incompatible with one another. But with today's announcement, we take a major step to bring healthcare into the digital age.' Trump said this public-private partnership would move the country away from 'clipboards and fax machines into a new era of convenience, profitability and speed and, frankly, better health for people.' Online, Americans were skeptical of the plan, voicing concern that the president was selling out to 'big tech.' 'More corruption and selling America out to big tech,' one X user posted. Others feared a massive data breach. 'I can see the headlines now, Millions of users have personal health data leaked,' another said. Lawrence Gostin, a Georgetown University law professor who specializes in public health told the Associated Press, 'There are enormous ethical and legal concerns.' 'Patients across America should be very worried that their medical records are going to be used in ways that harm them and their families,' Gostin said. Officials at CMS argued that users would have to opt-in to use these services. Helping sell the plan is Amy Gleason, an adviser to CMS and the Department of Health and Human Services, who's the acting administrator of the Department of Government Efficiency. Gleason made headlines in March when it was revealed that she, not Elon Musk, was technically in charge of the Trump administration's DOGE efforts. She starred in a CMS promotional video about the effort - and appeared on a panel alongside Trump, CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Wednesday afternoon. Gleason spoke about her daughter Morgan who suffers from a rare disease. She recalled how she carried a 'binder of paper records' to every doctor's appointment. 'And I truly believe that if one of those doctors had been able to see her whole history, they would have diagnosed her faster,' Gleason said. She added that if her daughter had access to today's AI tools, a diagnosis may have come quicker as well. 'Today Morgan takes 21 pills a day, gets two infusions a month and has over 40 patient portals,' Gleason said. 'Her disease is very rare, but her experience is very common.' Gleason then asked the audience to envision what healthcare could look like with this big tech-government partnership. 'So Morgan, in six months from now, might show up to her doctor's appointment,' she said. 'Instead of filling out a clipboard with her 21 medications, 12 doctors and her entire medical history, she can just pull out her phone and tap or scan a QR code and seamlessly transfer her digital insurance card, her verified medical record and a digital summary that can help her provider get up to speed faster.' 'We call this "kill the clipboard" as President Trump said,' Gleason said.

Ice entices new recruits with patriotism pitch and pledge of $50,000 signing bonuses
Ice entices new recruits with patriotism pitch and pledge of $50,000 signing bonuses

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Ice entices new recruits with patriotism pitch and pledge of $50,000 signing bonuses

The agency responsible for carrying out Donald Trump's mass deportations is launching a recruiting campaign to entice 'brave and heroic Americans' to serve as new deportation officers, lawyers and investigators as the government gears up for a major expansion of immigration enforcement thanks to a recent infusion of money from Congress. The icing on the cake: a promise of up to $50,000 in signing bonuses. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement campaign, which rolled out late Tuesday, recalls recruiting posters from the second world war with images of Uncle Sam and the words 'AMERICA NEEDS YOU.' There also are photos of the US president and top homeland security officials with the words 'DEFEND THE HOMELAND' across the images. 'Your country is calling you to serve at ICE,' said homeland security secretary Kristi Noem in a news release. 'This is a defining moment in our nation's history. Your skills, your experience, and your courage have never been more essential. Together, we must defend the homeland.' In addition to appealing to prospective applicants' patriotic fervor, homeland security is making a pocketbook pitch. The agency is promising up to $50,000 in signing bonuses, the potential for lots of overtime for deportation officers and other benefits such as loan repayment or forgiveness options. All of this is made possible by a big infusion of money to Ice. The package of tax breaks and spending cuts that Trump signed into law this month includes about $170bn for border security and immigration enforcement, spread out over five years. Ice is set to get $76.5bn, nearly 10 times its current annual budget. About $45bn will go toward increasing detention capacity. Nearly $30bn is for hiring 10,000 more staff so the agency can meet its goal of 1m annual deportations. New hires include deportation officers responsible for tracking down, arresting and removing people who the administration determines no longer have the right to remain in the United States. Under the Republican president, those officers are high-profile roles – making arrests at immigration courts, in the streets and at businesses. They often are criticized by immigration activists and Democratic lawmakers for wearing masks while carrying out their duties. On the recruitment webpage, the link to learn more about applying to be a deportation officer shows a photo of an armored vehicle rolling down a street with officers in military gear hanging onto the sides of the vehicle. The government is also seeking criminal investigators and lawyers who will prosecute immigration cases. The agency said it will advertise at college campuses, job fairs and law enforcement networks starting this week. But the recruiting drive has raised concerns about what happens if the agency grows too fast. Ice staffing has long been an issue, said Jason Houser, a former agency chief of staff during the Biden administration. At the beginning of the Trump administration there were roughly 6,000 officers within Ice tasked with monitoring noncitizens in the country, then finding and removing those not eligible to stay. Those staffing numbers remained largely static over the years even as the caseload ballooned. During the Biden administration, when the number of people arriving at the US-Mexico border skyrocketed, Ice workers were often pulled from their regular duties to go to the border. 'Ice does need more employees to handle the volume of what they're handling,' Houser said. But he is concerned about whether the rush to increase staffing could mean lower standards for recruits and training. The border patrol's rapid expansion during the early 2000s serves as a cautionary tale. To meet hiring goals, training and hiring standards were changed. Arrests for employee misconduct rose. 'If they start waiving requirements there like they did for border patrol, you're going have an exponential increase in officers that are shown the door after three years because there's some issue,' he said. At the same time, Houser noted the Department of Homeland Security has dismantled some of the key agencies that have provided some level of oversight over Ice and other DHS arms. Houser estimated it would take three to four years to actually hire and train that number of new Ice staffers. In the meantime, he worries that Ice will rely on private contractors, national guard troops and other federal law enforcement officers to meet the administration's goal of 3,000 arrests a day. Chuck Wexler is the executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, which studies policing issues. He said police departments across the country have struggled to maintain staffing since the pandemic and the fallout from the death of George Floyd, and are often offering hiring bonuses as a result. He's seen bonus offers ranging from $10,000 to as much as $60,000 or $70,000 for departments on the west coast. But he said the $50,000 topline bonus that DHS is offering is definitely on the high end, and homeland security's hiring spree could end up having repercussions on police departments across the country if their officers try to get hired by Ice. 'The environment for hiring law enforcement has never been more competitive,' he said. 'This could conceivably impact state and local agencies. You could have someone leaving a police department to get a $50,000 signing bonus with DHS.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store