Trump's CFTC Pick Troubles Tribes With Prediction Market Plans
Tribal groups are concerned Kalshi, Robinhood and Crypto.com pose an existential economic threat to them through sports prediction markets—and on Tuesday, it became even more clear the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) isn't coming to their rescue.
CFTC chairman nominee Brian Quintenz made his pro-market stance apparent while speaking in front of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry at a Tuesday confirmation hearing. Quintenz told senators the CFTC has a 'very clear' mandate to permit the sports event futures contracts that financial technology companies have offered nationwide since the start of the year, despite state and tribal objections.
More from Sportico.com
Yasiel Puig Sports Betting Guilty Plea Overturned by Federal Court
Robinhood's Sports Prediction Markets Are a Hook for Wider Play
ESPN Bet Faces Make-or-Break Year for $2 Billion Disney-Penn Deal
Unless Congress steps in with a new law, Quintenz said, 'I need to abide by the Commodity Exchange Act.'
The CFTC's exclusive regulatory authority for sports event contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act is being challenged in court by multiple states; those states, like many tribal groups, call the markets an illegal sports betting equivalent that circumvents state taxes and other regulations. While no tribal group has filed a related lawsuit to date, more than a dozen have petitioned the CFTC to shut down sports prediction markets in their regions.
Quintenz, a Kalshi board member, suggested unhappy tribal groups could compete with the new sports prediction markets by launching their own. But gaming exclusivity is the very right tribes are desperate to preserve in states where sportsbook operators such as DraftKings and FanDuel are banned.
'Nothing in the CEA that I'm aware of prohibits or affects the opportunity of tribes to offer those [prediction market products],' Quintenz said in response to a question from Democrat Sen. Adam Schiff of California.
President Donald Trump's agency pick said he would 'listen to the concerns of the tribes' raised by Schiff and reschedule a public roundtable discussion canceled without explanation in April by acting chair Caroline Pham. He said he did not have any information about why the original discussion was nixed.
'We respect Tribal Nations and their inherent sovereignty,' a Kalshi spokesperson wrote in an email after Quintenz's hearing. 'The Commodity Exchange Act does not restrict Tribes from engaging in gaming activities on their reservations or within the states where they operate, consistent with applicable laws. We have had productive conversations with several Tribes and are hopeful to build collaborative partnerships in the future.'
Amid conflict-of-interest concerns given his Kalshi ties, Quintenz wrote in a pre-hearing letter to the CFTC that he would step down from the company's board and divest stock upon being confirmed to lead the federal agency. He said he would recuse himself from matters involving Kalshi.
In Tuesday's hearing, Quintenz told U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) that the CFTC would appoint a 'screener' in his office 'to make sure no matter inappropriately comes before me.'
The current makeup of the CFTC strains the logic of his proposed strategy. If confirmed by the Senate, Quintenz would be the only commissioner at the CFTC, with the four other slots unfilled after a spate of resignations and retirements. It is unclear, then, who else right now could regulate the rise of Kalshi and similar companies that offer sports event futures.
Departing commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero, a Democrat, last month called the pending one-person CFTC leadership structure 'a disservice to regulation.' But Quintenz said several times in his hearing that he would not explicitly urge the president to nominate candidates from both political parties to be CFTC commissioners in accordance with agency rules—or ask that empty agency spots be filled at all.
'I don't tell the president what to do,' Quintenz said to U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.).
Interim CFTC chair Pham has not taken a vocal stance on sports prediction markets since being named to the post in January. The agency has been hands-off toward Kalshi and other exchanges—a full turn from how things went during Joe Biden's presidency when the agency fought Kalshi in court over its election contracts. It dropped an appeal in the Kalshi election contract case after Pham took over for Biden-era CFTC chair Rostin Behnam.
Quintenz has long argued that sports event contracts are a legitimate financial hedging tool that provide an opportunity for 'risk management, price discovery and price dissemination.' His claims date back to his stint as a CFTC commissioner from 2017-2021. During Tuesday's hearing, Quintenz repeated many of his talking points from a 2021 speech to the Federalist Society in which he said the CFTC has no right to inhibit sports prediction markets under the Commodity Exchange Act.
The U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry will vote on whether to recommend Quintenz for full Senate approval. Then, the Senate will hold a final vote on Quintenz's nomination.
Best of Sportico.com
Most Expensive Sports Memorabilia and Collectibles in History
The 100 Most Valuable Sports Teams in the World
NFL Private Equity Ownership Rules: PE Can Now Own Stakes in Teams
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Noem Says Padilla's Approach Wasn't Appropriate
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem talks about US Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat from California, being forcibly removed from her press conference. "I think everybody in America would agree that that wasn't appropriate, that if you wanted to have a civil discussion, especially as a leader, a public official, that you would reach out and try to have a conversation," she told reporters. Padilla says he was not arrested and was only trying to ask a question.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Mannion defends house floor outburst as act of patriotism: ‘I have to stop the rise of authoritarian government'
WASHINGTON, D.C. (WSYR-TV) — Congressman John Mannion is defending his vulgar outburst towards a fellow congressman on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives as an act of patriotism. Over a televised feed of the House vote, shouting can be heard in a distant part of the room. It's Representative Mannion saying, in part: 'get over there and get some f**king balls. Tell them. Tell them. You know who I am.' The comments were directed at Republican Congressman Mike Lawler, also of New York. Mannion's office said the congressman was already fired up about Senator Alex Padilla being removed from a press briefing hosted by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The tension continued into a Democrat-hosted press conference outside the house floor, which then spilled onto the house floor when the argument began the congressman began. Lawler posted a response, also profane, to his campaign's social media: 'John Mannion was entirely unhinged and unprofessional. That was a shameful display that exposed his complete lack of temperament. No wonder numerous staffers have previously alleged a toxic work environment. He should go seek help for anger management — and f**k off.' Mannion's office responded to NewsChannel 9's request for comment. Statement from Representative John Mannion: I'm a kid from Tipp Hill that's fighting for my hometown and my country. I'm giving everything I have to stop the rise of authoritarian government and the destruction of American democracy. If making some noise on the house floor and calling out Trump enablers draws attention to what's happening to our country right before our eyes – good. Today it's roughing up and handcuffing a United States Senator and a politicized military patrolling the streets of American cities. It's the willing abandonment of the rule of law and a gross fealty to a want-to-be dictator who is tearing the country apart. None of this is normal or okay. I'm always going to stand up and speak out and fight for the people of this country. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses
'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses Show Caption Hide Caption Three Democratic governors testify in House hearing over immigration New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, testify on Capitol Hill over immigration policies. NEW YORK − The Trump administration on June 12 sued New York state for its law restricting federal immigration enforcement inside state courthouses. The lawsuit challenges a New York state law that blocks immigration officials from arresting people at or near New York courthouses. The complaint, filed in federal court in Albany, New York, alleges the law frustrates federal immigration enforcement at a venue - state courthouses - where authorities can safely make arrests. U.S. Justice Department lawyers said New York's law and policies restricting cooperation with federal immigration officers violated the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, which gives federal law precedence over state law. The lawsuit filed in federal court in Albany comes after the administration has increased immigration enforcement at workplaces and while people appeared for immigration court hearings. People have protested against the federal actions in cities across the country. Attorney General Pam Bondi blamed so-called 'sanctuary city policies' for violence seen in California. Sanctuary policies generally refers to those limiting local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has also sued four New Jersey cities for their laws. New York state had similar policies preventing agents from apprehending migrants, Bondi said in a statement. 'This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law,' she said. Justice Department lawyers challenged the 2020 state law preventing federal officials from arresting people for civil immigration violations at state courthouses without a signed judicial warrant. New York's 2020 law doesn't apply to federal courthouses or immigration court, according to the legislation's author, state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Manhattan Democrat who called the lawsuit 'baseless and frivolous." The Justice Department said in a news release that enforcement at courthouses reduces risk of people fleeing or dangerous situations, especially since there is enhanced screening inside court buildings. 'Ongoing assault' on rule of law in NY, state officials say State officials said federal agents entering local courthouses make communities unsafe by preventing people from accessing the judicial system. The law ensures New Yorkers can pursue justice without fear, Geoff Burgan, a spokesperson for state Attorney General Letitia James, said in a statement. 'Due process means nothing if people are too afraid to appear in court,' he said. James would defend the law and 'all of New York's laws, just as she will continue to defend the rights and dignity of all who call New York home,' Burgan said. Hoylman-Sigal, who authored the law, said the lawsuit was part of the administration's 'ongoing assault on the rule of law in New York.' To avoid conflicting with federal law or federal immigration authority, the law doesn't apply to federal courts or immigration courts, he said in a statement. Meanwhile, it allows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest people in local courthouses when they have 'actual, valid judicial warrants.' 'At a time when masked ICE officials are roaming the state and lawlessly detaining New Yorkers without any due process, the law preserves access to justice and participation in the judicial process,' he said. 'Sensitive' areas targets of immigration enforcement A contentious issue has been federal agents targeting people in 'sensitive" areas. Prior Department of Homeland Security guidelines banned enforcement in areas such as schools, places of worship and hospitals. When President Donald Trump took office in January, DHS overturned the longstanding policy to give agents discretion on such actions. The administration enacted another policy permitting enforcement at or near courthouses. Justice Department lawyers also challenged two New York executive orders restricting civil immigration arrests at state facilities, and a separate policy preventing state employees from sharing information to federal officers related to civil immigration enforcement. 'Through these enactments, New York obstructs federal law enforcement and facilitates the evasion of federal law by dangerous criminals, notwithstanding federal agents' statutory mandate to detain and remove illegal aliens,' the complaint said. The same day as the lawsuit, Gov. Kathy Hochul was one of three Democratic governors testifying before Congress about "sanctuary" policies and immigration enforcement. Hochul said her state has cooperated with ICE since she's taken office. "But we have to draw a line somewhere,' Hochul said. 'New York cannot deputize our state officers to enforce civil immigration violations, such as overstaying a visa.' The administration's attack on the 2020 law would turn courthouses 'into traps,' Donna Liberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. It would further force immigrant communities into the shadows. An initial conference date for the lawsuit was scheduled for Sept. 10, court records showed. Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@ or on Signal at emcuevas.01.