logo
Portuguese far-right leader taken to hospital after second collapse

Portuguese far-right leader taken to hospital after second collapse

The Guardian15-05-2025

The leader of Portugal's far-right Chega party has been taken to hospital after another collapse during a rally days before the country votes in its third snap election since 2022.
André Ventura, whose brash, blunt leadership style has helped make the populist, anti-immigration party Portugal's third biggest political force, was taken ill at an event in the southern town of Odemira on Thursday, two days after a similar episode.
Videos from the rally showed Ventura, 42, grabbing his chest and trying to undo his tie before falling into the arms of aides who carried him away. He was taken to a local clinic and then transferred to a hospital in Setúbal, near Lisbon, to undergo a medical procedure.
Ventura had been discharged from hospital in Faro on Wednesday after his previous collapse. The hospital said he had had an oesophageal spasm caused by gastric reflux and high blood pressure.
The Chega MP Marta Silva told CNN Portugal on Thursday that an electrocardiogram in an ambulance immediately after the second collapse had shown that 'everything is well with his heart' and that it was probably another spasm.
Ventura posted a picture of himself giving a thumbs-up sign from a hospital bed on Thursday afternoon. 'This is a setback and a difficulty,' he wrote on X. 'It won't bring us down. Keep going … keep going!!! Portugal is much more important, it is this country that moves us.'
Chega looks likely to once again finish third on Sunday, behind the ruling, centre-right Democratic Alliance (AD) and the Socialist party (PS). Recent polls put the AD on about 33%, the PS on 26% and Chega on 17%.
Ventura's efforts to win a place in government have been rebuffed by Portugal's prime minister, Luís Montenegro, who has repeatedly ruled out any deal with the far-right party.
Chega, which has campaigned on a promise to clean up Portuguese politics at the same time as increasing its rhetoric against the Roma population, has been hit by a series of damaging allegations relating to some of its members over recent months.
Sign up to Headlines Europe
A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day
after newsletter promotion
In January, Chega expelled one of its MPs from the party after he was accused of stealing suitcases at several airports. Another party member was caught drink-driving the same month, while a third has been charged with paying for oral sex with an underage male, who was 15 at the time.
Reuters contributed to this report

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Corbynista MP Zarah Sultana under fire because she 'didn't declare marriage to senior official at trade union she lobbied for in Parliament'
Corbynista MP Zarah Sultana under fire because she 'didn't declare marriage to senior official at trade union she lobbied for in Parliament'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Corbynista MP Zarah Sultana under fire because she 'didn't declare marriage to senior official at trade union she lobbied for in Parliament'

A Labour politician who lobbied for the Fire Brigades Union in Parliament was last night under fire for failing to declare her marriage to one of its senior policy officers. Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana married the FBU's Craig Lloyd last August - and then went on to speak up for key FBU demands in the Commons, including calling for more funding for fire services. In the months leading up to the wedding, when the pair were living together in London, Corbynista Ms Sultana accepted a £10,000 donation from the union for her re-election campaign. Both before and after the wedding she has also been the chair of the FBU's Parliamentary Group, the union's political campaign team. Under the parliamentary code of conduct, MPs are meant to declare anything that could be seen to influence them as well as declaring any family members involved in lobbying the Government. Last night, Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the committee on standards in public life, said he had 'no doubt' that Ms Sultana should 'declare that relationship as part of her interests as an MP'. He added: 'In the role that she admits that he has, clearly he is bound to have a dialogue with the MP about the issues and about his relationship with Ministers. So I think it would be absolutely appropriate for her to declare that relationship.' Tory MP Ben Obese-Jecty said: 'Ms Sultana should declare this relationship in the interests of openness and transparency. As MPs, we all have a duty to let voters know if our family life has any bearing on our work at Westminster.' Approached for comment by the MoS, Ms Sultana launched an astonishing attack on the Labour Party, making unsubstantiated and false claims that it was 'a smear from the Labour right' and that it was revenge for her remarks linking Peter Mandelson to Jeffrey Epstein. She did not respond to repeated questions of whether she should have declared the relationship. These latest revelations come just a week after the MoS revealed that Labour MP Mary Foy is in an undeclared relationship with militant former fireman Matt Wrack, who led the FBU for two decades until January. Ms Foy introduced Early Day Motions on behalf of the union, had a union staff member seconded to her office and accepted its £2,000 donation - all while in a relationship with its boss. She has since referred herself to Parliament's standards watchdog. MPs are required to declare any relevant interests which 'might reasonably be thought by others to influence' their actions, according to the code of conduct. They are also required to declare any family members involved in lobbying, including their spouses and 'cohabiting partners'. Lobbying is defined as those working in a professional capacity to attempt to influence, or advise those who want to influence, the Government or public sector at any level. It is not limited to only those who are employed as lobbyists. Mr Lloyd was behind an FBU guide called 'how to lobby your MP' published in 2022. In the guide, which told union members how to ask for their MPs' support for union demands, his email was listed as being available to help 'follow up on all contacts' with politicians. Mr Lloyd (above) was behind an FBU guide called 'how to lobby your MP' published in 2022. In the guide, which told union members how to ask for their MPs' support for union demands, his email was listed as being available to help 'follow up on all contacts' with politicians As a senior researcher and policy officer, Mr Lloyd was involved in various FBU policy campaigns. Last year he was publicly thanked by a senior official for working on 'the contribution that this union made to the Scottish Government's budget considerations'. He was also seconded by the FBU in 2021 to work with Momentum - a leftwing pressure group which campaigns to change the Labour Party - according to a report published by the Campaign for a Democratic FBU. His wife Ms Sultana has called for 'proper funding and resources' for the fire service and has pledged her support for two Early Day Motions introduced on the FBU's behalf in Parliament. During the relationship, she also voted against a Bill requiring unions to provide minimum service levels during strikes - in line with FBU demands. Approached by the MoS, Ms Sultana refused to say whether she thought she should have declared the relationship. Ms Sultana was suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party last summer alongside six other Labour MPs after voting against the Government on the two-child benefit cap. She said: 'As the right wing of the Labour Party are devoid of principles, they can't understand that I support the FBU and other trade unions not because of personal relationships or personal gain, but because I am a trade unionist. I've always stood with workers across the country long before I met my partner, who has never had a role lobbying MPs. His role in the FBU is Senior Researcher, which involves engaging with internal Labour Party processes and liaison with Ministers, neither of which involve me as a backbench MP. 'Trade unions are not lobbyists. They represent working people, the majority of the public, unlike the lobbyists for private business and powerful Governments who have the ear of many other politicians, including Sir Keir Starmer. Unlike them, I don't work for the wealthy or the well-connected. 'This is nothing more than a desperate smear from the Labour right because I called out Peter Mandelson's links to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and Morgan McSweeney for copying Enoch Powell's fascist language. For reference: I wouldn't use [the MoS] even if I ran out of toilet paper.' Last night an FBU spokesman said: 'The FBU is proud to campaign for and work closely with Labour MPs who champion the cause of workers' rights at Westminster. 'Our staff and officials played a pivotal role in campaigning to ensure that Labour's General Election manifesto included a plan to extend employment rights such as banning zero-hour contracts and outlawing fire and rehire. 'That was a highly positive intervention by the FBU and a huge step forward for working people. 'The FBU's funding of the Labour Party and election campaigns is completely transparent. It is the cleanest money in politics and is in stark contrast to that of the Tories and Reform UK who are bankrolled by the super rich. 'Every political donation made by the union goes through a democratic process and is agreed by the FBU's elected executive council.'

Trump warns of 'consequences' for Elon after he 'disrespected the office of president'
Trump warns of 'consequences' for Elon after he 'disrespected the office of president'

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump warns of 'consequences' for Elon after he 'disrespected the office of president'

President Donald Trump warned that Elon Musk would face 'very serious consequences' if he was to start bankrolling Democratic candidates. Their relationship disintegrated earlier this week as the former allies battled it out on social media after disagreeing on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Speaking with NBC News' Kristen Welker on Saturday, Trump was asked what he would do if Musk crossed the political aisle and donated to Democrats. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that. He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that', he told out the outlet. Musk, who is worth $330 billion, was a major contributor to Trump's presidential campaign - spending at least $250 million in supporting his race for the White House last year. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX is over, Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things. I won an election in a landslide. I gave him a lot of breaks, long before this happened,' he said. 'I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him', Trump added. Musk already said that he would be cutting back on spending on political campaigns ahead of next year's midterm elections. The president also accused Musk of being 'disrespectful to the office of the president.' 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful,' Trump said. 'You could not disrespect the office of the president.' During their spat, Musk even suggested in a since-deleted post that Trump had been named in the government files involving convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Responding to that remark, Trump said: 'That's called "old news," that's been old news, that has been talked about for years. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.' The two dialed back their barbs at each other by Friday night, with both saying that they wished each other well. But by that point, the damage to their relationship looked to be done. Following the outbreak of their feud, Trump and his allies have said Musk turned on the bill because it cuts subsidies for electric vehicles. Musk has said he doesn't need them anyway. The bill is estimated to add another $3.8 trillion to the national debt, which currently stands at a whopping $36 trillion. Musk went public with his criticism in a series of posts on X, arguing that the spending would wipe out the efforts of his DOGE team. Then, on Thursday, when Trump was supposed to be hosting the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, he was asked about Musk's recent criticism. From there the dam broke. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump told reporters. The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla, and replaced a Musk-approved nominee to lead NASA, which could hinder SpaceX's government contracts. 'And you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles, and they're having a hard time the electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'I know that disturbed him.' Over the weekend, Trump pulled the nomination of Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Isaacman worked alongside Musk at SpaceX. Reports have since emerged that the nomination of Isaacman being rescinded was in part because of the interference of Sergio Gor, the director of the Presidential Personnel Office. The New York Times had first reported that both Musk and some of those inside the White House had pinned the blame for the dust-up on Gor. Musk and Gor have had a sour relationship for months, stemming from what Axios described as Gor's 'resentment' of Musk's involvement in personnel issues. The Washington Post also reported that Gor had made it clear that he would find a way to get back at Musk, which turned out to be Isaacman's nomination. Trump had said he rescinded the nomination due to donations he had made to the Democrats over the years. Vice President JD Vance said in an interview tried to downplay the feud. He said Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' getting frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that´s not possible now because he´s gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance said that Musk´s DOGE, which sought to cut government spending and laid off thousands of workers, was 'really good.' He had made the comments as he spoke with comedian Theo Von, which was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X. Von showed the veep Musk´s claim that Trump´s administration hasn´t released all the records related to Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn´t do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. 'It´s totally insane. The president is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term.

Polling on Elon Musk glaring red light for Republicans
Polling on Elon Musk glaring red light for Republicans

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Polling on Elon Musk glaring red light for Republicans

Even as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump no longer appear to be on speaking terms, the Tesla CEO's popularity among the Republican base is on the rise, according to polling. Trump and Musk's friendly relationship came to a dazzling end on Thursday as their disagreement over the Republicans' spending package went into full bloom. Musk called the bill, which significantly increases the deficit, a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump said his former friend had gone 'crazy' as Musk called for his impeachment and removal and claimed that the president is included in the 'Epstein Files.' He later deleted that post. While Musk isn't set to take over as the top figure in the Republican Party, he could create chaos surrounding the GOP's agenda and its plans for the 2026 midterms. Seventy-six percent of Republicans see Musk favorably, according to the most recent poll by The Economist and YouGov. Meanwhile, just 18 percent view him unfavorably. According to a poll conducted by The New York Times and Siena College in late April, 77 percent of Republicans view Musk favorably. Since the start of the second Trump administration, Musk's popularity has been over 70 percent in most polls, Politico noted. The billionaire is more popular than House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, or almost anyone else in the GOP. Among Republicans, both Trump and Vice President JD Vance are more popular than Musk, with 87% and 80% approval, respectively, according to the Economist /YouGov survey. Musk's polling strength with the Republican base may partly be rooted in the fact that GOP voters believed in the mission of the Department of Government Efficiency from the outset, with almost 90 percent backing the notion that the government needs to be downsized. A recent Harvard-Harris poll found that about the same percentage of Republicans believe that DOGE has been effective at scaling back spending. Meanwhile, Democrats and independents are less likely to trust DOGE's accomplishments and are much less likely to view Musk favorably. Fifteen percent of Democrats and 34 percent of independents have favorable views of the billionaire. Musk may become a dangerous rival for the Republican Party, whose values align with the DOGE mission of cutting spending and reducing the deficit. Musk's wealth and social media influence as the owner of X may pose a threat to Trump and his party. This comes as Trump told NBC News on Saturday that he has 'no intention' of speaking to Musk or attempting to repair the relationship. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' said Trump. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' 'I would assume so, yeah,' he said when asked if his relationship with Musk was over. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' he added. He also issued a threat, saying that Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to use his significant wealth to fund Democrats. Musk's opposition to the spending bill could lead the billionaire to fund challengers to Republicans who voted in favor of it. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store