
Is debt forgiveness or debt management the better choice this August?
These terms are sometimes used interchangeably, but the reality is that they're two very different paths to debt relief, and as a result, they can have very different outcomes. One option, debt forgiveness, promises to shrink the amount you owe, while the other focuses on making repayment more affordable and structured. But while both can help lower your payment obligations, each option comes with its own set of trade-offs that could affect your credit score, taxes and even your future borrowing power.
As a result, choosing between them isn't a decision to make lightly. Before taking a step in either direction, it's important to understand the risks and benefits to determine which one may be the better option this August.
Find out how to get started with the right debt relief program today.
Debt forgiveness involves negotiating with your creditors, often with the help of a debt relief company, to accept less than the full amount you owe. If the negotiations are successful, you could settle your debt for 30% to 50% less than the original balance, on average, in return for a lump-sum payment on the account. That can help you save significantly on the cost of your debt.
Debt management, on the other hand, is typically facilitated through a credit counseling agency. Instead of reducing your total balance, the agency helps you set up a payment plan that works with your budget. The credit counselor then negotiates with creditors to lower your interest rates and consolidate your payments into a single monthly bill. You still repay your debts in full, but you may save significantly on interest and fees.
So, how do you know which one could be the better option this August? Here's what to consider:
Debt forgiveness makes the most sense this August if you're facing true financial hardship with no realistic path to paying off your debts in full. If you're dealing with a job loss, medical emergency, divorce or other major life event that has reduced your income, having a portion of your debt forgiven might be your most practical option. It's also generally worth considering if your debt-to-income ratio is so high that you'd need more than five years to pay everything off.
With debt forgiveness, the math can be compelling for the right borrower. For example, if you owe $30,000 across several credit cards and can settle for $15,000, which is a 50% reduction, you've essentially saved $15,000, minus fees and tax implications on forgiven debt. Debt relief companies typically charge 15% to 25% of the enrolled debt amount, so you'll need to factor those costs into your calculations.
However, there are tradeoffs to consider, even for the right types of borrowers. One major downside of pursuing this type of debt relief is that your credit score will drop during the process, and it involves months of delinquency, creditor calls and potential lawsuits. So, it's not necessarily a quick fix. Forgiven debt over $600 also becomes taxable income, so if you take this route, you might owe more than expected when you file your taxes.
Learn more about your debt relief options online now.
Debt management, on the other hand, will generally work best this August for borrowers with steady incomes who are drowning due to the rapidly compounding interest charges on their credit cards. Those who are lacking the funds to continue making payments may struggle with this option, though, as you'll still be required to pay back what's owed, just with a lower rate and fees.
Credit card rates are averaging over 21% this August, but a debt management plan can slash rates in half (or more) while consolidating your enrolled debts into one monthly payment. On $25,000 in credit card debt, this could save you thousands of dollars in interest and cut your payoff timeline down dramatically. And, because most credit counseling agencies are nonprofits, the monthly fees on this type of debt relief tend to be lower than what you'd pay to a debt relief company.
The catch? You'll need to close enrolled credit cards and stick with the plan for years without missing payments. Drop out early, and you could end up worse off than when you started. But for disciplined borrowers who simply need breathing room from crushing interest rates, debt management offers a path forward this August — one that actually preserves and eventually improves your credit score.
Debt forgiveness and debt management both offer ways to regain control over your finances, but they serve different needs. Debt forgiveness aims to reduce your total debt when repayment is out of reach, while debt management helps you pay it off in full with reduced interest and simplified payments.
As a result, neither is inherently "better" for everyone this August; your choice should be guided by your income, debt load, credit goals and tolerance for potential consequences. Whichever path you take, though, remember that a clear plan and consistent follow-through can help you move from debt stress to financial stability.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada labor minister presses Air Canada, union to intensify talks to resolve dispute
(Reuters) -Canadian Labor Minister Patty Hajdu said on Friday that she met jointly with Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), urging both sides to work harder and remain at the negotiating table to reach a deal and avert a potential strike. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
Putin made a 'business pitch' to Trump in his statement: Edward Lawrence
FOX Business White House correspondent Edward Lawrence analyzes Russian President Vladimir Putin's 'business pitch' to President Donald Trump in Alaska.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income
Key Points Statistical evidence supports the idea that these two ETFs can simultaneously grow capital and generate income. Maximum monthly drawdowns are less than the benchmark's performance, and so is the risk as defined by standard deviation. These ETFs do relatively best when benchmark indexes are highly volatile but still make money in bull markets. 10 stocks we like better than JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF › The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) have garnered significant investor attention, in part due to their trailing-12-month dividend yields of 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Moreover, they offer monthly income, making them a favorite among passive income investors. As such, it would be interesting to share some modeling of their performance to see if they do offer investors a way to a relatively low-volatility strategy that practically guarantees a monthly income. (Keep in mind dividends can always be cut.) Introducing two JPMorgan ETFs The first thing to understand about these two exchange-traded funds is that they are not tailored to invest in dividend stocks. Instead, they both follow the same strategy of investing up to 80% of net assets in equities (stocks), with the only difference being that the Equity Premium ETF focuses on S&P 500 stocks while the Nasdaq Equity Premium ETF focuses on stocks in the Nasdaq-100. As noted above, the stocks are not explicitly selected for their dividend yield, an essential point because high-yield equity-focused ETFs often involve concentrating holdings in sectors with high yields. The remaining net assets, up to 20%, are invested in equity-linked notes (ELNs) that follow a strategy of selling call options on the indexes that the two ETFs benchmark -- S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, respectively. A call option is the right to buy shares of the index at a specified price (the strike price) and is bought by bullish investors. The seller of the call options (in this case the ETF) receives a premium from the buyer. However, if the index increases significantly, the option is exercised, and the ELN typically incurs a loss. Conversely, when the index experiences a small gain, stays flat, or loses value, the option isn't exercised. The idea is that an anticipated net profit in premiums collected from the ELNs, combined with some dividend income from stock holdings, will generate sufficient income for distributions to be paid to shareholders under any condition, particularly in the event of a substantial increase in the index. And note that the upside is limited (gains less than the market), but the downside is also restricted. This table lays out how the portions of the ETFs will perform based on how the underlying index performs in a month. Monthly Index Performance Strong Gain Moderate Gain Moderate Loss Strong Loss Equities (At least 80% of the ETF assets) Strong Gain Gain Loss Strong Loss ELNs (Up to 20% of the ETF's assets) Loss Profit Profit Profit Overall Gain, but less than the market Gain, but less than the market Slight profit/slight loss Loss, but less than the market Author's analysis. What the ETFs need to do to demonstrate they work Before I throw charts at you, it's worth noting that the proof of the strategy working includes: The ETF should have a lower volatility than the index (measured here by the standard deviation of monthly returns). The ETFs should have relatively low maximum monthly drawdowns because passive investors usually do not want to lose a significant amount in any one month. The strategy should demonstrate a high coefficient of determination, or R^2, indicating that the independent variable (in this case, the benchmark index) is primarily responsible for determining the outcome. Performance consistent with the outcomes outlined in the table above. That said, here are the charts comparing the monthly index performance to the ETF's performance. Both sets of data include reinvestment of dividends. First, here's the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. And now the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. A few conclusions can be drawn from the data, along with some additional calculations. The monthly standard deviation of the S&P 500 over the period is 4.7%, compared to 3.1% for JEPI, indicating lower volatility returns. The monthly standard deviation of the Nasdaq-100 over the period is 5.7%, compared to 4.2% for JEPQ, indicating lower volatility returns. Both ETFs exhibit high R^2 values, indicating a consistency of outcome from the strategy. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPI are -6.4%, -4.2%, and -4.1%. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPQ are -8.7%, -6.8%, and -6.6%. In general, the strategy is effective, generating a collection of positive returns when the indices report moderate gains and losses. The downside is limited compared to the index when the market declines significantly, and the upside is limited when the indexes perform well. What it means to passive investors Both indices have performed very well over the periods, with an average monthly gain of 1.5% on the S&P 500 and 1.8% on the Nasdaq; therefore, the ETFs have understandably underperformed. However, there's no guarantee that these conditions will continue, and these ETFs have demonstrated lower volatility returns while maintaining substantial dividends for those seeking monthly income. As such, they are excellent options for those seeking to generate passive income across a range of market conditions. Should you invest $1,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF right now? Before you buy stock in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data