logo
Nato and the G7 — global power fractures that Africa must watch

Nato and the G7 — global power fractures that Africa must watch

Daily Maverick21-05-2025
Geopolitical shifts in the Western alliance could have a considerable impact on Africa's fortunes.
Two major summits in June could expedite one of the most significant strategic realignments in the international system. The Group of Seven (G7) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) summits may determine how deep current political fractures run.
Their outcomes will also suggest the extent to which certain actors are willing to pivot away from a collective Western bloc identity. This could see the locus of power becoming more evenly spread across either side of the Atlantic.
The implications will be profound, and although Africa is not at the table, it will be affected. A more hard-nosed understanding of global power shifts and their effect on African countries' shared security and developmental agenda is needed.
The G7 wields an outsized degree of influence on global governance. Its members represent more than half of the world's economic output, account for 55% of global military expenditure, and play a central role in trade with more than 90% of global foreign exchange reserves held in G7 currencies.
More importantly, this group of leading market economies and liberal democracies has influenced the global order for nearly half a century. All its members, barring Japan, are also part of Nato – a cornerstone of the post-World War 2 international system with a shared commitment to collective defence.
Broad policy consensus within both groupings has given credibility to a US-led international order and Western bloc identity, which has wielded considerable authority over the world's agenda.
The West's cohesion and influence have increased in recent years, with its members united by a desire to counter a revanchist Russia and a rising China. However, this upward trend evaporated after US President Donald Trump's January inauguration.
Nato's current pressure points relate to military expenditure. Topping this year's agenda will be elevated defence spending targets, which new secretary-general Mark Rutte has proposed at 3.5% of annual GDP by 2032. The Trump administration had called for 5%, despite most alliance members falling short of 2% over the past decade.
Nato will also be concerned about the US' commitment to 'collective defence' and the alliance's long-term viability. Washington's stance on Russia's Ukraine invasion, its wide-ranging trade tariffs, 'America First' approach to macroeconomics and right-wing turn on social policy issues have soured relations among its G7 and Nato allies.
Traditional US partners face three general scenarios. First is appeasement and acquiescence to the US continuing to lead the Western alliance. Second is paralysis under the weight of contradictions needed to find a workable middle ground with the US. Third is greater strategic autonomy from the US overall or within smaller coalitions of states across Europe, Japan and other like-minded actors.
Course-correcting won't be easy. The US accounts for more than half of the G7's combined GDP, just under 16% of Nato's budget, and surpasses all other alliance members in annual military expenditure. Accordingly, the horse-trading and foreign policy recalibration needed to speak with one voice will take time, diluting the G7 and Nato's potency in the short term.
For African countries, this presents a moment of profound opportunity and challenge in equal measure. Four key issues warrant greater attention by the continent's policymakers.
First, the surge in global defence spending will continue, particularly among Nato members. This will happen across all three scenarios above and is likely to reduce budgets for aid, official development assistance and other financial support to Africa.
Rough calculations based on Nato members spending 3.5% of their GDP on military expenditure amount to nearly $2-trillion a year, which could otherwise be allocated to social, climate and economic development initiatives. Initiatives like the G7's Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment and the Africa Renewable Energy Initiative could lose momentum due to budget cuts, or be used to champion greater private sector financing.
Second, a narrower security agenda may be pursued, linking issues such as migration and critical mineral supply chains to Western interventions in African conflicts. While specific conflicts such as in Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Libya and the Sahel may receive attention, Africa likely won't feature as a collective geostrategic concern for the West like the Indo-Pacific does.
Third, the global military expenditure surge, knock-on effects in the arms industry and shifting political priorities could mean more ad hoc, militarised responses to African conflicts. Support for these direct, politically expedient and less-costly interventions may grow as the effectiveness of multilateral peacekeeping wanes along with political appetites for long-term conflict prevention and peace-building.
Finally, a more fractured Western alliance will enable other major international actors to continue expanding their influence in Africa. China, Turkey, the Gulf States, India and Russia will look to expand into gaps left by Western interests, particularly regarding security cooperation.
For Russia, Africa will remain central to consolidating the activities of military contractors and state-controlled paramilitaries in countries like Mali, Libya, Burkina Faso, Niger and the Central African Republic. For China, Africa represents a testing ground for its increased power projection capabilities, pointing to a greater role as a security guarantor.
The Gulf countries and Turkey have also ramped up their military influence in Africa. They now play central roles in security initiatives and facilitating negotiations from the Horn to north Africa, the Sahel and even the DRC.
Similarly, India has increasingly looked towards Africa to raise its profile as a security partner. This has been buoyed by India's need to safeguard its maritime domain while providing joint field training exercises and hosting coordination meetings with African defence ministers.
African policymakers must identify how these four issues are related and will affect the continent's security and development agenda. Responding to these geopolitical headwinds will require bold leadership, particularly from regional anchor states, including South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt and Ethiopia.
Leaders must strengthen the resilience of the African Union and regional economic communities. They should also seek new opportunities with emerging powers, while keeping a close eye on the storm brewing further north. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Donald's long list of foreign policy failures
The Donald's long list of foreign policy failures

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

The Donald's long list of foreign policy failures

President Donald J Trump is an unusual artist. The author of Art of the Deal has become notorious for a string of failures in his foreign policy deals. He sold himself as transactional, and everything was up for negotiation. Image: Supplied UNITED States President Donald J Trump is an unusual artist. The author of Art of the Deal has become notorious for a string of failures in his foreign policy deals. He sold himself as transactional, and everything was up for negotiation. Yet, the clumsiness of his bashfulness has pushed the world onto a precipice of dangerous peril. From the margins of a heated electioneering campaign, panting from running and bothered, no doubt by a profusion of criminal and civil cases, the Donald enlivened the imagination of a fatigued world about the possibility of ending the US/Nato proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. The embattled Republican Presidential candidate was kind enough to remind even the unconverted, that Ukraine is a proxy. And he was determined to end it once and for all on day one in office, if he was elected. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ When pressed on how he intended to do so, he became more philosophical than discreet. He was not the one in office, he remonstrated. And he did not want to supplant or pretend to awaken a President Joe Biden who only worked a measly four hours a day and slept the rest of the other twenty. This probably triggered DJT, Elon Musk's endearment for Trump to coin the nickname 'Sleepy Joe'. So many observers were enamoured to champion his stance as anti-war, or DJT's most favourite, the peace candidate. For this attribution, the preponderance of analysts were prepared to forget history just so he could get a pass. Or to be fair, to temporarily ignore it. History, for its intransigence, however, insists that it can neither be ignored nor forgotten. And its memory cannot be erased either, especially not by the silliness of political importunity, or by the passage of time. For, history, is true manifestation of time's infinite trademark itself. In surreptitious ways therefore, it reminded those who cared to listen that Trump is a war candidate or an Israeli agent — whichever moniker fits. Almost seven months later, the Donald continues to approbate and reprobate, oscillating between a buffoon messing around with a nuclear button and a war monger that would destroy Russia. And the right-wing podcasters are endlessly worried. Where is the Section 25 impeachment procedure when you need one! On January 20, 2025 on the Donald's swearing-in ceremony, the 56 000 people of Greenland and their Danish colonisers, awoke to the shocking announcement that the United States of America has overweening designs over their sovereignty. From being a colony of the Danish, they would segue seamlessly into the colony of the Yankees. Besides, the Putuffik Space Base is a Danish-American project, the former, the current coloniser and the latter, a lustful aspirant. Poor Greenlanders or the Kalaallit as they prefer to be known! So soon thereafter, they had to play indignant hosts to Vice President JD Vance's visit, at great cost. USSF Colonel Susannah Meyers, the commander of the Base, was fired at the end of that visit. Mette Frederiksen, the Prime Minister of Denmark demurred at both the visit and Trump's vague insinuations of colonisation. As for the Greenlanders, they said nothing, looking funny at the hypocritical Danish first and disbelieving at the belligerent Americans second. Exactly in that order. All they are committed to do, as incredulous at it may sound, is to first liberate themselves from a leeching Denmark and with conviction, sit out the impatience of a peripatetic Trump. To date, Trump has failed on this policy adventure abysmally. Predictably! It must be said that Trump has achieved the improbable. This is that he has failed on foreign policy, a government's charitable vision that nominally unfurls over an interminably long period of time. And more often than not, history is the judge over such matters. Trump's normative foreign policy prescripts have already failed even before history has roused from its slumber awaiting him to vacate office. History is a soft spoken and impartial observer long after the fact. The signs that Trump was bound to fail, or that he would sabotage his own architecture of being nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, became apparent when the Donald was confronted with questions on how he intended to resolve Israel's genocide in Gaza. He had fanciful plans, which were blood-curling ominous in their absurdity. Trump supported an unseemly strategy. Starve the Palestinians and then pretend to provide them with food. Massacre them when they gather in desperation. And when Israel Defence Forces incur a lot of casualties, declare a temporary ceasefire. After so much ethnic cleansing and a proposal for World War II-like Warsaw Ghettoes fit for a holocaust, Trump will build a French Riveria in the splendid beaches of the Gaza shoreline drenched in innocent Palestinian blood. The incredulity of these designs is not even in the fact that that they are real, but that their authors and their followership, believe in them zealously. But Trump is in a bind. It is as if the Nobel Peace Prize Committee has dutifully assigned the task of awarding the coveted laurel to the languishing Palestinians. The more the slaughtering of the Palestinians endures, to the chagrin of civilised mankind, the further the prize eludes the expectant Trump. But if the US policy machinery does not curtail the genocidal instincts of the irascible Netanyahu, they would have failed to ride the rising tide of human goodness. Somebody help the devastated POTUS 47 caught between a war-rampaging Bibi and a morally repugnant Jeffery Epstein. A policy bought and paid for, is an embarrassing failure of vision occurring in slow motion. The ebullience and optimism that characterised Trump's first 100 days in office, attended by the novelty of return to the White House and other history making factoids, have waned into a lacklustre twilight, typified by a rancorous disquiet of a MAGA base cannibalising itself from the inside. Trump's first instinct was not to care, for he is no more up for re-election. But then again, he can't afford to lose the midterms in 2026 to the Democrats and be rendered lame duck. He may face the unedifying prospect of being possibly impeached. But every time he says something inelegant about how quickly they must forget about a dead paedophile, the more he feeds into the red embers of an implacable MAGA lot, avowed to torpedo his tenure over a many-layered three-decade-long scandal. What to do? Start a war, or make peace with Russia. Better still, turn Canada into the 51st State of America. It is not because if the US invaded Canada militarily, the polite Northern neighbours would put up some resistance. Hardly. But it is more of the fact that the justification to so invade would be hard to contrive in a quick turnaround and without a plausible false flag operation. Was this a humourless quip whipped to mortify the Canadians? Sometimes it is hard to tell. In the stead of pulling out of Nato, Trump lobbied for the increase of Nato members' defence spending to 5%. Instead of negotiating with Iran, he authorised Israel to decapitate their nuclear scientists, their negotiators and obliterate all their nuclear sites. Instead of peace between Rwanda and the DRC, Nato is still arming Rwanda and the M-23 rebels continue to capture more territory. India is upset and therefore insistent that the sudden military flare-up between them and Pakistan was attenuated by a consideration other than Trump's claim, short of saying he is a liar. It is a mixed masala of foreign policy ersatz, seasoned in threats, deception and a stand-up comedy gone horribly awry. What would be easier to do is to vilify President Jimmy Carter for returning the Panama Canal to Panama in 1981. To reclaim it, the Donald issued threats of its military re-annexation. In fact, the talking heads in the Oval Office and their loquacious Commander-in-Chief simply backed the purchase of the canal by Blackrock from Li Ka-shing and claim it as a foreign policy victory. Completely without precedent, President Xi Jinping held tight, resisting the purchase with tactic and stealth, resulting in the inability of the counterparties to fulfil the conditions precedent for the purchase. As a consequence, the deadline effluxed. Just one pitiful domino after another. But fall they must. The most prominent attribute of Trump's second term is the imposition of tariffs, especially to China. And as fate would have it, it is the only tariff imposition he cannot get right for reasons that have been fairly broadcast. Unlike the failure of foreign policy in other instances, none projects incompetence as the one in China. Trump may still win some, including the Azerbaijan and Armenian corridor for 99 years. Severally or cumulatively, however, they will not erase the fact that Trump is a phenomenal policy disaster for the United States of America and the world at large. * Ambassador Bheki Gila is a Barrister-at-Law. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, Independent Media, or IOL. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.

SA caught in East-West tug-of-war after military chief's Iran visit
SA caught in East-West tug-of-war after military chief's Iran visit

IOL News

time13 hours ago

  • IOL News

SA caught in East-West tug-of-war after military chief's Iran visit

Pretoria's foreign policy under scrutiny amid Iran relations Image: GCIS The South African government's distancing from recent Iran–RSA military cooperation has intensified diplomatic and economic headwinds, just as Western capitals press Pretoria to realign away from Eastern partners. The controversy hinges on remarks by South African National Defence Force (SANDF) chief General Rudzani Maphwanya during a visit to Iran, and the government's current posture on the broader foreign policy balance between East and West. The episode began to unfold after General Maphwanya's trip to Iran, a move that has since been disavowed by both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) and the Department of Defence and Military Veterans. The government maintained that President Cyril Ramaphosa, with DIRCO's guidance, remains the architect of South Africa's foreign policy. 'President Cyril Ramaphosa confirmed he would meet the general to discuss his 'ill-advised' trip,' a government source said, signalling that the visit has become a political flashpoint rather than a simple military exchange. DIRCO spokesperson Chrispin Phiri declined to comment on potential disciplinary steps against those who disregarded international protocol, noting the department's role in policy implementation rather than battlefield diplomacy. The political weather has grown even cloudier as Western powers press Pretoria to clarify its stance amid fears of mixed messages on the country's alignment. The US Congress has repeatedly questioned South Africa's closeness to BRICS partners and - by extension - its relationships with China, Russia, and Iran. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Political analyst Joe Mhlanga offered a stark assessment: Maphwanya's public remarks about potential military cooperation indicated a broader 'evidence that the country's foreign policy is not solid.' He warned that a pattern of swinging toward the East or West - 'going to the East to do something when they want to go to the West they just do' - could undermine confidence in South Africa's policy coherence. 'What we're saying is that countries seem to be taking positions when it comes to certain issues, so we cannot state that we are a country that is neutral,' Mhlanga said in paraphrase of his analysis. 'We need to have a clear foreign policy stance… You cannot be standing on both legs and stating that you support both Iran and the US.' The domestic response has been swift and pointed. The Democratic Alliance (DA) criticised Maphwanya's remarks as stepping beyond military-to-military dialogue into foreign policy. DA Defence spokesperson Chris Hattingh said: 'This is not the role of a military chief. Foreign policy is the domain of the elected Government of National Unity and must be conducted through DIRCO, not by an unelected general freelancing on the world stage.' The broader concern is that the public dispute over the Iran/RSA relationship comes at a sensitive juncture.

Trump to meet Putin in high-stakes Alaska summit
Trump to meet Putin in high-stakes Alaska summit

The Citizen

time13 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Trump to meet Putin in high-stakes Alaska summit

In their first meeting since 2019, Trump and Putin hold high-risk talks in Alaska with Ukraine's fate hanging in the balance. US President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin meet Friday in Alaska in a high-stakes, high-risk summit that could prove decisive for the future of Ukraine. Putin will step onto Western soil for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a war that has killed tens of thousands of people and on which Russia has not relented, making rapid gains just before the summit. Trump extended the invitation at the Russian leader's suggestion, but the US president has since been defensive and warned that the meeting could be over within minutes if Putin does not compromise. Every word and gesture will be closely watched by European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not included and has publicly refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia. Trump has called the summit a 'feel-out meeting' to test Putin, whom he last saw in 2019. 'If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future,' Trump said Thursday. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa speaks to Putin on Ukraine crisis, bilateral issues He gave the summit a one-in-four chance of failure. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov responded to a question from Russian state TV by saying that Moscow would not make guesses on the outcome of the meeting. 'We never make any predictions ahead of time,' Lavrov said after he reached Alaska, wearing what appeared to be a shirt with 'USSR' written across it in Cyrillic script. '… our position is clear and unambiguous. We will present it,' he said. Trump has promised to consult with European leaders and Zelensky, saying that any final agreement would come in a three-way meeting with Putin and the Ukrainian president to 'divvy up' territory. Trump's latest shift Trump has boasted of his relationship with Putin, blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the war and vowed before his return to the White House in January to bring peace within 24 hours. ALSO READ: Ukraine is becoming the wedge driving US and Europe apart But despite repeated calls to Putin, and a stunning February 28 White House meeting in which Trump publicly berated Zelensky, the Russian leader has shown no signs of compromise. Trump has acknowledged his frustration with Putin and warned of 'very severe consequences' if he does not accept a ceasefire — but also agreed to see him in Alaska. The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1900 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, the largest US military installation in Alaska and a Cold War base for surveillance of the former Soviet Union. Adding to the historical significance, the United States bought Alaska in 1867 from Russia — a deal Moscow has cited to show the legitimacy of land swaps. The Kremlin said it expected Putin and Trump to meet alone with interpreters before a working lunch with aides. Neither leader is expected to step off the base into Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, where protesters have put up signs of solidarity with Ukraine. ALSO READ: Ukraine war 'existential,' Kremlin says, launching revenge strikes Exiled Russian opposition figure Yulia Navalnaya — whose husband Alexei Navalny died in prison last year — urged the two leaders to strike a deal to 'release Russian political activists and journalists, Ukrainian civilians, (and) those who were imprisoned for anti-war statements and posts on social media.' A 'personal victory' for Putin? The summit marks a sharp shift from the approach of Western European leaders and Biden, who vowed no discussion with Russia on Ukraine's future unless Ukraine was also at the table. Putin faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, leading him to curtail travel sharply since the war began. However, the United States is not party to the Hague tribunal and Trump's Treasury Department temporarily eased sanctions on top Russian officials to allow them to travel and use bank cards in Alaska. Zelensky said on Tuesday that the Alaska summit was a 'personal victory' for Putin. With the trip, Putin 'is coming out of isolation' and he has 'somehow postponed sanctions,' which Trump had vowed to impose on Russia without progress. ALSO READ: Russia signals severe retaliation after Ukraine's strikes Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also called for security guarantees for Ukraine — an idea downplayed by Trump at the start of his latest term. Daniel Fried, a former US diplomat now at the Atlantic Council, said Trump had the means to pressure Putin but that the Russian could distract him by seeming to offer something new. Putin, Fried said, 'is a master of the new shiny object which turns out to be meaningless.' – By: © Agence France-Presse

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store