Tasmanian greyhound racing unprofitable and costing taxpayers, Saul Eslake review finds
Ms Eslake said a report — commissioned by 12 animal welfare advocacy organisations, including RSPCA Tasmania, and Dogs Homes of Tasmania — the sport had received a total of $74.6 million from Tasracing over the past 15 years, "rising from $3.5 million in 2010-11 to a projected $7.5 million in 2024-25".
Funding for greyhound racing has risen by an annual average of 5.6 per cent over the past 15 years — faster than education funding over the same period (4.1 per cent), and general government sector spending (5.2 per cent).
The report also found the sport received $12.70 per head in 2023-24 — more than twice the national average of $5.27.
Mr Eslake wrote that the returns were "diminishing", with attendances, race starters, wagering and employment declining.
For every $1,000 the code received, four people attended a race meeting in 2021-22 — down from 6.4 in 2011-12.
The industry also supports 82 jobs for each $1 million it receives, down from 150 in 2011-12.
A report by IER, performed for Tasracing, found that in 2021-22, greyhound racing sustained and created 639 full or part-time jobs, or 0.2 per cent of the state's employment.
Tasracing and the state government have been contacted for comment.
Deb Fleming, who is representing the 12 organisations that commissioned the report, said animal welfare concerns were not being heeded by the government or the Labor opposition, which both support greyhound racing.
"They fall back on justifying the well-known animal welfare issues — that are just unavoidable in dog racing — by saying it's vital for the economy, particularly in the regions, and that it provides lots of jobs and lots of benefits to the economy," she said.
"So we thought it was a reasonable thing to obtain an independent interrogation of those claims from one of the most respected independent economists in the country."
She said Mr Eslake's report made it clear that greyhound racing was a "dud investment".
Sixty-two per cent of respondents to a 2023 EMRS poll were opposed to greyhound racing, while about 79 per cent agreed the government should stop spending money on it.
Tasracing, which manages the state's three racing codes, is backed by a 20-year funding deed it signed with the Tasmanian government in 2009.
While it was then worth $27 million per year, it is indexed for inflation. Tasracing received just over $36 million in 2023-2024.
That represents about half of its income, with the remainder coming via wagering, entry fees, media rights, and sponsorship.
The deed is partially funded by the sale of betting agency TOTE Tasmania, which the government sold for $103 million in 2011.
With the current deal set to expire in 2029, Tasracing and the state government are currently in negotiations for a new one.
Mr Eslake described the negotiations an "opportunity", and said there was a "growing case" for the taxpayer not to back greyhound racing.
"Its popularity is declining significantly — especially in the aftermath of revelations concerning animal welfare," he said.
Tasracing has released a draft Code of Practice for Racing Greyhound Welfare, which it says is similar to standards in place in other jurisdictions.
"While it was prepared to provide guidance to the Tasmanian industry, it also provides critically important assurances to the Tasmanian public about the welfare oversight of racing greyhounds in the state," said chief veterinary and animal welfare officer Martin Lenz.
The final code will be enforceable under the Rules of Racing.
"Amongst other things, it specifies minimum standards for accommodation, management, breeding, socialisation and care required to meet the physical and behavioural needs of a racing greyhound throughout its entire life cycle," Dr Lenz said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Grants for social enterprises look to break cycles of disadvantage
Roya Moeen never saw herself being a head chef of a popular restaurant. Fleeing the Taliban from her home in Afghanistan, she came to Australia in 2014. Her experience working was mainly as a housewife for her family. But then, three years ago, she found an opportunity to work at Kabul Social. "I can, because I'm [a] good chef at home and [then I] come here, after that, I started work. First time I'm very scared. You know, after that, slowly, slowly, I'm better." Now the head chef, she says it's been an empowering experience. She leads a kitchen which donates meals to those in need, one in Sydney and one in Afghanistan for every meal sold. "I can look after my family and I work outside and independent. You know, I feel independent. It's so good for everyone." This kind of initiative has been backed by the federal government and is now receiving a $120,000 grant. Minister for Social Services Tanya Plibersek even had her own go at Afghan cuisine. Plate it Forward, which runs Kabul Social, is just one of the organisations receiving funding aimed at helping marginalised communities. Ms Plibersek says it's hoped social enterprises like this will have a long-lasting impact. "We want to invest a small amount of money so these terrific organisations can help more people help themselves. We know the impact of intergenerational disadvantage, and we want to stop it by investing with refugee women, with First Nations communities, people with a disability. By investing early, helping them become financially self-sustaining, we know that we'll change their lives and we'll change the trajectory of their families' lives." David Hetherington is the CEO of Impact Investing Australia. He says better employment outcomes help address the disadvantages experienced by marginalised communities. "We want to see the funders and the kind of supporting ecosystem, who makes it possible, get stronger and deeper and ultimately, the goal is to address that disadvantage, that marginalisation that exists in the Australian community, and bring more and more and more people into mainstream employment and the mainstream economy." Shaun Christie-David is the CEO of Plate it Forward Hospitality. With four other restaurants as well, he says this is an opportunity for Plate it Forward to grow even further. "This represents so much to us. I think where we're seeing is the incredible strength and talent of our team, accelerating in ways that are beyond what we would have dreamt of. So this allows us to move into more venues, more impact, more employment and great opportunities and outcomes for our incredible people from the under-represented communities that we serve." For Roya, cooking is deeply meaningful to her. And it's a career she hopes to pursue further. "I feel so good and I want a big restaurant!"
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Some people with disability feel 'silenced' by this law. Now there's a fresh push for change
Members of Victoria's parliament are being urged to support proposed changes to a law that prevents some people with disability from speaking freely and publicly about their experiences. The Greens are set to introduce a bill to parliament today, alongside disability advocate Uli Cartwright, seeking to amend the 'gag law' — known as clause 37 — affecting those under guardianship or administration orders. Cartwright has long advocated for reform of this law based on his lived experience of such orders. "It's just outdated. It needs to be changed," he told SBS News. In Australia, guardianship laws vary state to state but gag laws, which restrict public comment on such arrangements, are enforced across most jurisdictions. For many Australians currently or formerly subject to guardianship, including Cartwright, this limits their ability to speak openly about their experiences. The move by the Greens seeks to change that in Victoria. The proposed amendment adds to calls of support from disability sector organisations, along with the Victorian Office of the Public Advocate — the state body responsible for advocating for the rights of people living with disability — which backed amending the legislation in 2023. "Not only are we listening to advocates in the sector, but the Office of Public Advocate has also made their position pretty clear on this exact reform," Greens MP Anasina Gray-Barberio said. "We need to be ensuring that legislation as it stands does not constrain the rights of people with a disability." What is clause 37? In Australia, a person may be placed under guardianship or administration orders if they require help with decision-making. An appointed guardian then has legal authority to make decisions or support decision-making on behalf of an individual about personal and lifestyle matters specified in an order. An administrator is someone granted authority over financial and property matters. In Victoria, the so-called gag law refers to clause 37 in schedule 1 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) Act 1998, which states that, "unless the Tribunal orders otherwise", a person must not publish or broadcast information that could identify parties involved in guardianship and administration proceedings. The tribunal may make an order, "only if it considers it would be in the public interest to do so". The Greens' proposed amendment is set to be introduced to parliament in Victoria on Wednesday. Source: AAP / Con Chronis This provision can effectively stop people from talking publicly about any of their experiences of guardianship or administration orders. This can also extend to VCAT proceedings, according to a spotlight paper published by the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) in February. In a letter to Victorian MPs, the state's peak advocacy organisation for adults with intellectual disability, VALID, said the "unnecessary restriction" is applied automatically and "assumes the need to protect people with disabilities". "Their will and preference is not taken into account," the letter reads. "It contradicts human rights principles, undermines transparency and public trust and curtails free speech." Gray-Barberio said the current legislation has a "silencing impact" on those under guardianship or administration orders. "It is so important for them to be able to have choice and control when it comes to their decision-making, to publicly share their lived experience and stories related to their guardianship. I think that is within public interest," she said. "People living with disability or with chronic health [conditions] shouldn't have to ask for permission to tell their own story and lived experience." Telling Uli Cartwright's story Cartwright, 30, is an advocate who lives with disability. He came up against the gag law several years ago when a documentary about his life became subject to it. Life is a Battlefield was acquired by SBS and broadcast in December 2021 as part of the International Day of People with Disability, after which it was available online via SBS' streaming service On Demand. Two weeks after it screened, VCAT raised concerns relating to Cartwright having identified himself as someone previously under the control of the State Trustees. SBS decided to take the program down to allow legal concerns to be addressed. Uli Cartwright has been a long-standing advocate for reform. Credit: Otis Filley Cartwright applied to VCAT for a declaration that clause 37 did not apply in his case, with a tribunal deputy president making an order allowing the material to be published. This meant the documentary could go back online, and Cartwright could be legally identified. Cartwright has been advocating for reform in Victoria ever since. Most states and territories in Australia, except the ACT, ban the publication of information about guardianship proceedings in some way, according to the VLRC paper. This varies state by state, with Tasmania introducing changes last September. The Victorian private member's bill, backed by Cartwright, proposes an amendment to clause 37 of the Act, which allows a represented person, or someone authorised by them, to disclose information about their proceedings without requiring tribunal approval. "I think there is a place for it [the gag provision]," Cartwright said. "I do believe that there needs to be some protections in place to stop abuse and weaponisation of people's stories, whether that's with the media or with family members. "But the bill says the silence mechanism is not the default. It's an extra step." The Greens' Gray-Barberio said the change would ensure a "human rights approach" to legislation in the state. 'Simply the right thing to do' In a letter to Victoria's parliament on 6 August, VALID's chief executive Fionn Skiotis called on all members to support the upcoming bill. "Provisions to protect privacy and limit the disclosure of sensitive and personal information, for example by parties other than the person subject to an order, will continue to exist," Skiotis said. "In our view, supporting this change is simply the right thing to do, for any elected representative in Victoria, so that all citizens in the state can enjoy the same freedoms and rights, whether they are a person with disability or not." LISTEN TO It follows disability service providers Yooralla and Life Without Barriers supporting gag law reform in Victoria in late 2023. "Freedom for people with disability to speak with the media and share their experiences under guardianship is an important step in transparency and accountability and can contribute to safeguarding by individuals and organisations responsible for providing safe and quality support," Life Without Barriers said in a statement. Yooralla said current legislation is at odds with decision principles in the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019, which state that a person's will and preference should only be overridden to prevent serious harm. "While safety and privacy are a factor, the Act conflicts with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disability, which provides the rights of people with disability to freedom of expression and opinion and the participation in political and public life," its statement said. In April 2023, the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA) also voiced support for reform. The OPA recognised there are "valid reasons" to limit the disclosure of sensitive and personal information discussed in guardianship and administration proceedings to protect the privacy of those under orders. But it said these should ensure the person's right to tell their own story is not inadvertently limited. It called on the government to amend the legislation, saying: "Ensuring people can freely tell their own stories will increase transparency and promote public trust in this essential safeguarding system." Gray-Barberio said there has been "no progress" in reform since 2023. This is one small section which we feel is really important, that we feel the government should recognise. "The evidence is there, the calls are there from the community, from advocates, campaigners, as well as the Office of the Public Advocate. So really, it makes sense for them [the government] to come on board and support this reform," she said. The Victorian government has been contacted for comment.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Experts back Melbourne Cup day for next RBA rate cut
Mortgage holders will get further rate relief in 2025, with most experts betting on a rate cut on Melbourne Cup day following quarterly inflation data. The central bank is widely tipped to cut interest rates again this year after the cash rate dropped for the third time on Tuesday to 3.60 per cent. Tuesday's interest rate decision by the Reserve Bak board was unanimous and in line with previous comments where the central bank said future rate cuts were just about timing. The cut is the third in the cycle, after rate cuts in February and May, and follows the bank's shock decision to keep the cash rate on hold in July. Following the August rate cut, experts quickly forecast more interest rate relief, although the market is not banking on back-to-back rate cuts. Betashare chief economist David Bassanese said more interest rate cuts were coming on quarterly data, with inflation falling towards the midpoint of the 2 to 3 per cent target. 'That said, barring a major growth scare, the RBA does not seem in any rush to cut interest rates,' Mr Bassanese said. 'All up, my base case remains that a rate cut on Melbourne Cup day is an odds-on favourite – following release of the June quarter consumer price index report in late October. 'If the CPI report confirms annual underlying inflation has fallen to at least 2.6 per cent (the RBA's current expectation) – as I expect – then I fully anticipate the RBA will cut rates to 3.35 per cent on Melbourne Cup Day, Tuesday November 4.' AMP chief economist Shane Oliver said the RBA would continue to cut interest rates on the back of risks to higher unemployment and inflation subsiding. 'So, while low unemployment and poor productivity growth mean that the RBA will remain cautious and gradual in cutting rates, and they will assess the situation from meeting to meeting, we continue to see the RBA cutting rates again in November, February and May, taking the cash rate down to 2.85 per cent,' he said. In her press conference post announcing a rate cut in August, RBA governor Michele Bullock confirmed that further interest rate cuts were coming but said the bank would remain data dependent. 'You'll note that in the forecasts, we have inflation coming back down to target, and the unemployment rate remaining where it is with a couple more cash rate cuts in there – that's the best sort of guess,' she said. 'But things can change, and the board has to be taking things meeting by meeting and absorbing the data and thinking about what that might mean for whether or not we're on track to achieve our goals.'
