Tasmanian greyhound racing unprofitable and costing taxpayers, Saul Eslake review finds
Funding for Tasmanian greyhound racing is rising faster than for education, according to independent economist Saul Eslake, who says the state government has "an opportunity to stop throwing good money after bad".
Ms Eslake said a report — commissioned by 12 animal welfare advocacy organisations, including RSPCA Tasmania, and Dogs Homes of Tasmania — the sport had received a total of $74.6 million from Tasracing over the past 15 years, "rising from $3.5 million in 2010-11 to a projected $7.5 million in 2024-25".
Funding for greyhound racing has risen by an annual average of 5.6 per cent over the past 15 years — faster than education funding over the same period (4.1 per cent), and general government sector spending (5.2 per cent).
The report also found the sport received $12.70 per head in 2023-24 — more than twice the national average of $5.27.
Mr Eslake wrote that the returns were "diminishing", with attendances, race starters, wagering and employment declining.
For every $1,000 the code received, four people attended a race meeting in 2021-22 — down from 6.4 in 2011-12.
The industry also supports 82 jobs for each $1 million it receives, down from 150 in 2011-12.
A report by IER, performed for Tasracing, found that in 2021-22, greyhound racing sustained and created 639 full or part-time jobs, or 0.2 per cent of the state's employment.
Tasracing and the state government have been contacted for comment.
Deb Fleming, who is representing the 12 organisations that commissioned the report, said animal welfare concerns were not being heeded by the government or the Labor opposition, which both support greyhound racing.
"They fall back on justifying the well-known animal welfare issues — that are just unavoidable in dog racing — by saying it's vital for the economy, particularly in the regions, and that it provides lots of jobs and lots of benefits to the economy," she said.
"So we thought it was a reasonable thing to obtain an independent interrogation of those claims from one of the most respected independent economists in the country."
She said Mr Eslake's report made it clear that greyhound racing was a "dud investment".
Sixty-two per cent of respondents to a 2023 EMRS poll were opposed to greyhound racing, while about 79 per cent agreed the government should stop spending money on it.
Tasracing, which manages the state's three racing codes, is backed by a 20-year funding deed it signed with the Tasmanian government in 2009.
While it was then worth $27 million per year, it is indexed for inflation. Tasracing received just over $36 million in 2023-2024.
That represents about half of its income, with the remainder coming via wagering, entry fees, media rights, and sponsorship.
The deed is partially funded by the sale of betting agency TOTE Tasmania, which the government sold for $103 million in 2011.
With the current deal set to expire in 2029, Tasracing and the state government are currently in negotiations for a new one.
Mr Eslake described the negotiations an "opportunity", and said there was a "growing case" for the taxpayer not to back greyhound racing.
"Its popularity is declining significantly — especially in the aftermath of revelations concerning animal welfare," he said.
Tasracing has released a draft Code of Practice for Racing Greyhound Welfare, which it says is similar to standards in place in other jurisdictions.
"While it was prepared to provide guidance to the Tasmanian industry, it also provides critically important assurances to the Tasmanian public about the welfare oversight of racing greyhounds in the state," said chief veterinary and animal welfare officer Martin Lenz.
The final code will be enforceable under the Rules of Racing.
"Amongst other things, it specifies minimum standards for accommodation, management, breeding, socialisation and care required to meet the physical and behavioural needs of a racing greyhound throughout its entire life cycle," Dr Lenz said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
PNG's Cyber Laws: Safeguard or Censorship?
This week on Radio Australia, we're turning up the volume on Pacific voices—through music, the arts, sport, and politics. On Politok, Scott Waide takes a hard look at PNG's Cyber Crime Act. The arrest of activist Eddie Tanago has sparked a national debate: are these laws protecting citizens—or silencing dissent? On Nesia Daily, Michael Chow and Jacob McQuire serve up footy and food with former Kumul star James Segeyaro in a fresh episode of Mean Feeds. And on Stories from the Pacific, Wendy Mocke sits down with Tajhon Mailata to talk resilience, leadership, and bouncing back from life's toughest hits. Relax into your Sunday morning with two hours of the best stories from across the Pacific. Host, Kuntamari Crofts, will take you on a Pacific Sundays journey, bringing you stories that will inspire, entertain and inform you.

News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
High school ‘Tradwife' debate topic divides
A hot button topic put forward for Year 9 students to discuss during a statewide debate competition has caused a stir online. Debating SA, a non-profit organisation that runs debating competitions in South Australia, revealed its latest topics ahead of next week's debates. However, it was the topic for round three — 'The 'Trad Wife' movement is good for women' — that has raised eyebrows and sparked fierce discussion. The 'Trad Wife' movement has been popularised by the likes of influencer Hannah Neeleman, also known as Ballerina Farm, who has more than 10 million followers on Instagram, and Nara Smith, a US-based model and influencer with nearly 5 million followers. The movement is often rooted in 'traditional' values, based on the idea of a woman looking after the home and children while the woman's husband goes off to work and earn money. Typically, it is associated with conservative values where the woman is seen as submissive, however defenders say those who follow it, do so as a matter of personal choice. Debating SA's topic choice left many questioning whether it was appropriate for Year 9 students to research and discuss, let alone be aware of the phrase 'Trad Wife'. 'Personally I think being able to debate around a topic even one that is clearly terrible is still an important skill,' one social media user said. 'But the point of contention is that tradwife stuff promotes not only staying at home, but actual straight up misogyny. And it would always be controversial to debate 'is it okay to hate women?'.' Another said: 'This is a huge misstep by the debating orgs (and I'm saying this as a former high school debater and coach).' 'Sounds like those who champion 'critical thinking, cultural nous and debate' to set this topic have NFI of the current cultural implications of the 'tradwife' movement online, especially its direct pipeline to white supremacy and misogyny,' another added. But others argued there was no real issue. 'I thought one of the points of debating was arguing for a side you don't necessarily agree with. My son recently was involved with a school debate where the topic was 'Is the current climate change man made?'. I don't see a trad wife debate being much different,' one parent wrote. Another weighed in: 'Honestly, if the goal is to teach kids how to think critically about the content they're bombarded with online, this isn't the worst topic to explore. 'The tradwife movement is something they'll run into on TikTok or YouTube eventually, so better to unpack it in a guided, moderated classroom than leave them to figure it out through algorithm-fed echo chambers. Context and intent matter. If this was framed as a critical discussion — not an endorsement — then it's literally education doing its job.' Following the outrage, Debating SA sent a clarification to schools, saying that students 'must look critically at sources'. 'It goes without saying that any websites that denigrate women (or any person) are not a good source of information and are not relevant to the topic,' the clarification, which also appeared on its website, said. 'To avoid any confusion about the topic, the following definitions for the purpose of the debate apply: 'Tradwife is a portmanteau for 'traditional wife', a woman who embraces traditional gender roles, primarily focusing on home making and family care, while her husband is the primary breadwinner. This can include cooking, cleaning, child-rearing, and maintaining the home. 'This term is intended to be synonymous with the idea of a stay at home parent.' 'The tradwife movement is therefore a group of people who support a lifestyle such as the above. Note that this does not include any concept of 'submission' as some sources may define. 'Good for women generally refers to something that has a positive impact on women's lives and wellbeing. Note specifically that the definition does not infer 'all women'.' In a further email provided to Sonja Lowen, the chairman of Debating SA, said: 'The positive response to the topic and our organisation [has] been well expressed by a number of people in the mainstream media. 'The negative response from some of the public has been very illuminating in the way in which they chose to express not only their views. but also the idea that there can be no debate about this subject. It seems that thinking about a subject that they don't agree with has become a radical act. Shutting down discussion is not a good idea and is the antithesis of a free society.' Ms Lowen said it made her realise debate provides a regulated forum for students to be able to present a case in a measured way, 'something some of the public would do well to emulate'. 'We expect our debaters to present their case with evidence and reasoning. It is very necessary for young people to be able to develop the skills to navigate their way in what is now a very complicated social landscape and those skills are perfected and refined by debating,' she said. 'Debating is an intellectual and academic discipline that allows the participants to examine both sides of a topic regardless of their own personal beliefs. This ability to explore both sides makes us tolerant of other views. Thinking is hard work and we should not surrender our intellectual independence because a topic may be difficult or in this case deemed unacceptable by some of the public.' But some were not satisfied with the reasoning from Debating SA. 'This isn't moderated in class discussion, it's a discussion topic for a Debating Competition, and the organisers have said that they used trad-wife as a synonym for 'stay at home parent',' one said. 'Honestly, their excuse sounds pretty pathetic – trad-wife is not a synonym for stay at home parent, it's a controversial social movement with significant connections to right-wing politics and influencers.' Another added: 'They're engaged enough to know the term, but not the context. 'Tradwife' is absolutely not a synonym for 'stay at home parent'. They've gone awry from the outset.' 'The issue is them conflating SAHM with Trad Wife. Trad wife is a social movement. They are vastly not the same thing. And the Trad Wife may not necessarily have children,' another said.

News.com.au
7 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Not an easy path': Specialist outlines steps to enter Australian defence industry
Defence industry specialist Brent Clark breaks down the steps for breaking into the Australian defence industry as a supplier with government contracts. 'These things are always complex,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'It is not an easy path to tread to become a supplier into defence, but in many ways, nor should it be. 'Defence has cutting-edge equipment and very complex projects that it's trying to undertake. 'The reality, of course, is that you need to be diverse, you need to ensure that you have the best capability possible, and you need to make sure you are ready to take on a defence contract.'