logo
NYC biz leaders left shaking over prospect of Zohran Mamdani mayoral win: ‘It would be disastrous'

NYC biz leaders left shaking over prospect of Zohran Mamdani mayoral win: ‘It would be disastrous'

New York Post3 hours ago

They want none of his business.
Big Apple business leaders are shaking in their boots that socialist Zohran Mamdani will pull off an upset win in Tuesday's Democratic mayoral primary and coast into Gracie Mansion, The Post has learned.
Frightened movers and shakers said that a Mayor Mamdani would be 'disastrous' for New York City — with some loath to speak out publicly for fear of ticking off progressives and galvanizing the Queens assemblyman's lefty, anti-business base.
'It would be disastrous for the city,' said startup entrepreneur John Borthwick — who recently met the surging candidate during a Partnership For New York City meeting.
Mamdani, who spent just three years in the workforce between graduating college in 2014 and being elected to the state Assembly in 2020, struck Borthwick as out of his depth.
'He's a very nice charming human who I think who has absolutely no idea what it would take to run a city government,' Borthwick, the CEO of Betaworks, said.
3 Zohran Mamdani's surge in the Democratic mayoral primary has some business leaders running scared.
LP Media
'Given the challenges the city faces with the state budget and federal government, they will eat him for breakfast.'
The business community's fear has been rising along with Mamdani's standing in the polls — culminating with an Emerson College Polling/Pix 11/The Hill survey Monday shockingly finding him edging out former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in eight rounds of ranked-choice voting.
Mamdani's surge in the polls has been driven by his unabashedly socialist, freebie-heavy platform promising free buses, city-run grocery stores and higher taxes on the rich.
But many business leaders such as billionaire John Catsimatidis — who threatened to close his Manhattan-based grocery chain Gristedes if Mamdani wins — have claimed that the Democratic socialist's proposals will lead to an exodus from the city.
3 Billionaire John Catsimatidis threatened to move his Gristedes grocery chain out of New York City if Mamdani wins.
Stefan Jeremiah for New York Post
Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis gleefully weighed in on the recent poll showing a Mamdani win by boasting of boon for the Sunshine State — at least for the well-to-do.
'Just when you thought Palm Beach real estate couldn't go any higher…' he wrote on X.
Frank Garcia, national chairman of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, who lives in New York, bluntly said business leaders were very concerned about Mamdani getting elected.
'He's like Bill de Blasio. He's anti-business,' Garcia said.
One New York business industry leader, who spoke with The Post under the condition of anonymity out of concern that Mamdani may actually win, said the outspoken progressive would bring 'uncertainty.'
'Uncertainty is never good for businesses, it's never good for the market,' he said, even going so far as comparing Mamdani to President Trump and his erratic tariff policy.
'It's almost like Trump in reverse,' he said.
One of Mamdani's people-pleasing planks is a promise to raise New York City's minimum wage to $30 an hour by 2030.
'In the world's richest city, making the minimum wage shouldn't mean living in poverty,' his campaign's platform states.
Tom Grech, president of the Queens Chamber of Commerce, said his borough's merchants — of whom 90% have 10 or fewer employees — are worried about Mamdani's promises.
'A $30 minimum wage is unsustainable,' he said. 'The average merchant can't afford a minimum wage increase now. That would kill the bottom line. They'd have to cut employees.'
But other business leaders have publicly kept their concerns to themselves.
3 Kathryn Wylde, CEO for the Partnership For New York City, said business leaders have stayed silent in the Democratic primary because their 'kind words' are not helpful.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
Kathryn Wylde, CEO for the powerful Partnership For New York City nonprofit business group, said their silence isn't necessarily unusual, noting they don't typically comment on political races.
'Plus, they are not plugged into social media, so few were forewarned about the possible far-left direction of the mayoral race,' she said.
'Many have some history with Cuomo — as some pundit put it 'the devil they know' — who was looking for their dollars but not for public endorsement in a Democratic primary, where kind words from the business community are not helpful.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Controversial land bill faces rewrite after public backlash
Controversial land bill faces rewrite after public backlash

Axios

time12 minutes ago

  • Axios

Controversial land bill faces rewrite after public backlash

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) says he's revising a proposal to sell millions of acres of public land to housing developers after backlash from outdoor rec enthusiasts, Axios' Erin Alberty reports. State of play: Across California, land around Mount Shasta, Big Sur, Mendocino, the Eastern Sierra and along the Pacific Crest Trail could be eligible for sale under the current draft, according to a recent analysis by a conservation nonprofit. Why it matters: Privatizing that land could limit access to popular hiking, camping and picnic areas near destinations frequented by San Franciscans, including around Yosemite National Park and Lake Tahoe, The Wilderness Society found. The big picture: The Republican-led proposal would require the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management to put up to 3.3 million acres on the market for housing development. The bill's focus is on parcels outside of protected lands like national parks, monuments and wilderness areas — which are exempt — but near roads and other development deemed suitable by local and state lawmakers. More than 250 million acres across 11 Western states could be eligible for sale. Caveat: National parks, monuments, recreation areas and other federally protected lands would be excluded. The intrigue: The proposal has sparked outrage in longtime Republican strongholds in rural parts of the state. Outdoor writer Todd Tanner has long warned of a conservative contradiction — a love for public land alongside support for a party that has threatened to sell it, SFGATE reports. Follow the money: Most proceeds from the potential sale of those public lands — projected to bring in between $5 billion and $10 billion over the next decade — would go to the U.S. Treasury. Just 5% would go to local governments. What they're saying:"If Republicans have their way, we will never get our public lands back once they are privatized," Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said in a statement to Axios. What we're watching: Whether a revised proposal could include protections for long-used public trails for hiking and skiing access.

Murkowski leaves door open to scenario of caucusing with Democrats
Murkowski leaves door open to scenario of caucusing with Democrats

Axios

time12 minutes ago

  • Axios

Murkowski leaves door open to scenario of caucusing with Democrats

Sen. Lisa Murkowski is leaving the door open to caucusing with Democrats if they managed to produce enough midterm upsets to create a 50-50 tie in 2027. Why it matters: The Alaska Republican is serious about putting her state first, and takes pride in practical wins for her constituents — and bucking her party when necessary. "There is some openness to exploring something different than the status quo," she told the GD Politics podcast. She called caucusing with Democrats as an independent an "interesting hypothetical," but added she has plenty of disagreements with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's (D-N.Y.) conference. Zoom in: Murkowski is on a book tour for her memoir that goes public tomorrow, Far From Home. "I call myself a Republican because of the values I hold, such as personal responsibility, small government, a strong national defense, and the individual's right to make her own choices," she writes in the book's epilogue. In an interview with Axios, she dismissed the self-imposed July 4 deadline the White House and Hill leadership are gunning to meet as "arbitrary." "I don't want us to be able to say we met the date, but our policies are less than we would want." "Why are we afraid of a conference? Oh my gosh," she added. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) are wary of going to conference negotiations with both chambers' tight majorities and the upcoming debt ceiling "X-date." Between the lines: Murkowski also shares some eye-catching personal anecdotes in the book, which spans from before her historic write-in 2010 Senate win through her 2021 vote to convict Trump of impeachment and the overturning of Roe in 2022. Trump once referred to her as "that bitch Murkowski" in a phone call with her late colleague Rep. Don Young, Murkowski writes. "You have nice hair," Trump told her after a 90-minute meeting about Alaska priorities in the Oval Office during his first term. Zoom out: Murkowski shares — in almost agonizing detail — her reasoning and internal debate behind some of the biggest moments of her career. That includes: Choosing to face nepotism charges to accept her initial appointment to the Senate from her father, who was governor at the time. Working with Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) to allow the late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to have his iconic thumbs down moment, preserving the Affordable Care Act in 2017. Joining multiple bipartisan "gangs" to pass legislation with important wins for Alaska. Voting against Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court. Her decisions to first acquit and then convict Trump of his two rounds of impeachment charges. The bottom line: The timing of the book is not meant to signal anything, Murkowski told Axios. She just finally got around to telling the story, with the help of Charles Wohlforth, of when she won a write-in campaign for Senate 15 years ago after losing in the GOP primary. "We joke many times that we tried to stop the book at multiple points," Murkowski told us, "but then, you know, you've got an impeachment or you have an insurrection. And it just seemed like there was not an ending point."

Iran ceasefire upends congressional fight to limit Trump's war powers
Iran ceasefire upends congressional fight to limit Trump's war powers

Axios

time12 minutes ago

  • Axios

Iran ceasefire upends congressional fight to limit Trump's war powers

President Trump's abrupt announcement Monday that a ceasefire in the Iran-Israel war is imminent threatens a congressional effort to limit his power to initiate unilateral military strikes on Iran. Why it matters: The lead House Republican on the push is getting cold feet, but non-interventionist Democrats still want to have the vote in order to send a broader message about congressional war powers. "We may ... have a conflict in the future, and we need to be on record saying no offensive war in Iran without prior authorization," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told Axios. It may be a moot point: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) had signaled plans to use a procedural work-around to block rank-and-file members from forcing a war powers vote. The latest: House Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member Greg Meeks (D-N.Y.) is introducing his own war powers resolution, Axios has learned. His two-page measure would direct Trump to "remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran," according to a copy obtained by Axios. The measure is also sponsored by Reps. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrats on the House Armed Services and Intelligence committees. Driving the news: Trump said in a post on Truth Social that Israel and Iran had agreed to a "Complete and Total CEASEFIRE ... in approximately 6 hours from now." Trump said the ceasefire will last for 12 hours, "at which point the war will be considered, ENDED!" The ceasefire was mediated by Qatar and the U.S. after Iran sent the White House a message saying no further strikes would follow its attack on a U.S. base in Qatar, Axios Barak Ravid reported. What they're saying: "If there's a ceasefire, we don't need to withdraw from a war," Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), the lead Republican on the war powers resolution, told reporters after Trump's announcement. The libertarian Kentuckian said he told Johnson he "wouldn't push" the resolution "if the ceasefire holds." Massie has been locked in an increasingly adversarial relationship with Trump — with the president's political operation even launching a PAC to defeat him in his GOP primary. Yes, but: Khanna told Axios "we still need" a vote, arguing a ceasefire "makes it probably an easier vote for people to do, just to get it on record for Congress to take back its authority." Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), another supporter of the resolution, similarly told Axios: "I still think we need to do it."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store