3 Top Dividend Stocks To Consider For Your Portfolio
As global markets react to the Trump administration's emerging policies and AI-related optimism, major indices like the S&P 500 have reached new highs, reflecting positive investor sentiment. With this backdrop of market enthusiasm and shifting economic dynamics, dividend stocks present a compelling option for investors seeking stable income streams amid potential volatility.
Name
Dividend Yield
Dividend Rating
Tsubakimoto Chain (TSE:6371)
4.19%
★★★★★★
Guaranty Trust Holding (NGSE:GTCO)
5.94%
★★★★★★
Southside Bancshares (NYSE:SBSI)
4.58%
★★★★★★
CAC Holdings (TSE:4725)
4.52%
★★★★★★
Yamato Kogyo (TSE:5444)
3.90%
★★★★★★
Padma Oil (DSE:PADMAOIL)
7.45%
★★★★★★
GakkyushaLtd (TSE:9769)
4.34%
★★★★★★
Nihon Parkerizing (TSE:4095)
3.93%
★★★★★★
FALCO HOLDINGS (TSE:4671)
6.52%
★★★★★★
E J Holdings (TSE:2153)
3.12%
★★★★☆☆
Click here to see the full list of 1938 stocks from our Top Dividend Stocks screener.
Let's dive into some prime choices out of the screener.
Simply Wall St Dividend Rating: ★★★★★☆
Overview: Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. provides non-life insurance products and services across Korea, China, the United States, Indonesia, Vietnam, Singapore, and the United Kingdom with a market cap of approximately ₩14.31 trillion.
Operations: Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. generates its revenue primarily from its insurance business, amounting to approximately ₩19.31 billion.
Dividend Yield: 4.2%
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance's dividend payments have been volatile over the past decade, despite increasing overall. The company's dividends are well-covered by earnings and cash flows, with payout ratios of 37.5% and 39.7% respectively, suggesting sustainability from a financial standpoint. Trading significantly below fair value estimates, it offers a competitive dividend yield in the top 25% of the Korean market. Recent earnings growth supports potential future stability in payouts.
Take a closer look at Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance's potential here in our dividend report.
The valuation report we've compiled suggests that Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance's current price could be quite moderate.
Simply Wall St Dividend Rating: ★★★★☆☆
Overview: China Banking Corporation offers a range of banking and financial products and services to individuals and businesses in the Philippines, with a market cap of ₱180.19 billion.
Operations: China Banking Corporation's revenue segments include interest income of ₱37.25 billion, service charges and fees of ₱5.13 billion, trading and securities gains of ₱2.47 billion, and foreign exchange gains of ₱1.08 billion.
Dividend Yield: 2.4%
China Banking Corporation's dividends have been stable and reliable over the past decade, supported by a low payout ratio of 13.3%, indicating strong coverage by earnings. However, its dividend yield of 2.37% is relatively low compared to top-tier payers in the Philippine market. Despite this, CBC has seen consistent earnings growth at 18.3% annually over five years, although it faces challenges with a high bad loans ratio of 2.4%.
Dive into the specifics of China Banking here with our thorough dividend report.
Insights from our recent valuation report point to the potential overvaluation of China Banking shares in the market.
Simply Wall St Dividend Rating: ★★★★★☆
Overview: Meiwa Corporation operates in the chemicals, lubricants, battery materials, automotive and mineral resource, and environmental sectors both domestically in Japan and internationally, with a market cap of ¥26.41 billion.
Operations: Meiwa Corporation's revenue segments include First Business at ¥42.86 billion, Third Business at ¥59.98 billion, Second Business at ¥47.67 billion, and Automobile/Battery Materials Business at ¥11.34 billion.
Dividend Yield: 4.7%
Meiwa's dividend yield of 4.66% ranks in the top 25% of payers in Japan, though its dividends have been volatile over the past decade, with drops exceeding 20%. Despite this instability, dividend payments are well-supported by a low payout ratio of 45.2% and a cash payout ratio of 25.9%. The company's earnings surged by 94.6% last year, and it trades at a significant discount to its estimated fair value.
Click here and access our complete dividend analysis report to understand the dynamics of Meiwa.
In light of our recent valuation report, it seems possible that Meiwa is trading behind its estimated value.
Unlock our comprehensive list of 1938 Top Dividend Stocks by clicking here.
Are any of these part of your asset mix? Tap into the analytical power of Simply Wall St's portfolio to get a 360-degree view on how they're shaping up.
Invest smarter with the free Simply Wall St app providing detailed insights into every stock market around the globe.
Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention.
Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management.
Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include KOSE:A000810 PSE:CBC and TSE:8103.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
9 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
What will happen to food assistance under Trump's tax cut plan? A look at the numbers
President Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food assistance for lower-income people. The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future. The legislation, which narrowly passed the U.S. House, could undergo further changes in the Senate, where it's currently being debated. Trump wants lawmakers to send the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' to his desk by July 4, when the nation marks the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Here's a look at the food assistance program, by the numbers: The federal aid program formerly known as food stamps was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, on Oct. 1, 2008. The program provides monthly payments for food purchases to low-income residents generally earning less than $1,632 monthly for individuals, or $3,380 monthly for a household of four. The nation's first experiment with food stamps began in 1939. But the modern version of the program dates to 1979, when a change in federal law eliminated a requirement that participants purchase food stamps. There currently is no cost to people participating in the program. A little over 42 million people nationwide received SNAP benefits in February, the latest month for which figures are available. That's roughly one out of every eight people in the country. Participation is down from a peak average of 47.6 million people during the 2013 federal fiscal year. Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly household benefit of $353. The money can be spent on most groceries, but the Trump administration recently approved requests by six states — Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska and Utah — to exclude certain items, such as soda or candy. Legislation passed by the House is projected to cut about $295 billion in federal spending from SNAP over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. A little more than half of those federal savings would come from shifting costs to states, which administer SNAP. Nearly one-third of those savings would come from expanding a work requirement for some SNAP participants, which the CBO assumes would force some people off the rolls. Additional money would be saved by eliminating SNAP benefits for between 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants legally in the U.S. who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents. Another provision in the legislation would cap the annual inflationary growth in food benefits. As a result, the CBO estimates that the average monthly food benefit would be about $15 lower than it otherwise would have been by 2034. To receive SNAP benefits, current law says adults ages 18 through 54 who are physically and mentally able and don't have dependents need to work, volunteer or participate in training programs for at least 80 hours a month. Those who don't do so are limited to just three months of benefits in a three-year period. The legislation that passed the House would expand work requirements to those ages 55 through 64. It also would extend work requirements to some parents without children younger than age 7. And it would limit the ability of states to waive work requirements in areas that lack sufficient jobs. The combined effect of those changes is projected by the CBO to reduce SNAP participation by a monthly average of 3.2 million people. The federal government currently splits the administrative costs of SNAP with states but covers the full cost of food benefits. Under the legislation, states would have to cover three-fourths of the administrative costs. States also would have to pay a portion of the food benefits starting with the 2028 fiscal year. All states would be required to pay at least 5% of the food aid benefits, and could pay more depending on how often they make mistakes with people's payments. States that had payment error rates between 6-8% in the most recent federal fiscal year for which data is available would have to cover 15% of the food costs. States with error rates between 8-10% would have to cover 20% of the food benefits, and those with error rates greater than 10% would have to cover 25% of the food costs. Many states could get hit with higher costs. The national error rate stood at 11.7% in the 2023 fiscal year, and just three states — Idaho, South Dakota and Vermont — had error rates below 5%. But the 2023 figures are unlikely to serve as the base year, so the exact costs to states remains unclear. As a result of the cost shift, the CBO assumes that some states would reduce or eliminate benefits for people. The House resolution containing the SNAP changes and tax cuts passed last month by a margin of just one vote — 215-214. A vote also could be close in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats. Democrats did not support the bill in the House and are unlikely to do so in the Senate. Some Republican senators have expressed reservations about proposed cuts to food assistance and Medicaid and the potential impact of the bill on the federal deficit. GOP Senate leaders may have to make some changes to the bill to ensure enough support to pass it. Lieb writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Insiders At Vistra Sold US$39m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness
Over the past year, many Vistra Corp. (NYSE:VST) insiders sold a significant stake in the company which may have piqued investors' interest. Knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more helpful when evaluating insider transactions, as insider selling can have various explanations. However, when multiple insiders sell stock over a specific duration, shareholders should take notice as that could possibly be a red flag. While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, logic dictates you should pay some attention to whether insiders are buying or selling shares. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Notably, that recent sale by Scott Helm is the biggest insider sale of Vistra shares that we've seen in the last year. That means that even when the share price was slightly below the current price of US$174, an insider wanted to cash in some shares. When an insider sells below the current price, it suggests that they considered that lower price to be fair. That makes us wonder what they think of the (higher) recent valuation. However, while insider selling is sometimes discouraging, it's only a weak signal. This single sale was just 16% of Scott Helm's stake. In total, Vistra insiders sold more than they bought over the last year. The chart below shows insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction! View our latest analysis for Vistra If you like to buy stocks that insiders are buying, rather than selling, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: Most of them are flying under the radar). Over the last three months, we've seen significant insider selling at Vistra. In total, insiders dumped US$22m worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. In light of this it's hard to argue that all the insiders think that the shares are a bargain. Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. Usually, the higher the insider ownership, the more likely it is that insiders will be incentivised to build the company for the long term. It's great to see that Vistra insiders own 1.0% of the company, worth about US$576m. Most shareholders would be happy to see this sort of insider ownership, since it suggests that management incentives are well aligned with other shareholders. Insiders haven't bought Vistra stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. Despite some insider buying, the longer term picture doesn't make us feel much more positive. But it is good to see that Vistra is growing earnings. While insiders do own a lot of shares in the company (which is good), our analysis of their transactions doesn't make us feel confident about the company. So while it's helpful to know what insiders are doing in terms of buying or selling, it's also helpful to know the risks that a particular company is facing. To assist with this, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Vistra. Of course Vistra may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors in Trupanion (NASDAQ:TRUP) have seen favorable returns of 92% over the past year
These days it's easy to simply buy an index fund, and your returns should (roughly) match the market. But investors can boost returns by picking market-beating companies to own shares in. To wit, the Trupanion, Inc. (NASDAQ:TRUP) share price is 92% higher than it was a year ago, much better than the market return of around 11% (not including dividends) in the same period. If it can keep that out-performance up over the long term, investors will do very well! In contrast, the longer term returns are negative, since the share price is 2.4% lower than it was three years ago. So let's assess the underlying fundamentals over the last 1 year and see if they've moved in lock-step with shareholder returns. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Given that Trupanion didn't make a profit in the last twelve months, we'll focus on revenue growth to form a quick view of its business development. When a company doesn't make profits, we'd generally hope to see good revenue growth. Some companies are willing to postpone profitability to grow revenue faster, but in that case one would hope for good top-line growth to make up for the lack of earnings. Trupanion grew its revenue by 14% last year. That's a fairly respectable growth rate. Buyers pushed the share price 92% in response, which isn't unreasonable. If revenue stays on trend, there may be plenty more share price gains to come. But it's crucial to check profitability and cash flow before forming a view on the future. The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). If you are thinking of buying or selling Trupanion stock, you should check out this FREE detailed report on its balance sheet. It's nice to see that Trupanion shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 92% over the last year. That's better than the annualised return of 6% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Trupanion is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about... If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
