
Car companies are paying tariffs so you don't have to
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
That is good news for Trump and Republicans in Congress because it insulates them from the political consequences of higher sticker prices, which would also contribute to inflation.
Advertisement
Carmakers 'will try to hold prices and focus on cost reduction for as long as they can,' said Lenny LaRocca, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's work with the auto industry.
But, LaRocca said, 'clearly it's not sustainable.' He predicted that automakers would start raising prices significantly early next year.
No car company is immune. Even those that make most of their vehicles in the United States use imported parts that can amount to more than half the value of some cars. In recent weeks General Motors, Toyota, Ford Motor, Stellantis, Tesla, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen have all blamed tariffs for declines in profit.
Advertisement
Ford, which makes most of its cars in the United States, expects retail prices for its vehicles to rise just 1% this year, Sherry House, the chief financial officer, said last month during a conference call with reporters.
Mercedes-Benz vehicles at the Port of Baltimore, where new vehicle imports are processed before distribution to dealerships.
Stephanie Scarbrough/Associated Press
But that's not because the tariffs aren't having an effect. Import duties subtracted $800 million from Ford's profit in the second quarter, leading to a slight loss for the period. For the whole year, Ford estimated that tariffs would cost the company $2 billion.
General Motors, the largest U.S. carmaker, said last month that tariffs would cost the company as much as $5 billion for the full year, although it hoped to offset about a third of that amount by cutting costs and moving some manufacturing to the United States. Still, the company expects retail prices to rise 1% or less this year, Paul Jacobson, chief financial officer of GM, told investors last month.
Toyota, which makes many cars in the United States but also imports them from Japan, Mexico and Canada, said Thursday that tariffs would cost it $9.5 billion. A day earlier, Honda pegged its tariff cost at $3 billion.
Tariffs and sinking profits could make it harder for carmakers to do what Trump wants them to do -- relocate assembly lines to the United States from other countries. Companies will have less money to invest in new factories and equipment.
The Trump administration maintains that deregulation, tax deductions for equipment purchasing and other measures will be positive for the industry.
Advertisement
'Two things can be accomplished at once: We can lower costs for everyday Americans while restoring American auto dominance,' Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, said in an email. 'The administration is working closely with the auto industry to deliver on both fronts.'
Car prices as measured by U.S. officials declined slightly in June, Desai pointed out, 'despite months of autos, auto parts, steel and aluminum tariffs being in place.'
Workers gave final inspections to vehicles at a General Motors plant in Spring Hill, Tenn.
BRETT CARLSEN/NYT
Others see signs that prices are beginning to creep higher. Cox Automotive estimates that tariffs will add at least $5,000 to the cost of imported cars on an annual basis. Even for cars manufactured in the United States, tariffs on components add about $1,000, not including the 50% duties that Trump has imposed on imported steel and aluminum.
By the end of the year, prices could be 8% higher, Cox says, pushing the average selling price of a new car above $50,000.
Higher prices would fall hardest on less affluent consumers. Many of the least expensive cars are imported, like the Chevrolet Trax made in South Korea or the Nissan Versa made in Mexico.
Some car buyers will be able to afford only used models. And higher demand for pre-owned vehicles will push up their prices, too. Adding to the pain, buyers of used cars often pay much higher interest on loans, which can exceed 20% for people with less-than-stellar credit records.
The cost of repairs and parts will also rise. So far the price increases have been modest, said Michael Holmes, co-chief executive of Virginia Tire and Auto. The chain of auto repair and maintenance shops adds a tariff surcharge to prices to reflect the additional cost. That can range from 50 cents or so for an air filter to around $5 for a tire.
Advertisement
But the surcharges could rise depending on where tariffs on parts from Mexico and Canada end up, he said.
His biggest problem, Holmes said, is staying abreast of shifting trade policy. 'You get exhausted trying to figure out where all these tariffs are,' he said.
Trump policies have some financial benefits for carmakers. The Republican domestic policy bill passed last month eliminated penalties for violating clean air standards. That angered environmental groups but allows carmakers to build more big SUVs and pickups, which tend to have the highest profit margins.
The end of those penalties has also freed established carmakers from having to buy clean air credits if they fall short of emissions targets. That will save GM and others hundreds of millions of dollars, but comes at the expense of companies that have lots of credits to sell, like Tesla and Rivian, because they make only electric vehicles that emit nothing from tailpipes.
Car executives are hopeful that the Trump administration will take further steps to ease the impact of tariffs. 'We're having very constructive conversations with them to ensure a more level playing field,' House, the Ford chief financial officer, told reporters this month.
But Trump continues to threaten substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada and has yet to reach a permanent trade deal with either. Both countries are critical suppliers of vehicles and parts and are important destinations for parts and vehicles made in the United States.
The policy bill also contained a measure designed to stimulate demand for cars. The provision lets taxpayers deduct from their taxes the interest they pay on loans used to buy cars assembled in the United States. But the value of the deduction will be relatively small, in the hundreds of dollars for most people.
Advertisement
'We don't think it's really going to drive demand,' said Erin Keating, executive analyst at Cox Automotive.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
43 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs
As household budgets continue to feel squeezed, many Americans find it harder to juggle everyday expenses with long-term financial goals. Rising grocery store and gas pump costs are forcing tough choices, and for many, retirement savings are slipping down the priority list. Popular personal finance author and podcaster Dave Ramsey shares key ideas about how 401(k)s and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) are useful tools workers can use to help relieve their sense of nervousness about the future. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter This growing anxiety is compounded by uncertainty in the stock market that leaves investors questioning whether their portfolios are truly prepared to support them in their later years. In addition to that, there are looming concerns about Social Security. Projections suggest its trust funds may be depleted by 2034, potentially slashing benefits to only about 80% of what retirees currently expect. Health care costs are another major stressor. Even with Medicare, premiums and out-of-pocket expenses can add up quickly, making it difficult for retirees to feel financially secure. In light of these challenges, Ramsey offers his views on 401(k)s, IRAs and how they compare to Roth 401(k)s and Roth IRAs. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security Ramsey emphasizes the fact that many workers are not saving or investing enough for retirement - and that this shortfall stems from entrenched habits. The only way to break these patterns is to take deliberate action and make meaningful changes to how one manages their money today, he says, and a great place to start is with 401(k) plans and IRAs. A 401(k) is a retirement savings program offered through an employer. It enables workers to automatically set aside a portion of their earnings for retirement, with contributions conveniently deducted from their paychecks. And many 401(k) plans feature matching contributions from the employer, essentially offering free money to invest in retirement savings. The amount individuals can contribute to their 401(k) plans in 2025 has increased to $23,500, up from $23,000 for 2024, according to the IRS. An IRA is a type of savings account designed to help workers prepare for retirement while offering valuable tax benefits. Depending on the type of IRA, a person can either reduce their taxable income now and let their investments grow tax-deferred, or enjoy tax-free growth and withdrawals later when they retire. The limit on annual contributions to an IRA remains $7,000. The catch-up contribution limit for employees aged 50 and over remains $7,500. Getty Images Ramsey explains that when one contributes to a traditional 401(k), they are getting a tax benefit up front. The money goes in before taxes, which lowers taxable income for the year and reduces what is owed to the IRS. It's a solid deal for now, Ramsey writes - but when one retires, they will pay taxes on everything: their contributions, the employer's match, and any investment gains. More on personal finance: Dave Ramsey has blunt words for Americans on Medicare, MedicaidJean Chatzky sends strong message on major 401(k) changesFinance expert has blunt words for car buyers A Roth 401(k) works differently. An individual contributes after-tax dollars, so there is no immediate tax break. But the payoff comes later - one's money grows tax-free, and they will not owe anything when they withdraw it in retirement. "Both types of tax advantages are great, but if your employer offers a Roth 401(k), we always recommend taking that option," Ramsey wrote. "Allowing your money to grow tax-free for decades and then not having to worry about taxes when you're living out your retirement dreams? Sign us up!" Related: Dave Ramsey has blunt words for Americans on Medicare, Medicaid Ramsey emphasizes the fact that traditional IRAs offer a tax break up front - an individual contributes with pretax dollars, which can lower taxable income and reduce their tax bill for the year. However, because they didn't pay taxes going in, they will owe taxes later when when they withdraw the money in retirement, including any growth. Traditional IRAs are open to anyone with taxable income, regardless of how much they earn, and they can contribute the full amount. But starting at age 73, people are required to begin taking withdrawals - called required minimum distributions - because the government wants its share eventually. Roth IRAs use a different plan. A person contributes after-tax dollars, meaning they have already paid taxes on the money. The benefit? Investments grow tax-free, and people can withdraw them tax-free in retirement. In 2025, one can contribute to a Roth IRA if their income is below $153,000 as a single filer, or $241,000 for married couples filing jointly. If one earns more than that, Ramsey suggests using a backdoor Roth IRA strategy to still take advantage of its long-term benefits. Related: Tony Robbins sends warning message to Americans on IRAs, 401(k)s The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dollar steady before inflation report, US-China tariff deadline
By Gregor Stuart Hunter SINGAPORE (Reuters) -The U.S. dollar stabilised on Monday after last week's losses, as markets await Tuesday's key U.S. CPI report for July and focus on developments in trade talks between Washington and Beijing ahead of a deadline to avoid the imposition of higher tariffs. The dollar index was flat at 98.25 after a 0.4% decline last week. Against the yen, the dollar was unchanged at 147.685 yen, with Japanese markets closed for the Mountain Day holiday. Trade talks were in focus as Trump's August 12 deadline for a deal between the U.S. and China loomed, particularly around chip policy. "The market has fully priced in the idea that we're going to get an extension," said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone Group Ltd in Melbourne, adding that another 90-day truce was most likely. With the U.S. and China seeking to close a deal that would avoid imposing triple-digit tariffs on each other's goods, the Financial Times reported on Sunday that chip manufacturers Nvidia and AMD agreed to allocate 15% of their revenues from sales in China to the U.S. government under an arrangement to obtain export licences for the semiconductors. The report follows a warning that Nvidia's H20 chips pose security concerns for China, a social media account affiliated with the country's state media said on Sunday. "I don't know if that's going to be a good thing or a bad thing, but if it puts closure on the matter it's not a bad outcome," Weston said. "If this is Trump says 15% and we'll call it a day, that may not be too bad." The offshore yuan fluctuated between gains and losses after data on the weekend showed China's producer prices fell more than expected in July, while consumer prices were unchanged. The Australian dollar fetched $0.6515, down 0.2% in early trade ahead of a rate decision from the Reserve Bank of Australia on Tuesday, where the central bank is widely expected to cut interest rates by 25 basis points to 3.60% after inflation for the second quarter missed expectations and the jobless rate hit a 3-1/2-year high. The kiwi last traded at $0.59455, down 0.13%, while the British pound traded at $1.34405, down 0.1% so far on the day. In crypto markets, bitcoin rose 0.7% to $119,154, not far from its previous record, while ether was up 1.1% at $4,267, after reaching its highest since December 2021 on Sunday. Elsewhere, personnel moves at key U.S. monetary policy institutions were also in focus. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the new Federal Reserve chair should be someone "who can examine the whole organisation" as the Fed's mission has included so many things outside of monetary policy and has put its independence at risk, Japan's Nikkei newspaper reported. The Trump administration was also interviewing candidates to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics including E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday, citing a senior administration official. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
With 42% stake, TIME dotCom Berhad (KLSE:TIMECOM) seems to have captured institutional investors' interest
Explore TIME dotCom Berhad's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Key Insights Institutions' substantial holdings in TIME dotCom Berhad implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price 50% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders Insider ownership in TIME dotCom Berhad is 11% Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If you want to know who really controls TIME dotCom Berhad (KLSE:TIMECOM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TIME dotCom Berhad. Check out our latest analysis for TIME dotCom Berhad What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TIME dotCom Berhad? Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. TIME dotCom Berhad already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see TIME dotCom Berhad's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. TIME dotCom Berhad is not owned by hedge funds. Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Afzal Rahim, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. Insider Ownership Of TIME dotCom Berhad The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. It seems insiders own a significant proportion of TIME dotCom Berhad. It has a market capitalization of just RM9.4b, and insiders have RM1.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently. General Public Ownership The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. Private Company Ownership We can see that Private Companies own 12%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. Next Steps: While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with TIME dotCom Berhad . If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data