Our Blood Institute calls for donors in summer blood drive
OBI's All-American Blood Drive will be happening across Oklahoma from Friday, June 13, to Monday, July 21.
There are plenty of opportunities to give back and help save lives. These special drives come with fun summer swag and a chance to make a real difference during a critical time of year.
All successful donors will receive:
A limited-edition All-American T-shirt
A free camp chair
One FREE theme park ticket to Frontier City or Hurricane Harbor.
Select All-American Drive Dates & Locations:
Oklahoma City Metro:
June 13 & 14 | Bass Pro Shops, Cabela's, OKC Outlets
June 21 | Quail Springs Mall & Bass Pro Shops
July 3 | Penn Square Mall
Tulsa Area:
July 3 | 2:00 pm – 8:00 pm | Tulsa Drillers
July 7 | 2:30 pm – 5:00 pm | River Spirit Casino Resort
For a complete list of statewide locations and dates, visit Our Blood Institute/All American or call 877-340-8777 to make an appointment.
Anyone 16 years of age or older in good health can donate blood. Donation typically takes only about an hour, and one donation saves up to three lives. Appointments to donate can be made online at obi.org or by calling 877-340-8777. Walk-ins are also welcome.
'Summer brings more accidents, more emergencies—and a greater need for blood,' said Dr. John Armitage, president and CEO of Our Blood Institute. 'Donors who give during these critical months are true lifesavers. We're deeply grateful to every person who rolls up a sleeve to help patients in need.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
NIH director offers reason for cutting vaccine contracts
Bhattacharya said in a recent episode of the podcast 'War Room' and then again in an opinion piece in The Washington Post, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) chose to cancel millions of dollars in mRNA contracts because the American public does not trust the technology. His reasoning differs from the explanation HHS Secretary Kennedy gave for canceling $500 million worth of mRNA contracts last week. Kennedy justified the move by claiming the technology does not meet 'current scientific standards.' Bhattacharya called mRNA a promising technology that could lead to better treatments for diseases like cancer. But he expressed concern over just how much antigen mRNA vaccines produce and leave in the body, even though other types of vaccines share the same issue and are considered safe and effective. Bhattacharya blamed public distrust in mRNA on vaccine mandates and other public health safety measures issued under the Biden administration, arguing that his administration did not properly address concerns about the vaccine's safety and efficacy. 'As a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust,' he wrote. 'No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.' outspoken critic of lockdown measures and vaccine mandates.
UPI
4 hours ago
- UPI
Alcohol use by U.S. adults at all-time low, Gallup says
1 of 2 | The results of Washington, D.C.-based Gallup's new survey released Wednesday suggest the self-reported drinking habits of many Americans is down to a new record low of 54%. File Photo (2021) by Bill Greenblatt/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A new Gallup Poll shows the use of alcohol among American adults is at its lowest point in a nearly 90-year downward trend. The results of Washington, D.C.-based Gallup's new survey released Wednesday suggest the self-reported drinking habits of many Americans is down to a new record low of 54% after "consecutive declines" since 1939 when the firm began tracking such behavior. The results of Gallup's annual Consumption Habits survey from July 7-21 supported data indicating that drinkers reported drinking less, and 53% of respondents say they believe that even a few drinks is bad for a person. Gallup experts are suggesting that, for the first time, it's now the majority view of the population that even moderate alcohol drinking is bad for one's health. Even John Gramlich, an associate research director at the nonpartisan Washington think tank Pew Research Center, called it "fascinating new data" in a social media post early Wednesday morning. The downward trend of drinking among young American adults has only accelerated from 59% in 2023 to 50% in the latest Gallup surveys. Previous Gallup results from 1997 to 2023 revealed at least 60% of Americans reported being casual alcohol drinkers. That number fluctuated for a few years before landing at its current 54% in the latest survey results. Gallup's historic data highlighted a 58% use of alcohol among Americans in its initial 1939 poll only 10 years after the economically devastating October 1929 stock market crash, but a one-time low in 1958 of 55%. Gallup said the belief that drinking is detrimental is now gaining traction with older adults, too. From 2023-2025, there was a 5% drop to 56% among people age 55 and older. The World Health Organization noted earlier last month that a separate 2022 Gallup Poll found strong public support among respondents for higher taxes on alcohol, tobacco and "sugary drinks." "Why? Because these products can harm your health & smart taxes help reduce consumption & fund better healthcare," the WHO said on social media.
NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
Hundreds of groups push back on Trump denying lawful immigrants access to Head Start, other programs
The Trump administration's expanded ban on immigrants' access to social services, such as Head Start and Meals on Wheels, could have a 'devastating' impact on children of immigrants, including U.S. citizens, hundreds of opponents told the federal government Wednesday. A total of 372 organizations have coalesced to oppose the administration's decision to make more federally funded health and human service programs off-limits to immigrants with some form of permission to be in the country. The groups say the administration wrongly promotes the expanded restrictions as part of its efforts to target illegal immigration. The policy actually 'directly targets lawfully present immigrants' by turning early learning centers, community health centers and mental health and addiction treatment programs 'into immigration checkpoints' where providers would have to check a person's immigration status, according to the groups. 'Undocumented immigrants already are not eligible for most federally funded programs. This is another case where the administration is lying to the public,' said Adriana Cadena, director of the Protecting Immigration Families coalition, which led the organizations' opposition to restrictions to be implemented by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). As a result, the restrictions will harm millions, the groups stated in official comments filed in response to the administration's expanded restrictions, published in the Federal Register July 14. The deadline for public comment on the new restrictions was set for 11:59 p.m. Wednesday. One in 4 children in the U.S. are in a family with at least one immigrant parent. In 2023, 86% of those children were born in the U.S., making them U.S. citizens, according to Migration Policy Institute, an immigration think tank. (President Donald Trump also wants to change such birthright citizenship.) Even if a U.S. citizen child is entitled to use a program, the Trump administration's restrictions are likely to cause confusion and misunderstanding, Cadena said, because of the many children who are in families whose members have different types of immigration status. "This is going to have long-term consequences we cannot begin to grasp," she said. In response to an NBC News request for comment, the White House sent a link to a July 10 news release by HHS announcing the new restrictions. The administration said in the release that it was ensuring that public benefits were not 'diverted to subsidize illegal aliens.' 'For too long, the government has diverted hardworking Americans' tax dollars to incentivize illegal immigration,' HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., stated in the July 10 release. 'Today's action changes that — it restores integrity to federal social programs, enforces the rule of law, and protects vital resources for the American people.' Expanding the programs restricted to 'qualified' immigrants The 1996 Personal Responsibility Reconciliation Act restricted the eligibility for federal public benefits to certain 'qualified' immigrants, according to KFF, a health policy group. Qualified immigrants have been defined as those lawfully present in the U.S. and do not include people with Temporary Protected Status, those who have Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and others, KFF reported. The HHS has added 13 more programs to the list of programs open only to qualified immigrants. Those newly added by the administration include Head Start, some of the funding for community health centers, family planning services, child welfare prevention, kinship guardian assistance, substance abuse prevention, treatment and recovery and mental health services and the Community Services Block Grant, the groups said. The federal government has said the list is not comprehensive and more programs could be added later. The groups argue that the programs and immigrants' access to them have a larger benefit to society as a whole and that "reducing access to these vital programs will make all of our communities less healthy, less safe, less stable, less able to thrive." Restrictions on the HHS programs announced in July were to be effective immediately. Groups said little guidance has been given to providers regarding their implementation, creating confusion and having a chilling effect on people who are eligible for the programs and benefits as well as on the nonprofits, local governments and others who provide them. Several states have sued over the changes, which they said would also affect programs such as Meals on Wheels, domestic violence shelters, housing assistance and more. A lawsuit also was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and others on behalf of parent groups challenging Trump's policies on Head Start. The administration provided a 30-day comment period for the new restrictions. "We do not necessarily expect that there is a real interest from the administration to seek comment on public policy that will impact millions of people," Cadena said. "This is all about the Trump administration's governmentwide attack on immigrant families, and to dismantle the safety net system that many Americans rely on," she said.
