Jamie Bryson and Daithí McKay cleared in Northern Ireland Nama misconduct trial
Bryson, 35, from Rosepark in Donaghadee, and co-accused Thomas O'Hara, 41, from Lisnahunshin Road in Cullybackey, were found not guilty of conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office.
The charges had related to a Stormont committee hearing that examined the sale of the National Asset Management Agency's (Nama) Northern Ireland assets in 2015.
McKay, 43, from Loughan Road in Dunnamanagh – who was chairman of the finance committee at the time – was found not guilty of misconduct in public office.
Bryson and McKay said there are now questions for the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) over why the prosecution was brought.
The PPS has said the available evidence had indicated it was in the public interest to prosecute.
Trial judge Gordon Kerr KC said he believed Bryson had lied while giving evidence in the case, but said he was not involved in a criminal conspiracy.
The long-running Nama trial had related to Bryson's 2015 appearance before the Stormont committee, chaired by McKay, which was investigating the sale of Nama's Northern Ireland assets to a US investment fund.
The criminal probe was launched after the publication of leaked Twitter messages between Bryson, McKay and the account of O'Hara, who at the time was a Sinn Fein activist in north Antrim.
McKay quit as an MLA within hours of the Twitter messages being published in August 2016.
The Stormont Finance Committee inquiry was set up in 2015 amid political controversy over the multimillion-pound sale of Nama's property portfolio.
Advertisement
Nama, the so-called bad bank created by the Irish government to deal with the toxic loans of bailed-out lenders during the economic crash, sold its 800 Northern Ireland-linked properties to investment fund Cerberus for £1.2 billion.
Giving evidence to the committee in 2015, Bryson used Assembly privilege to name former DUP leader Peter Robinson as a beneficiary of the sale.
The then-first minister of Northern Ireland strongly rejected any suggestion he benefited from the deal. All other parties involved in the transaction also denied wrongdoing.
Delivering his judgment in the non-jury trial today, the judge said: 'Despite his lies in court, I am sure that Bryson was at all times communicating with McKay.
'I am sure that the communications were designed to give Bryson the best advice and guidance to maximise his chances of giving evidence.
'My analysis of the messages do not show any occasion where McKay undertook to say or do anything outside his duties as chairman to ensure Bryson's evidence would be in open session.
'Clearing Bryson, the judge said the evidence did not establish there had been a criminal conspiracy between him and McKay.
He said: 'In the absence of an agreement, the conspiracy charge must fail.'
Turning to McKay, the judge said there was 'no doubt he deliberately misled the committee to ease the way for Bryson's presentation'.
The judge pointed out the Assembly had its own code of conduct and said there was 'no precedent for a prosecution in these circumstances'.
Clearing McKay, he added: 'I do not consider it my role to expand the offence.'
The judge said the evidence against O'Hara 'fell well short' of anything which would convince him of his guilt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The GPO is not ‘sacred ground'. It's so much more than that
What to do with the General Post Office (GPO) site on O'Connell Street has, ever since the 1916 Rising , generated controversy, performative outrage, piety and genuine concern. Talk of its commercial development, as seen in recent weeks, inevitably leads to assertions about it being, in the words of politicians in Aontú, 'sacred ground' and the 'heartbeat of our republic.' Sinn Féin has launched a petition to 'save the GPO,' insisting the Government, which is proposing mixed commercial and cultural use of the large complex, has 'turned its face against the preservation of our revolutionary history'. But if it is broadly accepted that the GPO is closely tied to Irish national identity, it should also be accepted that identity has never been fixed. In 1923 the Free State's cabinet planned to hand over the GPO site to the Catholic archbishop of Dublin for the construction of a new cathedral, a proposal abandoned due to legal complications. In her book Dublin 1916: The Siege of the GPO (2009), Clair Wills clears a path through the historic fog of competing narratives around the building and its meaning. Following its destruction in 1916 it was restored and formally reopened in 1929 when WT Cosgrave was head of government. As someone who fought during the Rising, Cosgrave held the key to the new building with some credibility, but his message at the reopening was not just about its glorious past: the GPO was now, he insisted, 'symbolical of the new order – and the Irish nation is progressing on the path of prosperity'. It was also where the State's new radio service, 2RN, was based. For those on the opposite side of the Civil War divide from Cosgrave, the GPO was a reminder of betrayal of the republican ideal. With Fianna Fáil winning power in 1932, political ownership of the GPO began to shift. In initiating the formation of an Easter Week Memorial Committee, and a plan to have a 1916 memorial placed in the GPO – Oliver Sheppard's sculpture The Death of Cúchulainn – Fianna Fáil was accused of political partisanship by excluding its political opponents from involvement, despite their shared 1916 heritage. READ MORE Oliver Sheppard's sculpture The Death of Cúchulainn in the GPO. Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill WT Cosgrave refused to attend the ceremony in 1935 to mark the unveiling of the sculpture because there was too much 'bitterness, suspicion and envy', and 'it is not possible to hide these national humiliations today or to cover them with a veil lifted from the bronze statue of Cúchulainn'. Republicans opposed to Fianna Fáil's acceptance of the legitimacy of the State were also critical, and the ceremony in 1935 was notable for the arrival at the GPO of a rival republican procession, en route to Glasnevin Cemetery. The GPO was a focal point in 1941, during the Emergency, with a military parade to mark the Rising's 25th anniversary and a message of the need to protect Irish sovereignty, but by 1966, when Seán Lemass was taoiseach, the message he communicated, as a 1916 GPO veteran, was that the national task now was to 'consolidate the economic foundations' of the State. In more recent decades, the GPO site has been the backdrop to a variety of protests and social outreach, including a soup kitchen. It is thus far from an exclusive 'sacred ground' in relation to the 1916 legacy; that description is more fitting for the graves of the executed 1916 leaders at Arbour Hill, which, it was accepted by successive governments, needed to remain a place austerely dignified. But the GPO is more complicated than that. It pre-dates the Rising, having opened in 1818. It has always been a post office, and indeed, was open for business on Easter Monday 1916 when its customers got such a rude awakening. The preparation of the GPO museum for the centenary of the Rising in 2016, which I participated in, saw An Post insist that as well as being a 'witness to history', its historic centrality to communications be emphasised. The Government wanted themes of inclusivity to be stressed, while there was also a focus on those who inhabited its hinterland. Citizen witnesses, and indeed victims, were also what prompted Patrick Pearse to surrender in 1916, a reminder that the burning GPO did not exist in splendid isolation but at the heart of a living city, and with that came responsibilities to respect both the living and the dead associated with it. And that remains the case. Narrowing the debate to one about 'sacred ground' is too restrictive. Given its iconic status, continued commercial function, and centrality to so many causes and communications, surely it is better that respect for its history is combined with a repurposing of the GPO area that would generate pride, and improve the perception of a space widely regarded as deficient and devoid of sufficient imagination for the main thoroughfare of a capital city.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Work begins on apartments at derelict Tallaght site after ‘20-plus years of promises, false starts and false hopes'
Building work will commence in the coming weeks on 16 new apartments at the site of a fire in Jobstown, Dublin , that killed a boy more than 20 years ago. Stephen Hughes was 12 in 2001 when he died in a fire at Rossfield Avenue, where he and a friend had been sleeping overnight in a makeshift den. The den had been built by a group of children in a side entrance situated between derelict shop units and a house. The den was made predominantly of pallets, doors and carpet. Dermot Griffin (54), of Ballyfermot Road, was convicted in 2014 of causing the death of the boy after setting the hut on fire. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison. The two derelict shop units were demolished last year with the area behind it being incorporated for the proposed housing development. READ MORE Sinn Féin TD Seán Crowe told the Dáil last month that the former retail units had been 'lying idle for more than 20 years'. A memorial area was established for Stephen at the front of the site where the fire occurred. South Dublin County Council said the derelict shop buildings were demolished in June 2024 following 'repeated vandalism and attempts to set fire to the property'. 'Initial site preparations and enabling works were carried out in December 2024,' it said. 'Following a procurement process, a building contractor has now been appointed for the construction of 16 new homes in Rossfield. Works are due to commence in the coming weeks.' The 16 apartments will consist of a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom units across two blocks. The council also said it has been in contact with the Hughes family throughout the design and planning of the development. Sinn Féin councillor Louise Dunne said the development is due to be called Stephen's Place in memory of the young boy. She said the area had become a site for illegal dumping and anti-social behaviour. Ms Dunne added that the local community as well as the Hughes family were 'cognisant of wanting to do something there, especially in the midst of a housing crisis'. Her party colleague, Deputy Crowe, said he welcomed that 'some progress is now in sight after 20-plus years of promises, false starts and false hopes'. 'This building at the entrance to Rossfield was an eye sore, a daily symbol of neglect and dereliction,' the Dublin South-West TD said. 'It was also a constant reminder, particularly to older residents and parents, of the tragic death of the local 12-year-old child Stephen Hughes who was killed as he slept at a makeshift play den located at the site.' [ Man jailed for 15 years over fire that killed boy (12) loses appeal Opens in new window ] At the trial in 2014, the jury viewed footage from the house of a neighbour which showed an unidentified man approaching the den at about 5am on September 1st, 2001, and the den catching fire immediately thereafter. Griffin was interviewed in 2001 and at that stage stated that he had stayed indoors on the night in question along with then partner, Tracy Deegan, who gave him an alibi. He said that he only left the house after he heard screaming. His story was supported at the time by Ms Deegan and she confirmed this again in 2006 when the case was re-examined. That year, 2006, a witness named Linda Prentice informed gardaí that she had seen Griffin setting fire to the den after telling gardaí in 2001 that she had not seen anything. Also in 2006, James Farrelly came forward to say he too had seen Griffin, and that Griffin threatened to kill him if he told anyone. In 2012, Ms Deegan admitted lying to gardaí in earlier investigations. She stated that Griffin left the house twice on the night of the fire and that he told her he was going to burn the hut down.
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish unification would cost €152m annually to give Northern Irish civil servants pay parity, report says
The cost of paying for unification would be €3 billion in the first year and the need for a subvention from the United Kingdom would disappear after nine years, if not earlier, a new study argues. The report, published on Thursday, is the result of research conducted by Dublin City University (DCU) and the Ulster University Economic Policy Centre, partly funded by The Ireland Funds. The cost of unification given in the report takes into account transfers from the Treasury in Whitehall, along with the cost of bringing wages and pensions in the North into line with the Republic . The deficit in public finances would last for between five and nine years, depending on economic growth, but would gradually decline over that time, according to the report, authored by Professor John Doyle, vice-president for research in DCU. READ MORE Bringing wages for public sector workers in the North into line with their better-paid equivalents in the Republic would cost taxpayers an extra €152 million per annum for 15 years. However, the costs of dealing with Northern public sector and state pensions would be a fraction of the costs estimated by others, requiring an additional €115 million per annum, over 40 years. 'If Northern Ireland replicates growth of the best Eastern European economies between 2000 and 2023, its gross national income would reach the same level as the Republic in 25 years, but the fiscal deficit would end in year five,' says the report. The study describes itself as the first peer-reviewed report 'to calculate the cost of unity over the first 10 years which takes account not only of the subvention, but necessary investment and gradual economic convergence with the rest of the island'.
