Revision of creamy layer income limit ‘need of the hour': House panel
The committee had made this recommendation first in a report in April this year. In its action taken report tabled on Friday, even as the committee reiterated its recommendation, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (MoSJE) said in its response that 'at present there is no proposal under consideration for further revision of the OBC creamy layer income limit'.
Noting the Centre's response, the committee stated that the present threshold of Rs 8 lakh was 'insufficient', given the 'increase in basic income of individuals of even lower income groups and the increasing trend of the inflation index.'
It went on to reiterate in 'no uncertain words' its recommendation for revising the present creamy layer threshold, to cover more persons from the OBCs as 'this would eventually help in raising their socio-economic condition to a satisfactory level'.
In the last revision in 2017, the income limit for OBCs to avail reservations was raised from Rs 6.5 lakh per annum to Rs 8 lakh per annum. As per Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) norms, the income limit for determining creamy layer for OBCs is to be raised every three years or even before the stipulated period, according to a September 1993 order.
In its April report, the committee had noted that the existing income limit of Rs 8 lakh for determining the creamy layer among OBCs was low, and covered only a small segment.
'Due to this, a large segment of OBC population, which is otherwise in need of support from the State through various welfare schemes to raise its social and educational status in the society, is being deprived from the benefits of reservation policy,' it had said.
The committee's report also noted the government's response that the pre-matric scholarship scheme was due for review and revision in the next financial cycle, from 2026-27 to 2030-31, and even the revision of parental income limit is under discussion.
In its April report, the committee had recommended to the Centre that pre-matric scholarship should begin from Class 5 onwards and that the current eligibility limit of parental income be raised from Rs 2.5 lakh per annum to Rs 5 lakh per annum to cover more OBC students.
An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change.
Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Parliament panel slams govt for keeping MGNREGS funding static at Rs 86,000 crore since 2023–24
NEW DELHI: A parliamentary panel on Monday criticised the government for not increasing the allocation under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), expressing concern that funding has remained static at Rs 86,000 crore since the revised estimates of 2023–24. In a report tabled in Parliament, the Department-Related Parliamentary Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj stressed that the effective implementation of the scheme hinges on 'timely and adequate' funding. 'The Committee is concerned to note that the allocation has remained unchanged since the 2023–24 revised estimates,' the report stated. It added that given MGNREGS's role in providing employment to rural and marginalised communities, consistent funding is essential for uninterrupted implementation. The panel questioned the government's rationale behind the stagnation in allocations, particularly for a demand-driven scheme like MGNREGS. It reiterated its earlier recommendation to reassess funding needs and raise allocations at the revised estimate stage if necessary. In its response, the Department of Rural Development (DoRD) maintained that fund disbursal is a 'continuous and demand-driven process,' and assured that the Centre remains committed to ensuring timely fund availability in coordination with the Ministry of Finance. The committee, however, dismissed the reply as 'stereotypical' and lacking seriousness, noting it merely outlined procedural aspects without addressing the core funding concerns. 'The Committee feels an immediate need for greater coordination between the DoRD and Ministry of Finance to ensure seamless implementation,' the report said. It reaffirmed its call for increased allocation to meet the scheme's objectives. According to budget data, Rs 89,153.71 crore was spent on MGNREGS in 2023–24. However, allocations for 2024–25 and 2025–26 remained fixed at Rs 86,000 crore each.
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sacking of Rajanna exposes Congress' ‘anti-Dalit' face, says BJP
The BJP has maintained that the sacking of Scheduled Tribes leader K.N. Rajanna from the Cabinet over his views on 'voter theft' had revealed the 'true anti-Dalit face' of the Congress, besides exposing the hollowness of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's claims of championing the cause of Ahinda (Kannada acronym for minorities, OBCs, and Dalits). In a social media post, BJP State president B.Y. Vijayendra said: 'This is the true face of Congress — anti-Dalit, anti-democratic and anti-truth. It also exposes the hollowness of Mr. Siddaramaiah's claims of championing the Ahinda cause. When leaders from these communities are targeted, he does not defend them. Instead, he bows to the diktats of the Delhi high command to safeguard his own position as Chief Minister.' He said that Mr. Rajanna, a senior Dalit leader, was removed from the State Cabinet 'for merely speaking the truth.' 'Clear pattern' Mr. Vijayendra further claimed: 'The pattern is clear. In the case of erstwhile ST Welfare Minister Nagendra, funds earmarked for the development of the community were siphoned off to finance Congress's election expenses. Instead of holding the CM and Deputy CM accountable, the blame was placed entirely on Mr. Nagendra, and the matter was quietly closed.' Meanwhile in the Legislative Assembly, the BJP members led by Leader of the Opposition R. Ashok raised the issue as soon as speculations about Mr. Rajanna either quitting or being sacked started doing the rounds. Mr. Ashok urged the government and Mr. Rajanna to clarify on the issue. He even argued that Mr. Rajanna should not be sitting in the place earmarked for Ministers if he is no longer a part of the ministry. While Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H.K. Patil said that Chief Minister Siddaramaiah would respond to them later, Mr. Rajanna said he was told by the Law Minister not to speak. 'Whether I have resigned or not will be told by the Chief Minister,' he said. But the Chief Minister stayed away from the session, while Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, who was in the session, chose not to comment on the floor of the House. Taking exception to Mr. Rajanna and the government remaining mum, Mr. Ashok sought to remind them that it was during the protest over the honey-trap allegations made by Mr. Rajanna that 18 of the BJP MLAs had been suspended. Meanwhile, Deputy Leader of the Opposition Arvind Bellad maintained that the sacking of Mr. Rajanna, a close aide of Mr. Siddaramaiah, was 'a big blow' delivered to the Chief Minister by his deputy.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
House adjourned till Tuesdayfollowing opposition's protest
1 2 L ucknow: Speaker Satish Mahana adjourned the proceedings of the Assembly till Tuesday morning following protest over mistreatment of leader of opposition Mata Prasad Pandey. The first day of the Monsoon Session got inundated in din that prevailed since the beginning, leading to Speaker Satish Mahana rushing for the day's business before adjourning the House until Tuesday morning. As the House session began on Monday, SP member Sangram Yadav stood up and objected to the alleged mistreatment meted out to Pandey when he had gone to meet the traders in Gorakhpur. He urged the Speaker to intervene in the matter. Pandey then stood up and said he was shown black flags and was stopped from proceeding ahead in the CM's constituency. He alleged that it was the handiwork of "BJP workers". After the CM's reply, the SP members jumped into the well of the House and began shouting anti-govt slogans. Pandey then demanded an inquiry into the incident and said that if he is found guilty action should be taken against him and if others are found guilty action should be taken against the alleged protesters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Amid ongoing din, parliamentary affairs minister Suresh Khanna said that it was the political agenda of the SP and there was no need for an inquiry. The Speaker tried to pacify the SP members, who by the time had sat in the well. Unable to pacify the SP members, the Speaker first adjourned the Question Hour for 15 minutes and later adjourned the entire Question Hour till 12.20pm. However, when the proceedings began, the reluctant SP members continued with their agitation forcing the Speaker to rush through the day's business before adjourning the House till Tuesday morning. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
