Truss ‘carries quite a lot of blame' for Tory record, Badenoch claims
Speaking on a farm near Saffron Walden in her constituency, Mrs Badenoch also described herself as an 'Essex girl', and added that people from the county 'are grafters; they work hard'.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch wipes away grain dust after trying her hand at harvesting wheat (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
The Leader of the Opposition faced questions about Ms Truss's claim that under the Conservatives, 'the economy was wrecked with profligate Covid spending by (Rishi) Sunak' and that 'the huge increase in immigration has been a disaster'.
Mrs Badenoch told ITV Anglia: 'I know that, as a former prime minister and a former foreign secretary, (Ms Truss) carries quite a lot of that blame.
'The party's now under new leadership.
'I wasn't in charge during those 14 years; she was.
'That's a criticism she's probably levelling at herself.'
The Tory leader also said she was 'telling the truth' about her party's record.
Kemi Badenoch speaks to farmer Sam Goddard during her visit to Hall Farm in Little Walden, Essex (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
'I'm telling the truth that immigration was too high – that's why we have much tougher policies to fix immigration,' she continued.
'I am telling the truth that taxes were too high, that we were putting a lot of regulation on businesses, and what we're seeing is Labour making every single thing worse.
'They're doing that because they haven't learned many of the lessons that we learned. They haven't learned from our mistakes. They're making worse mistakes.'
The Labour Government's mistakes include making 'no cut in spending at all – the books were not balanced', Mrs Badenoch claimed.
'We're spending more on welfare than we are on defence – that cannot continue,' she said.
Mrs Badenoch had previously told The Telegraph that 'for all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes'.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch drives a combine harvester during her visit (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
Ms Truss, who spent 49 days in Number 10, hit back when she said that 'instead of serious thinking', Mrs Badenoch was 'repeating spurious narratives'.
She continued: 'I suspect she is doing this to divert from the real failures of 14 years of Conservative government in which her supporters are particularly implicated.
'It was a fatal mistake not to repeal Labour legislation like the Human Rights Act because the modernisers wanted to be the 'heirs to Blair'.
'Huge damage was done to our liberties through draconian lockdowns and enforcement championed by Michael Gove and Dominic Cummings.
'The economy was wrecked with profligate Covid spending by Sunak. The huge increase in immigration has been a disaster.'
Mrs Badenoch also took questions about her identity, after she told the Rosebud podcast: 'I have not renewed my Nigerian passport, I think, not since the early 2000s.
Kemi Badenoch speaks to farmers during her visit to Hall Farm in Little Walden (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
'I don't identify with it any more, most of my life has been in the UK and I've just never felt the need to.'
The North West Essex MP told ITV Anglia: 'I am definitely an Essex girl, that is a fact.'
A London Assembly member before she took her Commons seat in 2017, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I represent an Essex constituency, these are my people.
'I was a Londoner, but Essex people asked me to be their MP, and I want to make sure that I do them proud. And I love this part of the world.
'It's fantastic being here. It's a rural community, and I've been talking to the farmers here. I talked about how my grandfather was a farmer, it's very hard work.
'The people of Essex and East Anglia – they are grafters.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch sits in the cab of a combine harvester (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
'They work hard, and I want to make sure that we do right by them.'
Mrs Badenoch spent Tuesday morning at a farm in Little Walden, where she tried her hand at harvesting wheat using a Claas Lexion combine harvester.
She told farmers: 'A lot of farming just feels like constant interference.
'Everything is interfered from the minute you wake up.'
Examples of interference included 'chemicals and insecticide, people you're hiring, how much you've got to pay them', plus changes to 'employers' NI (national insurance), then somebody wants to put pylons on, there's compulsory purchase, it's impacting the cost of the land, if you want to add a new farm building, there's planning applications', she said.
'It's just endless constant Government saying, 'You can't do this, you can't do that, you can't move forwards'.
'And the burden in my view has now crossed the threshold.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
10 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
New questions over Newport indoor market redevelopment
The local authority provided a £6 million loan to a developer for work on the market, which reopened in 2022. The market deal, which leased the building to the developer for 250 years, also included an agreement under which the council would receive a share of future rental income. However, no rental payments have yet reached the council, it said. 'Three years on and not a penny has been paid,' said Conservative councillor David Fouweather. 'We need some openness and transparency. The redevelopment was supported by £6 million of taxpayers' money. 'The public has a right to know what's going on. Why hasn't [the council] been receiving rental payments?' Separately, local Conservative campaigner Michael Enea has questioned what proportion of the overall project cost was funded by the council loan. A council spokesperson said the redevelopment had 'transformed' the market, attracted new independent businesses to Newport, and raised city-centre footfall. But the council said it had not received any rental share payments, and did not clarify how much of the project its loan had ultimately covered. 'As per our rental agreement, which is in place, the rental income share is calculated on the basis of income received, minus agreed deductions,' the spokesperson said. 'Agreed deductions include any fitting-out and rent-free periods offered to new occupiers by the market operator. These deductions should not be confused or misinterpreted, as they do not relate to the original development.' A 2019 council report described the agreement as providing '15% geared rental based on the gross rental received, less loan interest payments'. Freedom of Information disclosures, meanwhile, have shown the council loan is repayable with 5% monthly interest payments and is due to be 'redeemed' in February 2026. Speaking at a council audit committee meeting last week, Cllr Ray Mogford requested the market loan be included in a private briefing to members at their next meeting, in September. 'It's been difficult to find information out about that in the public domain,' he said. Committee chairman Gareth Chapman said members 'have the right… to address that in a closed session'. On the loan arrangements, the council spokesperson said 'we have received money by way of interest payments on this loan', but described financial input from the market owner as being 'commercially sensitive and not for the council to disclose'. 'The development transformed the former provisions market, breathing new life into the listed building and offering residents and visitors to the city a great place to meet, socialise and work,' the council spokesperson said. 'It has also helped some businesses who are at the start of their journey to establish a presence in Newport, with a number of former occupiers having taken up residence elsewhere in the city centre after vacating the market.' 'Independent businesses, like the ones in the market, are at the heart of our city, and we will continue to provide all the support we can to help them thrive,' they added. LoftCo, the company which led the redevelopment, was contacted for comment on the matter.
The Herald Scotland
24 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kate Forbes business and economy prowess is major SNP loss
All too often in politics, economic and business matters are covered by soundbites which are at best banal and at worst downright ridiculous. In terms of the latter, we should remember those Conservative politicians who told us all that Brexit was going to be good for the UK economy, while keeping a straight face. You got the impression that some, though surely not all, even believed the utter nonsense they were peddling. The Tory Brexiters constitute an extreme, but crystal clear, example of just how dismal politicians can be on business and the economy. What is plain is that too much of the narrative on matters business and economic from politicians, having listened to it over the years and decades, tends to demonstrate either a lack of understanding or a disposition to trot out learned ideologies without thinking about what is being said, or both. Ms Forbes, in contrast, has understandably won the respect of many people in the business community and others interested in economic issues. And a significant proportion of these individuals will not agree with Ms Forbes's political outlook, notably her passion for independence. This relatively broad respect surely speaks volumes about the Deputy First Minister's abilities when it comes to the economy and business. While she is not alone in the political sphere in being a serious thinker on the economy, my experience over years and decades from speaking to politicians is this is a far rarer trait than many people might expect. All too often among politicians, coherent arguments around economic matters are absent. Since she became Deputy First Minister in May last year, I have had two sit-down interviews with Ms Forbes covering a broad range of business and economic issues. Unlike many interviews with politicians on such matters - where there is much dispensable because it amounts to hot air or sheer spin with no supporting arguments that stack up - there was plenty of substance and original thought from Ms Forbes across the full range of topics covered. And there was a refreshing big-picture view on the major issues. In an interview in June last year, Ms Forbes revealed the greater income tax burden for higher earners in Scotland relative to the rest of the UK would be kept 'under review', taking into account 'how easy it is for taxpayers to shift'. However, Ms Forbes flagged figures from HM Revenue & Customs showing more people had come to Scotland from the rest of the UK than had moved in the opposite direction, against the backdrop of devolved income tax. And she highlighted the part 'progressive' taxation played in funding the Scottish child payment for lower-income households north of the Border amid UK austerity. That said, when asked if she thought there had been too great a divergence in the income tax burden for higher earners in Scotland compared with those elsewhere in the UK as things stood, Ms Forbes replied: 'No but I think we keep it under review.' Read more She added: 'I was…public finance minister when income tax was first devolved and I recall at the time us making it clear that we would follow the Adam Smith principles of taxation and one of the commitments that we made was to always keep the divergence under review to understand the behavioural impact because I want to be independent but we are devolved and that has implications for how easy it is for taxpayers to shift.' It was a most considered response, on a topic that has undoubtedly been highly controversial among the business community and more broadly over the years. And it signalled what was to come. When I spoke to Ms Forbes again in June this year, she said: 'The First Minister was very clear when he became leader that he didn't believe that you could continually raise income tax, and that we should provide certainty. And that's what last year's Budget delivered - the Budget announcement last year for this financial year. And the programme for government then built on that in May - being very clear that there wouldn't be further divergence from the rest of the UK on income tax for the remainder of this parliament. 'And the reasons for that is because certainty matters in a world that seems to be constantly in flux with lots of global headwinds and challenges of recruitment for businesses. The more certainty that we can provide, the better.' There was much focus on the strained relationship between the Scottish Government and the business community ahead of John Swinney being appointed First Minister and Ms Forbes taking up her Cabinet roles in May last year. Read more Ms Forbes was swift to engage with the business community after becoming Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic. And in the interview in June last year, when asked whether she saw it as difficult to balance maximising economic growth with social justice, Ms Forbes replied: 'No, it is not difficult to balance at all. I have never seen even an iota of difference in our desire for resilient public services, for eradicating child poverty, for protecting our environment, and our economic objectives, for the very simple reason that we can't achieve those objectives without economic growth.' She added: 'So when I look at our mission to eradicate child poverty, clearly we are investing substantially in the Scottish child payment. That investment comes through progressive taxation because of a growing and thriving economy but it can't happen without the creation of well-paid, secure jobs, and that is where a growing economy creates the jobs.' Another measured, thought-through answer. It might seem like common sense to many. However, such sense is not anywhere near as common among politicians on such topics as many people would probably imagine. Labour, for example, has shunned the huge boost to the UK economy that would come from rejoining the European single market, seemingly because such a move is not viewed as politically expedient. And it is worth noting, in a general context, there are significant numbers of people in the business community too who fail to grasp the bigger economic picture. Asked in June if she believed the overall relationship between the Scottish Government and business had improved over the last year, Ms Forbes replied: 'I think so. I mean, the first meetings I had when I became Economy Secretary was with all the business organisations one by one, to understand what their top asks were.' Ms Forbes declared the Scottish Government had since then worked through the first programme for government, then the Budget last December, and then the most recent programme for government 'to try and deliver against those asks'. She said: 'I think the business community understand that we can't do everything overnight, but we can either stop doing things that would otherwise have made the cost of business higher, or do things that lower the cost of business. The most recent programme for government led with economic growth and prosperity. So our sentiment, my sentiment is pro-economy, pro-prosperity, pro-business.' This is a message that seems, on the face of it, like it should go down well with the business community. Of course, this is also the broad message from Mr Swinney. And senior figures in the business community, including those who do not agree with the First Minister's politics, have praised Mr Swinney's willingness to engage and listen, and take action. That said, there is no escaping the reality that Ms Forbes's decision will leave a big gap for the SNP to fill on business and the economy.
Glasgow Times
3 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Minister denies migrant returns deal leaves open human rights loophole
Dame Angela Eagle denied the agreement with France would allow for spurious claims to be used to avoid deportation after shadow home secretary Chris Philp questioned the wording of the document. The 'one-in, one out' deal coming into effect on Wednesday will see migrants ineligible to stay in the UK sent back across the Channel, in exchange for taking those who have links to Britain. Dame Angela said the deal had been worded to ensure 'unfounded' claims could not be used to avoid deportation (Richard Townshend/UK Parliament) The agreement contains a clause that says in order for people to be returned to France, the UK must confirm they do not have an 'outstanding human rights claim'. Critics have argued this could risk bogus applications being made to frustrate the deportation process and cause delays. Mr Philp said on Tuesday this section offered 'an easy loophole for lawyers', adding that 'France will not give us any data on the people they are sending our way… so we have no idea who they really are'. Borders minister Dame Angela said he was wrong, and that the clause was included 'precisely to ensure no-one can use 'clearly unfounded' human rights claims to avoid being returned'. She added: 'And we will do full security checks on any applicants, and reject anyone who poses a risk.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper conceded earlier that the accord is not a 'silver bullet' to stop small boat crossings, but marked a step change as migrants will be sent back across the Channel for the first time. Speaking to the BBC, she declined to put a number on how many people would be returned under the agreement ahead of time, saying that she believed it could aid criminal gangs. She added: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that.' Speaking to reporters earlier, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the deal would likely result in only small numbers of migrants being swapped with France and is 'not going to make any difference whatsoever'. Asked whether the Conservatives were partly to blame for the immigration and asylum situation, she told reporters: 'No I don't accept that at all, because what Labour are doing is just rubber-stamping all of the applications and saying they're processing.' It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boats this year. Bruno Retailleau, France's interior minister, said the agreement 'establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs'. The initial agreement will be in place until June 2026.
