logo
On Decision Day, more high school seniors choose a college based on cost

On Decision Day, more high school seniors choose a college based on cost

CNBC03-05-2025
Ethan Bianco, 17, waited right up until the May 1 deadline before deciding which college he would attend in the fall.
The senior at Kinder High School for the Performing and Visual Arts in Houston was accepted to several schools, and had whittled down his choices to Vanderbilt University and University of Texas at Austin. Ultimately, the cost was a significant factor in his final decision.
"UT is a much better award package," he said. In-state tuition for the current academic year is $10,858 to $13,576 a year, which would be largely covered by Bianco's financial aid offer.
More from Personal Finance:Is college still worth it? It is for most, but not allHow to maximize your college financial aid offerWhat student loan forgiveness opportunities remain under Trump
Vanderbilt, on the other hand, consistently ranks among the best private colleges for financial aid and promises to meet 100% of a family's demonstrated need.
The school initially offered Bianco $35,000 in aid, he said. With that package, "it would be about $40,000 more for my family to attend Vanderbilt per year."
However, he successfully appealed his award package and leveraged private scholarships to bring the price down further — and committed to Vanderbilt on National College Decision Day.
For most graduating high school seniors, the math works out differently. The rising cost of college has resulted in a higher percentage of students enrolling in public schools over private ones, according to Robert Franek, editor-in-chief of The Princeton Review.
"Currently, it is about 73% of the undergraduate population — but this year, with increasing uncertainties about financial aid and changing policies about student loans, it is very likely that number will go up," Franek said.
Soaring college costs and looming student debt balances have pushed this trend, and this year, there are added concerns about the economy and dwindling federal loan forgiveness options. As a result, this year's crop of high school seniors is more likely to choose local and less-expensive public schools rather than private universities far from home, Franek said.
Price is now a bigger consideration among students and parents when choosing a college, other reports also show. Financial concerns govern decision-making for 8 in 10 families, according to one report by education lender Sallie Mae, outweighing even academics when choosing a school
"Choosing a school is a personal and individual decision," said Chris Ebeling, head of student lending at Citizens Financial Group. Along with academics and extracurriculars, "equally important is the cost," he said. "That needs to be weighed and considered carefully."
On National College Decision Day, Carlos Marin, a senior at Milby High School, also in Houston, enrolled at the University of Houston-Downtown. Marin, 17, who could be the first person in his family to graduate from college, said he plans to live at home and commute to classes.
"The other schools I got into were farther away but the cost of room and board was really expensive," Marin said.
College costs have risen significantly in recent decades, with tuition increasing 5.6% a year, on average, since 1983 — outpacing inflation and other household expenses, according to a recent report by J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
Deep cuts in state funding for higher education have also contributed to the soaring price tag and pushed more of the costs onto students. Families now shoulder 48% of college expenses, up from 38% a decade ago, J.P. Morgan Asset Management found, with scholarships, grants and loans helping to bridge the gap.
Nearly every year, students and their families have been borrowing more, which boosted total outstanding student debt to where it stands today, at more than $1.6 trillion.
A separate survey by The Princeton Review found that taking on too much debt is the No. 1 worry among all college-bound students.
Incoming Vanderbilt freshman Bianco qualified for a number of additional private scholarships and even received a free laptop from AT&T so that he could submit the Free Application for Federal Student Aid and fill out college applications. He said he is wary of taking out loans to make up for the difference.
"I believe that student loans can be beneficial but there's also the assumption that you'll be in debt for a very long time," Bianco said. "It almost becomes a burden that is too much to bear."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why a Fed rate cut could lead to bad news for Big Tech stocks
Why a Fed rate cut could lead to bad news for Big Tech stocks

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why a Fed rate cut could lead to bad news for Big Tech stocks

Investors are looking for an interest rate cut — but the market may not respond as expected when it comes. "I think that the market's going to have to come to grips with the Fed is going to cut rates, and is it going to be the right move for the Fed to make now?" Jim Bianco of Bianco Research said on Opening Bid. July's Consumer Price Index (CPI) report showed core inflation rose 0.3%, the largest increase in six months. "Last year they cut rates, and the market decided it wasn't the right move," Bianco added. "And it shot yields on the 10 [year Treasury] and the 30-year up over 100 basis points." Bianco said the real inflationary pressure is building due to Trump's tariffs, and the impact could be significant. While some of the costs may be eaten by exporters or corporations, others will be passed on via price hikes. "There's about an extra $250 to $300 billion of tariffs that are going to be collected over the next year ... tariffs were running around $8 billion a month. Now they're running nearly $30 billion a month," he noted. Bianco expects Fed Chair Jerome Powell to provide some clarity at the Fed's annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium later this month. And if Powell signals a September cut isn't coming, the backlash could be intense — including renewed political pressure from President Trump, who has previously floated the idea of firing the Fed chair. "If he says he's not going to cut rates, I would then put Trump firing him back into the play," Bianco said. The Fed's decision could also have an outsized impact on megacap tech stocks. The largest 10% of US companies now account for 76% of total market capitalization, the highest concentration on record, according to market data platform Barchart. The concentration makes the entire market vulnerable to shifts in interest rates. As yields go higher, money could move out of stocks and into bonds. Bianco warned that if 10-year Treasury yields hit 5%, it could trigger profit-taking in Big Tech stocks. Bianco advised investors to stay cautious when chasing the market's most popular names. "If you want to play some of these Mag 7s, you have to be prepared for big gains and big losses," he said. "Some think it's all a one-way street ... until it isn't." Francisco Velasquez is a Reporter at Yahoo Finance. He can be reached on LinkedIn and X, or via email at Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

Why a Fed rate cut could lead to bad news for Big Tech stocks
Why a Fed rate cut could lead to bad news for Big Tech stocks

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why a Fed rate cut could lead to bad news for Big Tech stocks

Investors are looking for an interest rate cut — but the market may not respond as expected when it comes. "I think that the market's going to have to come to grips with the Fed is going to cut rates, and is it going to be the right move for the Fed to make now?" Jim Bianco of Bianco Research said on Opening Bid. July's Consumer Price Index (CPI) report showed core inflation rose 0.3%, the largest increase in six months. "Last year they cut rates, and the market decided it wasn't the right move," Bianco added. "And it shot yields on the 10 [year Treasury] and the 30-year up over 100 basis points." Bianco said the real inflationary pressure is building due to Trump's tariffs, and the impact could be significant. While some of the costs may be eaten by exporters or corporations, others will be passed on via price hikes. "There's about an extra $250 to $300 billion of tariffs that are going to be collected over the next year ... tariffs were running around $8 billion a month. Now they're running nearly $30 billion a month," he noted. Bianco expects Fed Chair Jerome Powell to provide some clarity at the Fed's annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium later this month. And if Powell signals a September cut isn't coming, the backlash could be intense — including renewed political pressure from President Trump, who has previously floated the idea of firing the Fed chair. "If he says he's not going to cut rates, I would then put Trump firing him back into the play," Bianco said. The Fed's decision could also have an outsized impact on megacap tech stocks. The largest 10% of US companies now account for 76% of total market capitalization, the highest concentration on record, according to market data platform Barchart. The concentration makes the entire market vulnerable to shifts in interest rates. As yields go higher, money could move out of stocks and into bonds. Bianco warned that if 10-year Treasury yields hit 5%, it could trigger profit-taking in Big Tech stocks. Bianco advised investors to stay cautious when chasing the market's most popular names. "If you want to play some of these Mag 7s, you have to be prepared for big gains and big losses," he said. "Some think it's all a one-way street ... until it isn't." Francisco Velasquez is a Reporter at Yahoo Finance. He can be reached on LinkedIn and X, or via email at Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Revenue sharing impact, transfer portal changes & hot seats
Revenue sharing impact, transfer portal changes & hot seats

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Revenue sharing impact, transfer portal changes & hot seats

Subscribe to the College Football Enquirer Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube We are back! After a bit of a break, your favorite college football podcast has returned! Some new voices have joined the show with the departures of Dan Wetzel and Pat Forde. Andy Staples and Steven Godfrey join Ross Dellenger for College Football Enquirer's newest version! There was quite a bit of news that happened while we were away, so it's time to catch up. Schools can pay athletes directly now. Revenue sharing has arrived! This has already caused an immediate shift in the college football landscape and schools are taking full advantage. One team who is capitalizing on that is Vanderbilt. Huge hype and ticket prices have followed. How has this change affected the college landscape? Has it changed for the better? These questions and more are what Andy, Ross and Steven answer. As athletes continue to get paid, guardrails around how they can be paid continue to be developed. Enter the College Sports Commission. This commission is supposed to make sure there is fairness across the board in how athletes are being paid. How exactly they are doing that is a bit more complicated. Luckily, Ross can break it all down. Another huge change on the horizon has to do with the transfer portal. This topic has been discussed at length. Should there only be one portal window rather than two? When should that be? Change is coming and while there is some disagreement among conferences for when the portal window should open, a shift appears imminent. The guys explain what the change may look like, and they give their takes on when the portal should open. We are just a few weeks away from the start of the season, so naturally we have to talk about what coaches are hoping to still have a job by the end of the season. While some coaches' buyouts are too big for them to have any concern this year, others do not have that luxury. Texas Tech's Joey McGuire and Oklahoma's Brent Venables are two coaches that look to be in win now situations. The guys discuss the coaches' futures with their respective programs. They also dive into how the new college landscape of paying players may have led to some coaches' jobs being saved. Finally, Andy, Ross and Steven take a look at some upset ready matchups in the Week 1 slate. Are Boise St., Mississippi St. and Kentucky on upset watch? The guys chat about what they are looking at in those Week 1 games. A jam-packed episode of College Football Enquirer begins now. Welcome back! (5:10) - Paying athletes (16:43) - College Sports Commission (28:01) - Transfer Portal changes (44:46) - Coaching hot seat (1:20:42) - Week 1 Upset Watch List 🖥️

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store