Thousands of Boeing workers who build fighter jets and weapons go on strike
The strike started at Boeing facilities in St Louis; St Charles, Missouri; and Mascoutah, Illinois, after about 3,200 local members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers voted on Sunday to reject a modified four-year labour agreement, the union said.
'IAM District 837 members build the aircraft and defence systems that keep our country safe,' Sam Cicinelli, the general vice president of the union's Midwest division, said in a statement.
'They deserve nothing less than a contract that keeps their families secure and recognises their unmatched expertise.'
The vote followed a week-long cooling-off period after the machinists rejected an earlier proposed contract, which included a 20% wage increase over four years and 5,000 dollars ratification bonuses.
Boeing warned over the weekend that it anticipated the strike after workers rejected its latest offer, which did not further boost the proposed wage hike.
However, the proposal removed a scheduling provision that would have affected workers' ability to earn overtime pay.
'We're disappointed our employees rejected an offer that featured 40% average wage growth and resolved their primary issue on alternative work schedules,' said Dan Gillian, Boeing Air Dominance vice president and general manager, and senior St Louis site executive.
'We are prepared for a strike and have fully implemented our contingency plan to ensure our non-striking workforce can continue supporting our customers.'
Boeing's Defence, Space & Security business accounts for more than one-third of the company's revenue.
But Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg told analysts last week that the impact from a strike by the machinists who build fighter jets, weapons systems and the US Navy's first carrier-based unmanned aircraft would be much less than a walkout last year by 33,000 workers who assemble the company's commercial jetliners.
'The order of magnitude of this is much, much less than what we saw last fall,' Mr Ortberg said. 'So we'll manage through this. I wouldn't worry too much about the implications of the strike.'
The 2024 strike that shut down Boeing's factories in Washington state for more than seven weeks at a bleak time for the company.
Boeing came under several federal investigations last year year a door plug blew off a 737 Max plane during an Alaska Airlines flight in January.
The Federal Aviation Administration put limits on Boeing plane production that it said would last until the agency felt confident about manufacturing quality safeguards at the company.
The door-plug incident renewed concerns about the safety of the 737 Max. Two of the planes crashed less than five months apart in 2018 and 2019, killing 346 people.
Mr Ortberg told analysts that the company has slowly worked its way up to an FAA-set 737 Max production cap of 38 per month and expects to ask regulators later this year for permission to go beyond it.
Last week, Boeing reported that its second-quarter revenue had improved and its losses had narrowed. The company lost 611 million dollars in the second quarter, compared to a loss of 1.44 billion dollars during the same period last year.
Shares of Boeing Co slipped less than 1% before the opening bell on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
US court reinstates $81 million award against Boeing in trade secrets case
Aug 14 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Thursday reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab in a lawsuit accusing it of stealing trade secrets from electric-aircraft startup Zunum Aero. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned, opens new tab a California judge's decision to throw out a jury verdict for Zunum, rejecting his finding that the information Boeing allegedly stole was not entitled to trade-secret protection. A spokesperson for Boeing declined to comment on the appeals court's decision. Zunum attorney Vincent Levy of Holwell Shuster & Goldberg said that the decision "affirms what we have said from the start — that Zunum had an enormous opportunity to remake air travel, but Boeing took that opportunity away." Washington State-based Zunum was founded in 2013 to develop small electric commuter aircraft that can travel up to 1,500 miles. Boeing's venture capital arm invested $5 million in the startup in 2017. Zunum said in a 2020 lawsuit that it planned to begin selling its planes in 2022 but halted development after Boeing allegedly blocked its access to capital. The complaint said that Boeing developed its hybrid commuter aircraft using Zunum's trade secrets. A federal jury last May awarded Zunum nearly $81.2 million from Boeing for trade secret theft and $11.6 million for tortious interference, but reduced the total award to $72 million based on damages that it said Zunum could have mitigated. U.S. District Judge James Robart later set the final award at $81 million, but overturned the verdict last August after determining that Zunum did not adequately identify its secrets or show that they derived their value from being kept secret. The 9th Circuit said on Thursday, however, that Zunum had provided "sufficient specificity" for the jury to find that its secrets were legally protectable as well as "not generally known, not readily ascertainable, and valuable." The appeals court also ordered the case to be assigned to a new judge after Robart revealed that his wife had acquired Boeing stock through a retirement savings account during the litigation. The case is Zunum Aero Inc v. Boeing Co, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-5212. For Zunum: Vincent Levy of Holwell Shuster & Goldberg For Boeing: Moez Kaba of Hueston Hennigan Read more: Boeing hit with $72 mln verdict in EV aircraft trade secrets case Boeing should pay more than $300 mln after US verdict, EV aircraft maker says Boeing convinces US judge to overturn $72 mln trade-secrets verdict
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Media corporations beware, piracy is starting to roar back
But corporate greed and the battle for market share have recreated a lot of the same conditions where piracy once thrived. For film and television, the battle for rights is often an exclusive agreement, meaning having access to everything requires paying subscriptions to multiple services. If you want everything available that you wish to watch, then make sure and subscribe to Disney+, Netflix, Max, Apple TV+, Hulu, Amazon Prime, and an assortment of others. It all becomes reminiscent of the expensive and burdensome cable packages that plagued the 2000s. The lessons learned from the past become easily forgotten through the tunnel vision of quarterly profits, and the decisions of media corporations seem to always be taken at the expense of their users. Read more: Spotify CEO is bankrolling high-tech military warfare, now musicians are walking away Except now, in 2025, people are poorer, and household entertainment budgets are nonexistent. Where convenience once dictated user behaviour, now affordability is a major factor. The streaming model has become unsustainable – if it ever was sustainable – and it will only get more complicated and less appealing as the expectations of endless growth cannibalise streaming services further. Moves like widespread crackdowns on password sharing and other harsh decisions made to punish users just make the openness and freedom of piracy all the more alluring. And prices for streaming services steadily climb, too. The price of Netflix's standard plan has more than doubled since 2011. Plenty of streaming services have subsequently introduced a cheaper plan equivalent to their original asking price, but with adverts included where there were none before. The constant flow and lack of interruption were once an arrow in streaming's quiver, but now media corporations seem intent on bringing back all the pitfalls of traditional television and radio that initially drove people to the convenience of pirating. Piracy was at its most insignificant during the height of streaming's dominance in the pandemic, but it has risen in use dramatically in the following years, up to 216 billion website visits in 2024 from the low of 130bn in 2020. Several factors are converging to make piracy an attractive option once again. The promise of streaming was simplicity – one or two services for everything. Now, it's a labyrinth of paywalls and subscription fees, and there is increasing fatigue towards such fragmentation. Want access to all your favourite shows and films? You might need to subscribe to quite a number of services (Image: Unsplash) And the illusion of endless choice has begun to run dry. As studios pull their shows and movies to bolster their own platforms, users find that what was available yesterday is gone today. HBO Max's infamous purges, Disney's vault strategy, and Netflix's ever-rotating catalogue mean that even loyal subscribers can't reliably access what they want. Why subscribe in the first place when your watchlist might disappear next month, once the licensing and rights terms change (which is often the case)? Before, piracy was framed as an attack on artists, that downloading a song is equivalent to personally taking food out of the artist's mouth. The erosion of the moral argument against piracy is perhaps the biggest danger to streaming's dominance. Because it's now not the artists facing the harmful effects of piracy but the industry itself, the faceless corporate middlemen who are already busy exploiting artists through streaming. In the old industry model, there was a bit of truth to piracy decimating the artist's share. But in the streaming era, where artists are compensated so little, it's much harder to make this case. Read more: Netflix and the films no one is actually watching A trend of straight-out advocating piracy has been building, with musicians, filmmakers, and even actors openly criticising the inequities of streaming payouts. Some artists are encouraging piracy as a way to stop an unwanted license holder from benefiting from their work. When the system feels rigged, piracy becomes its own form of protest. The resurgence of piracy shows a failure of trust. Media corporations spent years conditioning audiences to believe that streaming was the ethical, sustainable alternative to piracy, only to replicate the same exploitative practices that pushed people toward illegal downloads in the first place. The difference now is that consumers are more aware than ever of how little their subscriptions actually support creators, making piracy feel less like theft and more like bypassing a broken system. The industry's response so far only accelerates the problem. If corporations refuse to adapt, history will repeat itself. The golden age of streaming was built on the illusion of consumer-friendly access. Now, as that illusion shatters, piracy is poised to reclaim its throne – not because people want to steal, necessarily, but because the industry has left them with no choice.
BreakingNews.ie
2 days ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Michael O'Leary says Ryanair summer bookings remain strong
Ryanair is seeing strong demand across Europe with bookings ahead of last year, and is "reasonably optimistic" about hitting its summer targets, chief executive Michael O'Leary said in an interview on Thursday. He also praised Boeing for agreeing to deliver some jets earlier than scheduled, ending a run of delays that have curbed Ryanair's growth rate. Advertisement "We're seeing strong bookings through the peak summer months ... The fares are holding up," O'Leary said, adding that bookings were about 1 per cent ahead of the same point last year. He repeated a forecast from July that average fares were likely to recover almost all of a 7 per cent decline seen in the July-September quarter last year, when Ryanair was hit by consumer caution and a dispute with some online travel agents. Hitting the summer target will depend on close-in bookings for the remainder of the airline's key second quarter, which ends on September 30th, he said. There has been no sign of consumers changing their plans due to heatwaves this summer, O'Leary added. But he warned that US tariffs would ultimately act as a drag on global growth. Advertisement "I think everybody is cautious at the moment, and we're right to be cautious," he said. Boeing, which is due to deliver the final 29 aircraft of Ryanair's current order of 737 Max jets this winter, has agreed to deliver seven jets in August and seven in September, ahead of an earlier-agreed schedule. "Boeing are doing a terrific job," O'Leary said. He was speaking in Tirana, where he announced a doubling of capacity to four million passengers per year with the basing of three aircraft at the airport from next April. He described Albania as a hidden jewel of the Adriatic. Advertisement Ryanair, Europe's largest airline by passengers, also announced plans to increase capacity serving Sweden by 25 per cent for this winter, adding eight new routes, after the country scrapped its aviation tax at the beginning of last month. That will add to pressure on local rivals such as SAS and Norwegian Air. Ryanair chief marketing officer Dara Brady called on Sweden also to freeze airport charges and potentially offer additional incentives for growth, saying this could allow Ryanair to double its Swedish traffic by 2030. "The market is well capable of growing significantly here over the next number of years," Brady told a news conference.
