Ex-Foreign Secy, 26/11 prosecutor among 4 nominated to Rajya Sabha
Retired diplomat Harsh Vardhan Shringla, prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam, historian Meenakshi Jain, and BJP leader C Sadanandan Master will join the Rajya Sabha, which, as per Article 80 of the Constitution, can have 12 nominated members who have specialised knowledge or practical experience of literature, science, art, or social service.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi welcomed the nominations. Congratulating Shringla, he posted on X, 'Shri Harsh Vardhan Shringla Ji has excelled as a diplomat, intellectual and strategic thinker. Over the years, he's made key contributions to India's foreign policy and also contributed to our G20 Presidency.'
Shringla is a 1984-batch IFS officer and served as India's Ambassador to the US, High Commissioner to Bangladesh, and Ambassador to Thailand. In 2019, during his tenure as the envoy to the US, the 'Howdy Modi' event was held in Texas. The 63-year-old was the Foreign Secretary from 2020 to 2022 and served as the chief coordinator of India's G-20 presidency in 2023.
Ujjwal Nikam, 72, is best known as the man who prosecuted Kasab, and is the go-to man whenever a complicated or high-profile case crops up. 'Ujjwal Nikam's devotion to the legal field and to our Constitution is exemplary,' Modi posted on X. 'He has not only been a successful lawyer but also been at the forefront of seeking justice in important cases …'
Following the announcement, Nikam told ANI, 'Yesterday, the PM called me and asked, 'Ujjwal ji, should I speak in Marathi or Hindi? I started laughing, and he also laughed. I told him, 'You know both languages well.' He then switched to Marathi and told me that the President has entrusted me with new responsibilities and asked if I was ready to take them on. I immediately said yes.'
Nikam has represented the state in cases such as the 1993 Bombay blast trial, the murder of music executive Gulshan Kumar in 1997, the 2006 murder of BJP leader Pramod Mahajan, and the 2006 Khairlanji massacre in which four members of a Dalit family were killed.
The case that made him a household name across the country was the trial of Kasab. During the proceedings, Nikam claimed the terrorist had demanded biryani in jail. However, he later admitted he had 'made up the statement as there was a sympathetic wave building towards Kasab', who was hanged in November 2012.
In May 2024, Nikam resigned as special public prosecutor to contest the Lok Sabha elections from Mumbai North Central on a BJP ticket.
However, he lost to the Congress's Varsha Gaikwad by more than 16,000 votes. Nikam was then reappointed as the special public prosecutor and was handling cases such as the 26/11 attack case against Zaibuddin Ansari alias Abu Jundal and the murder charges against Vijay Palande who challenged Nikam's reappointment, claiming 'he would act to further the BJP's agenda and may go to any extent to secure false convictions'.
Congratulating Meenakshi Jain, Modi wrote on X, 'It's a matter of immense joy that Dr Meenakshi Jain Ji has been nominated to the Rajya Sabha by Rashtrapati Ji. She has distinguished herself as a scholar, researcher and historian…'
Jain taught history at Delhi University's Gargi College for over three decades and authored the NCERT textbook on Medieval India during the Vajpayee government's tenure. Her book replaced the one authored by historian Satish Chandra and was, in turn, replaced once the Congress-led UPA came to power in 2004.
Jain became a member of the Indian Council of Historical Research during the Modi government's first term and was honoured with the Padma Shri in 2020. A Senior Fellow at the Indian Council of Social Science Research at present, she has written several books. One of those is Rama and Ayodhya that traces, in depth, the conflict over the Ram Janmabhoomi in Ayodhya.
Delhi University Teachers' Association president Dr A K Bhagi described Jain's nomination as a moment of joy, saying, 'Only our ideology can provide such an honour to teachers.'
The sole politician on the list, retired schoolteacher Sadanandan Master survived an attack in north Kerala's Kannur three decades ago in which he lost both his legs.
The 61-year-old, who was last week appointed one of the Kerala BJP vice-presidents, hails from Perinchery village near Mattannur, Kannur, that is considered a CPI(M) stronghold. Although from a family of Communist supporters, he joined the RSS's student wing ABVP and was officially a part of the Sangh by 1984. For a time, he was the Sangh's boudhik pramukh in Ernakulam, responsible for the ideological training of the cadre. By 1994, he was the RSS sahkaryavah (joint general secretary) for Kannur.
On the night of January 25, 1994, he was walking home after alighting from a bus at Uruvachal near Mattannur when a group of suspected CPI(M) workers attacked him. Sadanadan later recalled, 'A gang suddenly started hurling bombs, seeking to create a scare, and people started running and shut their shops. The gang approached me from behind and caught me. They laid me down on the road, then hacked both my legs below the knee and threw them away. No one dared to come to help me until the police arrived and took me to the hospital.'
After a few months in the hospital, Sadanandan, who has had prostheses for both legs, returned to his school, which was struggling to attract students. The BJP then appointed him sub-editor in the party mouthpiece Janmabhumi. In 1999, he joined as a teacher in a school in Thrissur run by the Sangh Parivar.
In the 2016 Assembly elections, in which the BJP made 'CPI(M)-sponsored' violence a key issue, Sadanandan was fielded from the Koothuparamba Assembly constituency, where some of the brutal political killings in Kannur took place in the 1990s. He finished third behind K K Shailaja of the CPI(M) and the JD(U) candidate K P Mohanan, polling over 20,000 votes. Sadanandan retired as a teacher from a school in Peramangalam in Thrissur in 2020 and in recent years has been active with the Bharatiya Vichara Kendram, an intellectual wing of the RSS, and writes columns in the media.
'Shri C. Sadanandan Master's life is the epitome of courage and refusal to bow to injustice. Violence and intimidation couldn't deter his spirit towards national development. His efforts as a teacher and social worker are also commendable … Best wishes for his role as MP,' Modi wrote.
— With ENS Delhi inputs
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
31 minutes ago
- The Wire
The Future of Queer Rights in India and Why the Judiciary Must Play Catalyst
This is the full text of the speech delivered by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul on Saturday, July 12, at the launch of a report and recommendations by the Keshav Suri Foundation and the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy titled 'Queering the Law: Beyond Supriyo' at The Lalit, Delhi. The document lists legal and policy solutions to help eliminate systemic discrimination, ensure recognition of queer relationships and families, and promote equal access to healthcare, safety education, and employment. The recommendations are based on legal research and community consultations across Delhi, Mumbai and Jaipur. § The Future of Queer Rights in India A very good evening to all gathered today! Mr Keshav Suri, Founder of the Keshav Suri Foundation (KSF), Dr. Jyotsna Suri, Chairperson and Managing Director, The Lalit Suri Hospitality Group, Senior Advocates Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Ms. Menaka Guruswamy and Ms. Arundhati Katju, Dr. Arghya Sengupta and other members from the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy and other esteemed panellists. At the outset I extend my congratulations to the entire Vidhi team in coming out with the public policy brief on ' Queering the Law: Beyond Suprio' assiduously prepared jointly by Vidhi and Keshav Suri Foundation (KSF). Vidhi, of course, has been doing commendable work across topical issues and its detailed recommendations are invariably well received and acknowledged. The Future of Queer Rights, assumes even more significance, not only because of the recent pronouncement of the Supreme Court in Supriyo, but also because it really is an issue that must be discussed with legislative reforms at the heart of such discussion coupled with a need for advocating change in societal perception. As I had opined in Supriyo, our Constitution contemplates a holistic understanding of equality, which applies to all spheres of life. The practice of equality necessitates acceptance and protection of individual choices. This endeavour not only requires judicial interpretation of existing statutes but also an attempt on the part of the legislature to consolidate and make necessary amendments to laws that remain archaic and rooted in a biased assignment of rights. The future of Queer Rights in India, as the Supreme Court had opined in Supriyo requires action in the realm of the legislature and the executive with a co-ordinated effort across various ministries and department. This is so because redressal is to take place across various aspects. Amendment to only civil laws relating to marriage, parenthood and inheritance and making them more inclusive would in my view be only the first step albeit significant. What is required perhaps is also a legislation on civil union. Vidhi, last year, had published what I believe to be a more contemporary rendition of a comprehensive Family Code. This could definitely form the basis of a framework to aid public deliberations on family laws in India. Cue may also be taken by the legislature while framing laws relating to civil union from those already enacted in foreign jurisdictions. For instance, the UK Civil Partnership Act which defines and provides for registration of civil unions or the Australian Family Law Act which states that two persons are in a relationship, if they are not married, not related to each other by family but have been in a relation with each other on a domestic basis. Vidhi's recommendations to the Committee constituted following the decision in Supriyo extensively cover these facets. Protection must also be afforded to such unions which are not ultimately registered but a relationship exists between two persons which could characterised as a civil union. Yet another hurdle to be crossed and surely an important consideration for any couple, would be parent-child relations and the law on this subject. Presently, parent-child relations are determined under an array of statutes – CARA Regulations for adoptions, Guardianship and Wards Act, Juvenile Justice Act, Surrogacy Act. Unfortunately, these legislations deem couples to mean only heterosexual couples. Reformation, amendment or introduction of new legislation is warranted here too. Gender-based discrimination and even bias against single parents must be written out of the statutes. In fact, in Supriyo, the minority view had noted that CARA regulations to the extent that unmarried couples could not adopt a child would disproportionately effect non-heterosexual couples since the State had not conferred legal recognition to the union of queer couples. Both the minority and majority, however, recognised that this area of the law required state intervention. A closely connected aspect would also be whether extant provisions which do not accord legitimacy to children of married couples as opposed to unmarried couples which, of course, would include non-heterosexual couples. There is a need for reworking this statutory scheme and move in-step with societal reality of the 21st century. An almost existential difficulty faced by LGBTQIA persons is access to goods, financial services and access to public infrastructure. In this regard, in my opinion in Supriyo, I had underscored the need for an umbrella anti-discrimination law, noting that: "There are several laws that have an anti-discrimination aspect to them. However, they are fragmented and may fail to capture the multitudinous forms of discrimination. Another compelling reason for a law that places a horizontal duty of anti-discrimination is provided by the spirit of Article 15, which prohibits discrimination by both the State and private actors." Furthermore, while anti-discrimination law do exist, they require courts to be: "...'sentinel on the qui vive', the only method to enforce this Constitutional right under Article 15 would be through its writ jurisdiction. There are significant challenges for marginalized communities to access this remedy. Therefore, the proliferation of remedies through an anti-discrimination statute can be a fitting solution. Such legislation would also be in furtherance of the positive duty of the State to secure social order and to promote justice and social welfare under Article 38 of the Constitution." Anti-discrimination law is ever more crucial in today's age where access to capital is sine qua non for say starting a business, buying a house or even otherwise bridging personal needs is wholly dependent on factors such as ease of availing loans or finances, opening bank accounts. Undoubtedly, there are barriers to access for LGBTQIA persons to even something as routine as opening a bank account which requires one to carry a document which conforms to gender identity. There is also a more deep-rooted societal bias, which compound inaccessibility to the financial system which is normally available to cis-gender or heteronormative individuals. This is naturally a significant handicap to the LGBTQIA community. On the whole, In my view, the future beckons a sanguine and more inclusive reality which requires a more concerted effort not only on the part of the judiciary and legislature but also the more pressing and urgent need for societal reformation. Dishearteningly, there still persists a stigma and sense of rejection for LGBTQIA persons, in particular, non-binary and transgender individuals. There is also, a degree of legislative inertia on the rights and entitlements of queer persons which risks prolonging the legal limbo for same-sex couples seeking marriage, adoption, or inheritance rights. A conservative attitude still persists across a large populace of the country which hinders acceptance. The Supriyo judgment is a nuanced milestone in India's queer rights journey. It affirms cohabitation and non-discrimination rights for LGBTQ individuals but defers to parliamentary wisdom. The minority's push for civil unions offers a potential middle ground, while the court's directives for a government committee signal incremental progress a chasm is required to be crossed which would only be successful through tempered judicial intervention, legislative progress and most importantly growing societal awareness. I believe, we are on a path of progressive recognition of rights of LGBTQIA persons. The Supreme Court's pronouncement in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India recognized transgender individuals' right to self-identify their gender. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 codifies identification of gender but has several lacunae to be filled by the legislature. Societal perception plays a key role. A 2019 Pew survey found 37% of Indians supported homosexuality, up from 15% in 2013. Urban areas and younger generations show greater openness, but rural and conservative communities often remain hostile. The judiciary must perform the role of a catalyst. India's legislative landscape for LGBTQIA recognition has evolved, but significant gaps persist. The term 'queer' is not defined in Indian law, and asexual individuals are invisible in policy frameworks. In February 2025, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment introduced certain administrative measures for queer couples, including access to ration cards, joint bank accounts, and the right to claim a partner's body in case of death (if no next of kin exists). These measures, prompted by the Supreme Court's Judgement in Supriyo are a step forward but remain limited, as they are not enshrined in statute and do not address comprehensive rights. I truly believe that the future is more promising than what is behind us and in the words of Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man to be elected to public office in California, 'Hope will never be silent'. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul retired as a Supreme Court judge in 2023.
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Chhangur Baba campaigned for gangster Atiq Ahmed, claims former BJP MP
Uttar Pradesh's self-styled godman Jalaluddin, alias Chhangur Baba, who was arrested for running a conversion racket, was a close aide of the late gangster-turned-politician Atiq Ahmed and campaigned for him in the Shravasti Lok Sabha constituency and even shared stage with him during the 2014 general elections, former BJP MP from the seat, Daddan Mishra, told India Today said that Chhangur Baba made repeated visits to Shravasti and recalled warning people about his activities back then, adding that those warnings went further accused Chhangur Baba of using religion as a means to mislead people. He said that such political tactics harm societal cohesion and pose a threat to law and order. Mishra has called for a thorough investigation into Baba's links with politicians and criminal networks. In addition to his political activities, Chhangur Baba, also known as Jalaluddin, is under investigation for allegedly running a large-scale religious conversion racket. The Uttar Pradesh Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) has revealed that he financed over 1,000 Muslim men to trap Hindu girls under the guise of 'Love Jihad' and subsequently converted investigation has uncovered potential foreign funding sources, adding complexity to the case. Meanwhile, several girls who managed to escape from Chhangur Baba's influence have returned to their families in Lucknow, with some reporting threats from abroad, including Saudi Arabia and President of the Vishwa Hindu Raksha Parishad Gopal Rai took several of these girls to a press conference, allowing them to share their experiences publicly.- EndsInputs from Kumar KunalMust Watch
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Kerala Governor, state spar again. This time over feet-washing ritual in schools
The Kerala government raised concerns about the appropriateness of students washing the feet of teachers in educational settings, after videos of the same during Guru Purnima controversy erupted after videos showing students washing the feet of teachers in some CBSE schools went viral. In one instance, at a school in Alappuzha, BJP district secretary Anoop was also among those whose feet were washed as part of the ceremony. Following this, Kerala Education Minister V Sivankutty sought an explanation from the schools Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar defended the observance of ritual in schools as the practice of 'guru puja'. Speaking at a public event, Governor Arlekar strongly defended the ritual. 'Guru puja is our culture and in that culture we offer flowers at the feet of our Guru. And some people have objected to it. I don't understand from which culture they are coming from. What are their thoughts?' He further recounted a complaint he received from a religious leader about the police coming to a school run by his institution in Kasargod and asking about the guru puja celebration in the city. 'He said, 'what should we tell them? What do they mean by 'why perform'? It is our culture, the culture of our country, our soil. What answer can be given?'Governor Arlekar also questioned the rationale behind criticising the practice and said, 'If one tries to forget their culture, they will forget themselves and will be nowhere in this world.'Education Minister V Sivankutty rejected the Governor's stance, saying: 'They are making our small children wash their feet. I don't even know where in Indian culture is something like this said. There are many books related to Indian culture. Does any of it say that students should be used to wash the feet of BJP Leaders? Does any of it say that this is Kerala culture? It doesn't say anywhere.''It's the agenda of RSS which is coming out through the Governor,' the minister further also asserted that Kerala does not follow such a culture and expressed concern over using children for such practices in educational state government has also asked the managements of the schools concerned to explain the circumstances under which the ritual was conducted.- Ends
