Trump's 100% chip tariff to exempt everyone but China
US President Donald Trump made the remarks in the Oval Office during a meeting with Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook on Wednesday (August 6). 'But if you're building [factories] in the US, there's no charge,' Trump told Cook.
They were meeting to discuss an agreement for Apple to invest an additional $100 billion, on top of the $500 billion it pledged to invest in February, for making iPhone components in the US over the next four years.
South Korean officials told the media they will be exempt from Trump's 100% tariff, as South Korean companies promised to build fabrication plants in the US.
Liu Chin-ching, minister in charge of the National Development Council in Taiwan, also said that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the world's leading chip maker, is also exempt from the chip tariffs because it has plants in the US.
On Wednesday, TSMC's Taipei-listed shares gained 4.9% to NT$1,180 (US$39.6) on the news of its exemption.
As the US expands its domestic chip-making production capacity, Taiwan's global chip manufacturing market share is expected to decrease to 60% in 2027 from 68% in 2023, according to TrendForce, a Taiwan-based market intelligence and consulting firm.
TrendForce stated that the United States' market share will grow from 12% to 17%, while South Korea's will increase slightly from 12% to 13% over the same period. Japan's market share is predicted to surge from 0% to 4%, while China's will fall from 8% to 6%, according to the projection.
Trump's 100% tariff applies to all chip imports, but due to numerous exemptions, only Chinese chipmakers will be affected.
In an article published in April, before Trump's 100% tariff announcement, a Hunan-based columnist predicted that the impact of US tariffs on Chinese chipmakers will be minimal. In 2024, Chinese direct exports of integrated circuits to the US totaled US$2.2 billion, or 1.4% of China's total chip exports, according to official customs department data.
However, the writer failed to note that about $67.7 billion of Chinese integrated circuits were shipped to Hong Kong last year, accounting for 42.3% of China's total chip exports. It is believed that many of these chips were re-exported to other countries, though a more detailed breakdown by product is not available.
The Census and Statistics Department's research data showed that Hong Kong exported $6.8 billion of semiconductors and electronic valves and tubes to Vietnam, $6.5 billion of the same products to India and additional amounts to other Southeast Asian countries in 2023.
The Hong Kong Trade Development Council said the city's exports to the US amounted to $34.9 billion in 2023, 7% of which were semiconductors and electronic valves and tubes ($2.4 billion).
It's unclear whether the Trump administration will impose new tariffs on electronic products that use Chinese semiconductors. If not, Chinese chipmakers will still have to pay several billion dollars in tariffs to the US annually, unless they diversify to customers outside the US.
On Thursday, TMTpost.com, a Beijing-based technology news outlet, published an article titled 'Trump has gone crazy! The US will impose a 100% tariff on chip imports. The global supply chain is on high alert.'
'The new US tariff imposed on global chipmakers will significantly impact China's supply chain,' says Lin Zhijia, the article's author. 'The uncertainty caused by US tariffs will discourage Apple from sourcing components from Chinese suppliers.'
Citing Bloomberg's data, Lin says that about 24% of Apple's suppliers are based in the US, followed by those in China (18.2%), Japan (13%), Taiwan (12.7%) and South Korea (8.3%).
While Apple will use fewer Chinese parts, it will continue to rely on its partner Foxconn to assemble most of its iPhones in China.
In fact, Tim Cook said Wednesday that 'Made in US' iPhones won't be seen for a while, as assembly will still be done 'elsewhere.'
Evercore ISI, a research unit of the New York-based Evercore, said in a note in March that China accounts for about 80% of Apple's production capacity. Around 90% of iPhones are assembled in China.
Estimates show that 55% of Apple's Mac products and 80% of iPads are assembled in China.
In May, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US would not pursue a generalized decoupling with China, but would push for a 'strategic decoupling', particularly in critical sectors such as medicine and semiconduc tors.
Trump told CNBC in an interview on Tuesday that the US will soon impose a 15% tariff on all pharmaceutical imports. He said after one to 1.5 years, this tariff will increase to 150% and then to 250%. He said he wants Swiss firms to produce medicines in the US, not in China. Trump recently imposed a new 39% tariff on Switzerland, one of the highest on any country in the world.
Read: China fears Nvidia chips could track, trace and shut down its AIs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
38 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
A look at Alaska's Russian past as Trump and Putin prepare to meet
Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will hold a high-stakes meeting about the Ukraine war on Friday in Alaska, which the United States bought from Russia more than 150 years ago. Russian influence still endures in parts of the remote state on the northwest edge of the North American continent, which extends just several kilometres from Russia. When Danish explorer Vitus Bering first sailed through the narrow strait that separates Asia and the Americas in 1728, it was on an expedition for Tsarist Russia. The discovery of what is now known as the Bering Strait revealed the existence of Alaska to the West - however Indigenous people had been living there for thousands of years. The Saint Sophia Orthodox Church in Bethel, Alaska. File photo: AFP Bering's expedition kicked off a century of Russian seal hunting, with the first colony set up on the southern Kodiak island.
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
Trump-Putin summit to produce more dread than hope
It will be the moment Ukraine and its European supporters have been hoping for, but also one they have been dreading. The summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, which the White House and Kremlin have said will take place in Alaska on August 15, in theory, represents the best chance this year that America could put real pressure on Russia to stop its war on Ukraine. But, sadly and much more likely, it also represents the worst danger that Putin could sweet-talk Trump into selling out Ukraine's legitimate interests. Like Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, the leaders of France, Germany, Britain and Italy have not been invited to the summit, as superpowers prefer to talk to each other alone, rather as if they own the world. But all the Europeans must make sure that their influence is present, firmly in the minds of both the Russian and the American presidents. And they will need to make it clear that a Putin-Trump deal over Ukraine without Ukraine's or its European neighbors' consent will be no deal at all. The prospects are not good. The latest demands made by Russia during lower-level talks with Ukraine in June left the two sides impossibly far apart. Those included Russia's demand that Ukraine should be 'demilitarized', that there should be no foreign armies involved in policing a ceasefire or protecting Ukraine, and that Russia should gain all the lands in eastern Ukraine that it has claimed, including areas it has failed to conquer. For Putin to abandon those demands in talks with Trump would represent a major climbdown — yet that climbdown is exactly what is needed if peace is ever to be achieved. As we have seen with tariffs, Trump's normal negotiating technique is to make bold demands and loud threats, in the hope that his opponents will be intimidated, allowing a deal to be struck somewhere Trump sees as being favorable to him. Yet for Russia, his technique has been neither bold nor loud. So far, it has not seemed at all designed to intimidate Putin into making compromises. This may be because he loves dictators like Putin more than he does democratically elected leaders. But it is also because in this case he is negotiating over lands, interests and above all people that are somebody else's, not his. So his definition of 'success' seems to pay little heed to the interests of Ukraine or its public opinion. This is illustrated by the fact that the few threats Trump has made towards Putin have been uncharacteristically vague and not terribly threatening. He has spoken rather unspecifically of being 'disappointed' at Putin, while saying quite softly that he is considering tougher economic sanctions on Russia while, strangely, imposing tariffs on American imports from some buyers of Russian oil, but not all, in the hope of hurting Russian revenues. India is wondering why it has been singled out for such punitive tariffs, leaving Turkey, China and other Russian customers untouched. Last month, Trump reversed course on a decision by his defense department to stop supplying Ukraine with weapons, but only on condition that European governments should pay for them. Moreover, the quantities of weapons so far involved do not represent a major threat to Russia. Some optimistic commentators have labeled Trump's change on this issue as a 'pivot' to Ukraine's side, but while the change was certainly welcome, it would be premature to see it as decisive. Ukrainians' and Europeans' greatest fear will be that in his desperation to come out of a summit looking like a peacemaker, Trump will be the one who makes concessions to Putin, not the other way around, and that Zelensky will find himself trapped in a position of having to oppose what he and the Ukrainian public see as an unacceptable peace. European leaders now need to work hard to reduce that danger. One way to do that would be immediately to announce further supplies of long-range missiles and other weapons systems to Ukraine, showing that the Europeans are determined that the Ukrainians will continue to be able to fight back and to hurt Russia badly for however long the war goes on. Another way would be to use the days before the summit to communicate clearly to Trump and his staff what Ukraine's, and hence also the Europeans', priorities will be in any negotiation. European diplomats could also mutter, unofficially of course, that if America sells Ukraine out, then it can go whistle for the US$600 billion of energy, defense purchases and investments that Trump has claimed the EU has agreed to make in America. Trump's claim was largely imaginary in any case, but it clearly mattered a lot to him, so threatening to make it clear that such investments and purchases will now never happen might make him cautious. The main reason why the EU chose not to retaliate against Trump's tariffs and to go along with his claim about investments is that it couldn't afford to risk losing American support for Ukraine. If that motive disappears, the gloves can come off. Territory should be the easiest issue to set clear rules for in any peace negotiation. Ukraine has already made it clear that it can accept a ceasefire that freezes the lands already occupied by the Russians, even if it will be unwilling to sign any permanent treaty ceding those territories to Russia. But neither Europeans nor Ukrainians would accept Russian occupation of any lands the Russians do not currently hold. Immediately after Trump started talking airily of 'swapping of territories', Zelensky stated unequivocally that Ukrainians are 'not willing to gift their land to the occupier.' Second, the Europeans can make it clear that there is zero chance that a country that has been invaded and has seen hundreds of thousands of its citizens killed is going to accept any form of 'demilitarization', which would simply leave it vulnerable to a new invasion. The 'reassurance force' of troops and aircraft to be assembled by France, Britain and other members of the 30-country 'coalition of the willing' must be allowed to enter Ukraine and help to enforce the ceasefire. Otherwise, no ceasefire agreement can be expected to last for more than a few months. Putin's demands that Ukraine should be barred from joining NATO are the easiest to agree to: there is no chance of it joining anyway for as long as Trump is in the White House, and no promise made now can bind Trump's successors. But there is no reason why this should also exclude the presence in Ukraine of the foreign 'reassurance force.' A third issue that Europeans should encourage Trump to highlight at the summit is Russia's abduction during the war of an estimated 35,000 Ukrainian children. Russia has held these children to undermine morale in Ukraine. By highlighting the issue in a high-profile international setting, Trump would have a chance of embarrassing Putin, even though the ex-KGB agent is not easily embarrassed. There should be no chance in any case of agreeing to drop war crimes indictments against Putin and Russia's military leaders, but the issue of the abducted children should surely be the clincher on this, even for Trump. Plenty of his pro-Ukrainian Republican Party backers should be persuadable to come out on Ukraine's side on this. The biggest question lying behind this summit is whether Putin will arrive feeling he is in a strong or weak position. Trump's soft treatment of him will doubtless make Putin feel confident. However, Russia's attempts this summer to win more Ukrainian territory have largely failed, meaning that the Russian military's estimated by some as one million or more casualties in this war have occurred for little benefit. Some economists think that with the global oil price below US$70, the Russian economy is showing signs of strain. Putin really ought to feel weak, even if he will do his best not to show it. Europeans can and should brief Trump about how weak Putin's position really is. Let us be realistic: the forthcoming summit, if it actually takes place, is unlikely to produce any sudden move toward a credible peace. The best we can hope for is for the summit to begin a process that would consist of several events during the next few months at which the pressure on Russia can be steadily increased, changing Putin's calculations and those of the people around him about the benefits of continuing to fight. The worst outcome would be a public row between Ukraine, European leaders and America over the shape of a future peace deal. Nonetheless, one thing is clear: no one, including even Russia, should want this war to continue into 2026. This article first appeared on Bill Emmott's Global View Substack and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here .
RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
Nvidia, AMD 'to pay 15pc China sales revenue to US'
Nvidia, AMD 'to pay 15pc China sales revenue to US' Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is said to have agreed on the 15 percent deal in a meeting with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday. File photo: Reuters US semiconductor giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) have reportedly agreed to pay the US government 15 percent of their revenue from selling artificial intelligence chips to China. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with US President Donald Trump at the White House on Wednesday and agreed to give the federal government the cut from its revenues, a highly unusual arrangement in the international tech trade, according to US media outlets, including Bloomberg and the New York Times on Sunday. Investors are betting that AI will transform the global economy, and last month Nvidia – the world's leading semiconductor producer – became the first company ever to hit US$4 trillion in market value. The California-based firm has, however, become entangled in trade tensions between China and the United States, which are waging a heated battle for dominance to produce the chips that power AI. The United States has been restricting which chips Nvidia can export to China on national security grounds. Nvidia said last month that Washington had pledged to let the company sell its H20 chips to China, which are a less powerful version the tech giant specifically developed for the Chinese market. The Trump administration had not issued licences to allow Nvidia to sell the chips before the reported White House meeting. On Friday, however, the Commerce Department started granting the licences for chip sales, the reports said. Silicon Valley-based AMD will also pay 15 percent of revenue on Chinese sales of its MI308 chips, which it was previously barred from exporting to the country. (AFP)
