logo
One SC order, million problems: How removing over 10 lakh+ dogs could lead to zoonotic diseases & more aggressive strays

One SC order, million problems: How removing over 10 lakh+ dogs could lead to zoonotic diseases & more aggressive strays

Time of India2 days ago
The Supreme Court's directive to move all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR into shelters has set off a scramble among civic authorities -- and an outcry from
animal welfare advocates
-- over what many are calling an 'unworkable' order.
On Monday, the apex court described the stray dog menace as 'extremely grim' and ordered the Delhi government and municipal bodies to pick up strays from all localities and keep them in shelters. It warned of strict action against anyone obstructing the drive. According to the data of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and various surveys, Delhi alone has an estimated stray dog population of around 10 lakh.
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
The ruling comes amid growing public anger over dog bite incidents in the region. However, as both officials and activists point out, the immediate challenge is the lack of infrastructure and funds to house the vast number of stray animals -- which also pose the risk of becoming breeding grounds for zoonotic diseases.
Activists warn of 'vacuum effect' and health risks
Animal welfare advocates argue that the order not only ignores ground realities but could worsen the problem.
Ambika Shukla, trustee at People For Animals, wrote in The Times of India that 'without any meaningful discussion or ground-level consultation,' the Supreme Court had given an unprecedented order that fails to account for the lack of census data, infrastructure, budget, and trained manpower.
Live Events
Shelters, she warned, could become breeding grounds for zoonotic diseases like leptospirosis, mange, and parvovirus-- citing past outbreaks in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Mumbai. Removing territorial, sterilised dogs could also trigger the 'vacuum effect', allowing unvaccinated, more aggressive dogs to move in.
Instead, Shukla and others advocate strengthening ABC programmes, which they say have reduced rabies cases nationwide from 20,000 annually to just 54.
A Rs 15,000 crore challenge
Former Union minister and animal rights advocate Maneka Gandhi called the plan impractical.
'You have three lakh dogs in Delhi. To get them all off the roads, you'll have to make 3,000 pounds (enclosures), each with drainage, water, a shed, a kitchen, and a watchman. That will cost about Rs 15,000 crore. Does Delhi have Rs 15,000 crore for this?' she told PTI.
Feeding the impounded dogs, she added, would require another Rs 5 crore every week.
Gandhi also warned of unintended ecological consequences. 'Within 48 hours, three lakh dogs will come from Ghaziabad, Faridabad because there's food in Delhi. And once you remove the dogs, monkeys will come on the ground… In Paris in the 1880s, when they removed dogs and cats, the city was overrun with rats,' she said, calling dogs 'rodent control animals'.
Instead of relocation, Gandhi argued for strict enforcement of existing measures: sterilisation, anti-rabies and distemper vaccinations, a ban on relocation, and close monitoring of Animal Birth Control (ABC) centres.
Municipal bodies caught off guard
Hours after the ruling, Gurgaon Municipal Commissioner Pradeep Dahiya instructed officers to start planning for implementation. But as Dahiya told The Times of India, 'We will first study the Supreme Court order and then decide on the further course of action. Yes, we must allocate space to set up dog shelters in the city. But we will have to determine whether these shelters will be set up zone-wise or ward-wise.'
In Gurgaon, the task is daunting: 50,000 stray dogs, but only two operational shelters -- each with a capacity of 50 animals -- and two more under construction. The Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023, which require sterilised dogs to be returned to their original locations, meant large-scale shelter infrastructure was never developed.
In Ghaziabad, the last census recorded 48,000 stray dogs. According to Dr Anuj Singh, chief veterinary officer at the Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation, 'We have been sterilising 25 dogs a day at the Animal Birth Control Centre here. But without a shelter, housing these animals is a significant challenge.'
Noida's situation is worse. With no official census, estimates run as high as 1.5 lakh strays -- and only four private shelters to house them. The city also reported 73,754 street dog bite cases in the past seven months.
The road ahead: Eight weeks, no clear plan
The Supreme Court has given civic bodies just eight weeks to comply. That means building or expanding shelters, arranging food and veterinary care, hiring trained staff, and securing budgets running into hundreds of crores -- all in under two months.
Meanwhile, sterilisation contracts in several NCR cities are expiring this year, leaving even population control efforts in limbo.
For now, municipal commissioners across NCR are convening emergency meetings. But the gap between judicial mandate and administrative capacity remains vast. As one Gurgaon official told ToI: 'On paper, the order is clear. On the ground, it's almost impossible.'
With inputs from ToI
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bengaluru devotees donate Rs 1 cr, golden Lakshmi pendant to Tirupati temple
Bengaluru devotees donate Rs 1 cr, golden Lakshmi pendant to Tirupati temple

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Bengaluru devotees donate Rs 1 cr, golden Lakshmi pendant to Tirupati temple

A Bengaluru devotee donated Rs 1 crore to the Sri Venkateswara Anna Prasadam Trust and another devotee gave a golden Lakshmi pendant embedded with diamonds and Vyjayanthi stones to Lord Venkateswara on Wednesday, the temple authorities said. Kalyan Raman Krishnamurthy's donation will support the trust's free meals initiative for devotees visiting the hill shrine of Lord Venkateswara. The devotee handed over the demand draft to TTD additional executive officer Ch Venkaiah Chowdary at the Additional EO's camp office in Tirumala, a release from the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) said. Similarly, KM Srinivasa Murthy offered the 148-gram ornament, valued at around Rs 25 lakh, for adorning the idol of Sri Bhoga Srinivasa Murthy. "Murthy from Bengaluru donated a diamond and Vyjayanthi-studded golden Lakshmi pendant weighing 148 grams worth Rs 25 lakh," the release said. He handed over the ornament to Venkaiah Chowdary at the Ranganayakula Mandapam inside the Srivari temple. TTD is the official custodian of Sri Venkateswara temple in Tirupati, considered the richest Hindu shrine in the world.

SC orders return of four infant girls to adoptive parents
SC orders return of four infant girls to adoptive parents

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

SC orders return of four infant girls to adoptive parents

The Supreme Court has ordered the return of four infant girls from the custody of the child welfare committee (CWC) in Telangana to their adoptive parents, prioritising the welfare and emotional security of children. The Supreme Court, however, took a different view, stressing that institutionalisation should be a measure of last resort. (File photo) The apex court, invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, set aside a Telangana High Court order that had directed CWC to retain custody until statutory adoption procedures were completed. A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and KV Viswanathan noted that the children, aged between a few months and three years, had been living with their adoptive parents long enough to form strong emotional bonds, and that uprooting them would be contrary to the 'best interest of the child' principle enshrined in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The case arose after the Telangana police took custody of the four children in May 2024 and placed them with CWC, citing non-compliance with the adoption procedures under the 2015 Act. The adoptive parents challenged the action, claiming their adoptions were valid under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Also Read: Supreme Court orders probe into Noida land compensation payouts In one case, a couple adopted a nine-day-old baby girl in March 2024 while in another, a two-day-old girl was adopted in November 2021. A third adoption involved a 20-day-old baby girl in January 26, 2024, and in the fourth case concerned a two-day-old baby girl, adopted in January 2024. While a single judge of the high court had earlier held that the 2015 Act did not apply to these cases and ordered that the police action was illegal, a division bench overturned that decision in November 2024. This bench stressed that statutory requirements under Sections 36, 37, and 38 of the 2015 Act, covering inquiry, CWC orders and the declaration of a child as legally free for adoption, had not been met, and directed CWC to complete the process before granting custody. The Supreme Court, however, took a different view, stressing that institutionalisation should be a measure of last resort and that restoration to a family environment, wherever possible, is preferable. 'This is in the interest of the children owing to the bonding between the 'adoptive parents' and the respective children,' the bench said, also citing the principles of family responsibility, safety, and repatriation laid down in the 2015 Act. Ordering that custody be restored to the adoptive parents by August 14, 2025, 5pm, the top court also put in place safeguards. The state legal services authority or district legal services committees will monitor the welfare and progress of the children through quarterly reports from November 2025 onwards. Child welfare experts may also be deputed to inspect the homes to ensure the children's well-being. The bench clarified that the order was passed in the peculiar facts of the case to 'do complete justice' and should not be seen as diluting statutory adoption procedures. 'We have passed the aforesaid order in the best interest of the children concerned… as they have been with their adoptive parents for a few months up to three years in these cases,' the judgment stated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store