logo
Washington tells Trump after Iran strikes: No more ‘forever war'

Washington tells Trump after Iran strikes: No more ‘forever war'

Independent22-06-2025
The trauma of America's post-9/11 conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan was evident in Washington on Sunday as Americans reckoned with the implications of Donald Trump's decision to launch strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
Across the political spectrum, varying factions unified under the banner of opposition to the kind of nation-building ground assault that defined America's two wars launched by the Bush administration.
It is the only area of agreement between a faction of progressives and pro-Trump paleoconservatives who opposed the U.S. becoming involved in what up until now had been an Israeli military campaign and their opponents, a waning neoconservative faction in Washington which has called for further escalation in the form of strikes against other facilities and targeted assassinations of Iranian political and military leadership.
Sunday morning, the Trump administration publicly leaned towards the former group. Three top administration officials, Trump's vice president, Defense Secretary and Secretary of State, spoke to journalists and urged Iranian leaders to choose against responding to the U.S. strike. Pledging that the U.S. was not seeking to topple Iran's government, the trio left open an off-ramp as Vance claimed: 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.'
But both Democrats and Republican opponents of military force against Iran were smarting after Saturday night's attacks, and many cast doubt on the U.S.'s ability to avoid what Senator Jim Risch, one of the administration's defenders, said would be another 'forever war'.
A number of Democrats urged more of their party to sign on to a resolution aimed at reining in the president's war powers. The resolution's lone Republican supporter, Rep. Thomas Massie, called on his party to do the same while condemning the influence of AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby in Washington, in a pair of interviews.
'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER,' wrote Trump on Truth Social, in a lengthy post against Massie.
But for Democrats, the bombing of Iran represented an issue where common ground could be found. 'This is a defining moment for the Democratic party. We need to stand against war with Iran,' warned one of the resolution's co-sponsors, Rep. Ro Khanna.
Rep. Adam Smith, one of the party's more centrist members who voted for the Iraq War in 2002, released a lengthy statement on Saturday for Trump's refusal to seek congressional authorization for the strikes. He also warned against the kind of Iraq-style intervention he once supported: 'The path that the President has chosen risks unleashing a wider war in the region that is both incredibly unpredictable and treacherous.'
The effort to rein in Trump's military powers gained Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's support on Saturday as well. A strong supporter of Israel, Schumer nonetheless accused the administration of making 'erratic threats' and having 'no strategy'.
'The danger of wider, longer, and more devastating war has now increased,' added the Senate Democratic leader.
On the right, conservative supporters of the president who opposed Israel's sudden military strikes — which occurred during the first U.S-Iran talks in years — were furious and worried about the future of the White House's domestic agenda.
Former congressman Matt Gaetz, speaking with . Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on his OANN show, accused Israel of seeking 'regime change' in Iran. He also tore into the Netanyahu government, accusing the prime minister of trying to avoid his own electoral defeat by getting the U.S. involved in his war and attacked Israel over the alleged existence of its own nuclear weapons program.
Steve Bannon, writing on Gettr, derided Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for claiming Sunday that the U.S. still sought peace with Iran.
'Guys, please run this by [Benjamin] Netanyahu,' he quipped.
Curt Mills, executive director of the American Conservative, warned that it was now going to be extremely difficult for Trump to back the U.S. out of what it had started.
'Goal posts. Instantly moved,' Mills wrote as he reacted to calls for further strikes reportedly made on Israeli media. 'They're going to keep asking Trump to do much more, forever, until he or another American president Says No.'
'The goal posts will be moved until morale collapses,' he added: 'Every drop of juice is squeezed from Trump's political capital.'
Even those who defended the administration's involvement in the Israeli military campaign were hesitant to endorse the kind of foreign military footprint that America sustained during the so-called War on Terror.
Risch, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, praised the president's 'decisive action' in his own statement after previously writing in May that the administration should insist on 'full dismantlement of the Iranian nuclear program', including civilian enrichment, during now-scuttled negotiations.
'This is Israel's war not our war,' the senator said. 'This is not the start of a forever war. There will not be American boots on the ground in Iran.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program
9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program

The Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • The Independent

9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program

An attorney who helped design and implement the 9/11 victims' compensation fund says New Hampshire lawmakers have eroded the fairness of a settlement program for those who were abused at the state's youth detention center. Deborah Greenspan, who served as deputy special master of the fund created after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, recently submitted an affidavit in a class-action lawsuit seeking to block changes to New Hampshire's out-of-court settlement fund for abuse victims. She's among those expected to testify Wednesday at a hearing on the state's request to dismiss the case and other matters. More than 1,300 people have sued the state since 2020 alleging that they were physically or sexually abused as children while in state custody, mostly at the Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester. Most of them put their lawsuits on hold after lawmakers created a settlement fund in 2022 that was pitched as a 'victim-centered' and 'trauma-informed' alternative to litigation run by a neutral administrator appointed by the state Supreme Court. But the Republican-led Legislature changed that process through last-minute additions to the state budget Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed in June. The amended law gives the governor authority to hire and fire the fund's administrator and gives the attorney general — also a political appointee — veto power over settlement awards. That stands in stark contrast to other victim compensation funds, said Greenspan, who currently serves as a court-appointed special master for lawsuits related to lead-tainted water in Flint, Michigan. She said it 'strains credulity' to believe that anyone would file a claim knowing that 'the persons ultimately deciding the claim were those responsible for the claimant's injuries.' 'Such a construct would go beyond the appearance of impropriety and create a clear conflict of interest, undermining the fairness and legitimacy of the settlement process," she wrote. Ayotte and Attorney General John Formella responded by asking a judge to bar Greenspan's testimony, saying she offered 'policy preferences masquerading as expert opinions' without explaining the principles beyond her conclusions. 'Her affidavit is instead a series of non sequiturs that move from her experience to her conclusions without any of the necessary connective tissue,' they wrote. The defendants argue that the law still requires the administrator to be 'an independent, neutral attorney' and point out that the same appointment process is used for the state's judges. They said giving the attorney general the authority to accept or reject settlements is necessary to give the public a voice and ensure that the responsibility for spending millions of dollars in public funds rests with the executive branch. As of June 30, nearly 2,000 people had filed claims with the settlement fund, which caps payouts at $2.5 million. A total of 386 had been settled, with an average award of $545,000. One of the claimants says he was awarded $1.5 million award in late July, but the state hasn't finalized it yet, leaving him worried that Formella will veto it. 'I feel like the state has tricked us,' he said in an interview this week. 'We've had the rug pulled right out from underneath us.' The Associated Press does not name those who say they were sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly. The claimant, now 39, said the two years he spent at the facility as a teenager were the hardest times of his life. 'I lost my childhood. I lost things that I can't get back,' he said. 'I was broken.' Though the settlement process was overwhelming and scary at times, the assistant administrator who heard his case was kind and understanding, he said. That meeting alone was enough to lift a huge burden, he said. 'I was treated with a lot of love,' he said. 'I felt really appreciated as a victim and like I was speaking to somebody who would listen and believe my story.' Separate from the fund, the state has settled two lawsuits by agreeing to pay victims $10 million and $4.5 million. Only one lawsuit has gone to trial, resulting in a $38 million verdict, though the state is trying to slash it to $475,000. The state has also brought criminal charges against former workers, with two convictions and two mistrials so far. The 39-year-old claimant who fears his award offer will be retracted said he doesn't know if he could face testifying at a public trial. 'It's basically allowing the same people who hurt us to hurt us all over again,' he said.

US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says
US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says

Reuters

time13 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says

WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - U.S. federal budget deficits will be nearly $1 trillion higher over the next decade than projected in January by the Congressional Budget Office as a result of tax and spending legislation and tariffs, a budget watchdog said on Wednesday. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's latest forecasts show a cumulative deficit of $22.7 trillion from fiscal 2026 to 2035, compared to the CBO's January forecast of $21.8 trillion, which was based on laws and policies that were in place before U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January. The CBO, Congress' non-partisan budget referee agency, said on Monday, opens new tab that it will not issue its customary mid-year budget update this year and will issue its next 10-year budget and economic outlook in early 2026, offering no explanation for the move. The CRFB, which advocates for deficit reduction, projected a $1.7 trillion deficit in fiscal 2025 or 5.6% of GDP, down slightly from $1.83 trillion in 2024 and the CBO's 2025 projection of $1.87 trillion in January. But it said deficits steadily rise over the decade, reaching $2.6 trillion or 5.9% of GDP by 2035. The new CRFB estimates include the budget effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax and spending bill, as well as Trump's tariffs that are currently in place. But like CBO, they do not include the dynamic economic effects on growth from these changes, a forecasting rule that has drawn criticism from the Trump administration. The group projects the tax cut and spending bill to increase deficits, including interest, by $4.6 trillion through 2035, adding another year to the CBO's $4.1 trillion cost estimate through 2034. But CRFB estimates that this will be offset by $3.4 trillion worth of extra import duty revenue over the next decade due to Trump's new tariffs that are currently in place. New rules restricting eligibility for health insurance subsidies will reduce deficits by another $100 billion through 2035, and Congress' rescission of prior funding to foreign aid, public broadcasting and other programs would save another $100 billion if sustained over a decade, CRFB said. Net interest payments on the national debt will total $14 trillion over the decade, CRFB projected, rising from nearly $1 trillion or 3.2% of GDP in 2025 to $1.8 trillion or 4.1% of GDP in 2035. The forecasts are based on legislative and tariff changes since January but keep CBO's economic forecasts unchanged. Under an alternative scenario forecast by CRFB, the budget picture looks far worse, boosting deficits nearly $7 trillion higher than the CBO baseline. This scenario would see a significant part of Trump's tariffs canceled if the Court of International Trade's ruling against many of Trump's new tariffs is upheld, cutting $2.4 trillion from revenues over a decade. The alternative scenario also assumes extension of a number of temporary tax cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including tax breaks on overtime, tips, Social Security income and car loan interest, higher state and local tax deduction allowances and full expensing of factory investments, adding $1.7 trillion to deficits over 10 years. CRFB's alternative scenario also ditches the CBO's projection of a decline in 10-year U.S. Treasury yields over the decade to about 3.8%. If that interest rate stays at the current level of about 4.3%, interest costs would grow by about $1.6 trillion through 2035, CRFB said. The total 2035 debt-to-GDP ratio would grow from 118% in the CBO January baseline to 120% under the CRFB's projected baseline scenario and 134% under the CRFB's alternative scenario.

Trump calls Israel's Netanyahu a ‘war hero' and says ‘I guess I am too'
Trump calls Israel's Netanyahu a ‘war hero' and says ‘I guess I am too'

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump calls Israel's Netanyahu a ‘war hero' and says ‘I guess I am too'

President Donald Trump, who claims to have ended seven wars, declared himself a 'war hero' and lauded Benjamin Netanyahu as a 'good man' and fellow 'war hero' during a radio interview on Tuesday evening. Speaking to conservative radio host Mark Levin, the president said he was working with the Israeli prime minister to free Hamas-held hostages, adding that Netanyahu is 'a good man, he's in there fighting.' Despite the Israeli prime minister's detractors wanting him jailed as a war criminal following a November 2024 arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in the Gaza conflict issued by the International Criminal Court, Trump insisted: 'He's a war hero.' Trump then extended the accolade to himself, saying: 'He's a war hero, cause we worked together. He's a war hero. I guess I am too.' He continued: 'Nobody cares. I am too. I sent those planes,' a reference to his order for June airstrikes against three critical enrichment facilities in Iran. Throughout the interview, Trump complained he had not received sufficient credit for ordering those air strikes or other recent actions he has taken aimed at easing global conflict. For his part, Netanyahu has previously called Trump 'the greatest friend Israel has ever had,' and in July presented him with a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. Shortly after the interview aired, CNN host Erin Burnett played the clip to former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a Trump nemesis who served on the January 6 House Select Committee. Kinzinger, a former Air National Guard officer who flew missions over Iraq and Afghanistan, commented: 'I mean, look, this is just nuts. This is nuts. And they're going to find, his people are going to find, a way to justify this.' He continued: 'Listen, when they were putting out something honoring the Army's 250th anniversary, they put out a picture of Donald Trump in his military academy uniform, which has nothing to do with the military except they drill you. This is nuts. He's not a war hero.' Kinzinger added, referencing the president's role in nascent peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine: 'You can like what he's done. That's fine. I hope he gets a resolution in Ukraine. But to put himself on the same level of people that have actually gone out and served this country, not claimed bone spurs, is an offense to anybody who served.' The former congressman also noted that it would be inappropriate for anyone who had actually served to call themself a war hero. Burnett, agreeing that the administration will likely find a way to justify the comment, also noted: 'You're also right about something really important, which is the humility that defines a war hero, right? The humility of the fact that someone who's a war hero would never call themselves that.' Trump's most infamous comments about war heroes in the past included denying that the late Senator John McCain was a war hero because he had been captured and held as a prisoner of war. The president made those remarks while campaigning for the Republican nomination in 2015, caused a storm of protest at the time. During an interview in Iowa, the presenter said McCain was a 'war hero,' to which Trump replied: 'He's not a hero... He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured, OK? I hate to tell you that.' McCain, a former Navy pilot, spent five and a half years in a notorious Vietnamese prison known as the 'Hanoi Hilton,' where he was repeatedly tortured and spent years in solitary confinement. Trump avoided serving in Vietnam with four college deferrals and one for having 'bone spurs,' a foot problem. In 2018, Trump reportedly snubbed a planned commemoration for the 100th anniversary of WWI at the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery in Belleau, fearing his hair would become disheveled in the rain, The Atlantic reported in 2020. 'Why should I go to that cemetery? It's filled with losers,' Trump reportedly told staffers, according to the magazine. The then-president also called the more than 1,800 Marines buried there 'suckers' elsewhere during his 2018 trip in France, per The Atlantic. John Kelly, a former Marine Corps general and the White House chief of staff at the time, attended in Trump's place. Kelly, whose son was killed in action serving in Afghanistan in 2010, later told CNN that Trump had indeed made the derogatory remarks, describing him in a statement as someone who 'rants that our most precious heroes who gave their lives in America's defense are 'losers' and wouldn't visit their graves in France.' Trump has repeatedly denied ever making the statement, calling the alleged comments 'disinformation' reported by the 'fake news.' During his second administration's radical attempts to downsize the federal government, the Department of Veterans Affairs was forced into backing down from its plans to cut 83,000 jobs after a public outcry. The department has moved to reassure veterans that it has 'multiple safeguards in place to ensure these staff reductions do not impact veteran care or benefits.' While VA Secretary Doug Collins had insisted the much bigger reduction in the workforce was tough but necessary, veterans' advocacy groups warned that it would have devastating long-term consequences for former members of the armed forces, who deserved better after serving their country. 'Gutting VA will result in delayed appointments and substandard care, leading directly to more veteran deaths,' said Kayla Williams, an Iraq War veteran and senior policy adviser at VoteVets. Connecticut Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal, the ranking member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, also slammed the plan as 'a gut punch' and 'breathtaking in its potential significance and its malevolence and cruelty.' The Gaza War, for which Netanyahu's arrest warrant was issued, was triggered by an attack inside Israel by Hamas on October 7, 2023, during which around 1,200 Israelis were killed, while another 251 people were taken hostage. The ICC issued warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity. It also issued a warrant for Hamas leader Mohammed Deif, who Israel said it had killed in an airstrike, accusing him of war crimes over the attack on Israel. While the decision makes Netanyahu an internationally wanted suspect, the extent of the warrant's practical implications is unclear, given that Israel and its major ally, the U.S., are not members of the court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store