Remark on Kharge disrupts Rajya Sabha debate on Op Sindoor
Tensions flared when JP Nadda, the BJP leader and Leader of the House, responded to Opposition charges. While promising that all concerns raised would be addressed, he remarked that the tone of Mallikarjun Kharge's speech indicated 'mental instability.'
The statement provoked immediate protests from Opposition benches, and the House witnessed an uproar for a while, even though the deputy speaker Harvansh Narayan Singh tried to pacify the members that the Leader of the House had withdrawn his words.
Kharge, clearly incensed, rose to respond: 'I have always respected a few ministers in this House—Nadda is one of them. But calling me mentally unstable is outrageous. He must apologise. I will not let this go.'
Opposition MPs echoed his protest, prompting Nadda to withdraw his words and apologise. 'I apologise. You're not mentally unstable. But in your emotional fervour, you overlooked the dignity due to the Prime Minister,' he clarified.
The confrontation highlighted the deepening divide between ruling and Opposition parties, not only over national security but also the deteriorating standards of Parliamentary dialogue.
The debate on 'Operation Sindoor' is set to continue, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah expected to speak later in the session.
Earlier, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had opened the proceedings by outlining the government's position. He said Indian security forces had killed three terrorists belonging to The Resistance Front, the outfit responsible for the April 22 massacre of 26 civilians.
Singh commended the joint action of the Army, CRPF, and Jammu and Kashmir Police, and reinforced India's uncompromising position on terrorism.
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, spearheading the Opposition's response, criticised the government's internal security record, demanded clarified answers, and fixing of accountability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
7 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's tariff may seem severe, but India not worse-off than nations that signed trade deal: GTRI
Despite US President Trump's proposed tariffs on Indian goods, GTRI suggests India isn't worse off than nations that made trade deals with Washington. These countries conceded significantly, while India refused to compromise on key areas like agriculture. India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, and its relationship with Russia has aided in managing inflation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff and penalty on Indian goods may seem severe but the country is not in a worse position than nations that signed trade deals with Washington, think tank GTRI said on Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said the UK, the EU, Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam now face elevated tariffs, and in return, have given sweeping concessions --zero tariffs on US farm goods, massive investment pledges, and purchases of American oil, gas, and has made no such concessions, it added."While Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff plus penalty on Indian goods appears harsh, a closer look shows that India is not significantly worse off than countries that did sign deals with the US," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava added that India did not walk away from the deal and it negotiated in good faith but refused to cross its red lines particularly on agriculture, where over 700 million livelihoods are at justification for India's tariffs, trade barriers, and ties with Russia does not stand up to scrutiny, he said, adding that India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, non-tariff barriers are common globally, and discounted Russian oil has helped India manage inflation during global volatility."India is not alone; over 90 countries face similar US pressure. A deal may still emerge, but only on fair terms. For now, India's principled stand has avoided the trap of a one-sided deal -- and that's a success," he added.
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
Rajya Sabha showdown: Congress walks out, HM Shah says ‘they are afraid to hear the truth on terror'
New Delhi: In a heated session of the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, the Congress party and other INDIA bloc members staged a dramatic walkout, demanding Prime Minister Narendra Modi's presence in the House to respond to questions related to Operation Sindoor after the discussion. The protest unfolded just as Union Home Minister Amit Shah began replying to the Opposition's concerns. Despite HM Shah's assurance that he would address every question raised, Opposition MPs shouted slogans such as 'PM ko bulao (Call the Prime Minister)', stalling the session and refusing to engage in the Minister's detailed response. "You have to deal with me first. Why do you want to call the PM? You will have more difficulty," HM Shah responded, directly taking on the protesting MPs. Emphasising that Prime Minister Modi was 'very much in office", HM Shah questioned the insistence on his presence: 'If I can respond and clarify, then why insist on hearing from him?' As tensions escalated, Leader of Opposition in the Upper House Mallikarjun Kharge stood up, reiterating the demand. 'The questions pertain to PM Modi. I'm not saying you (Shah) are not capable of answering. But if PM Modi, being in Delhi, does not come here, this is disrespect of the Rajya Sabha,' Kharge said before walking out, followed by all Opposition MPs. However, HM Amit Shah continued his address, calling out what he termed the Opposition's double standards and lack of political will to discuss the facts. He pointed out that the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) had already decided that the government would respond to the Operation Sindoor debate and left it to the government to decide who would speak. 'It was decided that the discussion will happen for as long as the Opposition wanted, but the response would be given as per the government's decision. You agreed to the debate, now you walk out because you don't want to hear the truth,' HM Shah said. In a sharp attack on the Congress party, Shah alleged that the walkout was not about parliamentary protocol, but a strategy to avoid being held accountable for years of 'appeasement politics' that, according to him, weakened India's war on terror. Shah reiterated what he had said in the Lok Sabha a day earlier — that Congress-led governments had diluted anti-terror laws for vote-bank politics, jeopardising national security in the process. 'This is the same party that sought proof of surgical strikes and airstrikes. And now, they are unwilling to even sit through a discussion on Operation Sindoor, which was a powerful response to terrorism,' HM Shah said. Despite the walkout, the Union Home Minister continued detailing the operational success and strategic clarity behind Operation Sindoor, underscoring India's resolve to neutralise terror at its roots — even if it meant taking the battle across the border.
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
25% Import Tariff On Indian Goods: The Art Of The No Deal
The Art Of The No Deal Ajay Srivastava Updated: Jul 30, 2025, 21:26 IST IST That India didn't blink on a trade pact with US is (1) good for core interests like protecting farmers and (2) not as bad as it sounds given what countries that have buckled have had to concede to Trump Months of speculation over the India-US trade deal ended last evening with a blunt announcement from Trump on Truth Social. Starting Aug 1, all Indian goods entering US will face a 25% import tariff, plus an additional penalty. This new tariff regime will apply even to goods already in transit. An apparel item that previously attracted a 12% tariff will now face 12% + 25% + a-yet-to-be-disclosed penalty.
