The corporate giants fueling Israel's war machine
Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in occupied Palestine, stands as a testament to the notion of speaking truth to power. This 'power' is not solely embodied by Israel or even the US, but by an international community whose collective relevance has tragically failed to stem the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
Her latest report, 'From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide,' submitted to the UN Human Rights Council last week, marks a seismic intervention. It unflinchingly names and implicates companies that have not only allowed Israel to sustain its war and genocide against Palestinians, but also confronts those who have remained silent in the face of this unfolding horror.
Albanese's 'Economy of Genocide' is far more than an academic exercise or a mere moral statement in a world whose collective conscience is being brutally tested in Gaza. The report is significant for multiple interlocking reasons. Crucially, it offers practical pathways to accountability that transcend diplomatic and legal rhetoric. It also presents a novel approach to international law, positioning it not as a delicate political balancing act, but as a potent tool to confront complicity in war crimes and expose the profound failures of the existing international mechanisms in Gaza.
There is vital context that is necessary to understand the significance of this report, which is considered a searing indictment of direct corporate involvement, not only in the ongoing Israeli genocide in Gaza but Israel's overall settler-colonial project.
In February 2020, following years of delay, the UN Human Rights Council released a database that listed 112 companies involved in business activities within illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territories. The database exposed several corporate giants for helping Israel maintain its military occupation and apartheid.
This was particularly earth-shattering considering the UN's consistent failure to rein in Israel or hold accountable those who sustain its war crimes in Palestine. The publication of the database was an important step that allowed civil societies to mobilize around a specific set of priorities, thus pressuring corporations and individual governments to take morally guided positions. The effectiveness of that strategy was clearly detected through the exaggerated and angry reactions of the US and Israel. The US said it was an attempt by 'the discredited' council 'to fuel economic retaliation,' while Israel called it a 'shameful capitulation' to pressure.
The Israeli war on Gaza, starting on Oct. 7, 2023, however, serves as a stark reminder of the utter failure of all existing UN mechanisms to achieve even the most modest expectations of feeding a starving population during a time of genocide. Tellingly, this was the same conclusion offered by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who, in September 2024, stated that the world had 'failed the people of Gaza.'
The Israeli war on Gaza serves as a stark reminder of the utter failure of all existing UN mechanisms.
Ramzy Baroud
This failure continued for many more months and was highlighted by the UN's inability to even manage aid distribution in the Strip, with Israel and the US instead entrusting the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a violent, mercenary-run apparatus that has killed and wounded thousands of Palestinians. Albanese herself, of course, had already reached a similar conclusion when, in November 2023, she confronted the international community for 'epically failing' to stop the war.
Albanese's new report goes a step further, this time appealing to the whole of humanity to take a moral stance and confront those that have made the genocide possible. 'Commercial endeavors enabling and profiting from the obliteration of innocent people's lives must cease,' the report declares, pointedly demanding that 'corporate entities must refuse to be complicit in human rights violations and international crimes or be held to account.'
In the report, the categories of complicity in the genocide are divided into arms manufacturers, tech firms, building and construction companies, extractive and service industries, banks, pension funds, insurers, universities, and charities. Their collective technological know-how, machinery and data collection has allowed Israel to kill, to date, more than 57,000 and wound 134,000 in Gaza, while also maintaining its apartheid regime in the West Bank.
What Albanese's report tries to do is not merely name and shame Israel's genocide partners, but to tell us, as civil society, that we now have a comprehensive frame of reference that allows us to make responsible decisions and pressure and hold accountable these corporate giants.
'The ongoing genocide has been a profitable venture,' Albanese writes, citing Israel's massive surge in military spending, estimated at 65 percent from 2023 to 2024 — reaching $46.5 billion.
Israel's seemingly infinite military budget is a strange loop of money, originally provided by the US government, then recycled back through American corporations, thus spreading the wealth between governments, politicians, corporations and numerous contractors. As bank accounts swell, more Palestinian bodies are piled up in morgues and mass graves or are scattered in the streets of Jabaliya and Khan Younis.
This madness needs to stop and, since the UN is incapable of stopping it, then individual governments, civil society organizations and ordinary people must do the job, because the lives of Palestinians should be of far greater value than corporate profits and greed.
• Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is 'Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out.' His website is www.ramzybaroud.net.
X: @RamzyBaroud
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
40 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Russia slams report it backed ‘zero enrichment' Iran nuclear deal
Russia's foreign affairs ministry on Sunday described reports claiming that President Vladimir Putin had encouraged his Iranian ally to accept a 'zero enrichment' agreement on its nuclear program as 'defamation.' US news outlet Axios reported on Saturday, citing three anonymous sources familiar with the matter, that Putin had 'encouraged' Iran to accept a deal with the United States that would prevent the Islamic republic from enriching uranium. The article 'appears to be a new political defamation campaign aimed at exacerbating tensions around Iran's nuclear program,' the Russian ministry of foreign affairs said on Sunday. 'Invariably and repeatedly, we have emphasized the necessity of resolving the crisis concerning Iran's nuclear program exclusively through political and diplomatic means, and expressed our willingness to help find mutually acceptable solutions,' the statement read. Tehran is suspected by Western countries and Israel of seeking to develop an atomic bomb, which it denies, defending its 'non-negotiable' right to develop a civilian nuclear program. Moscow has a cordial relationship with Iran's clerical leadership and provides crucial backing for Tehran but did not swing forcefully behind its partner even after the United States joined Israel's bombing campaign in June. Publicly, Moscow has defended Tehran's right to use nuclear technology for civilian purposes but in recent months, Putin has also drawn closer to US President Donald Trump. On June 13, Israel launched an unprecedented attack on Iran, triggering a 12-day war. The conflict halted negotiations initiated in April between Tehran and Washington to frame Iran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting economic sanctions against Iran. On June 22, the United States bombed the underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo, south of Tehran, and nuclear facilities in Isfahan and Natanz. The exact extent of the damage is not known.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Closing Bell: Saudi main index ends lower at 11,253
RIYADH: Saudi Arabia's Tadawul All Share Index slipped on Sunday, shedding 24.01 points, or 0.21 percent, to close at 11,252.90. The total trading turnover on the benchmark index stood at SR4.04 billion ($1.08 billion), with 98 stocks advancing and 148 declining. The Kingdom's parallel market Nomu edged down by 41.88 points to close at 27,437.62, while the MSCI Tadawul Index fell 0.19 percent to 1,442.43. The best-performing stock on the main market was SHL Finance Co., with its share price rising 9.98 percent to SR21.26. Al Sagr Cooperative Insurance Co. followed, gaining 6.47 percent to SR14.80, while Fawaz Abdulaziz Alhokair Co. climbed 5.80 percent to SR33.20. Zamil Industrial Investment Co. recorded the steepest decline of the day, with its share price falling 2.75 percent to SR46.00. On the announcement front, Almoosa Health Co. said it signed an SR192 million contract with MASAH Specialized Construction Co. to carry out preliminary construction and foundation work for the Almoosa Specialist Hospital project in Al-Hofuf. In a press statement, the company said the financial impact of the 14-month contract will be reflected after the completion of the hospital's construction. The company added that there are no related parties involved in the deal. Almoosa Health's share price inched up 0.12 percent to close at SR165.00. Sports Club Co. completed its retail offering ahead of its planned listing on the Kingdom's main market. Saudi Fransi Capital, the lead manager, financial adviser, bookrunner, and underwriter for the IPO, confirmed the development. According to a statement, 259,690 investors participated in the retail subscription period, with a final offer price of SR7.50 per share. Saudi Fransi Capital added that retail orders totaled approximately SR247.7 million, representing an oversubscription rate of 533.6 percent.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Kabul's water crisis: How unsustainable foreign aid projects made it worse
KABUL: As Kabul makes global headlines for being on the brink of running out of water, experts say the crisis stems not only from natural and local causes, but also decades of unsustainable foreign projects and mismanagement of aid. About one-third of Afghanistan's population — around 12.5 million people — lack reliable access to water, according to the latest data from the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. In the country's capital, the situation is even worse, with the UN expecting that by 2030 its aquifers could dry up — a projection that has been in international media since last month, as that would make Kabul the first modern city to run out of water. 'Without urgent action, like bringing in surface water from other basins, Kabul risks facing a severe crisis, potentially a 'Day Zero' like Cape Town experienced a few years ago,' Obaidullah Rahimi, an Afghan scholar whose doctoral research at the University of Kaiserslautern-Landau focuses on urban water management, told Arab News. 'The city's groundwater can only cover about 44 million cubic meters — enough for just 2 million people at a modest per capita consumption of 50 liters per person per day.' This means that less than 30 percent of Kabul's 6.5 million residents have access to the WHO's basic water requirement to ensure minimum essential needs for health, hygiene, and basic consumption. Years of excessive and unregulated groundwater extraction, combined with prolonged drought, shrinking rainfall, and the thinning of the Hindu Kush snowpack — the primary natural source for the city's rivers and aquifers —have pushed Kabul to the edge. But these problems are not new and have only worsened as they have not been addressed over the two decades, when Afghanistan was occupied by foreign forces following the US invasion in 2001. Despite the billions of dollars that entered the country in foreign development projects, Kabul's water management systems were hardly touched. 'A significant portion of this aid was spent on short-term, small-scale projects without considering future impacts on the water balance of the Kabul basin and failed to establish large-scale water conservation infrastructure that could maintain and preserve this balance,' Rahimi said. Dr. Ahmad Shah Frahmand, a geographic information systems and remote sensing expert specializing in mapping changes in water surface areas, said that also the way the projects were implemented, along with the lack of knowledge transfer, prevented them from having a lasting impact. 'International donors funded networks and pipelines across Kabul, often constructed by foreign contractors with little local involvement. But within just a few years, many of these systems fell into disrepair due to poor construction and a lack of oversight,' he told Arab News. 'One of the biggest failings was the focus on short-term fixes over long-term solutions. Aid money was frequently funneled into demonstration projects — temporary wells, pilot programs, or highly visible installations that offered quick results but little durability. Meanwhile, large-scale infrastructure like dams, reservoirs, and water treatment plants received far less attention and funding.' According to Frahmand, less than 10 percent of the water sector budget was spent on training and maintaining local staff. 'Without skilled technicians, engineers, and maintenance crews, even well-built systems can crumble. And in Kabul, many already have,' he said. A report published by the US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction in 2020 — a year before the withdrawal of American-led forces from Afghanistan — estimated that at least 30 percent of reconstruction aid, or $19 billion, was lost to waste, fraud, and abuse. Additional audits by the oversight agency suggested the true figure may have been 40 percent due to corruption and mismanagement. As foreign donors have left the country and international sanctions have been slapped on it since 2021, when the Taliban took over after the US forces withdrew, there are no funds for big infrastructure projects, especially as Afghanistan is already facing several other humanitarian crises. 'In a country desperate for stable infrastructure, these funds could have transformed lives. Instead, many projects stalled, failed, or were quietly abandoned,' Frahmand said, highlighting how urgent redesigning Kabul's water systems has been, as the city has not seen a comprehensive water management plan since 1978. 'Kabul's infrastructure was never built for the population it now serves. The existing water supply system, designed decades ago for a much smaller population, can no longer meet basic demand. Millions of Kabul residents now rely on tankers, private vendors, or unsafe wells to access water.' By 2030, as many as 2 million people could be forced to leave Kabul in search of water, according to projections by the UN refugee agency. Water loss could lead to the extinction of local fish species and a collapse of biodiversity in the region. 'The agricultural sector is already under immense pressure. The Food and Agriculture Organization forecasts a 40 percent drop in crop yields across Kabul province by 2035. For a population already grappling with food insecurity, this decline could tip entire communities into hunger and poverty,' Frahmand said. 'If urgent action is not taken, the coming decade could bring irreversible social, environmental, and economic consequences that reshape the city and the lives of those who remain in it.'
