
Iran will pursue all legal avenues to seek redress from its attackers
The attack by the United States and Israel on Iran, including the targeted killings of scientists and intellectuals, bombing of IAEA-approved nuclear facilities, and strikes against residential, medical, media, and public infrastructure, is a prime example of illegal, unilateral action that must not remain unaddressed. It is a wrongful act and a clear violation of fundamental norms of international law.
In this context, the principle of state responsibility, which dictates that states are held accountable for wrongful acts, must be applied. This principle was codified by the International Law Commission ILC in its 2001 Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, which have since been widely recognised and cited by international courts and tribunals.
Per their provisions, the commission of a wrongful act – such as the unlawful use of force – constitutes a violation of an international obligation and imposes a binding duty on the responsible state to provide full and effective reparation for the harm caused.
In the case of the illegal acts committed by the United States and Israel, the scope of legal responsibility goes far beyond ordinary violations. These acts not only contravened customary international law, but also breached peremptory norms, the highest-ranking norms within the international legal hierarchy. Among these, the principle of the prohibition of aggression is a core and universally binding rule. No state is permitted to derogate from this norm, and violations trigger obligations, requiring all members of the international community to respond collectively to uphold the law.
There are at least two relevant legal precedents that can guide the application of the principle of state responsibility and the obligation for reparations in the case of Iran.
In 1981, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 487 in response to Israel's attack on Iraq's nuclear facilities. It unequivocally characterised this act of aggression as a 'serious threat to the entire safeguard regime of the International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA]', which is the foundation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The resolution also fully recognised the inalienable sovereign right of all states to establish programmes of technological and nuclear development to develop their economy and industry for peaceful purposes.
Article 6 stipulates that 'Iraq is entitled to appropriate redress for the destruction it has suffered, responsibility for which has been acknowledged by Israel'. By mandating that the aggressor compensate the victim for the resulting damages, the resolution provides a clear legal precedent for pursuing redress in similar cases.
Thus, given the fact that the attacks by the US and Israel were carried out with public declarations confirming the operations and are well-documented, the application of the principles and provisions of Resolution 487 to the Iranian case is not only appropriate and necessary but also firmly grounded in international law.
Another relevant document is UN Security Council Resolution 692, which was adopted in 1991 and established the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCC) following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The commission was tasked with processing claims for compensation of losses and damages incurred as a result of the invasion.
The creation of UNCC demonstrated the capacity of international mechanisms to identify victims, evaluate damage, and implement practical compensation – setting a clear model for state responsibility in cases of unlawful aggression.
This precedent provides a strong legal and institutional basis for asserting the rights of the Iranian people. It is therefore both appropriate and necessary for the UN to establish a rule-based mechanism, such as an international commission on compensation, to redress Iran.
Such a commission, initiated and endorsed by the UN General Assembly or other competent UN bodies, should undertake a comprehensive assessment of the damages inflicted by the unlawful and aggressive acts of the US and the Zionist regime against Iran.
The establishment of reparative mechanisms – whether through independent commissions, fact-finding bodies, or compensation funds operating under international oversight – would contribute meaningfully to restoring trust in the global legal system and provide a principled response to the ongoing normalisation of impunity.
Iran also has another avenue for pursuing justice for the illegal attacks it was subjected to. In the lead-up to them, the IAEA published biased and politically motivated reports about the Iranian nuclear programme, which facilitated the commission of aggression by the US and Israel and breached the principle of neutrality.
This places Iran in a position to seek redress and claim damages from the agency under Article 17 of the IAEA Safeguards Agreement. As a state harmed by the agency's manifest negligence, Iran is entitled to full reparation for all material and moral damages inflicted upon its peaceful nuclear facilities and scientific personnel.
In this context, pursuing accountability for the IAEA, alongside the aggressor states, is a vital element of Iran's broader strategy to uphold accountability within the international legal order. By relying on recognised, legitimate, and binding international mechanisms, Iran will steadfastly defend the rights of its people at every forum.
Ultimately, responsibility for the recent crimes of this war of aggression does not lie solely with the direct perpetrators, the US and Israel, and those who aided them, the IAEA. All states and international organisations bear an undeniable obligation to implement effective legal measures to prevent such crimes.
The international community as a whole must respond decisively. Silence, delay, or any form of complicity in the face of aggression and atrocities would reduce the principle of state accountability under international law to an empty slogan.
In its pursuit of accountability, Iran will exhaust all available resources and will not relent until the rights of its people are fully recognised and they receive adequate redress. It will continue to seek the prosecution and accountability of those responsible for these crimes, both domestically and internationally, until justice is fully achieved.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
If Trump wants Gaza ceasefire, he must pressure Netanyahu, experts say
Washington, DC – The White House says Donald Trump's 'utmost priority' in the Middle East is to end the war in Gaza. But as the United States president hosts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week, the two leaders have heaped praise on each other. Meanwhile, Israel continues its assault on the Palestinian territory, where more than 57,575 people have been killed. Analysts say that, if Trump is truly seeking a lasting ceasefire in Gaza, he must leverage his country's military aid to Israel to pressure Netanyahu to agree to a deal. Brian Finucane, a senior adviser with the International Crisis Group nonprofit, drew a parallel between Trump's mixed messaging and that of his predecessor Joe Biden. Both men, he said, called for a ceasefire but showed unwillingness to press Israel to end the fighting. 'It's like deja vu with the Biden administration, where you would hear similar pronouncements from the White House,' said Finucane. 'If a ceasefire is indeed the 'utmost priority' of the White House, it has the leverage to bring it about.' The US provides Israel with billions of dollars in military assistance each year, on top of offering it diplomatic backing at international forums like the United Nations. While US officials expressed optimism about reaching a 60-day truce this week that could lead to a permanent ceasefire, Netanyahu told reporters in Washington, DC, that Israel still has to 'still to finish the job in Gaza' and eliminate the armed group Hamas. Finucane, a former State Department lawyer, described Netanyahu's comments as 'maximalist rhetoric' and 'bluster', stressing that Trump can push Israel to stop the war. He said Trump can use the 'threat of suspension of military support' to achieve the ceasefire, 'which very much would be in the interest of the United States and the interest of the president himself in terms of scoring a diplomatic win'. Trump and Netanyahu 'in lockstep' Netanyahu arrived in Washington, DC, on Monday and took a victory lap with Trump to celebrate their joint attack on Iran's nuclear facilities during a 12-day war last month. From the start, the Israeli prime minister appeared to play to Trump's ego. As he sat down to a White House dinner on Monday night, Netanyahu announced he had nominated the US president for a Nobel Peace Prize. The two leaders met again on Tuesday, with Trump saying that their talks would be all about Gaza and the truce proposal. A day later, Netanyahu said he and Trump are 'in lockstep' over Gaza. 'President Trump wants a deal, but not at any price,' the Israeli prime minister said. 'I want a deal, but not at any price. Israel has security requirements and other requirements, and we're working together to try to achieve it.' But Annelle Sheline, a research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said that Israel is the party standing in the way of a ceasefire. She noted that Hamas has already demanded a lasting end to the war, which is what the Trump administration says it is seeking. 'While we know Trump has said he wants a ceasefire, thus far we've not seen Trump being willing to use America's extensive leverage to actually get there,' Sheline told Al Jazeera. Far from stopping the flow of arms to Israel, the Trump administration has taken pride in resuming the transfer of heavy bombs — the only weapons that Biden temporarily withheld during the war on Gaza. Dire situation in Gaza While truce talks are ongoing, the horrors of Israel's war on Gaza — which UN experts and rights groups have described as a genocide — are intensifying. Hospitals are running out of fuel. Cases of preventable diseases are on the rise. Hunger is rampant. And hundreds of people have been killed by Israeli fire over the past weeks while trying to receive food at US-backed, privately run aid distribution sites. Nancy Okail, the president of the Center for International Policy, said Trump appears to be interested in a Gaza ceasefire in part to boost his own image as a peacemaker and to win a Nobel Peace Prize. During the presidential campaign, Trump promised to bring peace to the world, seizing on Americans' weariness of war after the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. But so far, he has failed to end the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. And he oversaw the outbreak of war between Israel and Iran, even ordering the US's participation in it. The US president took credit for a Gaza truce that came into effect in January, only to let it unravel as he supported Israel's decision to resume the war in March. Okail said the atrocities in Gaza cannot be stopped with just verbal calls for a ceasefire. 'If it is not accompanied by action — as in the suspension of aid or suspension of arms to Israel — Netanyahu doesn't have any reason to actually go forward seriously with the peace negotiations,' she told Al Jazeera. Netanyahu pushes displacement Even if a 60-day truce is reached, rights advocates are concerned that Israel not only may return to war afterwards, but it might also use the time to drive Palestinians out of Gaza and further entrench its occupation. Hamas said on Wednesday that it agreed to release 10 Israeli captives as part of the proposed deal, but the remaining sticking points are about the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and guarantees for a permanent ceasefire. Before Netanyahu arrived in Washington, DC, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz revealed a plan to create a concentration camp for Palestinians in southern Gaza, according to the newspaper Haaretz. The publication quoted Katz as saying that Israel would implement an 'emigration plan' to remove Palestinians from Gaza, which rights groups say would amount to ethnic cleansing, a crime against humanity. The idea of depopulating Gaza is not new. Far-right Israeli ministers have been publicly championing it since the start of the war. But the international community started taking the idea seriously when Trump floated it in February, as part of his desire to turn Gaza into the 'Riviera of the Middle East'. Netanyahu brought it up again during his visit, saying that Palestinians in Gaza should be free to leave the territory if they choose. 'Involuntary transfer' While the Trump administration has not re-endorsed the ethnic cleansing scheme in Gaza this week, the White House still suggested that Palestinians cannot remain in Gaza. 'This has become an uninhabitable place for human beings, and the president has a big heart,' Trump's spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters. 'He wants this to be a prosperous, safe part of the region where people and families can thrive.' Rights advocates have stressed that people under bombardment and with no access to basic necessities cannot have a 'free' choice to stay or leave a place. Sheline said the international fears that Trump and Netanyahu are working to ethnically cleanse Gaza and displace its Palestinian residents elsewhere are warranted. 'There was a lot of discussion of the idea that, maybe because the US helped Israel with its war on Iran, that would be the leverage used for a ceasefire in Gaza,' she said. 'But instead, it sort of seems to be something like: If Netanyahu agrees to a ceasefire, then the US will facilitate this involuntary transfer of Palestinians out of Gaza.' For her part, Okail likened pushing people to leave Gaza under the threat of bombardment and starvation to shoving Palestinians out of the enclave at gunpoint. 'If expanding the occupation and ethnic cleansing is their approach to ceasefire, it means they want to kill any ceasefire attempt, not negotiate one,' she told Al Jazeera.


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump singles out Brazil for 50 percent tariffs, citing political motives
United States President Donald Trump has continued to publish letters announcing individualised tariff hikes for foreign trading partners. But on Wednesday, one of those letters was different from the rest. While most of the letters are virtually identical, denouncing trade relationships that are 'far from reciprocal', Trump's letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took a decidedly more personal — and more confrontational — approach. 'Due in part to Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections, and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans', Trump wrote that he would be charging Brazil an extra 50-percent tax on any goods it exports to the US, separate from existing 'sectoral tariffs'. 'Please understand that the 50% number is far less than what is needed to have the Level Playing Field we must have with your Country,' Trump added. 'And it is necessary to have this to rectify the grave injustices of the current regime.' The letter marked the biggest attack yet in Trump's escalating feud with Lula, as he seeks to pressure Brazil to drop criminal charges against a fellow far-right leader, Jair Bolsonaro. Known as the 'Trump of the Tropics', Bolsonaro, a former army captain, led Brazil for a single term, from 2019 to 2023. Like Trump, Bolsonaro refused to concede his election loss to a left-wing rival. Like Trump, Bolsonaro also raised questions about the accuracy of the results, including by voicing doubts about electronic voting machines. And like Trump, Bolsonaro has faced legal repercussions, with court cases weighing whether he could be criminally liable for alleged actions he took to overturn his defeat. In Bolsonaro's case, the election in question took place in October 2022, against the current president, Lula. The results were narrow, but Lula edged Bolsonaro out in a run-off race, earning 50.9 percent of the vote. Still, Bolsonaro did not acknowledge his defeat and instead filed a legal complaint to contest the election results. Meanwhile, his followers attacked police headquarters, blocked highways, and even stormed government buildings in the capital, Brasilia, in an apparent attempt to spark a military backlash against Lula. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have accused Bolsonaro of conspiring with allies behind the scenes to stage a coup d'etat, one that might have seen Supreme Court justices arrested and a new election called. According to the indictment, Bolsonaro, as the outgoing president, considered provoking these changes by calling a 'state of siege', which would have empowered the military to take action. One of the other possibilities reportedly discussed was poisoning Lula. Bolsonaro and 33 others were charged in February, and the ex-president's case is ongoing before the Brazilian Supreme Court. The charges came as the result of a federal police investigation published in November 2024, which recommended a criminal trial. Bolsonaro, however, has denied any wrongdoing and has framed the trial as a politically motivated attack. Trump himself has faced two criminal indictments – one on the state level, the other federal – for allegedly seeking to overturn his loss in the 2020 election. He, too, called those cases attempts to derail his political career. In recent days, Trump has highlighted what he sees as parallels between their cases. On July 7, he wrote on social media that he empathised with what was happening to Bolsonaro: 'It happened to me, times 10.' He reprised that theme in Wednesday's letter, announcing the dramatic increase in tariffs against Brazil. 'The way that Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his term, including by the United states, is an international disgrace,' Trump said. 'This trial should not be taking place,' he added. 'It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!' In addition to ramping up tariffs against Brazil, Trump revealed in his letter that he had directed US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to investigate Brazil for unfair practices under the Trade Act of 1974. This is not the first time that Trump has lashed out at Brazil, though. In February, the Trump Media and Technology Group filed a Florida lawsuit against Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, arguing that his decisions curtailed online freedom of speech in the US. De Moraes had also overseen the investigation into Bolsonaro's alleged coup attempt, and he is a target of criticism among many on the far right. While Trump's tariff letter contained the standard language alleging that the US's trading relationship with Brazil was 'very unfair', the US actually enjoys a trade surplus with the South American country. According to the Office of the US Trade Representative, in 2024, the US imported a total of $42.3bn from Brazil. But that was dwarfed by the amount it exported to the country: $49.7bn. In short, Brazil's purchases from the US amounted to about $7.4bn more than US purchases from Brazil. Still, Trump has cited uneven trade relationships as the motivation for his tariffs, though he has also used them to influence other countries' policies, particularly with regards to immigration, digital services and transnational drug smuggling. On Wednesday, Bolsonaro took to social media to once again proclaim his innocence. In a separate case, he was barred from holding public office in Brazil for a period of eight years. 'Jair Bolsonaro is persecuted because he remains alive in the popular consciousness,' the ex-president wrote in the third person. 'Even out of power, he remains the most remembered name – and the most feared. That's why they try to annihilate him politically, morally, and judicially.' He also reposted a message from Trump himself: 'Leave the Great Former President of Brazil alone. WITCH HUNT!!!' Lula, meanwhile, responded to Trump's previous tariff threats on Monday by saying, 'The world has changed. We don't want an emperor.'


Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump: ‘Very good chance' of Gaza ceasefire this week or next
Trump: 'Very good chance' of Gaza ceasefire this week or next NewsFeed Video Duration 01 minutes 05 seconds 01:05 Video Duration 01 minutes 03 seconds 01:03 Video Duration 01 minutes 31 seconds 01:31 Video Duration 01 minutes 23 seconds 01:23 Video Duration 01 minutes 20 seconds 01:20 Video Duration 03 minutes 26 seconds 03:26 Video Duration 02 minutes 16 seconds 02:16