Budget to consolidate economic gains, NA told
He said the reforms would also extend to tax fraud investigations, with new safeguards to prevent arbitrary arrests. Under the new policy, arrests during investigations would only occur in cases of sales tax fraud exceeding Rs50 million, and only after approval from a three-member Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) panel.
The opposition lawmakers; however, sharply criticised the budget, saying it lacked vision and heavily favoured the handful elite. They decried the increase in allocations to the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), which rose from Rs592 billion to Rs716 billion, arguing it came at the expense of education, whose allocation remains comparatively low.
PTI says 'federal budget favours elite, ignores masses'
The opposition also slammed what they termed a symbolic 10 percent salary raise for government employees and a seven percent hike in pensions for retired government employees. They noted the budget failed to increase the minimum wage, allegedly due to pressure from industrialists.
The Finance Ministry did announce some tax relief for salaried individuals, a promise previously made by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. But opposition members ridiculed the tax relief for those earning above Rs1.2 million annually, calling it a 'cruel joke.'
At the outset of the session, Federal Minister for Finance Muhammad Aurangzeb laid four Statutory Regulatory Orders (SROs) before the House, issued under the Customs Act and Income Tax Ordinance. He confirmed to the speaker that he would conclude the budget debate on Monday.
Several lawmakers belonging to both opposition and treasury participated in the ongoing debate on the Finance Bill for 2025-26, voicing a wide range of concerns and suggestions.
Pakistan People's Party (PPP) MNA Nafeesa Shah called for greater support to the agriculture sector. Saba Talpur echoed this sentiment, urging the government to cut prices of seeds, fertilisers, and pesticides to support farmers.
Junaid Akbar Khan of PTI said the budget had nothing for the people and called attention to sacrifices made by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in the war on terror.
Agha Rafiullah of PPP demanded that the government review proposed family pension reforms and remove limitations affecting spouses and disabled children.
Sahibzada Hamid Raza of SIC criticised the apparent neglect of health and education sectors in the budget.
Minister for Religious Affairs Muhammad Yousaf described the budget as balanced and praised the government's handling of Hajj arrangements, noting that over 115,000 Pakistani pilgrims participated this year. Saudi Arabia awarded Pakistan for its management, and planning for next year's pilgrimage has already begun, he added.
Qaiser Ahmed Sheikh, Minister for the Board of Investment, said macroeconomic indicators were improving, with inflation falling and remittances rising. He urged all political parties to agree on a Charter of Economy to attract investors.
Minister for Public Affairs Rana Mubashir Iqbal said Rs250 billion had been allocated for Balochistan, including Rs100 billion for road infrastructure and further allocations for dams, agriculture, energy, education, and health.
Minister of State for Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony Kesoo Mal Kheal Das stressed that no new taxes had been imposed on agriculture and reaffirmed the government's commitment to completing the Sukkur-Karachi motorway.
Murtaza Mahmud lauded the government's steps toward economic stability, while Pullain Baloch called for tax relief for the public.
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar reiterated Pakistan's stance against Israeli aggression – whether in Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, or elsewhere – stating that the country will continue to oppose and condemn such actions.
Other lawmakers who took part in the debate included Fayyaz Hussain, Azimuddin Zahid, Shaharyar Khan Mahar, Osama Sarwar, Noor Alam, Farah Naz and Zulfiqar Ali, Zahra Wadood.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
41 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Steady economic improvement
EDITORIAL: In a statement issued by his office Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed great satisfaction over the stock market index surpassing 148,000 points, a historic high, and thanked the business community for their continued confidence in government policies though he added that while 'the nation is on the path of development further efforts are still needed.' There is no doubt that apart from the stock exchange performance the current account deficit has performed well and plunged by 27 percent in July 2025 but is still an improvement when compared to July 2024 — and even more praiseworthy was the USD 2.1 billion surplus for July-June 2025. Inflation too has declined dramatically — from 28.31 percent in 2023-24 to 11.09 percent in 2024-25 as per data uploaded on the State Bank of Pakistan website. As noted by the Prime Minister, there is no doubt that further efforts are still needed on all counts. The plunge in the current account last month is partly attributable to a rise in the trade deficit — from USD 22.177 billion in 2023-24 to USD 26.785 billion in 2024-25 with the July 2025 deficit at negative USD 2.679 billion against negative USD 2.488 billion in July 2024. The decline in exports is mirrored by a rise in negativity of the large-scale manufacturing sector in 2024-25 (1.21 percent) and though credit to the private sector rose to 741.3 billion rupees against 527.3 billion rupees the year before yet reports indicate that the rise was mainly channeled into speculative investment on the stock market rather than in industry. Pakistan's stock market, with relatively a small number of key players compared to India's, is taxed at a low rate evident from the 15 billion rupees per annum revenue collected from this source as opposed to over a 100 billion rupees in India. The stock market index has been consistently used by successive governments as an indicator of improved economic performance; however, this claim is easily refuted as those who deal in stocks and shares are not the general public and certainly not the poor and vulnerable. This is reflected by the fact that poverty levels in Pakistan today are a high of 44.7 percent as per the World Bank. Furthermore, the number of entities listed on the bourse are just a fraction of the total number of business entities and employers in the country. Remittances rose dramatically, by nearly USD 8.299 billion, and are the main reason for the current account surplus last year. This has to be sustained in the current year and the July figures show this trend continuing — from USD 2,994 million in July 2024 to USD 3,214.4 million last month though geo-political considerations may make this a challenge in months to come. The business community has been increasingly vocal about the cessation of fiscal and monetary incentives in this year's budget as an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme loan's key condition with discussions underway between the government and the community that have yet to reach a successful conclusion. Tax on traders was deferred last fiscal year on the threat of countrywide strikes, again as per an IMF condition; however, it is unclear as to how long the government will be able to resist the Fund on this count. And finally, it is relevant to note that while the foreign exchange reserves situation has improved markedly — to USD 14,243.2 million on 8 August 2025 from USD 9,153.3 million on 2 August 2024 — yet given that the rollovers from friendly countries alone are USD 16 billion, requiring a yearly request to roll over till the IMF programme duration which is scheduled to end on 15 September 2027, the situation is far from satisfactory. The best option is to cut current expenditure that would automatically reduce the pressure to raise taxes that have a negative impact on domestic output; however, while the cabinet continues to rhetorically claim that wasteful expenditure is being cut yet this claim is simply not backed by data released by government agencies so far. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
41 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Enforcement, accountability: NA body moves to boost Nepra's powers
ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly Standing Committee on Cabinet Secretariat has decided to introduce legislation aimed at empowering the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) with enhanced authority to monitor enforcement, ensure accountability, and take action against power sector entities, with the objective of safeguarding and facilitating consumers. The committee assigned NEPRA the task of preparing a draft of the proposed legislation to enhance its role and powers and to submit it for approval. The committee emphasised that stringent monitoring of distribution companies was imperative for improving service delivery. The committee met with Member of the National Assembly (MNA) Malik Ibrar Ahmed in the chair at the NEPRA office on Thursday. A comprehensive briefing was given to the committee on NEPRA as regulator and its effectiveness, circular debt, energy sector, control of line losses and electricity theft. Responding to questions from committee members, NEPRA Member (Technical) Sindh, Rafique Ahmed Shaikh, stated that the organisation has a limited role under the existing laws and regulations. He informed the committee that a five-member team is deployed in each distribution company for monitoring purposes. He said that NEPRA has initiated legal proceedings against distribution companies (DISCOs) facing worsening losses. So far, a fine of Rs50 million has been imposed on the Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO) and Rs25 million on the Sukkur Electric Supply Company (SEPCO), while proceedings against other DISCOs are still underway. Responding to questions regarding capacity payments to Independent Power Producers (IPPs), Shaikh explained that IPPs are not unique to Pakistan, as such producers exist in other countries as well. He said, 'We signed agreements with IPPs on capacity payments because, at that time, there was a shortage of electricity and Pakistan urgently needed additional power. However, now we have sufficient generation capacity.' He further remarked, 'The electricity problems cannot be resolved without prioritising distribution companies (DISCOs). For instance, we have set a target of 8 percent line losses for the Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO). Any losses beyond this limit ultimately add to the circular debt.' While briefing the committee, Senior Advisor (Legal) Mian Ahmad Ibrahim said that in June 2024, electricity consumers across Pakistan received unusually high bills. He informed the committee that NEPRA investigated the issue and found that the problem arose because some distribution companies did not follow the standard 30/31-day billing cycle. He said that in cases of delayed meter readings, the failure to adjust billing days also resulted in excessive charges. He added that all affected bills were subsequently rectified, and consumers were granted relief accordingly. He informed that a total of 1.58 million consumers were affected by overbilling, with Rs3.55 billion adjustments made to provide relief. He said that among them, 434,856 consumers of Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO) faced Rs961 million in overbilling, while 371,107 consumers of Gujranwala Electric Power Company (GEPCO) were overbilled by Rs892 million. Similarly, 178,516 consumers of Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO) were affected, he said. He added that other distribution companies involved included FESCO, HESCO, PESCO, QESCO, SEPCO, K-Electric, and IESCO. He said that the aggrieved electricity consumers may approach NEPRA through digital application free of charge. About quarterly and monthly relief, he said that a negative adjustment of Rs1.881/kwh has been approved. He said that relief is being passed on billing months August 2025 to October 2025. He said that defective meters were replaced immediately to prevent average billing. He said that the NEPRA also sent notices to the DISCO to take action against executive engineers (XENs) found violating the Consumer Services Manual (CSM). On the issue of monitoring and controlling line losses and theft, Mian Ahmad Ibrahim informed the committee that NEPRA has a clear policy, whereby, only technical losses are recognised in tariff determinations. He explained that commercial losses resulting from theft and non-recovery are not passed on to consumers; instead, the burden rests with the DISCOs. Regarding affordable electricity supply, he stated that for the financial year 2025–26, the NEPRA has determined an average national tariff of Rs34/kWh, compared to Rs35.5/kWh in the previous financial year. This reflects a reduction of Rs1.5/kWh, directly benefiting consumers. About circular debt, he said that as per the Ministry of Energy's report for 30th of June 2025, the circular debt stands at Rs1.614 trillion. He said that within this stock, operational inefficiencies of DISCOs continue to play a significant role: excess Transmission and Distribution (T&D) losses Rs265 billion and under recoveries Rs132 billion. He said that operational inefficiencies of DISCOs continue to play a significant role. The committee felt the need for improving the overall performance of the power sector so that consumers receive uninterrupted and affordable electricity. The committee directed NEPRA to closely monitor DISCOs to improve their performance and ensure that they adhere to the regulatory framework. The committee also directed NEPRA to oversee restoration of electricity infrastructure demanded due to floods and rains. The committee decided to pending its discussion on two private members bill seeking amendments in the Civil Servants Act, 1973 to restrict re-employment after retirement till its next meeting. The committee asked the movers of the bill to comprehensively brief the committee about the rationale behind moving that amendment. The committee also pended discussion on another private members bill titled Civil Servants Amendment Bill till final outcome of the deliberations of secretary's committee and presentation of report to the prime minister. The meeting was attended by MNAs; Tahira Aurangzeb, Nuzhat Sadiq, Dr Nelson Azeem, Farah Naz Akbar, Pir Ameer Ali Shah Jeelani, Nawabzada Mir Jamal Khan Raisani, Khurram Munawar Manj, Syed Raza Ali Gillani, Shandana Gulzar Khan, Shahida Begum and Rana Ansar, Muhammad Aslam Ghumman through Zoom, Movers; Noor Alam Khan, MNA, Sahibzada Sibghatullah, MNA, Usama Ahmed Mela and the special secretary, Cabinet Division and special secretary Establishment Division and other officers of other concerned departments also attended the meeting. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Eight May 9 cases: SC grants post-arrest bail to IK
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court granted post-arrest bail to founder Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Imran Khan in eight cases related to 9th May mayhem. A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi and comprising Justice Syed Azhar Rizvi and Justice Shafi Siddiqui, on Thursday, heard Imran Khan's appeal against the Lahore High Court (LHC) in cases linked to May 9 incidents. Despite the bail in 9th May case, Imran Khan will remain in Adiala Jail as he is serving sentence in the £190 million graft case. There are also multiple other cases against him. The PTI hailed the SC ruling, using the hashtag 'Victory for Imran Khan' in its post on X. Special Prosecutor General, Punjab, Zulfiqar Naqvi contended that the petitioner hatched a conspiracy for the commission of the offences mentioned in the FIRs. He drew the attention of the Court to the ocular statements of three witnesses, as well as electronic media, and argued that these clearly implicate the petitioner and connect him with the commission of the alleged offences. The chief justice then confronted the prosecutor with the definite findings regarding the merits of the case recorded in the LHC order refusing bail to the present petitioner. Naqvi explained that it is by now settled that the findings so recorded in a bail granting order are tentative in nature, to be restricted only to the proceedings of bail and are not considered during the trial of an accused. The chief justice then said this Court (SC) granted bail to Ejaz Ahmad Chaudhary, Imtiaz Mehmood, and Hafiz Farhat Abbas, who were linked to the same occurrence (9th May) and charged similarly to the present petitioner. The prosecutor responded that the case of the present petitioner was clearly distinguishable and, therefore, the principle of consistency would not apply in the instant bail matters. Naqvi told that in the conspiracy case, the court had granted bail to three accused, adding that in one such case, the accused were not named in the FIR. He said the apex court had laid down this criterion in 2014, earlier reaffirmed in 1996, 1998, and in the 2022 Muhammad Rafiq vs State case. 'The High Court's judgment also states that the observations are of an interim nature,' he added. Naqvi argued that Ejaz Chaudhry's case is different from the PTI founder's case as 'no evidence existed and the accused had not been named in the FIR. Upon that, CJP Afridi asked the prosecution to show how the instant matter is 'different from earlier ones.' Naqvi contended that three witness statements have been placed on the record, arguing the PTI founder 'played a central role in all cases.' The chief justice then stopped him from arguing on the merit of the case. He told the prosecutor that if you touch the merit of the case then Salman Safdar, lawyer Imran Khan, would present his arguments on merit, adding this would affect the trial. The CJP said; 'My role was to warn you; the rest is for you to consider.' Naqvi insisted that the law barred bail and claimed there was 'solid evidence' against Imran Khan, but the CJP said, 'the evidence will have to be proven before the trial court.' Naqvi informed that out of 10 cases, the petitioner is involved in three cases. Justice Shafi Siddiqui questioned when the FIR was lodged against the petition. Naqvi replied that the FIR was filed against Imran on May 9. He said the SC allowed the trial court to approach the court to conduct three tests of the PTI founder, adding that the police approached the magistrate for voice matching, photogram metric and polygrammatic tests. 'Despite the court's permission, these tests could not be conducted,' he added. The chief justice remarked; 'If that is the case, there will be legal consequences'. The written order of the hearing stated; 'Lest this Court pass any findings on the merits of the case which may prejudice either party at trial, it is sufficient to state that the material brought on record regarding the alleged criminal conspiracy attributed to the petitioner requires scrutiny, and the same would be best adjudged after recording pro and contra evidence during the trial.' Justice Hassan inquired; 'Are such tests normally conducted in other cases as well?' Naqvi, the law prohibited bail to the suspect. 'There is solid evidence against the suspect.' However, the CJP told him that the evidence will be proven in the trial court. Salman Safdar argued that no indictment had been filed in any of the eight cases and that challans had not yet been submitted. He opposed the arguments of Naqvi and emphasised that the principle of consistency had to be applied in favour of the petitioner, as all three accused, namely, Ejaz Ahmad Chaudhary, Imtiaz Mahmood, and Hafiz Farhat Abbas, were charged with alleged criminal conspiracy, and thus the case of the petitioner would surely fall within the domain of parity, which had to be positively considered in favour of the present petitioner. Salman explained that the cases of the present petitioner were on a better footing, in particular, than that of Ejaz Ahmad Chaudhary, who had been granted bail by this Court. He pointed out that in the case of Ejaz Ahmad Chaudhry, the investigation had been completed and the trial had commenced, whereas, in the case of the present petitioner those stages had not yet been reached, and thus, his entitlement to bail is comparatively stronger. The order stated that the case of the petitioner has to be positively considered in view of the principle of consistency, as others similarly placed have been granted bail by this Court. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
