Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' offers car tax credits to add to Biden's
? "Big Beautiful Bill": Trump's new law offers an annual tax credit of up to a $10,000 on the interest of loans for new vehicles as long as they're less than 14,000 pounds and assembled in the United States. It covers purchases made in 2025 through 2028.
Big Beautiful Bill 101: What you need to know about the new law
How long Biden's and Trump's tax credits for new cars last
Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them.
More: What new version of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' could mean for EV car buyers and automakers
How to stack the auto tax credits
Here's how combining Biden's and Trump's tax credits over the next four years could save you a hunk of money on an EV:
A new EV might not be the best investment
To be sure, this strategy might not be the best way to stretch your dollar. But perhaps you're set on purchasing a new EV with the latest gadgets and upgrades.
The average price paid for a new EV this year has been $57,734, according to Kelley Blue Book. Even with the $7,500 tax credit, the EV premium over a gas-powered car is about $1,500. The math tips in favor of EVs when you look at the five-year fuel costs: $9,490 for gas-powered vs. $4,295, according to Kelley Blue Book.
If you can live without the new-car smell, used EVs' average listing price this year is about $20,000 less than for new models, according to Kelley Blue Book. You can also get a $4,000 tax credit from Biden's legislation for a used EV, but that wouldn't qualify you for the Trump tax credit.
Some additional fine print to consider if you use either of these tax credits
? Big Beautiful Bill: The tax credit for auto loans phases out for incomes between $100,000 and $150,000 for an individual and between $200,000 and $250,000 if you file jointly. It's not available for fleet purchases, commercial vehicles or leasing.
? Inflation Reduction Act: To take advantage of the EV credit, you also must buy the car - assembled in North America - for your own use. Your income must to fall below $150,000 for an individual and $300,000 for those filing jointly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Inside Elon Musk's clever plot to undermine Trump as billionaire's breakaway party ignites MAGA fury
The rollercoaster of a relationship between the world's richest man Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has captivated the attention of many political observers over the last yeah, but Musk's latest move could be his boldest. Musk officially filed a Statement of Organization Sunday with the Federal Election Commission for his 'America Party' political party after weeks of threatening the GOP. On July 4th, Musk asked his 221.7 million followers on X if it is time to make good on his threats to create a new political party and oust the Republicans who supported Trump's signature budget bill which narrowly passed through Congress after weeks of debate and different factions of the GOP plotting to the tank the legislation as various points the process. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he wrote on X. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' Republicans currently hold slim majorities in both the House and Senate with just a handful of seats giving them the edge over Democrats. Out of 100 seats in the U.S. Senate, 53 are held by Republicans. In the U.S. House of Representatives, 220 seats are held by Republicans and 212 are held by Democrats with three seats presently vacant due to members passing away. Trump's budget bill passed with narrow margins in both chambers last week, with some members of the President's party voting against the legislation. In the Senate, the vote was 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaker. Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina joined Democrats in opposing the bill. In the House the vote was 218-214. Republicans Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania voted no. Musk and Trump got into a social media war during debate on the legislation, leading to Musk threatening to use his billions to start a third political party and Trump threatening to deport the naturalized American citizen. Last Monday before Trump's bill even passed, Musk escalated his attacks, saying lawmakers who campaigned on cutting spending but supported the bill 'should hang their heads in shame.' 'And they will lose their primary next year if it's the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk declared. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO also called for a new political party, arguing the bill's massive spending showed 'we live in a one-party country — the PORKY PIG PARTY!' 'Time for a party that actually cares about the people,' he wrote. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk pledged in a post on X Monday evening. Musk, now worth over $400 billion, founded the AmericaPAC super PAC in 2024. AmericaPAC raised more than $260 million last year, much of it to back Republicans in swing districts. Over $88 million went to supporting Trump directly. The Senate version of Trump's bill, which also passed the House on Wednesday, is estimated to add between $3.3 billion and $4.5 billion to the national debt. 'The insane spending of this bill increases the debt ceiling by a record five trillion dollars,' Musk posted. Despite the relative unpalatability of a national third party or independent presidential campaigns, state level races are another story. There is precedent for a third party candidate running in place of a major party candidate, and some have even won. Two seats in the U.S. Senate are presently held by Independents, although those independents caucus with Democrats. Dozens of members of the U.S. Senate have been elected outside of the two major parties throughout the chamber's history. In one other relatively recent example, Independent Greg Orman ran against former GOP Kansas Senator Pat Roberts, albeit unsuccessfully in 2014. Orman managed to pull in 42.5% of the vote as the Democrat party did not field a candidate in the race. Musk was curiously silent in the hours following the congressional vote on Trump's budget bill but, on July 4th, he decided to weigh in: 'Great day for some … fireworks,' he wrote, adding two fire emojis. He also praised Republican Senator Rand Paul and Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, both of Kentucky, for voting against the bill for the amount of money it added to the country's deficit. '100,' the world's richest man wrote using an emoji in support of them. Musk has perviously threatened to primary any GOP lawmaker who voted in favor of Trump's signature legislation. Two Republican lawmakers who spoke to the Daily Mail on Thursday brushed aside Musk's potential threats against GOP members who voted for the big beautiful bill. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus brushed off Musk's threats when asked if he thought any members of his conference were worried about any potential retaliation from Musk for their vote. 'No, Elon Musk is for the country. No retaliation' Norman stated. Asked again if he thought his fellow Republicans could get primaried with millions of dollars flowing from Musk, Norman added the following. 'Elon Musk is a true patriot. He identified where our tax money went. For you, young people, you ought to be grateful that we had him.' 'No one else had the bandwidth to do what he did,' Norman noted, referring to Musk's work as Trump's former lead of the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk directly called out a pair of House Republicans who are a part of the conservative 'Freedom Caucus,' for their votes to pass the preliminary House version of the bill back in May. 'How can you call yourself the Freedom Caucus if you vote for a Debt Slavery bill with the biggest debt ceiling increase in history? @RepAndyHarrisMD @chiproytx,' Musk wrote, addressing the two GOP lawmakers directly. Another conservative Republican, Representative John McGuire (R-Va.) told the Daily Mail that he believes Musk is going to move on 'bigger and greater things.' 'I think yesterday, he said more nice things about President Trump,' McGuire added, referring to a recent positive post Musk's made on X, formerly Twitter. In that post, Musk praised Trump's peace making abilities. 'Credit where credit is due. Donald Trump has successfully resolved several serious conflicts around the world,' Musk wrote in a post made at around 1:30 AM Wednesday. McGuire is no stranger to competitive GOP primaries in red seats, as he himself came to Congress after he primaried former Rep. Bob Good, a fellow Republican from the right last year. While members of Congress brushed off Musk's threat's and even further political involvement following the passage of Trump's bill, some of the President's business allies are willing to to go scorched earth on the billionaire. Venture capitalist James Fishback - whose Azoria 500 ETF invests in companies that don't engage in DEI practices - posted on X that he was withdrawing support for Tesla and Elon Musk. Fishback noted that his firm 'decided to postpone next week's public listing of our Azoria Tesla Convexity ETF.' Fishback added that his organization's 'decision comes in direct response to Elon Musk's announcement that he is launching a new national political party.' While nearly all Republicans backed the budget, two conservative lawmakers from Kentucky — Rep. Thomas Massie and Senator Rand Paul — voted no. Massie was already criticized by the Trump White House for opposing the bill, and Musk defended him even before the final vote. It remains to be seen whether Musk's support for Massie was an exception, or a sign he's prepared to oppose Trump in future primaries within the GOP or even have a greater impact with his own political party in it's entirety.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How Trump won over Republicans on Big Beautiful Bill
President Donald Trump wasn't on the House floor for Thursday's vote on his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' – but he was there in spirit, including on the right hand of one South Carolina lawmaker voting his way. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, was sporting a custom ring on the big day with a golden image of the president's face as he cast his vote for the mega-bill that extended Trump's 2017 tax cuts. With Wilson's help, the massive bill passed 218–214 after a pressure campaign by Trump and congressional leaders kept lawmakers working overnight. 'It's gold Donald Trump on silver. You don't see it every day,' Wilson told the Daily Mail about the special jewelry he wore for the occasion. 'One of my staff was kind enough to get it for me,' he explained. Wilson's vote wasn't considered up for grabs, which may be why his staff came up with its own special Trump swag. For the dozen or so lawmakers who were wavering, the president applied his famous fear tactics – as well as charm and even an array of signed swag – to get Republicans to push the mammoth bill across the finish line. That came despite polls showing the bill was underwater, and even some supporters warning about steep cuts to Medicaid or fretting over the estimated $3 trillion it's expected to tack onto the national debt. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) testified to Trump's salesmanship in a video he posted after meeting with the president. 'The president was wonderful, as always,' Burchett gushed. 'Informative, funny, he told me he likes seeing me on TV, which was kind of cool.' Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, a Trump loyalist, asked, 'Did you show them what he signed for you?' Burchett replied, 'Yeah, he signed a bunch of stuff. It's cool.' Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins also poured on the charm when she ran into Burchett outside the White House, offering a hug and asking, 'Are we getting it done?' 'Yes ma'am,' he replied, before adding, 'I'm a happily married man.' The video also shows Burchett gripping a gold challenge coin of the kind Trump doles out, as he did to an African reporter he once called 'beautiful.' 'Donald Trump absolutely was our closer, and Donald Trump never stopped,' said House Majority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.). 'Every day [he] was there in the fight [asking] "Who do I need to call? What do I need to do?"' Scalise said no president was 'more directly engaged.' Trump's economic advisor Kevin Hassett added, 'President Trump was in the Oval Office making phone calls to just about everybody in the House.' Not all of Trump's persuasive tactics worked. He golfed with ally Sen. Lindsey Graham and also with Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, one of three Senate Republicans who voted against the bill. Trump has notably avoided criticizing Paul but has vowed to primary Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who he ripped as a 'grandstander' for opposing the bill. Only Massie and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) voted against it in the House. Even lawmakers who had previously objected, like Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), ended up backing the bill after securing changes. Van Drew said limits on healthcare provider taxes would have devastated Medicaid in his state. 'I couldn't vote for it that way,' he said, but added he worked with Trump directly to get a change added in a final 'wrap-around' amendment. With the bill now passed, Van Drew acknowledged it becomes a messaging battle, given the CBO's projection that it could cut Medicaid by $1 trillion and cause nearly 12 million people to lose coverage. 'So now this changes from public policy into a policy of who's going to be a better mouthpiece... If we articulate that well, if we sell it well, if we talk about how we're still maintaining the safety net, then I think we'll be okay.'
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Treasury secretary says countries without trade deals will see tariffs 'boomerang' to April rates by Aug. 1
WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that the U.S. will revert to steep country-by-country tariff rates at the beginning of August, weeks after the tariff rate pause is set to expire. 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on Aug. 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level,' Bessent said in an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'So I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly.' President Donald Trump had originally set a 90-day deadline — set to expire Wednesday — for countries to renegotiate the eye-watering tariff levels he laid out in his April 2 'Liberation Day' speech. He paused those rates a week later, while setting a new 90-day deadline to renegotiate them. That deadline was set to expire on Wednesday. CNN host Dana Bash responded to Bessent on Sunday, saying, 'There's basically a new deadline,' prompting Bessent to push back. 'It's not a new deadline. We are saying this is when it's happening,' Bessent said. 'If you want to speed things up, have at it. If you want to go back to the old rate, that's your choice.' On Friday, Trump, too, referred to an Aug. 1 deadline, raising questions about whether the July 9 deadline still stands. A White House spokesperson did not provide a comment when asked to clarify whether the April 2 tariff rates would resume on July 9 or Aug. 1. The president has recently given shifting descriptions of how firm the July 9 deadline is, saying at the end of June, 'We can extend it, we can shorten it,' only to double down on it several days later, saying he was not thinking about extending it. Shortly after midnight Friday, Trump referred to an Aug. 1 timeline, telling reporters that the April 2 tariff rates would resume at the start of August. Asked whether the U.S. would be flexible with any countries on the July 9 deadline, Trump said, 'Not really.' 'They'll start to pay on Aug. 1,' he added. 'The money will start to come into the United States on Aug. 1, OK, in pretty much all cases.' Trump said Friday that the administration would start sending letters to countries, adding, 'I think by the 9th they'll be fully covered.' 'They'll range in value from maybe 60% or 70% tariffs to 10% and 20% tariffs, but they're going to be starting to go out sometime tomorrow,' Trump said overnight on Friday. 'We've done the final form, and it's basically going to explain what the countries are going to be paying in tariffs.' Tariffs are paid by importers — which can pass on part or all of the costs to consumers — and not necessarily by entities in the goods' country of origin. Bessent also noted on Sunday that 'many of these countries never even contacted us.' The White House had initially projected confidence that dozens of countries would try to make deals. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on NBC News' 'Meet the Press' in April that 'we've got 90 deals in 90 days possibly pending here.' Late last month, Trump said that 'everybody wants to make a deal,' and after announcing sweeping tariffs on April 2, he said countries were 'kissing my a--.' 'These countries are calling us up, kissing my a--,' Trump said in April. 'They are. They are dying to make a deal. 'Please, please, sir, make a deal. I'll do anything.'' The renewed uncertainty is likely to further upset markets, which saw stock futures go lower Friday after Trump mentioned the country letters. Stocks have returned to all-time highs in part due to the lull in tariff news. So far, Trump has imposed higher import duties on autos and auto parts, steel and aluminum, and goods from China and Vietnam.
