logo
EXCLUSIVE British cardinal reveals Pope Leo's reaction upon being elected and suggests he 'won't be afraid of tyrants' after notoriously secretive papal conclave

EXCLUSIVE British cardinal reveals Pope Leo's reaction upon being elected and suggests he 'won't be afraid of tyrants' after notoriously secretive papal conclave

Daily Mail​09-05-2025

A British cardinal involved in the election of Pope XIV has spoken about the secretive process to elect him – and revealed the first black smoke was late because of a lengthy sermon.
Cardinal Vincent Nichols, 79, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales, was one of 133 cardinals involved in the Conclave and described how 'every single step was meticulously followed'.
On Wednesday a crowd of 45,000 had waited patiently for the first sign of smoke from the Sistine Chapel chimney which had been due at 7pm but instead it wafted black to show no Pope had been elected more than two hours late.
Liverpool born Cardinal Nichols described the experience as 'remarkable' and revealed the smoke was late because papal priest Raniero Cantalamessa, 91, had over run his sermon by almost an hour.
He said: 'I think it's well known that Fr Cantalamessa gave a very long talk…it must have been an hour or more.
'One person said it was his valedictory address, and it was splendid stuff.
'It was suggested that it would be half an hour at the most, but it went on a lot longer. Patience is a good virtue, and it can't be easily demonstrated unless you are doing it.'
Revealing the details of how the Conclave worked Cardinal Nichols said: 'There was a remarkable sense of fraternity, with people from all over the world.
For Cardinal Nichols, who is the Archbishop of Westminster, it was also his first Conclave and he just made the 80 years old cut off limit
'There was no distraction from mobile phones and there was a great spirit among the group of us.
'It was a time of great patience because we followed every single step meticulously and that took time, taking the other took a long time and the process of voting also took a long time.'
For Cardinal Nichols, who is the Archbishop of Westminster, it was also his first Conclave, and he just made the 80 years old cut off limit.
And in an intriguing comment, speaking about a former Pope Leo, Cardinal Nichols said: 'In 452 AD Leo turned back Attila the Hun on the edge of the city of Rome, so he won't be afraid of tyrants.'
When asked whether he was referring to President Donald Trump, Cardinal Nichols replied: 'You might hear that, I didn't say it.'
He went on: 'It was a very rapid decision, just four votes, and I think that's because Pope Francis left a College of Cardinals that shared his vision and spirit to be a missionary church.
'I would say Pope Leo is a citizen of the world, and once we reflected, it was pretty clear that here was a man who as bringing the right depth to the church and experience.
'There was actually quite a bit of me that didn't want to leave because it was such a spiritual experience in there and I will treasure it deeply.
'He is very calm, clear in his mind decisive and I've seen him resolve difficulties that didn't leave enemies behind, and he can pull people together.'
Describing the moment the former cardinal Robert Francis Prevost was asked if he accepted being named Pope, Cardinal Nichols said:' He took it very matter of factly, there was no real emotion. He took it all in his stride.
'There was a real sense of elation when he accepted the position of Pope. I was standing just a few feet away as he spoke and he was so very calm.'
Then giving his first reaction to his beloved Liverpool winning the Premier League, he told the Mail: 'That was just as ecstatic.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hereford Sixth Form College looks to lease listed manor house
Hereford Sixth Form College looks to lease listed manor house

BBC News

time4 hours ago

  • BBC News

Hereford Sixth Form College looks to lease listed manor house

A Grade II listed Victorian manor house could be used by a neighbouring of Mercia Multi-Academy Trust, which runs Hereford Sixth Form College, has put forward an application to make use of Churchill House in Venns trust said it was looking at a number of options, rather than seeking to develop new House is owned by Herefordshire Council, but it has been boarded up since 2020. It was home of the Churchill Gardens Museum until it closed in 2002 and after that it housed council offices and a training March, Herefordshire Council awarded a contract for work on it worth up to £92,000, in order to "bring it back to a condition where it can be reoccupied".The academy trust and the local authority are now discussing a possible lease trust pointed out that while it has been empty, the building "has suffered from vandalism and a number of break-ins".It has suggested putting up a 2m (6.5ft) high fence and automated gates, plus security trust's chief executive, Peter Cooper, said: "The college is really thriving, and rather than looking at new builds we are exploring different options for the future and seeing where we stand." This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

‘My dad walked out of my life when I was 10 – then I did the same to him four decades later'
‘My dad walked out of my life when I was 10 – then I did the same to him four decades later'

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

‘My dad walked out of my life when I was 10 – then I did the same to him four decades later'

To date, I've enjoyed 19 Father's Days. So far so good, I hope. I get nice cards from my daughters and the hugs seem sincere. Now that both of them are on the brink of adulthood (my youngest is 17), I can increasingly allow myself the conviction that I did okay in the role. The relief is enormous. I always feared I'd fail at fatherhood, largely because I thought my own father had. He was never much around, rarely home, and left for good by the time I was 10. In his stead came no strong male presence, my mother never remarrying, so how on earth would I make a good father myself without that formative role model? Family strife I didn't see my dad again until I turned 40, by which time I was a father myself. I'd previously been adamant that I'd never have children, convinced that, as in the films of Mike Leigh, families only led to strife. I didn't want any more strife. I'd remained very close to my mother until her death from cancer 25 years ago, at the age of 55, and she'd been a lovely, if complicated person: strong, independent, staunchly feminist, a vegetarian big into alternative health; also chronically depressed, with periods of bulimia and anorexia we were never allowed to discuss. In the absence of a husband, she promoted me to co-parent of my younger brother, and to suggest that my brother didn't much appreciate this is an understatement: it drove a wedge between us that exists to this day. To me, growing up felt like living in a perpetual minefield: at any time, one of them could blow, both, it seemed, reliant upon me to maintain an even-ish keel. Why me? When I moved out at 19, the sense of escape was vertiginous. Free at last! When would I settle down? Hopefully never. Fatherhood did eventually find me, as it does to so many of us. But because this was no longer the Seventies, I entered into it willingly and with self-awareness. Nevertheless, I still panicked throughout the pregnancy, then again during the first few months of parenthood (oh boy, did I), then, steered by my wife's surprising patience and wise counsel, I came to realise that history need not repeat itself. So, yes: big relief. Back in contact I found myself contacting my father a few months before we had our second child. I'd barely thought of him in the previous 30 years, and the few remaining memories I held were not particularly encouraging ones: a pint perpetually on the go, brooding bad moods, a fondness for Dad's Army. But I was curious now. Who was he? Why did he leave? Were there regrets? I found his address online. He lived just three miles from the family home he'd left all those years previously. He responded to my letter immediately, sounding happy, surprised, eager. 'Lunch? I'll pay, the least I can do.' We met at a train station, and I wouldn't have recognised him, this whiskery 65-year-old in an overcoat and flat cap. An hour later, I'd realised I was very much my mother's son. We had nothing in common, few shared interests, held differing world views. No missing piece of the jigsaw fell pleasingly into place. That said, he was unfailingly polite, and, I sensed, afraid in any way to offend. There was diplomacy at work here. During the meal, I became increasingly aware that while he diligently answered all the questions I posed, he asked none of his own. The second time we met, this time for coffee, we ran out of conversational steam alarmingly quickly – and I can talk to anyone. An absence of 30 years, and he'd nothing to say. While I was planning my exit, he suddenly suggested that our families meet, perhaps in pursuit of mitigating our mutual awkwardness with the presence of his wife who, he relayed fondly, 'can talk a lot'. I could meet his adult daughter, and he could meet my girls. A tepid meeting In truth, I wasn't keen. The dramatist in me thought that this might be an occasion for recrimination and revelation (Mike Leigh again), but I agreed largely because I didn't want to offend. Also, my wife, by now, was intrigued. She comes from a large, sprawling family, and could never understand my lack of interest in mine. In the event, there was no drama at all, just a lamb roast, two veg and room-temperature wine at their small terraced house. His wife really was very chatty indeed, and perfectly pleasant. She made small talk last for an awfully long time, and gave us some leftover dessert in a Tupperware dish 'for the drive back'. Early the next morning, he emailed to suggest another date 'soon', and so, over the next few years, we submitted to occasional Sunday lunches, just like normal people. At first, these occurred every few months, but then, at my delay, with much longer gaps in between. Consistently, I turned down their Christmas invitations until the hint was taken. It's not that I had any (or, perhaps more accurately, much) lingering anger towards him – I knew that their marriage had been a difficult one, and that both were responsible for the way it ended – but my mother had stayed, while he, irrespective of the reason, had fled. If I'd ever needed a father, it was back then. Now, I had no idea what to do with him. Walking out of his life My daughters were similarly mystified. Because I'd only ever called him by his name, and never 'Dad', they did likewise. Over the years, they wondered why these particular friends of ours were 'so old'. When I explained the bloodline, and its significance – something I had to do more than once in their young lives – their eyes widened. 'Does this mean we'll get presents?' About a decade after that initial contact, I ended things. I was polite but firm. That early awkwardness between us had never eased; I still had no idea what to say to him whenever we met, and he never seemed to say very much to me, either. I couldn't quite work out where he fitted into my busy life, or, indeed, why he should. His wife was furious, and wrote to tell me. No, she confirmed, she did not see things from my perspective. When he died last year, she emailed my wife, not me. There was no invite to the funeral. I was sorry, genuinely, for her loss, but I cannot say I regretted my decision. The deeper into fatherhood I got, the more I found it impossible to comprehend how someone might walk out on his children quite so emphatically. I couldn't imagine doing that myself, and found it increasingly discomfiting to be around someone who did. But I'm glad I'd sought him out, and happy that he found familial happiness the second time around. His absence in my life has made me a much more conscientious father, and, for that, I'm grateful.

A beer and a baptism at the pub with a mobile christening pool
A beer and a baptism at the pub with a mobile christening pool

Times

time6 hours ago

  • Times

A beer and a baptism at the pub with a mobile christening pool

If you walk into the Mosley Arms as soon as it opens at midday on a Sunday, you might notice that a few of your fellow drinkers look a little damp. This might be because they have just been baptised in a mobile christening pool by a priest who leads a Church of England congregation that calls the Bolton pub its home. The priest and worshippers at New Life Church, Breightmet, do not have a traditional church building to call home, leading them to choose the Mosley Arms, a pub to the east of the city, as their literal and spiritual home for services and also for baptisms of people of all ages once per year. Their services start at 10.30am on Sundays and wrap up as the pub opens its doors at noon, just in time for worshippers to pop in for a pint if they fancy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store