Abhishek Banerjee in all-party team for Japan pays tributes to Rash Behari Bose
Bose was an Indian revolutionary and freedom fighter who fought against the colonial British. He was one of the key organisers of the Ghadar Mutiny and founded the Indian Independence League. Bose also led the Indian National Army which was formed in 1942 under Mohan Singh.
Banerjee also visited the monument dedicated to Justice Radhabinod Pal, a figure of great significance and respect in both Bengal and Japan, at the Yasukuni Shrine and paid floral tributes.
During his official visit to multiple countries, starting with Japan, Banerjee said he paid his respects to Bengal's icons.
The members of India's all-party outreach delegation in Japan arrived in Tokyo on Thursday. They called on Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and briefed him about India's position after the horrific Pahalgam massacre in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22 and the subsequent Operation Sindoor.
The delegation is headed by JD(U)'s Sanjay Jha. The members will continue their outreach mission in Japan before leaving for Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, and Singapore to focus India's robust mission of zero tolerance towards terrorism at global platforms. India has already declared that any terrorist attack on its soil would be treated as war against the country.
UNI PC PRS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 minutes ago
- Hans India
MP cabinet approves statewide Geeta Bhavans to promote cultural, spiritual learning
Bhopal: In a significant decision aimed at deepening cultural roots and expanding access to spiritual education, the Madhya Pradesh cabinet on Tuesday approved the construction of Geeta Bhavans across all urban local bodies in the state. The initiative, which carries a budgetary provision of Rs 100 crore, will be implemented over the next five years. 'As our chief minister had announced to construct Geeta Bhavans in each district. The state cabinet on Tuesday approved the scheme, and all district collectors have been asked to provide land on a token amount of Rs 1 only if land is not available with urban bodies. The scheme is for five years, which means all the districts will have Geeta Bhavan within five years," Urban Development Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya said here after the cabinet meeting. He described the Geeta Bhavan concept as 'unique and inclusive,' noting that the halls will be available free of cost to social, religious, and cultural organisations. To ensure financial sustainability, each Bhavan will include commercial extensions such as shops and service centres. 'Some districts can construct these Geeta Bhavans on a PPP mode, as funding size has not been decided yet,' he said. Each Geeta Bhavan will serve as a community hub for religious study, cultural events, and spiritual discourse. The halls will feature libraries and e-libraries stocked with literature on Indian philosophy, the Bhagavad Gita, and other sacred texts. Facilities will also include auditoriums, cafeterias, and refreshment centres, with seating capacities ranging from 250 to 1,500, depending on the size of the urban body. The architecture of the Bhavans will reflect traditional Madhya Pradesh styles, incorporating local art and murals. Municipal bodies may also collaborate with private partners for construction and maintenance, allowing for flexible implementation across diverse regions. Officials said the initiative will not only provide a permanent venue for spiritual and cultural gatherings but also create employment opportunities and foster a deeper connection between youth and India's philosophical heritage. Religious organisations and literary groups have welcomed the move, calling it a timely investment in the state's cultural infrastructure. With the cabinet's green light and budgetary backing, Madhya Pradesh's Geeta Bhavan network is poised to become a cornerstone of community life and spiritual engagement across the state.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US warns Indians: I-94 date, not visa expiry, decides your legal stay
Staying in the United States beyond the authorised date is an 'overstay' and could result in visa revocation, deportation and ineligibility for future visas, the US Embassy in India said on Monday. US Embassy's reminder on visa rules In a post on X, the embassy clarified: 'Your authorised period of stay is the 'Admit Until Date' on your I-94, not your US visa expiration date. Staying in the United States beyond your authorised date is called an 'overstay' and could result in a visa revocation, possible deportation, and ineligibility for future visas. You can check your I-94 date at On August 13, the embassy posted another message: 'Illegal entry into the United States is not an option. Those who break US law will be returned to their country or face criminal charges.' Earlier, on August 9, it had written: 'Our message is clear: those who violate US border security will be held accountable. We're working our network of global partnerships to root out illegal immigration and protect the integrity of our travel documents.' The embassy has repeatedly used social media to remind visa holders of the consequences of overstaying. On June 19, it wrote that a US visa is 'a privilege, not a right' and that screening does not stop after the visa is issued. What visa holders need to remember • Overstaying even by a few days can lead to visa revocation • Visa overstays may result in detention and a potential 10-year ban Deportations of Indians from the US The US government has deported 1,703 Indian nationals, including 141 women, so far in 2025, Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh told Parliament earlier this month. Between 2020 and 2024, 5,541 Indian nationals were deported from the US, according to Singh's written reply in the Lok Sabha. State-wise data showed: • 620 deportees were from Punjab • 604 were from Haryana • 245 were from Gujarat • 10 were from Jammu and Kashmir • 6 were listed under 'unknown' Flights carrying deportees Of the 1,703 deportees this year: • 333 were deported in February on US military flights • 231 were deported in March on charter flights operated by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Enforcement and Removal Operations • 300 were deported in July through Department of Homeland Security charter flights In addition: • 72 deportees arrived individually or in small groups on commercial flights from Panama • 767 deportees travelled on commercial flights from the US, either individually or in small groups, depending on ticket arrangements
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
President Trump's gain is America's loss: The high cost of Trumpian diplomacy
President Donald Trump seems to have gained a lot from his way of conducting American foreign policy from the very inception of his second term in office in January 2025. But has the US gained anything out of the Trumpian method of conducting diplomacy? What are Trump's private gains then? First of all, Trump's self-image and his belief that he can run the country's policy towards the rest of the world like an emperor towards his subjects are yet to rupture. No major power in the world appears equipped to confront him directly. Any country that has attempted to do so has remained ineffective. Many powerful countries rather have tried to massage his ego in very many ways. For example, President Vladimir Putin, despite his diplomatic victory in the Alaska summit, went to the extent of admitting that if Trump had been in power, there would not have been the Ukraine War! It was music to Trump's ears and made Trump forget his resolve to make Russia face 'severe consequences' if Putin did not sign on to a ceasefire agreement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Second, despite Trump's now-on-then-off tariff policy that has not been based on sound economics but on flimsy grounds, countries around the world are struggling hard to somehow negotiate with him and conclude 'deals'. He imposed high tariffs on Mexico because that country did not do enough to stop illegal immigrants from entering US territory and failed to prevent fentanyl imports into the US. Similar was the argument on high tariffs on imports from Canada. He announced 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian goods imported into the US, because he did not like the trial of former President Bolsonaro, accused of attempting a coup to stay in power! Trump threatened 25 per cent secondary sanctions on Indian goods because India bought oil from Russia. He did not extend secondary sanctions to European countries who also purchased Russian energy resources, though less in amount in comparison to Indian purchases. He refrained from imposing the same sanctions on China, which buys more Russian oil than India. Worse, he has not imposed any sanctions on Russia, accused of slow-peddling his efforts for a ceasefire agreement. Trump imposed high tariffs on Nato members of Europe, most of them also being members of the European Union, because these countries did not spend enough on defence and contributed more towards the alliance's budget. Similar was the logic to subject Japan and South Korea to high tariffs. He perceived the allies to be getting American protection at a cheaper rate while ripping off the US through trade. Do any of those reasons cited by President Trump for imposing high tariffs make sound economic sense? It is all politics. Third, Trump has so far triumphed, as he seems to be trying to garner as much revenue as possible to offset the budget deficit that will surely and greatly swell due to his pro-rich taxation policy. He hardly cares about its impact on middle-class consumers who supported him during the last election but cannot politically punish him anymore as he is no longer going to contest any election. Trump's tariff policy will sooner or later affect American companies that do import businesses. It will also adversely affect the countries that export goods to the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In all these, President Trump may benefit, while others lose. When myriad countries are sending their officials and leaders to Washington to strike trade deals, President Trump looks royal, and his king-size appearance satisfies his ego as well. He is also lucky, as forecast by many economists about the dire consequences of his tariff policy on inflation and employment have not yet been demonstrated on the ground. While the current state of the US economy may deteriorate once the high import tariffs begin to bite more severely, Trump appears more focused on the present. His policies may backfire later, but he will have the authority to change course. The unfortunate aspect of Trump's policies is that the victims of his haphazard tariff announcements will not be compensated. And Trump may not lose much financially or otherwise. Fourth, besides his erratic tariff policy, President Trump has given a body blow to foreign assistance schemes to numerous countries by cutting off assistance completely or reducing it substantially. Foreign aid has been a flagship foreign policy tool of the United States for decades. US foreign aid on the surface looks like Santa Claus doling out freebies to various countries, but in reality, it buys the United States immediate strategic benefits and financial gains in the long run. It also consolidates American influence over decision-making in the recipient countries. President Trump may once again gain by saving money that may be of use to deal with the budget deficit and manage his pro-business taxation policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The political and economic gain for the Trump presidency, however, has negative consequences for the United States. Some of the negative consequences are already discernible. One, the mistrust between the US and the NATO allies has widened a great deal. He succeeded in forcing the NATO allies to contribute more to the alliance by spending more on defence, but has failed to reinforce mutual trust among the allies. The same can be said about US-Japan and US-South Korean bilateral strategic alliances. Two, the Trump Administration spends much less on foreign assistance, but its consequences in terms of reduction of its soft power as well as political influence in numerous aid recipient countries will surely cost the United States very dearly. Three, the durability and intensity of the strategic partnership that the US has built in the last two decades with countries such as India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and many other countries has come under question. Future administrations will need to invest far more in renewing confidence with strategic partners, and yet there is no guarantee of success. Four, most American allies and strategic partners will almost certainly try to recalibrate their policies and de-risk their closer ties with the United States. It will take time, but their intention and the process have already begun. Trump's gain appears to be America's loss. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
