MK Party downplays Makhubele blunder during Appropriation Bill's voting
Colleen Makhubele's confusion – after a day spent rejecting the respective budgets presented for the various government departments – mistakenly supported the Government of National Unity (GNU) Appropriation Bill in the National Assembly on Wednesday.
ALSO READ:
- GNU passing national budget allows unhindered spending for rest of financial year
- GNU finally passes ultimate test of collaboration by getting national budget approved
The marathon sitting brought to an end 2025's sticky budget process.
Makhubele was seemingly tripped up by processes in the House and accidently cast a vote on behalf of the MK Party in favour of the Appropriation Bill.
The official opposition was allowed to change its vote at a later stage – a move other parties said sets a bad precedent because it was allowed after the voting window had closed.
Speaking to journalists after the session, the MK Party's Des van Rooyen dismissed the faux pas.
'From vote 1 to vote 42, the MK has been very clear – we have objected all these votes. I think there was a confusion from the table when the House chairperson announced order 5 and he was corrected by his table but by then, our chief whip had already channelled order 5. That was the confusion. But it's just logic, simple sense. You can't vote no for all budgets 1 to 42 and then at the final stage you vote yes - it doesn't make sense.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
GNU must take blame for not acting to avert imposition of Trump's exorbitant tariffs
The recent decision by US President Donald Trump to increase tariffs from 10% to 30% on most South African imports, effective this past Friday, 1 August 2025, is a damning indictment of our foreign policy shortcomings. At the heart of this unfolding crisis is the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), which for nearly 25 years has given South African goods duty-free access to US markets. In 2023, more than $3-billion worth of exports flowed to the US under Agoa, sustaining jobs and livelihoods in key industries such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. It's difficult to overstate just how beneficial Agoa has been. The US is South Africa's second-largest export market, and Agoa alone accounts for more than $2-billion in exports annually. Entire value chains are built on this preferential access. This has resulted in tens of thousands of jobs created and maintained in export-related industries, especially in the automotive and agricultural sectors. Yet, what once felt like abstract diplomatic tensions have now resulted in exorbitant tariff hikes that could wipe out margins for exporters and put thousands of jobs at risk across key sectors — from citrus and wine to auto manufacturing and metals. While some may point fingers at an increasingly protectionist White House, the Government of National Unity (GNU) must accept responsibility for what is in most parts a self-inflicted wound. Those in the GNU say that jobs and the economy are their number one priority. But when it came to protecting one of our largest export markets and tens of thousands of South African jobs, they sat on their hands and watched the tariffs roll in. This diplomatic misstep will be measured in job losses, declining export revenue, and dwindling investor confidence. Instead of strategic engagement, disarray ensued. Civil society organisations like AfriForum and Solidarity secured high-level meetings in Washington, while our official diplomatic presence remained directionless. Undermining national trade posture Even the Democratic Alliance was accused of undermining our national trade posture through uncoordinated political freelancing, a move that seemingly cost MP Emma Powell her role as the DA's International Relations spokesperson. At the core of Washington's growing frustration is South Africa's erratic and often contradictory foreign policy. Despite claiming to be non-aligned, our government has taken deliberate steps that signal the opposite. The ANC's hosting of senior Hamas representatives in Pretoria, Minister Naledi Pandor's infamous meeting with then Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi, and South Africa's ambiguous stance on Russia's war in Ukraine have all sent provocative messages that clash with global democratic norms. These actions carry real-world consequences, as this latest tariff decision makes painfully clear. Even under the more diplomatic Biden administration, South Africa failed to rebuild trust. We did not use the opportunity to engage, negotiate or reassure. And now, under a more transactional Trump presidency, patience has run out. What is clear is that South Africa urgently needs a foreign policy rooted in clear principles and strategic interests, instead of nostalgia and ideology. Our diplomacy must be led by the state, above party politics, and laser focused on three core objectives: expanding trade and economic growth, defending human rights, and advancing democracy on the continent and beyond. The current bipolar approach, with mixed signals from different actors, is unsustainable and deeply damaging. A government-led, coherent strategy to stabilise and grow our trade relationship with the US is now mission-critical. This strategy must include five immediate actions: South Africa must reassert official leadership in managing our engagement with Washington. Splinter groups and political parties must refrain from back-channelling for narrow political gain. Trade policy is national policy. South Africa must speak with one clear, credible, and united voice. Our government must directly engage with the US Congress, which holds immense sway over trade legislation. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill need to hear not just about Agoa's benefits for South Africa, but for the US too. More than 500,000 American jobs are tied to trade with us. We should use that as leverage. South Africa must table a credible trade and investment plan that showcases the mutual benefits of partnership. Priority sectors like automotive exports (valued at more than $1.2-billion annually), citrus, wine, metals and green technology must be at the forefront. We must position ourselves as a reliable partner for US capital, technology, and innovation as America eyes new partners in the global energy transition. A full economic risk assessment must be urgently commissioned to measure the impact of the proposed tariffs on jobs and industry. Such a study would not only quantify the damage, but guide our negotiating position and enable smarter policy responses, including sector-specific relief or adjustment mechanisms. Perhaps most urgently, we must appoint a capable and credible ambassador to Washington. This needs to be someone who understands both diplomacy and economics. The job now requires high-stakes negotiations to restore market confidence and protect jobs. That seat has remained vacant or ineffective for far too long. The truth is that South Africa's foreign policy has long lacked a future-focused economic dimension. It is too often discussed not in terms of trade, growth or a digital future, but in the context of how liberation movements can remain in power. This mindset has locked us into outdated alliances, including with authoritarian regimes that are neither democratic nor innovative. Meanwhile, we've neglected crucial relationships with long-standing partners like the US, and failed to appoint ambassadors, attend key forums or secure investment guarantees. What is clear is that we cannot afford to respond with more muddled messages, delayed decisions and ideological posturing. If we do not act with clarity, urgency and humility, we risk permanently losing one of our most important trade relationships. Now more than ever, our foreign policy must serve South Africa's economic interests. Jobs, industries and future growth hang in the balance. DM
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
ANC NEC seeks more alliances to fortify fragile GNU post-budget crisis
Despite growing challenges and ongoing policy disagreements, ANC President Cyril Ramaphosa maintains that forming the Government of National Unity was the right decision. Yet, the ANC is now turning to parties outside the coalition for support. After a bruising Budget crisis that nearly brought Parliament to a standstill, the ANC's highest decision-making body, the National Executive Committee (NEC), has resolved to engage with political parties outside the Government of National Unity (GNU) to stabilise governance and push for key reforms. The decision comes as the GNU, now more than a year old, continues to face multiple challenges and remains fragile in parts. Its biggest test was the failure to pass the national Budget — not once, but twice, marking an unprecedented moment in South Africa's democratic history. Closing the NEC's four-day meeting in Germiston, ANC president Cyril Ramaphosa said the committee had received a detailed report on the GNU and held robust discussions, ultimately acknowledging the growing fragility of the governing arrangement. 'The Budget process has taught us many lessons, including being able to build tactical and issue-based voting alliances with other parties. We welcome the cooperation on the Budget, including with parties that are not part of the Government of National Unity,' said Ramaphosa. The Budget was eventually passed with support from parties outside the formal GNU arrangement, including ActionSA and Build One South Africa, a development that Ramaphosa described as 'a real demonstration of acting in the interests of the people of South Africa'. 'We are grateful to all those parties that cooperated with us to have the Budget passed. The overall picture is that despite all the noise through the GNU we have been able to safeguard the core progressive policy agenda of the National Democratic Revolution, which is the core pillar of ANC policy,' said Ramaphosa. Beyond the Budget deadlock, the GNU has confronted significant challenges, including disagreements over land expropriation without compensation and pushback against the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act. Both cases sparked fierce opposition and court battles led by the Democratic Alliance, the second-largest party in the GNU. 'We have extensively discussed how we proceed with respect to the Government of National Unity, given our analysis and practical experience of the past 12 months. Accordingly, the National Executive Committee considered a number of options about how to strengthen the GNU and improve its effectiveness and stability to give full and proper effect to the Statement of Intent that was signed by the parties that are party to the GMU, as well as the three strategic priorities of the seventh administration,' said Ramaphosa. As part of this, Ramaphosa said the NEC had agreed to engage with parties that were willing to play a 'constructive role in furthering national unity and stability' so it could achieve three strategic priorities: driving inclusive growth and job creation, reducing poverty and tackling the high cost of living and building a capable developmental state. Despite the challenges faced by the GNU, said Ramaphosa, the NEC had concluded that the decision to establish it was correct. 'Our people appreciate that it has brought stability and enabled progress in addressing their challenges. The NEC reaffirms the view that the GNU is a correct tactic and remains valid.' Ramaphosa pointed to increasing pressure from 'global and domestic right-wing forces', but stressed that the ANC had not abandoned its democratic or developmental agenda. 'Through access to state power in the GNU we have been able to defend the democratic gains and to advance our transformation agenda, despite the pressure and resistance from the global and domestic right-wing forces. We have not retreated from the progressive domestic and foreign policy positions of our movement.' Local elections During the 2021 local government elections, the ANC lost control of several key metropolitan municipalities. Of the eight metros nationwide, the party won an outright majority in just two: Mangaung and Buffalo City. Now, with the 2026 local elections looming, Ramaphosa said, 'The marching order to all ANC-run municipalities and ward councillors is that we cannot proceed as if it continues to be business as usual. We need to undertake extraordinary measures to address challenges at local government level.' In a week or two, the NEC will hold a special session to focus more attention on the challenges in local government. SACP Another contentious issue in the discussions was the SA Communist Party's (SACP's) decision to contest the elections independently of the ANC, about which Ramaphosa expressed serious concern. Two weeks ago, the SACP, running separately from the ANC for the first time in the province, garnered only 70 votes in a by-election in a Polokwane ward, representing just 1%. 'We have no wish, nor do we have any intention, to interfere with the decision of the South African Communist Party. However, as we have indicated, we disagree with the decision,' said Ramaphosa. 'We believe that this decision has fundamental implications for the strategy and programme of the National Democratic Revolution … while the alliance between the SACP and the ANC has spanned the better part of a century. This is not about the past. It is not about nostalgia.' The NEC believes the SACP's decision will significantly weaken the forces for national democratic change. 'We will continue to seek to engage with the SACP on how we will run those elections. We will go out from this meeting to explain our position to our structures at every level of our organisation, so that comrades, members of the ANC, are empowered to explain the challenge this poses to our transformation agenda,' said Ramaphosa. Although the NEC is opposed to the SACP contesting elections, Ramaphosa stressed the need for unity within the broader alliance. 'We are determined to ensure that these developments do not divide our movement or cause instability. We reiterate that the SACP members who hold ANC membership are full members of our movement with the same rights and duties as any other ANC member, rights and responsibilities that are clearly stated in our constitution,' said Ramaphosa. However, how this stance will be implemented in practice remains uncertain, particularly in light of Ramaphosa's recent appointment of SACP member Buti Manamela as the minister of higher education, science and technology. DM
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa handed an MK Party ultimatum over his handling of the police minister saga
MK Party president Jacob Zuma says the country cannot afford two ministers in one portfolio. Image: Independent Media IN ACCUSING accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of of violating his oath of office and failing to uphold the Constitution, the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) said South African taxpayers cannot afford to pay for two ministers in one portfolio. This was after Ramaphosa placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave and appointed Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister. In light of their assertions, the MKP's leader, Jacob Zuma, gave Ramaphosa until 10am on Friday to resign. In a letter sent yesterday, Zuma said he will take action against Ramaphosa if he failed to adhere to the demand. Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya confirmed receipt of the letter. 'The legal team will deal with that letter,' he said. The letter penned by KMNS attorneys, Zuma's representatives, came after the Constitutional Court dismissed the MKP's application, last week, to have a direct access to challenge Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on a leave, appointing Cachalia and establishing a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the corruption allegations in the SAPS and judiciary. 'Various reasons have been offered in respect of the decisions which were impugned by our client and uMkhonto weSizwe Party in the Constitutional Court which found that it lacked exclusive jurisdiction and/or has no basis to grant the requested direct access. "As a result, our client has or sought urgent advice on possibly taking the relevant dispute(s) to the High Court and/or any other appropriate forum. It is assumed that you stand by the reasons previously given for the decisions announced on 13 July 2025,' read the letter. The MKP's spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, said: ' The judges did not want to take a decision knowing exactly that the MK Party has a strong case. By placing Mchunu on leave of absence and appointing Cachalia as an acting police minister, the country is having two ministers of police. Both ministers are acting.' Zuma, who said he was a concerned citizen, a voter and a former President, also demanded the date and time when Ramaphosa decided to place Mchunu on leave of absence and the decision to appoint Cachalia as acting police minister, as well as their current positions. 'When exactly (date and time) was your decision to place Minister Mchunu on leave of absence taken? When exactly (date and time ) was your decision to appoint Professor Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police (was) taken, communicated to him and to the public? 'What exactly is a 'Minister Designate', from a constitutional point of view? Immediately after the swearing-in ceremony (i.e. from around 9:30am on 1 August 2025), what was the exact correct description of Professor Cachalia? Was he a minister, acting minister or minister designate? What is the present, correct, full and official description of Mr. Senzo Mchunu? If the answers are the same, for how long is it envisaged that South Africa will have and pay for two Ministers of Police at the same time?' Zuma asks in the letter. He also wanted to know Ramaphosa's reasons for not dismissing Mchunu based on the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police boss Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, that Mchunu had ties to criminal gangs and meddled in police investigations into politically motivated murders. He said irrespective of the answers Ramaphosa might give, his conduct to place Mchunu on leave and appoint Cachalia remain illegal, irrational and unconstitutional. 'Due to the obvious urgency and importance of the issues raised above, these demands must be fulfilled immediately but by no later than 10h00 on Friday, August 8, 2025, failing which all our client's rights are reserved, including the right to urgently approach the courts for appropriate relief, without any further notice to you.' [email protected]
