HC pulls up Nainital body, cites remarks by wife of navy officer killed in Pahalgam
A bench of Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Ravindra Maithani observed that serving such notices has only aggravated the situation.
Instead of dousing the flames, such notices only add fuel to a fire, the court observed.
The matter was mentioned in the court on behalf of the rape accused's wife, describing the demolition notices as instances of 'bulldozer justice' that went against the orders of the Supreme Court.
The petitioner's lawyer also complained before the court against harassment for filing a case in favour of the accused.
The Nagar Palika, Nainital tendered an unconditional apology before the court for issuing such notices to 62 people, including the accused, and said those will be withdrawn.
The matter will now be heard on Tuesday.
The court said the Nagar Palika executive officer's action amounted to contempt of an order of the Supreme Court.
It also said that police should not be pushed to their limits.
Quoting the wife of a naval officer killed in the recent Pahalgam terror attack, who has said anger should not be vented on Muslims or Kashmiris in reaction to the incident, the court said the citizens of Nainital must follow her example.
They should not vent their anger on the community or the accused, it said.
Nainital's senior superintendent of police (SSP) Prahlad Meena joined the hearing via video-conferencing, while both the executive officers of the Nagar Palika appeared in the court in person.
The alleged rape of the 12-year-old girl by the 75-year-old accused, Osman, sparked communal tension in the town on Wednesday, with Hindu outfits taking to the streets and vandalising shops owned by members of the minority community.
The protesters raised anti-Pakistan slogans and damaged vehicles parked outside the shops. They also hurled stones towards a mosque.
The situation was brought partially under control with the arrest of the accused but tension persists in the town, with a massive police deployment to prevent further escalation.
The high court also asked how so much damage could be inflicted during communal tension in an area that was so close to the Kotwali.
On angry lawyers trying to assault the accused as he was being taken to a court dealing with cases lodged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in Haldwani on Thursday, the bench also asked why the area was not cordoned off in anticipation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Strange NCPCR challenging order granting protection to couple: SC
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Tuesday found it "strange" that the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights was challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order granting protection to a Muslim couple apprehending threat to life. Strange NCPCR challenging order granting protection to couple: SC While dismissing the NCPCR's plea, a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan wondered how the commission was aggrieved by the high's 2022 order which noted the marriage of a Muslim girl was governed by the Muslim Personal Law. The high court order said the girl, who married a 21-year-old man, was aged over 16 years. "We fail to see as to how the NCPCR can be aggrieved by such an order. If the high court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks to extend protection to two individuals, it is strange that the NCPCR is challenging such an order," the top court said. It said the NCPCR had no locus standi to challenge the order. The bench told the NCPCR's counsel that the commission was a "stranger" to the litigation. "Two people have come and they have asked for protection from the court. The court has granted protection and you are challenging that order?" the bench asked. The NCPCR's counsel said the high court order was challenged considering the question of law involved in the matter. Pointing out there was no question of law, the bench said how the NCPCR, meant for the protection of children, could challenge an order granting protection. The bench also dismissed a separate plea filed by the NCPCR against another order of the same high court. "Take up better causes than this," the bench told the NCPCR's counsel. The top court also dismissed other plea challenging the high court's orders. In its September 2022 order, the high court directed the 16-year-old girl's custody to be handed over to the petitioner husband and noted both were Muslims. The high court referred to a verdict which said marriage of a Muslim girl continues to be governed by the personal law of Muslims. According to the verdict, 15 years was the age of puberty of a Muslim female and on her own willingness and consent, after attaining puberty, she can marry a person of her choice and such a marriage would not be void in terms of section 12 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Assam Crime Branch issues summons to journalists Siddharth Varadarajan, Karan Thapar
On a day the Supreme Court granted interim protection from arrest to journalist and The Wire editor Siddharth Varadarajan in a case lodged by the Assam police over an article on Operation Sindoor, the Crime Branch of the police in Guwahati issued summons to him and another senior journalist from the news portal, Karan Thapar. On August 12, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi granted the interim protection from arrest to Varadarajan in a case lodged by the Morigaon district police under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which deals with acts 'endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India.' The same day, the Crime Branch of the Assam Police in Guwahati issued separate summons to Varadarajan and Thapar in connection with an FIR registered at the Crime Branch police station in Guwahati, directing them to appear at the police station on August 22. While the summons do not contain details of the case against them, it mentions that this too has been registered under Section 152, along with other sections of the BNS pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups; publishing false or misleading information jeopardising the sovereignty unity and integrity or security of India; statements conducing to public mischief; and criminal conspiracy. The Indian Express contacted the Joint Commissioner of Police Guwahati, Ankur Jain, and DCP Crime Guwahati, but they did not share details of the complaint(s) based on which the FIR has been registered. Varadajan said that they filed a petition before the Supreme Court on Monday night. 'We have replied to the inspector who issued the summons both via speed post and WhatsApp, saying that his summons is bad in law because it does not contain a copy of the FIR, no details of what it is we are accused of doing, it doesn't even have the date of the FIR. We also reminded him that we had already moved the Supreme Court over an earlier FIR,' he told The Indian Express. In the written response to the inspector, he has requested a copy of the FIR 'before proceeding any further in this matter'. 'In the meanwhile, I am happy to assist the investigation in accordance with the procedure established by law, and you may also question me virtually or in Delhi (my home town and place of residence) if I am provided a copy of the FIR beforehand,' states the letter.
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Opposition's V-P Pick Reddy Had Struck Down Anti-Naxal Campaign? The 2011 Verdict
Last Updated: Among Reddy's key judgments is one given in 2011, striking down Salwa Judum, a key anti-Naxal initiative of the Chhattisgarh government The Opposition's INDIA bloc has announced the name of former Supreme Court judge Sudershan Reddy for the upcoming Vice-Presidential election. The announcement has set the stage for a contest between Reddy, the opposition's nominee, and CP Radhakrishnan, the NDA's Vice Presidential candidate. Announcing the INDIA bloc's candidate, Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge said, 'This vice-presidential contest is an ideological battle, and all the opposition parties agreed on this, and this is the reason we have nominated B Sudershan Reddy as the joint candidate." The 2011 verdict Among Reddy's key judgments is one given in 2011, striking down Salwa Judum, a key anti-Naxal initiative of the Chhattisgarh government. The case was driven by Nandini Sundar, long accused of proximity to Maoist groups and named in a Bastar murder First Information Report (FIR) (later dropped). The verdict was seen as a setback to India's anti-Naxal fight, coming at the height of Maoist violence. Who is Reddy? B Sudershan Reddy, born in 1946 in Telangana, served as the Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court before his elevation to the Supreme Court. He began his legal career after enrolling as an advocate with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh on December 27, 1971. Reddy practised primarily in writ and civil matters at the Andhra Pradesh High Court, where he also served as Government Pleader between 1988 and 1990. In 1990, he briefly worked as Additional Standing Counsel for the Central Government, and later served as Legal Adviser and Standing Counsel for Osmania University. On May 2, 1995, he was appointed as a permanent judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. When is the V-P election? The Election Commission has scheduled the Vice Presidential election for September 9, with both polling and counting to be completed the same day. The deadline for filing nominations is August 21, and candidates will be able to withdraw their papers until August 25. The office fell vacant after Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar stepped down on July 21, the opening day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, citing health concerns. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 19, 2025, 17:44 IST News india Opposition's V-P Pick Reddy Had Struck Down Anti-Naxal Campaign? The 2011 Verdict Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
