Bad news for Garmin users — future features could go behind the Connect+ paywall, according to CEO
Given that the features you do get with Garmin Connect+ have thus far underwhelmed, it wasn't a great hardship to skip the subscription entirely.
However, the fear Garmin users had was that future features would end up locked behind the Garmin Connect+ paywall, and that fear may have just been confirmed by Garmin's CEO.
Speaking during Garmin's Q1 2025 earnings call CEO Cliff Pemble spoke about Connect+ and the features it might get in the future, saying, 'certain ones, we will likely reserve for premium offerings.".
While Garmin Connect+ certainly does need some new features to make it worth the outlay, if it becomes a requirement to get the most from a watch then that's bad news for Garmin users who have already spent a lot of money on a watch.
Pemble's also spoke about how Garmin Connect+ had been received by Garmin users, saying that the response 'had been positive', which is a surprise to me.
Notwithstanding the fact that introducing a paid subscription rarely, if ever, goes down well, Garmin users seemed particularly outraged by the arrival of Connect+.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
This is partly down to the fact the best Garmin watches like the Garmin Fenix 8 cost more than $1,000, meaning the idea of paying an extra $6.99 a month to unlock features is galling.
Even if you opt for a cheaper model like the Garmin Forerunner 165, part of the appeal of using a Garmin in the past has been that you don't have to pay more once you've bought the watch.
Furthermore, Garmin Connect+ hasn't drawn very positive reviews from those who have used it. The AI-based Active Intelligence feature in particular is yet to provide any useful insights, in my experience.
Once Garmin Connect+ was introduced it was inevitable that future features would end up behind its paywall, and if the service is to be a success it does need some more useful features than it currently has.
Subscription services are only likely to become more common with the best sports watches, unfortunately. However so far Suunto and Coros haven't introduced one to use with their devices.
The core experience of tracking and analyzing your training will remain free across the board I would expect, and it's still an excellent experience with Garmin.
However, if we read the tea leaves, it's likely that when interesting new Garmin features launch in the future, some are likely to cost you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
8 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
If you're moving from Apple to Garmin, you'll want to install this watch face
There's a lot to consider when moving from Apple Watch to Garmin — sure, you'll get a better battery life and more health tracking features, but one thing you might miss, as well as answering calls and texts from your wrist, is closing your rings. The good news is, you can still close your rings using this Garmin watch face. I review the best Garmin watches for a living, and while this is the watch face I always download, the Goals screen is super popular, and mimics Apple's rings. The best part is, unlike Apple, you can completely customize what your rings measure. Like all custom Garmin watch faces, you can download the watch face, named Goals, from the Connect IQ app. You can download a free trial of the watch face first, and then it will cost $1.99/£1.99. Once you've downloaded the face, you'll be able to move it from watch to watch, if you ever choose to upgrade your Garmin. Here's why I recommend it. I've been reviewing the best fitness trackers for the past decade, and I'm the first to admit, the Apple Watch rings are extremely motivating. Far more motivating than my watch randomly buzzing throughout the day, telling me to move. I've been known to go for a walk at 10 pm just to close my move ring, and the same applies with the Garmin goals, which I love seeing my move throughout the day. One big step up from the move, exercise, and stand rings you'll find on the Apple Watch is the ability to customize your goals to ones that are important to you. The goals watch face lets you pick from a huge list of stats, including all of the obvious options like steps, movement, and calories, but also more unique goals, such as floors climbed, monthly walking minutes, and time to recover in hours. As a marathon runner, it's always helpful to see my active calories — a stat you can't see on most of Garmin's built-in watch faces. This helps me ensure I'm eating enough when my training plan involves high mileage runs. If you're looking to lose weight, it's also a helpful metric to keep an eye on, as you want to ensure you're in a calorie defict, burning more calories than you consume. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. I've installed the Goals watch face on my Garmin Forerunner 570, Garmin Forerunner 970, and Garmin Epix Pro, and have not experienced any difference in battery life while using it. It looks fantastic on the bright, AMOLED screen, and I appreciate the option to customize the colors of the bars to suit my style. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
Garmin Venu 3 review: A great fitness tracker, but it falls short as a smartwatch
For the last four months, I've been testing the best Garmin watches available. The Venu 3 is Garmin's most advanced smartwatch yet, and it's built on the same top-tier fitness foundation the brand is known for. In addition to having a built-in microphone and speaker, it has best-in-class GPS, industry-leading heart rate tracking, and deep recovery metrics. During testing, I found the ability to answer calls and texts from my wrist was nice, but the advantages felt pretty limited in this model. Moreover, if your goal is to track workouts, stay on top of your stress and sleep, and see who's texting or emailing you without your phone nearby, I think the Vivoactive 6 is going to be a better pick — at a better price — for the majority of people looking for a smart fitness watch. (Check out our full Vivoactive 6 review.) While the Venu 3 is all-in-all a solid watch, after testing it for the last few months, I don't think it's the best value for your money. Here's why. What I found after 3 months of testing It's built on Garmin's fitness tracking power. Garmin has some of the best fitness tracking technology, based on a long-standing foundation of very accurate GPS and heart rate detection. With this core, the Venu 3 has a lot of the same features and abilities that make Garmin's other lifestyle watches great for fitness devotees: it tracks your steps, sleep, and stress automatically; has 30 pre-loaded activity profiles you can manually use to track workouts with helpful in-the-moment stats like heart rate, pace, and distance; it uses your health and activity data to determine your "body battery" energy and recovery levels throughout the day; and it has a digital coach for training and improving your sleep. Every morning, the Venu 3 delivers a morning report with sleep quality, body battery, and a daily suggested workout. And, like most every Garmin watch, the face and data fields are fully customizable in the app so you can tweak the watch to match your needs. It's sleek, intuitive, and has a great battery life. The Venu 3, like most Garmin models, has many other perks than the foundational tech: It has an exceptionally long battery life (14 days in smartwatch mode, or 26 hours in GPS mode), which means you can more continuously track sleep and daytime stress, and you can leave your charger behind for short travels. The AMOLED display is crisp and vivid, the interface intuitive, and the case design more refined than past Garmin watches (though it looks very similar to the Vivoactive 6). You can customize the watch face so it looks as sporty or as sleek as you prefer. I also appreciate that it comes in two sizes, the smaller Venu 3S with a 41mm screen and the Venu 3 with a 45mm screen. It's a smarter watch…sort of. The biggest headline that sets the Venu 3 apart from Garmin's other watches is that it has a built-in microphone and speaker. This means you can take calls and use your phone's voice assistant directly from your wrist — something the Vivoactive 6 and Garmin's less-smart watches can't do. On one hand, I found this feature genuinely convenient during moments like taking quick "need anything on my way home" calls from my husband, or replying to a text while hands-deep in pie crust. A quick voice reply definitely beats tracking down my phone for a short answer or trying to swipe with messy fingers. I also found the voice-to-text feature worked just as well (if not better) than using Siri to dictate. That said, there's a big catch: your phone has to be unlocked for you to do anything beyond responding to an incoming text or answering a call. Unlike with, say, an Apple Watch, the Venu 3 can't initiate a text to someone, reply to a text from earlier in the day, or even add something to your Notes app without your phone being unlocked first. I found this to be quite frustrating; this limitation really narrowed how often the on-wrist reply function was actually usable. The voice assistant access was also finicky — sometimes I'd press and hold the middle button and it would say "connecting to voice assistant," only to immediately go back to the home screen. In short, it's not quite the seamless smart assistant experience you get from an Apple Watch or Galaxy Watch. If you're an Android user, you have a little more to work with: You can access quick-reply features, and these only need Bluetooth, not voice assistant, so you can shoot a pre-set canned reply even if your phone is locked. Why it's not worth $150 more than the Garmin Vivoactive 6 Having tested both of these watches over the last three months, I can tell you Garmin's two smartwatches are very, very similar. The main difference: The Venu 3 is slightly smarter but also significantly more expensive than the Vivoactive 6. Here's what $150 more will get you with the Venu 3: Ability to take phone calls on-wrist. Ability to use voice assistant and reply to incoming texts on-wrist. Ability to initiate pre-set texts on an Android on-wrist. 14 days of battery life vs. 11 days in the Vivoactive 6. 30 preloaded activity profiles vs. 80 in the Vivoactive 6. Slightly higher display resolution. A built-in barometric altimeter for more accurate elevation tracking. In my opinion, unless you take quick phone calls a lot or use voice assistant all the time (and have your phone unlocked to do so), the Vivoactive 6 is a much better value for your money. How it compares to other smart watches If you are more interested in having a great smartwatch that does a good-enough job at tracking workouts, then your decision is really between the Garmin Venu 3, the Apple Watch Series 10, and the Google Pixel Watch 3. (After testing the Fitbit Versa 4, I can confirm it doesn't have a seat at this table.) All three watches are a similar price ($400 to $500), have a sleek and clean design, and have an intense, visually rich display (the Venu 3 and Pixel 3 use AMOLED, while the Apple Watch 10 uses retina OLED). The Venu 3 has a significantly longer battery life (14 days vs. 18-24 hours), a far more accurate GPS, and far more accurate heart rate sensor than either competitor. Overall, this means the Venu 3 is going to be better at tracking your health and fitness and delivering deeper, more insightful metrics than the Apple Watch Series 10, including personalized coaching for free in the Garmin app. That said, the Apple Watch Series 10 does a good enough job at tracking workouts for most people (and auto-tracks them, which Garmins do not), is very good at analyzing sleep, and is way better at being a smartwatch for iPhone users compared to the Venu 3. The Apple Watch integrates better with the iPhone ecosystem, so you have more apps on-wrist (including navigation from Apple Maps), access to Siri, and voice control without needing to unlock your phone. You will have to charge it every 1-2 days, though. The Pixel Watch 3, meanwhile, integrates much better with the Android ecosystem than the Venu 3 — you can access more apps and Google Assistant from your wrist versus just receiving notifications and responding to texts and phone calls. The Pixel Watch is built on Fitbit's technology, so its workout and sleep tracking are pretty good, though it can't compete with Garmin's GPS or recovery insights. And, like the Apple Watches, the Pixel 3 needs to be charged every 1-2 days versus the Venu 3's 14-day battery life. For more picks, check out our guide to the best smartwatches and best fitness trackers. The bottom line The Venu 3 may be Garmin's most advanced smartwatch, but it's not $150 smarter than the Vivoactive 6. While it's nice to have an on-wrist speaker and mic sometimes, the need to unlock your phone for access is too much of a limitation for us to justify spending $450 on this watch. If fitness is your priority, the Vivoactive 6 is a great wearable with basic smartwatch functions (e.g., on-wrist notifications, Garmin Pay, music control) and way more activity profiles, all at a more affordable price than Apple or Google watches. However, if an advanced smartwatch is your priority, you may be happier with an Apple Watch Series 10 or Google Pixel 3 for a similar price to the Venu 3.
Android Authority
a day ago
- Android Authority
Study finds your smartwatch might be way off on one key health stat
Kris Carlon / Android Authority TL;DR Study finds smartwatch stress scores often don't match how you actually feel. Researchers tracked 800 Garmin users for three months and saw 'basically zero' correlation for stress. Sleep tracking was more accurate, but better at logging hours slept than rest quality. They're meant to be your health sidekick, you might suspect that there's only so much that a wearable can tell you about your mental state from taking a pulse reading. If this wasn't already obvious, new research appears to confirm that your smartwatch might be completely misreading your mood. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. A study published in the Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science and reported by The Guardian found that a smartwatch often confuses stress with excitement — and could flag you as overworked when you're actually having fun. Researchers tracked 800 young adults wearing Garmin Vivosmart 4 devices for three months, comparing the watches' stress, fatigue, and sleep scores with what participants reported feeling at the time. According to Eiko Fried, an associate professor at Leiden University and lead author of the study, the verdict on stress tracking was that there was 'basically zero' correlation. He said his own Garmin has told him he was stressed while working out at the gym or catching up with an old friend at a wedding. 'These are consumer devices, not medical devices,' Fried warned. Andy Walker / Android Authority Fatigue tracking fared slightly better, and sleep readings were the most accurate of the bunch. Two-thirds of participants saw a clear match between their self-reported good nights and the watch logging about two extra hours of sleep. Still, the researchers say these devices are better at measuring how long you slept than how well-rested you actually feel. The team hopes the findings will help guide future work on using wearable data for early warnings about mental health issues like depression. But for now, they caution against taking stress scores too seriously — think of them as a rough guide, not a definitive read on your emotional state. Has your smartwatch ever told you you're stressed when you're just feeling excited? 0 votes Yes, often. NaN % Yes, at least once. NaN % Never. NaN % Follow
