Bengaluru stampede: CM Siddaramaiah says he gave nod for RCB felicitation at Vidhana Soudha, denies links to stadium event
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who is in the eye of a storm over the June 4 stampede outside the M Chinnaswamy cricket stadium in Bengaluru that killed 11 people, has distanced himself from the celebrations held at the stadium following the IPL championship victory of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB).
The Congress leader, however, acknowledged on Sunday that he had approved a felicitation for the cricket team on the portals of the Vidhana Soudha, the state government headquarters, and attended the event on the invitation of the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA).
Speaking in Mysuru, Siddaramaiah indicated that KSCA officials approached the state Department of Personnel and Administration (DPAR) for permission to conduct an event at which Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar would felicitate the RCB players at the Vidhana Soudha.
'The DPAR secretary was apprised of this, and granted permission. Of course, I was informed, and I said 'Give permission for the event at the Vidhana Soudha steps'. Has there been any incident on the steps of the Vidhana Soudha? Even the Governor of Karnataka attended the programme on the steps of the Vidhana Soudha,' Siddaramaiah said.
The Congress government, which facing a suo motu case taken up by the Karnataka High Court over the 11 deaths in the stampede, has ordered a judicial inquiry, a magisterial inquiry, and a probe by the state CID into the incident.
'Nothing untoward happened at the Vidhana Soudha. The incidents happened at the stadium. Who arranged the programme at the stadium?' he asked. 'In regular course, they informed the DPAR secretary. I was informed by the chief secretary. She said, 'Let us do it'. She said the police had agreed and I said, 'Let us do it'. The KSCA secretary and treasurer came and invited me for the event. It was not a function organised by us but by them. They said the Governor has also been invited. So, I went to the event. I do not know beyond this. I was not invited to the event at the stadium.'
He further added, 'The KSCA event was the responsibility of the police and the KSCA. The suspension of police officers was because they did not make proper arrangements. What has Sathyavathi (IAS officer and DPAR secretary) done wrong? Nothing happened at the Vidhana Soudha event.'
'This incident should not have happened. After I became the chief minister, no such incident had occurred. Prima facie, it is evident that this incident happened due to the mistakes of officials. We have taken action,' he said, adding, 'I have been pained by the incident. All are pained… The whole government is pained by the incident.'
Siddaramaiah rejected the argument that the organisation of two back-to-back events – one at the Vidhana Soudha and the second at the Chinnaswamy stadium located within one km of each other – caused the stampede, and suggested that the Bengaluru police displayed 'dereliction of duty' in making arrangements for the stadium event.
The Congress leader said, 'The question of the two events is different. The decision was to have the event outside the Vidhana Soudha, but the police made mistakes with respect to the other event (at the stadium). Who has to inform me about the bandobast for the events? It is the police. When we say the police, who does it imply in Bengaluru? It is the police commissioner. Did the police commissioner inform me about the arrangements?'
'The police have to inform the head of the government. The police have to say whether proper arrangements have been made in terms of security. They did not inform me. Is it not a serious thing?' the chief minister added.
Regarding allegations by the Opposition, he said, 'We have not sacrificed the police commissioner. Five people have been suspended. The intelligence chief has been transferred. My political secretary Govindaraju has been removed. We have taken a series of actions.' Govindaraju is an MLC and sports administrator who reportedly influenced the decision-making with respect to the RCB victory celebrations.
Siddaramaiah said, 'Why should the government be embarrassed when it has not committed a mistake? We have acted against those who committed errors. Did they provide resignations for the Kumbh Mela stampede tragedy, or when a bridge fell down a day after it was inaugurated? In the Kumbh Mela tragedy, over 50 people died, did anyone resign for it?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
How redoing Karnataka ‘caste census' weakens CM Siddaramaiah without strengthening Shivakumar
The 2015 Karnataka survey report was placed before the state cabinet this April but its findings have not yet been made public. The resurvey move was announced by Congress general secretary K.C. Venugopal Tuesday after the party's top brass, including AICC president Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi, met with Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his deputy D.K. Shivakumar in Delhi. Bengaluru: The Congress high command Tuesday said that though the report of the 2015 Karnataka 'caste census' had in principle been accepted, it asked the Siddaramaiah-led government to carry out a re-enumeration exercise to allay apprehensions of various communities and groups in the state. According to political analysts and observers, the Congress's resurvey move reflects the leadership's careful efforts to reconcile differing—and confrontational—viewpoints within Karnataka, effectively diverting attention from the Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede and preventing the Centre from taking credit for initiating the 'caste census' exercise at the national level. 'They (Congress) cannot allow the BJP or NDA (at the Centre) to claim credit for the caste survey, including with regards to the upcoming Bihar elections. That is why the (party's) national leadership spoke about the caste census. The main thrust for the (national) caste census has come from (Bihar leaders) Lalu Prasad Yadav and Nitish Kumar,' Narendar Pani, a Bengaluru-based analyst and faculty at National Institute of Advanced Studies, told ThePrint. 'This (resurvey decision) gives the impression that the Congress is actually leading and the others are following.' Prime Minister Narendra Modi had earlier said the Congress was turning the Constitution into a 'weapon' and 'medium of appeasement' for political gain. However, the PM's announcement of a national census that would include caste count in April has been interpreted by the Congress as a sign that the opposition successfully influenced the ruling party's position on this issue. The messaging for a national audience apart, the decision also has bearing in Karnataka and will possibly defuse some tensions between the CM and his deputy, analysts said. Statements by Shivakumar and Siddaramaiah on the subject indicate that both leaders are claiming some level of validation for their respective positions on the state survey, although the CM appears to have conceded some ground. While Shivakumar has previously sided with calls for scrapping the 2015 survey, the CM officially accepted the survey report. At a press meet following Tuesday's meeting, Siddaramaiah also announced the resurvey and acknowledged that the earlier survey's findings were more than 10 years old, in the process seemingly giving up any leverage he had to thwart attempts by Shivakumar, from the dominant Vokkaliga community, to replace him. The CM hails from the backward Kuruba community. Following this, Shivakumar stated on X: 'Caste census to be redone to dispel doubts over sanctity of data.' Also Read: Who are Panchamasali Lingayats & why they're so important in Karnataka politics 'Door-to-door survey again' In 2015, during Siddaramaiah's first stint as CM, he had commissioned the 'socio-economic and educational survey' in Karnataka, which had 55 questions and cost over Rs 180 crore to complete. It is a widely held belief that Siddaramaiah commissioned the 'caste census' in 2015 to challenge the perceived dominance of communities like Vokkaligas and Lingayats. Despite lacking definitive empirical evidence, these two groups have often been considered the largest in the state and hold significant influence among political parties, the government and broader society. According to analysts, the two groups have been vehemently seeking the scrapping of the 2015 survey report as its findings could potentially weaken their established hold over both politics and society. The Siddaramaiah government will iron out the details on how it will carry out the re-enumeration in a cabinet meeting Thursday, although there are many unanswered questions over how it would conduct a re-survey that would not completely alter the findings of the existing caste census in the state. The re-survey and report are set to be completed within 60-90 days. 'Data will be collected once again through door-to-door and online surveys. The entire process would be done in a very transparent manner,' Shivakumar said. This would also give the Vokkaligas, Lingayats and other aggrieved communities time to mobilise people and make a case for consolidation to retain their dominance, rather than further fragmentation that brings down their population numbers and lobbying powers. The deputy CM is a Vokkaliga and has sided with the community against Siddaramaiah and the government's stand. Ministers from the Lingayat community, like M.B. Patil, Lakshmi Hebbalkar, S.S. Mallikarjun and Eshwar Khandre, too, have opposed the government's decision to release the findings of the 2015 report. On the other hand, traditionally oppressed communities, who form the backbone of Siddaramaiah's core political constituency, have urged the CM to release the caste survey findings. Siddaramaiah's support base had also begun to target Shivakumar whenever the latter broached upon the unwritten agreement that he would replace the former halfway through the term of the Congress government in Karnataka. The Siddaramaiah camp had further complicated matters for the party by promoting a narrative that replacing a CM from a backward class with Shivakumar, who belongs to a dominant community, could be politically unfavourable. According to A. Narayana, a political analyst and faculty member at Azim Premji University, Siddaramaiah appears to be leveraging a perceived increase in resentment among Dalits to argue that oppressed communities should have the opportunity to claim the CM's position after him, rather than passing it on to Shivakumar. 'Ground for negotiation' According to the findings of the survey, the total population of Vokkaligas in Karnataka is 61.6 lakh or 10.3 percent. Lingayats are 66.3 lakh or 11 percent of the total population. These numbers are much lower than previous estimates—14 percent and 17 percent of the total population, respectively. According to the government, a total of 5.98 crore people or 94.17 percent of the state's population were asked 55 questions on various parameters for the survey. Though the Congress under Siddaramaiah has relied more on AHINDA (Kannada acronym for minorities, backward classes and Dalits) for support, the party has individual leaders who enjoy caste-based support in certain constituencies. 'For the party to put up a strong fight in the next elections, Shivakumar is necessary. It may not be so much in terms of caste but more in terms of his ability to mobilise funds. The reading of some of the Vokkaliga ministers and leaders in the Congress is that if Shivakumar is alienated, it will be difficult for them to win in their own Vokkaliga-dominated constituencies,' Narayana told ThePrint. He added that Shivakumar has tried to project himself as a leader of the Vokkaligas, which has not helped him loosen the grip of the Janata Dal (Secular) over the community. But any attempts to sideline Shivakumar would result in the community not backing the party entirely, piling up the challenges for the Congress in 2028. The analysts believe the Karnataka government will go ahead with the state resurvey since there is no clarity on the qualitative aspects of the Centre's proposed national caste survey nor a fixed timeline for when it will be conducted. Pani said Siddaramaiah was formulating a strategy to capitalise on fragmented sub-caste groups. Though the Lingayats are a force to reckon with, the community has many sub-sects which identify themselves under other categories of backward classes than the social umbrella of the caste group. According to Pani, the Congress will use the caste census to control the narrative. 'The whole purpose will be reservation but the question is whether he (CM) will actually go through and fix it (caste survey), or just keep the ground open for further negotiations till 2028,' he said. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: Quota shake-up, sub caste maths & Muslim numbers, why Karnataka caste survey has Siddaramaiah in a bind
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Karnataka High Court Reserves Order On RCB's Petition After State Concludes Arguments
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday reserved its order in the petitions filed by Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) and its marketing head Nikhil Sosale, challenging the criminal proceedings in connection with the stampede deaths that occurred during the team's IPL victory celebrations. The order will be pronounced on Thursday at 2:30 pm. Appearing for the petitioners, senior advocate Sandesh Chouta reiterated that while certain companies have been named as accused, individual employees like Sosale were being targeted without specific charges. The counsel questioned the basis of police action against the individuals, alleging that proper procedure was not followed during arrests. Advocate General (AG) Shashikiran Shetty, representing the State, began his response by tracing the timeline of events following RCB's IPL victory. He submitted that plans for a victory parade were already in place before the team won the final, and this was reflected in internal communications and planning documents. According to the AG, RCB went ahead with event announcements on social media without obtaining any permission from the State. "The Karnataka Cricket Association (KSCA) merely sent an intimation on June 3. No official request for permission came from RCB," he said. The AG accused the petitioners of suppressing this information in court filings and misleading the judiciary. Calling the event "illegal", the AG said that under the Karnataka Police Act, a license is mandatory for such public gatherings. He added that ticketing, crowd management, and security were the responsibility of RCB and BCCI. On the arrests, the AG argued that Sosale was detained while attempting to leave the city shortly after learning he was named in the FIR. He laid out the timeline, noting that after the suspension of DCP Shekhar, the investigation was lawfully transferred to another officer, who supervised the arrest via the Ashok Nagar Police Station. "Due process was followed even during transfer of case to CID, and all arrest documents were provided to the accused, in reasonable time," the AG said. He contended that the arrests were legal, the petitioners were evading investigation, and that Sosale, in his official role, bore direct responsibility for the alleged lapses in safety and planning. "There were no barricades, no medical support, no permissions. The public was invited by RCB in an irresponsible manner, and the tragic deaths are a direct result of this negligence," he submitted. The AG further stated that unless the arrest is proven to be illegal, the petition seeking quashing of proceedings is not maintainable. He emphasised that there was no delay in providing arrest documents and that the petitioners were attempting to suppress key facts. The petitioners' counsel Mr Chouta responded by alleging that Sosale's fundamental rights were violated and once again questioned whether the Chief Minister had directed the arrest, as reported in the media. He pointed out that the State had not issued a specific denial on this issue. He also asked why several police officials were suspended or transferred if the government believes the entire responsibility lies with RCB and associated entities. After hearing both sides, the court reserved its order for Thursday afternoon.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Punjab Kings Star Takes Blame For IPL 2025 Final Loss: "Actual Captain Is..."
Punjab Kings batter Nehal Wadhera took the entire blame for his team's loss to Royal Challengers Bengaluru in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 final. Wadhera emerged as one of the top performers for PBKS in the competition but failed to score big in the summit clash as he was dismissed for 15 runs off 18 balls. In a recent interaction, Wadhera opened up about the game and said that he failed to accelerate his innings at the right time - something that worked against his side. "I totally blame myself. If I had played better at that time, we could have definitely won. I won't blame the pitch because RCB scored 190 runs. I think I was just taking the game deep, and I believe in finishing games by taking it deep. I think this was one of those days when I couldn't finish the game. When I had to accelerate in all the tournaments, whenever I accelerated, I think it paid off except for the last game." "Some days, it doesn't click, and I think it was the same day when it didn't happen. But I don't have any regrets that I was taking the game deep, and that situation was fine because the wickets were falling, but I think I could have accelerated a little more, which I have learnt and analysed. I will do that in the future and that will help me and the team," Wadhera told Hindustan Times. Wadhera was also all praise for PBKS skipper Shreyas Iyer and how he led the franchise in IPL 2025. "You all have seen Shreyas' captaincy, but I think an actual captain is a leader, and his captaincy and leadership can be seen from off the field and the way he carries himself off the field. We have seen him closely in hotels, and we spend a lot of time together, and you also know the statements which he gives. I think he gave a statement which I liked a lot and I have seen that he applies it." "I think the statement that he is giving and applying it in real life off the field I think his confidence goes up just like that. The way he behaves off the field, his attitude is reflected in the game and I think a good captain, his attitude, the way he speaks, the way he handles people, if he is good, he is automatically a good leader and I think he is a perfect example for that," the youngster said.
