An Arch Manning succession target for the Rams is very realistic with Matthew Stafford's clock ticking
In fact, he wasn't on hand at all.
To the alarmists, who continue to be haunted by the elbow soreness that scuttled Stafford's season in 2022 and rolled over the Rams with it, it's hard not to wonder if his unforeseen back soreness is being underplayed by the franchise. Or if it might be something that's getting worse rather than better, with Stafford's absence being a flag that speaks more authoritatively than the franchise's brain trust's assurance that this is all ok … all part of the plan … all just a measurement in the larger vantage.
'He was working with the training staff,' Rams head coach Sean McVay said Wednesday. 'To be out here on his feet — could he be out here? Yeah, but what's more beneficial for him? I probably should have been a little bit more specific as to [what] working on the side [meant] — maybe working in the tents, things like that. So that was according to plan. I kind of misspoke [Tuesday] as far as 'working out onto the side'.'
Speaking to Yahoo Sports, McVay reiterated that there has always been a plan in place to work Stafford in slowly in 2025, keeping an eye on later in the season rather than overburdening him with early work that isn't necessary at this point in his career.
'This isn't anything new,' McVay told Yahoo Sports. 'It's just one of those things that at the early parts of camp we were going to monitor and restrict his workload anyway — really for the mental and physical aspects of it. That made it easy to say, 'F—k that, the first five-day acclimation period we're not even in pads, it's not even real football right now.' It's the right thing to do for him, number one, and for our team.'
Contrary to any anxieties, it doesn't resonate as damage control by McVay. Instead, it screams an element of management by the Rams brass, trying to deal with back soreness from Stafford that wasn't anticipated. A development that, as one team source told Yahoo Sports, happened when Stafford was traveling on vacation in recent weeks with his family prior to the opening of camp. The kind of thing that can develop when you have a 37-year old quarterback who already has a history of different health issues, including concerns with his back.
Realistically, everyone believes — including inside the Rams — that Stafford is deeply into the sunset portion of his NFL career. So much so, there's a feeling inside the franchise that if the Rams win a Super Bowl title this season, Stafford is going to use that opportunity to retire, a la John Elway with the Denver Broncos in 1999, after he'd secured the second Super Bowl title that would ensure he was a first-ballot Hall of Famer. According to a team source, even Stafford himself has joked with staff that the Rams acquiring a second first round pick in the 2026 draft from the Atlanta Falcons is a sign that the Los Angeles brass expect him to hang it up after the 2025 season.
But does that mean that the Rams are also exploring Stafford replacements?
It's a question that is at least a little complicated. First and foremost, Stafford is still operating inside a Super Bowl window open for the Rams. The leadership both in the coaching staff and front office is steadfast in his ability — if fully healthy — to lead Los Angeles to one more title in the next two seasons. That said, it's clear there is a fixed vantage on the horizon, with Rams decision makers knowing the next offseason is where they have to start moving toward a succession plan. Most likely toward a very young player who can grow with McVay and spend an elongated period attached at the hip.
One prominent name that surfaces inside this ideology is Texas quarterback Arch Manning, who some believe will end up being the No. 1 pick in the 2026 NFL Draft following his 2025 season — if he actually chooses to leave college before his senior year in 2026. Manning is tied to the Rams for a very obvious reason: Les Snead's stepson Tate is known to be a close friend of Arch Manning, and Snead himself was seen chatting up Arch Manning at the Texas pro day prior to the 2025 NFL Draft.
But it goes deeper than that. Speaking to a handful of Rams personnel sources, Manning is — at this moment — considered by the staff to be the lone tier one quarterback in the 2026 NFL Draft, regardless of who else could potentially enter into the selection process. Why? The Rams covet Manning's prototypical size and throwing acumen … but also believe it's his level of athleticism that sets him apart from from every other college football quarterback. So much so, the comparison for Manning inside the franchise is that his ceiling after the 2025 college football season could be a Josh Allen-type of prospect who is actually stronger physically and a faster running athlete than Allen was when he entered the draft in 2018.
That's some pretty significant praise from a team that's going to need a quarterback sooner rather than later. Could it change with Arch Manning's performance in the 2025 college football season? Certainly. But his No. 1 perch atop the college football ranks of quarterbacks is absolutely where the Rams evaluate him right now. And they may have the ammunition to make a run at Manning in the 2026 class if he declares, thanks to a boatload of draft picks that include two first rounders in the 2026 draft.
Interestingly, a high-ranking Rams source told Yahoo Sports that even if Stafford were to choose to return to the team in 2026, the Rams would — at this point — still lean into drafting Manning (if he were gettable) and then put him on ice for his rookie season, similar to the Kansas City Chiefs keeping Patrick Mahomes on the bench behind Alex Smith in 2017. The source added that the franchise believes Stafford would be open to such a scenario, knowing that 2027 will almost certainly be his last season in the NFL, regardless of what transpires during the course of the regular season and playoffs.
For now, there are more moving parts than a Swiss watch when it comes to the Rams' succession plan. But the reality remains that they're thinking about it in a very real and tangible way. And maybe moreso than ever, with Stafford once again sidelined with health issues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
How could the Harper-Manfred spat impact MLB's CBA talks?
Yahoo Sports senior MLB analysts Jake Mintz and Jordan Shusterman explain why the battle between the players union and the league - which reportedly came to a head in the Phillies star and commissioner's recent clubhouse meeting - may only get more contentious before a new deal is reached. Hear the full conversation on the 'Baseball Bar-B-Cast' podcast - and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you listen. View more Video Transcript How important is this story? Like, what type of impact does it have? Let's start with the cap as a character, because the cap is going to be the most important discussion point in the upcoming CBA negotiations, almost certainly. I think that it is important to understand the historical context here where players are just not gonna go for a cap. The league has been trying to get one for years. It is the only league that does not have one. It is going to be a central character here. That sets up the dynamic of how these negotiations are going to go. In the last round, the union was on offense and the league was on defense. And in this round, I think those roles are gonna switch a little bit, where the league wants to create change in the system, and the players are more content. With the status quo, then the league is. Now, obviously, the two sides are both trying to pull the situation, the CBA in their general respective directions, but I think that that is just a fair way to classify how this relationship is going to be. For the league to be like, we need to energize the workforce is, is like both fascin. and almost backwards, right? Because in theory, so much about this is the union sticking together and the union being on the same page. And so it is one hell of a tactic to be like, no, no, no, we're just going to jump over the union and try and convince them that they want what we want. Now, Manfred can say this is not my intention, all he wants. The outcome is to foster a level of discord and disagreement within the union about the cap. In theory, where the league can make headway is by convincing the lower salaried rank and file players that a salary cap and a floor would be good for them because they would then make more money. But like, that's what the union is fighting against, is keeping everyone on the same page, everyone together, advocating and arguing for the same things. The general energy. Right now is no bueno, like, it's ugly and it's going to get uglier. Do we lose games? Ask me in a year and a half. Ask me on March 15, 2027. Close
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
2 Indiana basketball players injured ahead of games in Puerto Rico. What we know
BLOOMINGTON — Indiana basketball guard Jason Drake and forward Nick Dorn could be sidelined for the program's upcoming trip to Puerto Rico. The Hoosiers leave Monday for their foreign tour that will include three exhibition games including a pair of games against Mega Superbet, a Serbian professional club. Drake and Dorn are dealing with undisclosed injuries that sidelined them during Wednesday's practice and there isn't an exact timeline for their return. IU coach Darian DeVries told reporters after practice that's possible Dorn could miss time this fall. Dorn had a standout sophomore season at Elon last year where he was one of six Division I players to average at least 15.0 points per game, make 70 3-pointers, and make 90 free throws while playing less than 1,000 minutes. He averaged 15.2 points and 3.8 rebounds in 30.7 minutes per game last season. He's made 47 career starts over two seasons and earned CAA All-Rookie honors as a freshman. Drake landed in Bloomington after a series of one-year stops at Cleveland State, Butler Community College and Drexel. Last season, he averaged 11.1 points, 3.0 rebounds, and 3.1 assists while starting all 33 games for Drexel. This story will be updated. Get IndyStar's IU coverage sent directly to your inbox with our IU Insider newsletter. Indiana Hoosiers podcast: Mind Your Banners on IU football as camp opens This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: IU basketball injury update: Will Nick Dorn, Jason Drake play Puerto Rico games
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Shannon Sharpe will not return to ESPN as a commentator on 'First Take'
Shannon Sharpe will not be returning to ESPN, according to a person with knowledge of the situation who is not authorized to publicly discuss it. The development comes weeks after the former NFL star settled a $50-million lawsuit that accused him of rape. Attorney Tony Buzbee, whose firm represented the woman who filed the civil lawsuit against Sharpe earlier this year, announced the settlement on July 18 in a statement posted on Instagram. Sharpe's legal team said at the time that Buzbee's statement should be considered the 'final word' on the matter. Terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. Read more: Shannon Sharpe settles $50 million lawsuit with woman who accused him of rape The lawsuit was filed on April 20 in Clark County in Nevada. Sharpe's accuser sought damages for claims of assault, sexual assault, battery, sexual battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress after multiple alleged non-consensual sexual encounters in her Las Vegas apartment between October and January. The sports media personality has denied the allegations. He announced days after the lawsuit was filed that he was temporarily stepping away from his duties as a commentator on ESPN's 'First Take' but would return in time for the 2025 NFL season. At that time, an ESPN spokesperson said in a statement emailed to The Times that 'this is a serious situation, and we agree with Shannon's decision to step away.' Sharpe has remained on his popular podcasts 'Club Shay Shay' and 'Nightcap.' The Athletic was the first to report that Sharpe won't be returning to ESPN. The network declined to comment for this article. Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.