
Trump's sagging poll numbers become a concern for GOP
President Trump's sagging poll numbers as he hits his 100th day in office are becoming a concern for Republicans, who have been steadfastly loyal to the White House but are starting to look ahead to the midterm elections.
While the White House is not expressing concern about Trump's downward trajectory in the polls, Republican operatives say Trump needs to stop with the turbulence on tariffs and focus on fulfilling the promises he made as a presidential candidate on the economy.
'It's actually incredibly simple,' said Republican strategist Kevin Madden. 'Trump won in 2024 because a broader coalition of voters were nostalgic for the pre-COVID economy of Trump's first term and they believed Trump was better suited to address their concerns about inflation.
'His approval has dropped because the pursuit of restrictive trade policies and higher tariffs has initiated a new round of concern among voters. Trump still has strong support from his most dedicated Republican voters, but the flight of moderates and independent voters, who tend to be nomadic, are currently diluting his political coverage.'
Madden added that Trump's drop in the polls is 'exactly the type of shift you worry about ahead of midterms.'
'When you lose the 'big middle' of the electorate, the swing races move away from you and the districts that usually have comfortable partisan margins can become surprise contests,' he said. 'It's still early, but the trend lines from the tariff policy are, so far, not looking good.'
A Decision Desk HQ survey out Wednesday morning showed Trump underwater, with an approval rating of 44 percent and 56 percent disapproving of his performance.
The poll was in line with a host of other surveys that also suggest Trump is in trouble, largely because of his trade policies.
Sixty-four percent in the Decision Desk HQ poll also said tariffs hurt consumers, and 91 percent said they were worried about inflation, an issue that Trump campaign on against President Biden. Sixty-two percent said they were very concerned about inflation, which can rise because of tariffs.
Other polls out in the last week also showed a sizable drop in Trump's approval ratings.
A Washington Post/ABC News/Ipsos poll out Sunday showed Trump's approval fell from 45 percent in February to 39 percent in March. Trump saw a similar drop in a New York Times poll, which revealed that 42 percent of those surveyed approved of Trump's job performance.
Republicans attribute the falling numbers to the headlines around Trump's tariffs, which sent markets plunging and left Americans worried about their retirement accounts. Markets have recovered a portion of those losses but remain below where they stood on Trump's first day in office.
'I think what's concerning people — and I think he knows this — are the economics of, and the uncertainty around this tariff protocol,' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.), a member of Republican leadership, told The Hill on Monday. 'I think that's what you see reflected.'
Susan Del Percio, a veteran Republican strategist who does not support Trump, said Trump arguably benefited from 'a bit of a Biden hangover' at the start of the presidency.
Voters fed up with rising costs at grocery stores felt the country was headed in the wrong direction under former President Biden and voted for change. But now they aren't seeing those price changes, Del Percio said.
Trump has the firm support of his base, which Del Percio said has got him through everything, and he hasn't signaled much worry about his polling or economic numbers. But Republicans are in a different political situation.
'I don't think the Trump team cares about its numbers as much as the House and Senate Republicans care about it,' she said.
In a speech to mark his first 100 days in office on Tuesday, Trump touted that prices 'are coming way down.'
'Gasoline prices are down by a lot. Energy prices are down. Mortgage rates are down,' Trump said. 'Prescription drug prices just took the biggest plunge … ever in the history of prescription drug prices.'
He added that 'grocery prices have gone down. Everything has gone down.'
He also argued the string of polls was inaccurate.
'They poll more Democrats than Republicans,' Trump said.
The poor polling numbers for Trump represent an opportunity for Democrats, who have been trying to figure out a new direction for their party. Some voices within the party said Democrats should seize upon Trump's performance in the polls, showing voters that he misled them in the run-up to last year's election.
Others have signaled an all-out war against Trump.
On Monday, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, whom many expect to mount a 2028 presidential campaign, suggested his party could not take a passive approach when dealing with Trump.
'It's time to fight everywhere and all at once,' Pritzker told a group of Democrats in New Hampshire on Monday. 'Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption. But I am now. These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.'
'The reckoning is finally here,' Pritzker added.
Republican strategist Shermichael Singleton, who worked in the first Trump administration, said he isn't concerned about Trump's approval numbers.
'Poll numbers go up and down,' Singleton said. 'That's part of politics.'
2024 Election Coverage
'Every leader has to lead in a way that they believe is going to yield the best results for the people who voted for them and sometimes the way people interpret those things are not always in sync so you have to make adjustments,' he added.
At the same time, Singleton pointed to a part of the Washington Post/ABC poll that showed while Trump's approval rating is on a downward spiral, he still instills more trust than Democrats in Congress.
'They still trust him more than Democrats to lead the country, and that says a whole lot,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Allies Wary of Buying American as They Plan Defense Buildup
(Bloomberg) — For European countries that just approved the biggest increase in military spending in decades, 'Buy American' is looking a lot less appealing than it once was. They may have no choice. As the allies rush to rebuild their fighting forces, leaders are confronting the reality that they'll have to rely on the US for many of the new weapons they're planning to buy, a sales pitch driven home by President Donald Trump on his visit to Europe this week. They fret that they may be put at greater risk if they deepen their dependence on a US whose president has embraced their main enemy - Russia - and rattled some with threats to annex their territory. Those deeper ties have become an increasingly hard sell at home, with electorates cautious about a closer embrace with the US. Allied leaders like French President Emmanuel Macron have pushed for relying on European companies to provide the weapons and the EU fast-tracked a €150 billion facility for just that purpose after Trump was elected. Canada is considering pulling out of the US-led F-35 fighter program and buying Swedish planes instead. 'We should no longer send three-quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said earlier this month. When a group of US legislators went to Copenhagen this spring to encourage Danish officials to buy more US weapons, the message they got was clear: we like your arms, but Trump's very public threats to take over Greenland, a Danish territory, were making buying them politically difficult, according to a person familiar with the meeting. Some Danish politicians have gone further. 'Buying American weapons is a security risk that we cannot run,' Rasmus Jarlov, a conservative lawmaker who heads the defense committee in parliament, said in a post on social media platform X in March. Trump's abrupt decision to briefly suspend intelligence sharing with Ukraine earlier this year alarmed allies, according to officials, fueling fears that the US might hobble American-made weapons in a crisis. The worries got so bad that the Pentagon had to issue a public reassurance that the F-35 fighter didn't have a 'kill switch.' But the planned buildup - worth as much as €14 trillion ($16 trillion) over the next decade if related infrastructure is included, according to Carlyle - is far beyond the current capabilities of a fragmented European defense sector that's been hollowed out by decades of cuts since the end of the Cold War. And the US lead in key areas, especially missiles and other high-tech weapons, means there's often no real alternative to buying American. 'Europe and the defense industry is not, at the moment, ready to take the load by itself,' said Tuure Lehtoranta, a senior executive at Finnish defense-tech firm Insta Group Oy. 'There's not enough production, there's not enough design in some areas.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, whose government is planning to nearly double spending on core defense items this year, said the European industry needs an overhaul to meet the demand. 'We have far too many systems in Europe, we have far too few units, and what we produce is often far too complicated, and therefore too expensive as a result,' he said this week. At the Paris Air Show last week, executives from Airbus SE and Dassault Aviation SA sparred openly over who should take charge of their next-generation fighter jet project. European allies will have no alternative but to buy American weapons to meet alliance targets, especially with stocks depleted by supplies given to Ukraine, a senior NATO official said, asking not to be identified discussing a sensitive issue. Allies also lack key technologies. 'Who is the European Palantir? Who is the European Planet?' asked Pierre Vandier, a top NATO commander, referring to the US technology and satellite companies that the alliance recently signed contracts with. 'It's a huge stimulus for Europeans to do all they can. If they don't get started now they can't cry if there are violent power struggles later.' Europe has no rivals as advanced as Lockheed Martin Corp's F-35 fighter or RTX Corp's Patriot anti-missile, which has been critical to protecting Ukraine from Russian attacks. Allies have no competitors for key capabilities like ballistic-missile defense and air-to-air refueling. While simpler weapons like howitzers are easier for allies to produce, they still require US satellite systems for precision targeting. The UK said this week it would buy at least a dozen new F-35As, which Prime Minister Keir Starmer hopes will help curry favor with Trump. European defense companies are hopeful. They've seen share-price increases of 50% or more this year, ahead even of the big gains of their US competitors, as investors anticipate the huge boost in business. 'More urgency is there now,' Micael Johansson, chief executive officer of Saab AB, which makes Gripen fighters, said in an interview. 'I wouldn't say we have seen a dramatic shift now to buy more European, but I think that's the trend.' US defense contractors are lining up cooperation deals with European counterparts to hedge against any shift away from American weapons. 'As these European defense budgets increase, that's where we're spending our time,' Stephen O'Bryan, president of Northrop Grumman Corp's international business, said in an interview, referring to partnerships in Norway, Germany and Denmark. Lehtoranta of Insta said his company already partners with big US manufacturers like Lockheed Martin, including by providing avionics maintenance and other support for F-35 jets. But they see American companies are even hungrier to join forces now. 'I can see in the US that it might be a little bit of a fear in the air. US companies think that they might lose opportunities if they don't find the right partners,' he said. 'There will be change, there will be probably more European investments in European factories and European acquisitions, but still we cannot survive without the US industries.' —With assistance from Wojciech Moskwa, Thomas Seal, Matthew Boesler, Michael Nienaber, Sanne Wass and Alex Wickham. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
How Trump could get his July 4 megabill
Presented by IN TODAY'S EDITION:— When the Senate might vote on the megabill— Lawmakers consider Kaine's Iran resolution— Possible federal pension changes incoming Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' is in tatters. President Donald Trump still wants it on his desk by July 4. Here's everything that will have to go right to make that happen: GOP senators and staff now believe Saturday is the earliest voting will start on the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged Thursday that parliamentarian rulings forcing Republicans to rewrite key provisions of the bill are throwing his timeline into chaos. A Saturday vote would assume no more major procedural issues, but that is not assured: Republicans could run into trouble with their use of current policy baseline, the accounting tactic they want to use to zero-out the cost of tax-cut extensions. Other adverse recommendations from Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough could force additional redrafts of Republicans' tax plans. Even if Republicans resolve every outstanding issue with the parliamentarian in the next 24 hours, Thune needs to firm up his whip count. The cap on state provider taxes remains among the thorniest issues, with senators threatening to block debate on the megabill until the Medicaid financing issue is resolved. If the Senate does vote Saturday to proceed, expect Democrats to use the bulk of their 10 hours of debate time, while Republicans forfeit most of theirs. Then comes the main event — vote-a-rama — which would set up likely final passage for sometime Sunday. That starts the timer for the House. GOP leaders there have pledged to give members 48 hours' notice of a vote — and they have already advised the earliest that voting could happen is Monday evening. Republicans will have to adopt a rule before moving to debate and final passage. But the House's timeline depends wholly on what condition the megabill is in when it arrives from the Senate. Groups of House Republicans are already drawing red lines on matters ranging from SALT to clean-energy tax credits to public land sales. The hope is that the Senate will take care of those concerns in one final 'wraparound' amendment at the end of vote-a-rama. If they don't, House GOP leaders are adamant that there will need to be changes — likely pushing the timeline deep into July, or perhaps beyond. For one, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Thursday the Senate's slower phase-out of clean-energy tax credits 'will need to be reversed,' or else. 'If there are major modifications that we cannot accept, then we would go back to the drawing board, fix some of that and send it back over,' Speaker Mike Johnson said on Thursday. 'So we should avoid that process, if possible.' TGIF. Well, unless you're in the Senate, where Sen. John Boozman politely told Lisa to be prepared to work through the weekend. Email us at lkashinsky@ mmccarthy@ crazor@ and bguggenheim@ Follow our live coverage at More live coverage: Starting at 10 a.m., the Supreme Court will issue the final opinions of its current term on birthright citizenship, abortion, congressional lines in Louisiana, the FCC and more. Follow along at for real-time analysis from our legal, politics and policy reporters. IN MEMORIAM — Former Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, who successfully ran for Congress in 1996 as a crusader for gun control after a mass shooting on a New York commuter train left her husband dead and her son severely wounded, has died. She was 81. THE SKED The House is in session and voting on a resolution condemning riots in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. — House members will receive a briefing on the Iran conflict from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Gen. Dan Caine and CIA Director John Ratcliffe in the CVC auditorium at 9 a.m. The Senate is in session and will vote on moving forward with Sen. Tim Kaine's war powers resolution on Iran at 6 p.m. Next week: House and Senate Republicans will attempt to pass their megabill before July 4. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Senators consider check on war powers Senators are expected to take an initial vote at 6 p.m. on Kaine's resolution that would bar the president from taking further military action in Iran without congressional approval. Kaine believes Republicans will support the measure, but won't say who or how many. Several GOP senators left a Thursday briefing on the conflict not entirely convinced by Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear program has been obliterated, Calen and Lisa report with our Connor O'Brien, Joe Gould and John Sakellariadis. Sen. Rand Paul — who is consistently critical of U.S. military interventions — has been mum on how he'll vote. But he signaled the answer could come in the floor speech he plans to give ahead of the vote. Democrats will lose Sen. John Fetterman. 'I want to make sure to reserve the right for the president, Democrat or Republican, to do the kinds of things that President Obama has done in the past or what Trump did with Iran,' Fetterman told reporters Thursday. House members will have their Iran briefing at 9 a.m. This comes as some House lawmakers are mulling two competing war powers resolutions, which Johnson could attempt to quash in advance using a rule. Johnson, Jeffries team up on member security Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries emerged from a meeting on member security pledging 'change' and tapping their deputies on House Administration to 'immediately' and 'aggressively chart the path forward.' The House leaders issued a joint statement Thursday saying they 'recognize the urgency of acting quickly, decisively, and in a bipartisan manner' but did not detail potential changes. Jeffries had been pushing Johnson to 'substantially increase' the amount of money the House spends on member security. POLICY RUNDOWN PENSION PROBLEM PATCH — Senate Republicans are considering a tweak to their pension reform plan that would hike how much federal employees need to contribute to their retirement, according to draft reconciliation text from Senate Homeland Security our Lawrence Ukenye scooped. Lawmakers are considering hiking federal employees' retirement contributions to 15.6 percent of their salary, as opposed to the 9.4 percent required in the first version. The bill would also carve out an exemption for members of Congress and their staff. FRESH BYRD DROPPINGS — Senate Banking Republicans are now proposing to slash the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding by almost half, after the parliamentarian deemed their initial plan to zero out the bureau's funding ineligible, our Jasper Goodman reports. The parliamentarian signed off on the new proposal late Thursday. The parliamentarian also ruled Republicans' bid to deregulate gun silencers is noncompliant, part of a new batch of decisions that hit overnight. The parliamentarian also asked Senate Commerce to rework the 10-year moratorium on enforcing state artificial intelligence laws that she initially approved to make clear it wouldn't impact $42 billion in broadband funding, our Anthony Adragna reported earlier Thursday. One win for Republicans: The parliamentarian approved Republicans' tweaked plan to push some costs of the nation's anti-hunger program onto states, our Grace Yarrow reports. That allows them to maintain a crucial $41 billion spending cut that will help pay for the megabill. LAND SALES LANDSLIDING — Five House Republicans are threatening to vote down the GOP megabill if the Senate includes a provision to sell public lands for development, after Sen. Mike Lee sought to include a narrowed version of his proposal in the bill this week, our James Bikales reports. In a letter led by Rep. Ryan Zinke, Reps. Mike Simpson, Dan Newhouse, Cliff Bentz and David Valadao warned they would not support a package that included Lee's proposed land sales language. But it may not even get through the Senate. Sen. Steve Daines said he has the votes to strike it during a vote-a-rama: 'We're ready,' he said. REVENGE TAX AXED — Senate Republicans abruptly dropped the 'revenge tax' from their megabill after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a new 'joint understanding' with members of the G7. Republicans originally intended to use the tax to retaliate against foreign countries for 'discriminatory' taxes levied against U.S. companies. Bessent said on X that, under the new understanding, part of an OECD framework brokered under former President Joe Biden no longer applies to American companies. But dropping the revenge tax language also means Senate Republicans lose a whopping $52 billion revenue-raiser and may have to look for additional savings elsewhere. D'ESPOSITO OUT, FOR NOW — Senate HELP reversed plans to vote on Trump's Labor Department IG pick Thursday afternoon, our Nick Niedzwiadek reports. A committee spokesperson didn't comment on why HELP removed the nominee, former Rep. Anthony D'Esposito, from the docket. He could still come up for a vote in the future. D'Esposito lost a close race for reelection last year after The New York Times reported he had placed romantic connections on his congressional payroll. MORE CRYPTO MACHINATIONS — Senate Banking Republicans won't take up cryptocurrency market structure legislation until September, the latest twist in senators' standoff with the House over how to advance legislation governing digital assets, Jasper reports. There's a chance draft text could be released before August recess, though. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott's decision to punt past August recess comes as House Financial Services Republicans weigh marrying market structure legislation to their version of the stablecoin regulatory bill. Senate Republicans and Trump are pressing the House to quickly pass a 'clean' version of the Senate's stablecoin bill. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: CAMPAIGN STOP TEXAS DEMS DUKE IT OUT — Former Reps. Colin Allred and Beto O'Rourke, Rep. Joaquin Castro and state Rep. James Talarico met virtually last month to sort out who among them would run for Senate, The Dallas Morning News reports. Problem is, they're all interested. That could dash some Texas Democrats' dreams that the four would slot themselves into a slate for top statewide offices. The group is set to meet again this summer. Democrats have one candidate in the race: former NASA astronaut and International Space Station commander Terry Virts. MEANWHILE, IN KENTUCKY — Businessman Nate Morris entered the GOP primary to succeed Sen. Mitch McConnell. Separately, Axios reported the super PAC Trump's political operation launched to oust Rep. Thomas Massie is going up with its first TV ad against Massie, part of a $1 million buy. It highlights votes Massie's taken against Trump-backed legislation and claims that by criticizing the president's decision to strike Iran, he 'sided' with the nation's supreme leader. TUNNEL TALK DACA DO-OVER — House appropriators added a proposal to allow DACA recipients to work in Congress in the Legislative Branch funding bill, with an amendment sponsored by Rep. Pete Aguilar, our Katherine Tully-McManus reports. Similar amendments have been adopted before, only to be nixed later by GOP leaders to appease hard-liners. Also in the bill: The panel voted to move forward with the nearly 50 percent cut to the Government Accountability Office and to keep the decade-long freeze on lawmaker's salaries in place. They also did not take up a few amendments on member security, despite recent concern from both sides of the aisle about lawmaker safety. THE BEST OF THE REST Republicans Say Tax Cuts Will Spur Growth. It Hasn't Worked in the Past., from Carl Hulse at The New York Times USAID Shutdown Costs Top $6 Billion, Internal Estimate Shows, from Ian Kullgren and Jack Fitzgerald at Bloomberg Government JOB BOARD Jonathan Kupperman has been promoted to be legislative director for Rep. Jodey Arrington. He most recently was his health policy adviser. Anthony Fakhoury has been promoted to be comms director for Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks. Landon Hoffman has been promoted to be chief of staff for Rep. Laurel Lee. Jason Berardo has been promoted to be legislative director for Rep. Mike Turner. Lizzie Harvey is now press secretary for Sen. Mike Lee. She most recently was deputy press secretary for Sen. John Barrasso. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Reps. David Scott (8-0) and Ashley Hinson… Jennifer DeCasper … Semafor's Eleanor Mueller … New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte … former Reps. Conor Lamb, Scott Taylor, Mike Honda, Jim Nussle and Jeff Miller … Hunter Morgen … Terry Nelson of FP1 Strategies … Reuters' David Shepardson … David Wochner of K&L Gates … Isaac Reyes of Target … Hub Project's Jessica Floyd … Robert Schlesinger … Matt Letourneau … Brian Martinez of the American Conservation Coalition … Thorn Run Partners' Harriet Melvin and Carmen Ojeda … Kathleen Welch … Bailey Ware of Sen. Dan Sullivan's office … Bullpen Strategies' Becca Atkins TRIVIA THURSDAY'S ANSWER: Piper Merritt correctly answered that Bill Clinton issued the Roadless Area Conservation Rule in 2001 to protect national forests. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Piper: Which House committee celebrated its 200th birthday in 2020? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@


Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Zohran Mamdani Proposes Taxing 'Whiter Neighborhoods' in NYC
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New York City's Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has said he wants to "shift the tax burden" to "richer and whiter neighborhoods" if he secures election in November. A housing policy document on Mamdani's official website includes a pledge to "shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods." Newsweek contacted the Mamdani campaign for comment via email on Friday outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Mamdani's proposal has already sparked a backlash with one conservative commentator branding him racist and urging New Yorkers to support incumbent Mayor Eric Adams instead, who is running in November as an independent. The New York mayoral election campaign has already turned bitter with several Republicans suggesting Mamdani, a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Uganda, should be stripped of his American citizenship and deported. What To Know Mamdani's official campaign website features a policy memo under the title "Supporting homeowners and ending deed theft." The document says that if elected his administration will "Shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods." It adds: "The property tax system is unbalanced because assessment levels are artificially capped, so homeowners in expensive neighborhoods pay less than their fair share. The Mayor can fix this by pushing class assessment percentages down for everyone and adjusting rates up, effectively lowering tax payments for homeowners in neighborhoods like Jamaica and Brownsville while raising the amount paid in the most expensive Brooklyn brownstones." New York mayoral candidate, State Rep. Zohran Mamdani (D-NY) speaks to supporters during an election night gathering on June 24, 2025 in New York City. New York mayoral candidate, State Rep. Zohran Mamdani (D-NY) speaks to supporters during an election night gathering on June 24, 2025 in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/GETTY The document asserts that currently New York City taxes "family homes in Black and Latino neighborhoods like Jamaica, Brownsville, and Tremont more than it does in wealthier neighborhoods of the city." On Tuesday Mamdani, who began the campaign as a rank outsider, defeated former New York State governor Andrew Cuomo to secure the 2025 Democratic nomination for the New York mayoralty. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, is running on a platform that includes a number of radical reforms such as creating city-owned grocery stores, offering free childcare to all New Yorkers with children aged between six weeks and five years and imposing a 2 percent tax on all residents earning more than $1 million annually. On Thursday bookmaker Star Sports was offering odds of 1/4 (80 percent) on Mamdani winning this year's New York mayoral election, ahead of Adams in second place on 7/2 (22.2 percent). What People Are Saying On X Eric Daugherty, assistant news director for conservative leaning publication Florida's Voice, said: "WTF? Zohran Mamdani supports taxing 'whiter neighborhoods" in New York City higher than other boroughs. "This Ugandan is not only a radical Muslim socialist but a RACIST. NYC, please reject this psycho and choose Eric Adams instead." The conservative Right Angle News Network on X shared a screenshot from Mamdani's policy memo referring to "whiter neighborhoods" adding: "BREAKING - A proposal by NYC Democrat mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani to shift tax burdens to "Whiter neighborhoods" has resurfaced." What Happens Next The New York Mayoral election will take place on November 4, with the winner expected to assume office in January.