logo
UK universities including Oxbridge fall down world rankings - as academics nationwide reveal fears teaching controversial topics will get them cancelled

UK universities including Oxbridge fall down world rankings - as academics nationwide reveal fears teaching controversial topics will get them cancelled

Daily Mail​18-06-2025
Oxford, Cambridge and more than 50 other UK universities have tumbled down the global rankings amid funding and free speech crises.
The respected Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings demoted the majority of our institutions, saying they are not improving as fast as those in other countries.
It comes as a poll found a fifth of academics around the country said they did not feel 'free' to discuss controversial topics such as gender.
Of the 90 UK universities ranked in the survey, published today, 54 institutions — 61 per cent – slipped down, while only 24 improved and 11 stayed the same.
Oxford slipped from third place to fourth in the world, while Cambridge slipped from fifth to sixth.
World-renowned science university Imperial College London retained its second place, while US university Massachusetts Institute of Technology was first.
It comes as many UK universities grapple with financial problems due to a drop in lucrative international students following visa rule changes.
In addition, many are having to dedicate time and resources to dealing with free speech controversies and student protests.
The rankings are based on a range of metrics including research, employment outcomes and academic reputation.
Jessica Turner, chief executive of QS, said that while some UK universities had improved their scores, 'the picture for the wider country as a whole is more worrying'.
She said: 'The UK has until now been one of the countries to dominate QS World University Rankings, but institutions in the country are facing heightened competition internationally.
'Universities across the country will need more support to ensure their stability going ahead.
'Global competitors are seeing their governments increase investment in higher education and research, leading to international peers gaining and, in many cases, overtaking UK universities.'
A total of 17 of the UK universities included feature among the top 100.
However, the QS researchers said that 'universities worldwide are improving at a faster pace than their UK counterparts'.
Others slipping down included Edinburgh, Manchester, the London School of Economics, Warwick, Glasgow, Leeds, Southampton and Durham.
Seven of Ireland's eight ranked universities improved this year, as did nine out of 13 universities in the Netherlands, and six of Hong Kong's seven.
The QS rankings evaluates more than 1,500 institutions across 106 countries and territories.
Its authors said UK universities face further problems due to Government plans to slash capital funding in higher education, introduce an international student levy and shorten the length of the graduate visa route to 18 months from two years.
They said: 'This could accumulate in a negative impact on the quality and breadth of higher education courses and research undertaken across the country.'
A recent report by the Office for Students showed 43 per cent of universities face a deficit in 2024/25.
Vivienne Stern, chief executive of Universities UK, said: 'The UK's universities are world leading, and continue to punch above their weight in global league tables and research partnerships.
'But other governments around the world are making the decision to invest in their universities at a time when our government is being slow to do so.
'This decline isn't inevitable.
'Universities are already working extensively to transform their work in the face of funding pressures, and, with a commitment from government to a long-term and lasting funding settlement, this slight downturn can be reversed.'
A spokesman for the Department for Education said: 'This government inherited a sector facing serious financial risk and has taken tough decisions to fix the foundations of higher education to deliver change for students and staff.
'Universities are independent from government, but we remain committed to boosting the sector's long-term financial sustainability, through our Plan for Change and restoring universities as engines of opportunity, aspiration and growth.
'The government has refocused the efforts of the Office for Students on monitoring financial sustainability, to help create a secure future for our world-leading sector.'
Fifth of academics feel restricted on topics such as gender
One in five academics do not feel 'free' to teach heated topics like gender as they fear being cancelled, a new poll shows.
A survey by the Office for Students (OfS) found 21 per cent feel restricted in discussing challenging topics in lectures.
Sex and gender was the most troublesome topic, with 63 per cent saying they were not free to discuss it, while more than 50 per cent said this of race, religion and immigration.
One in 20 of those polled said they were afraid of physical attacks if they included controversial topics in their teaching.
The weighted poll of 1,200 academics was released alongside new guidance telling universities to stop cancelling gender-critical events and avoid blanket bans on 'misgendering'.
Arif Ahmed, director of freedom of speech at the OfS said: 'The results of this poll are deeply disturbing, and show that a sizeable minority of academics from across the political spectrum do not feel free to teach, research or discuss controversial topics.
'This cannot stand, and should concern vice-chancellors up and down the country.'
The OfS guidance, released today, aims to help universities prepare to comply with the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill, which comes into effect in August.
The bill, introduced in 2023 under the Tories, has been watered down by Labour so that universities cannot be sued by individuals.
However, the guidance places heavy duties on universities, including taking action against foreign states accused of using their influence to enable censorship of debate – such a China.
It says universities must 'amend or terminate' agreements with such countries.
In addition, it says students and staff should not be 'punished' for expressing a lawful viewpoint, including one critical of the institution.
And universities must no longer require applicants for academic jobs or promotions to show commitment to a viewpoint.
It also says if a university cancels a professor's seminar about gender-critical views because of student protests, it is likely to be in breach of the law.
And any blanket ban on 'misgendering' transgender people is likely to be in breach too.
It comes after dozens of professors have spoken of how their universities turned against them due to their political views.
Last year, Professor Jo Phoenix won a constructive dismissal claim against the Open University, which 'told her off' and 'discriminated' against her due to her gender-critical beliefs.
This year, the University of Sussex was fined £585,000 for failing for uphold free speech for Professor Kathleen Stock, who was hounded out of her job by transgender activists.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over 13,000 Admiral staff to receive free share awards worth up to £1,800
Over 13,000 Admiral staff to receive free share awards worth up to £1,800

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Over 13,000 Admiral staff to receive free share awards worth up to £1,800

More than 13,000 staff at Admiral will each receive free share awards worth up to £1,800 under the firm's employee share schemes amid bumper half-year results. For the firm's broader base of shareholders, the company announced it would pay an interim dividend of 115 per share, up 62 per cent from last year. Admiral shares jumped 5 per cent to 3,534p on Thursday, having risen by over a quarter in the past 12 months. The insurance group raked in a pre-tax profit of £559million from its motor insurance arm in the six months to the end of June, against £359million at the same point a year ago. The FTSE 100 firm flagged 'higher insurance revenue and a notably improved insurance service margin' across its motor protection arm. It said car insurance prices had been falling for the past 18 months in response to softer inflation. Admiral recorded a near 5 per cent rise in the number of vehicles it insured across Britain in the period. Claims inflation across the motoring insurance arm is hovering at around five per cent, indicating prices may be close to finding a bottom. Across the business, Admiral reported a 69 per cent rise in pre-tax profit from continuing operations to £521million, while earnings per share surged 72 per cent to 132.5p. Total group turnover remained flat compared to the previous year, while insurance revenue increased by 18 per cent. In its home insurance arm, profits rose more than 100 per cent from £11.3million to £25.2million. The firm's pet and travel insurance arm saw its losses narrow. The business maintained its annual forecasts. Chief executive Milena Mondini de Focatiis, said: 'We have delivered another excellent first half with strong execution across all strategic objectives.' She added: 'I'm confident in our fundamentals and adaptability which mean that we are well-placed for further success, delivering even more value for our shareholders and our growing customer base.' The group flagged the Financial Conduct Authority's multi-business probe into UK motor insurance total loss claims valuations. Admiral said: 'The expected incremental claims cost of this action to Admiral (excluding statutory interest) is approximately £50million (around half of which has been accounted for in H1 2025, the remainder in the previous financial year).' It added: 'Admiral expects to begin contacting impacted customers during H2 2025, and whilst noting uncertainty remains, does not expect the final cost of the action to vary materially from that noted above.' Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said: 'FTSE 100 insurer Admiral is humming along quite nicely, supported by a strong showing in its motor insurance business. 'In a competitive market, Admiral remains in the fast lane. The strength of its brand allows it to remain disciplined on price while still attracting new business. Admiral's smart pricing tools have also helped to support underwriting profitability over time.' He added: 'The company is being rewarded for treating customers relatively well, at least in relation to its rivals, including during the pandemic. This is driving customer loyalty. 'Admiral recently swerved a potential hazard as the FCA decided to take no regulatory action on premium finance – effectively the cost borne by consumers if they opt to pay their insurance premiums in monthly instalments rather than in one lump sum.'

Report finds top 2% of households have 18% of wealth in Scotland
Report finds top 2% of households have 18% of wealth in Scotland

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Report finds top 2% of households have 18% of wealth in Scotland

The wealthiest households in Scotland have on average £1.7 million in total wealth, while in comparison the least wealthy had just £7,600, a new report has revealed. With the figures showing the wealthiest 2% of households have almost a fifth (18%) of wealth in Scotland, campaigners said the data highlighted 'the vast scale of unfairness in Scotland today'. The report looked at wealth in Scotland – which includes the physical wealth of households' belongings, as well as savings and investment, property and pension wealth. Scottish Government"> The latest data, for the period 2018 to 2020, showed median household wealth in Scotland stood at £214,000 – with this down from £242,700 in 2016 to 2018 and £250,700 in 2014 to 2016. The report, which was published by the Scottish Government, noted: 'A typical household in the wealthiest 10% of households had £1.7 million in total wealth, whereas a typical household in the least wealthy 10% of households had £7,600.' It added: 'The least wealthy households rarely own property or have any private pension savings. Their wealth is mainly made up of the value of their possessions such as cars, furniture and clothing.' The report also noted that wealth can 'vary a lot by age', saying that 'younger households are less likely to have much or even any pension or property wealth, and most of their wealth is made up of the value of their belongings (physical wealth)'. It added: 'In general, people start building up wealth once they start receiving a salary, buy some goods, maybe save some money, and pay into a private pension scheme such as a workplace pension. 'Many buy a home, and through paying off their mortgage they build property wealth.' Meanwhile when people retire, the report said that 'pension wealth gets drawn upon and used up, while some people also downsize their homes and reduce their property wealth'. However campaigners at Tax Justice Scotland – which wants Holyrood's powers to be used to deliver greater equality – insisted changes are needed to 'share wealth more fairly'. Speaking on behalf of the group Scottish Trades Union Congress, general secretary Roz Foyer said: 'These figures show the vast scale of unfairness in Scotland today. 'Whilst those at the top accumulate more wealth, more than one in five children grow up in poverty and our public services are starved of the investment they urgently need. This cannot go on.' Ms Foyer demanded: 'We need urgent tax reform to help share wealth more fairly and to distribute resources right across the country. 'Over time, public finance pressures mean that most of us may need to pay a bit more, but this data makes clear this must start with those at the very top. 'In Scotland, that means parties must set out clear plans to scrap Council Tax and replace it with a fairer, modern property tax. 'At the UK level, we also need common sense wealth taxes that ensure the richest pay their fair share.' She insisted: 'It's time for our political leaders to step up with serious tax plans to help close this growing wealth gap and to invest in creating a fairer, more prosperous future for all of us.'

Burnham 'watching Salford situation closely'
Burnham 'watching Salford situation closely'

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Burnham 'watching Salford situation closely'

Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has said he is "watching closely" at the situation at Salford Red beleaguered Super League club have had a season to forget, plagued with financial problems despite a takeover going through on the eve of the wage payments and an upcoming winding-up petition, previously served over £500,000 owed to His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC), has overshadowed a dismal campaign which has included a mass player exodus and just two wins from 21 league games."I've been watching the situation very closely indeed. [Head coach] Paul Rowley is someone I know very well," Burnham told BBC Radio Manchester."I know how difficult it's been for him and all of the staff there at Salford. I can say I'm watching it closely."The question is, what can be done to change things? Obviously a consortium came in promising to clear the debts and put significant investment in. But that clearly hasn't happened." Financial problems already plagued the club before a consortium, led by businessman Dario Berta, bought Salford on the eve of the season, with the Red Devils asking for an advance on 2025's funding late last the takeover, however, Salford have continued to struggle financially, while the club's attempt to purchase their Salford Community Stadium home was rejected by the council, who pulled out of negotiations in this week the Red Devils' owners, who have not spoken to the media since their arrival, said that they remained "fully committed", pledged that the club would not close, and said that bridge funding would be "available and settled" by the end of formerly a president of the Rugby Football League as well as previously being honorary chairman of Leigh Leopards, said that he is prepared to work alongside Salford city mayor Paul Dennett to support the club if necessary."All I can say is that Paul and I will do every single thing we can to protect one of the most historic names, not just in rugby league but in sport as a whole," Burnham added."Our commitment is there. Obviously we can't just conjure up the funding, but from both of us, we massively recognise the role of rugby league in Salford and Greater Manchester and we can't let a proud name like this be left to rot."We will do everything we can and pull out all of the stops to support Salford as they go forward from here."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store