
Cold War camaraderie: Why US refuses to take Pak to task
The growing rise of China, while facilitated in earlier decades by the US itself, had begun to look less like an opportunity and more like a coming storm. India, geographically positioned next to China, democratically stable and increasingly open to global markets, became a natural component of this new architecture—a potential US partner.
Yet, for much of its early strategic phase, the India-US relationship remained cautiously transactional. Military-to-military ties grew at a measured pace, beginning with the Malabar exercises in 1992. Somehow, the trust deficit remained a Cold War legacy. The 1998 Pokhran nuclear tests were a shock to Washington and created an immediate rift. But this proved temporary. President George W Bush's outreach, culminating in the landmark civil nuclear deal, and external affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee's 2005 speech at RAND Corporation marked a turning point. India, at that point, became a more serious US partner.
The devil in the relationship remained Pakistan. The US equivocation on Pakistan's role in cross-border terrorism has been one of the most vexing elements of this evolving relationship. Despite overwhelming evidence of Pakistan's nurturing of terror networks, Washington has not held Islamabad to account. It has always had the leverage—economic, diplomatic and military—but rarely used it. The oft-cited reason is strategic: an overstated fear of pushing Pakistan further into China's embrace. In reality, it is also an emotional and historical inertia rooted in the Cold War, SEATO, CENTO and years of military camaraderie.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
11 minutes ago
- The Print
Bangladesh envoy's assurance must translate into action. Neighbours can't afford mistrust
Bangladesh's envoy telling ThePrint that its soil won't host anti-India activity is reassuring. But intent must translate into action. India and Bangladesh share a historic but now complex bond that needs careful nurturing. Neighbours can't afford mistrust. Words help, but sustained respect and responsible conduct are what truly builds confidence. Trump's rants are destroying the most consequential bilateral relationship of the 21st century Tracking Trump is like watching a T20 thriller — odds flip with every ball, and whispers of a fixed match never fade. But this isn't a game. His ego-driven rants are destroying the most consequential bilateral relationship of the 21st century. Diplomacy deserves better than getting bowled by one man's tantrums.


India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
Putin's masterstroke: Russia uses Trump's threat as excuse to break 38-year-old deal; what was the deal? What will happen now?
New Delhi: Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022, leading to the largest and deadliest war in Europe since World War II. This invasion was a major escalation of the conflict between the two countries, which began in 2014. It has claimed thousands of lives on both sides, military as well as civilians. What was Trump's promise regarding Russia-Ukraine war? Joe Biden was the US President when this war started. The current US President, Donald Trump, had said in his candidature manifesto that if he wins, he will stop the Russia-Ukraine war immediately. Trump has failed to deliver on this election promise, and the war rages on, even as he has tried every possible method, including threatening mighty Russia, an adversary since the Cold War (Soviet Union). What is Russia's big plan after Trump's threat? Amid threats from President Trump, Russia has taken another big decision. It has lifted the ban on the deployment of short and medium-range missiles, which it had imposed earlier. The Russian Foreign Ministry said on Monday, 4 August, that it no longer considers itself bound by the ban on the deployment of these missiles, as the conditions necessary to maintain this ban do not exist. What is Russia's counterattack to Trump's threat? Russia has taken this step after the order of US President Donald Trump, in which he asked to deploy two US nuclear submarines on the coast of Russia. After this order of Trump, the tension between Russia and America has increased even more. This move has broken a 38-year-old agreement. In 1987, there was an agreement between Russia (Soviet Union) and America that both would not deploy missile launchers, ground-launched ballistic missiles and cruise missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 km. But America had pulled out of this agreement in 2019. What did Russia say? The Russian Foreign Ministry said that its repeated warnings on this matter were ignored. 'We had decided that we would deploy such missiles only when America takes some such step. Since America is doing this now, we have also decided to lift the ban on the deployment of missiles.'


Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Indian Bank to pare stake in ASREC below 30% by March 2026
Indian Bank aims to divest part of its ASREC stake to meet regulatory limits on holding in non-core businesses by end-FY26. Indian Bank plans to reduce its 38.26% stake in ASREC (India) Ltd to below 30% by FY26, in compliance with regulatory norms limiting bank exposure in non-subsidiaries. The stake is valued at ₹37.5 crore. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads State-owned Indian Bank plans to partly divest stake in asset reconstruction company ASREC (India) Ltd and has started scouting for a buyer, managing director Binod Kumar told state-owned bank holds 38.26% in ASREC. It is looking to bring down the stake to 30% by the end of this fiscal, Kumar said, even as it has received an extension of the deadline to pare stake below 30% by a year to March total value of the holding is Rs 37.5 banking law bars a bank from holding more than 30% share in any non-subsidiary company, to prevent over-concentration of risk outside its core activity, that is lending. Bank of India and Union Bank of India hold 26% each in ASREC while Life Insurance Corporation of India holds 9.18%.ASREC like any other asset reconstruction company buys non performing assets from banks and financial institutions at mutually agreed prices for resolution of the bad was incorporated in October 2004 to carry out activities under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002."The ARC will remain an attractive business even as the bad loan ratios are trending lower," Kumar said, indicating the size of non-performing assets of the banking sector as a average gross NPA for the sector stood at 2.3% of the gross advances of Rs 181.3 lakh crore at the end of June. This translates into Rs 4.2 lakh crore of NPAs even as the average ratio came down from 2.8% over the Indian Bank, the gross NPA ratio fell to 3.01% at the end of June quarter from 3.77% a year back. Its net NPA fell to 0.18% from 0.39%. Slippage ratio came down to 0.94% from 1.5% over the same period.