Lana Del Rey and Addison Rae Duet ‘Diet Pepsi' in London
The duo also sang '57.5,' the Spotify-featuring and unreleased song Del Rey debuted at Stagecoach in April. Rae is also set to join the Honeymoon headliner during the second night of her stop at London's Wembley Stadium on Friday.
More from Rolling Stone
Addison Rae's 2025 Tour: Here's Where to Find Tickets for Sold-Out Dates
Haim Put Their 'Headphones On' for Addison Rae, Janet Jackson Mashup in BBC Live Lounge
Addison Rae Unveils 2025 World Tour Dates
Trio London Grammar and Banks previously joined Del Rey earlier on her tour, with London Grammar helping the star launch the run on June 23 at Cardiff's Principality Stadium and Banks joining Del Rey in in Glasgow, Liverpool, and Dublin.
Although the tour had been hinted as in support of previously-titled album, Lasso, Del Rey later announced that it would be renamed The Right Person Will Stay. After the singer said it would release May 21, she shared with fans earlier this year that the LP will not 'come on time' and would get another name change.
Del Rey has since made her debut at the 2025 Stagecoach festival in Indio, California, (and made an appearance during Jelly Roll's headlining set for a rendition of 'Save Me') and released two songs, 'Henry, Come On' and 'Bluebird,' from her upcoming, untitled 10th album.
Meanwhile, Rae is bringing her debut album on the road and announced in June that the Addison tour will make stops across North America, Europe, and Australia as the her first headlining run set to begin in Dublin on Aug. 26.
Best of Rolling Stone
Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs
The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs
All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kanye West Ex-Staffer Seeking $100K in Legal Fees for ‘Frivolous' Effort to Block Lawsuit
A former Yeezy staffer who says Kanye West subjected her to a 'calculated campaign' of antisemitic and sexual harassment says she was forced to spend nearly $100,000 in legal fees fighting his failed attempt to dismiss her lawsuit – and he should be on the hook for the full amount. The marketing specialist, who sued in February as a Jane Doe, claims her turbulent tenure working for Yeezy in late 2023 and 2024 was filled with verbal abuse, discrimination, and 'constant degradation of women.' She claims West, also known as Ye, sent her harassing texts reading, 'Welcome to the first day of working for Hitler,' and 'Hail Hitler,' before her abrupt termination when she reported West's behavior to her manager. She further claims West once texted her a photo of a nude woman and ordered her to work on his Yeezy Porn venture against her wishes. More from Rolling Stone Soulja Boy Released from Custody as Gun Charge Rejected by Prosecutors Sean Combs Denied Bail for Second Time Soulja Boy Arrested on Weapons Charge During Traffic Stop in Los Angeles West, 48, was sued individually along with his company. In April, he filed his motion to strike the complaint, claiming the ex-staffer was trying to 'suppress' his constitutionally protected right to artistic expression. 'Ye is not merely a creator; he is art,' the filing said. 'Ye's public and private personas form a continuous, provocative performance that challenges societal taboos surrounding race, religion, gender, power, politics, and censorship.' A Los Angeles County judge denied West's motion in a June 30 ruling. Judge Theresa M. Traber said the motion was 'rife with defects, specious arguments, and misstatements of law.' She said the declarations West submitted from alleged witnesses, including one from West's self-described chief of staff, Milo Yiannopoulos, were 'totally lacking in personal knowledge or proper foundation upon which to base their asserted opinions.' In her scathing ruling, Judge Traber said the motion was 'frivolous and/or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay,' so West was on the hook to pay for Doe's 'reasonable' attorney's fees and costs. The woman is now asking for $99,720. A hearing to determine the fairness of that amount is set for Sept. 12. West's lawyers did not respond to a request for comment on the amount. They are appealing the ruling that upheld the lawsuit. In a failed filing last month that sought to disqualify the judge, they said Jane Doe 'voluntarily entered a provocative creative environment' and later tried to reframe West's creative expression as 'unlawful,' in an alleged violation of West's First Amendment right to free speech. The rapper, meanwhile, has been sued more than a dozen times since his initial, highly public antisemitic tirade nearly three years ago. In October 2022, West tweeted his now-infamous plan to 'go death con 3 ON JEWISH PEOPLE.' Weeks later, Rolling Stone published an investigation that found West presided over a 'toxic' work environment at his Yeezy label, telling one staffer that 'skinheads and Nazis were his greatest inspiration.' West later apologized in an Instagram post written in Hebrew, but he again promoted antisemitic ideology, sporting a T-shirt for the Norwegian metal musician Burzum, who has been fined for antisemitism. West also promoted Vultures 1 with artwork that evoked Burzum's cover art. 'Ye waged a relentless and deliberate campaign of antisemitism and misogyny against my client,' Jane Doe's attorney, Carney Shegerian of Shegerian & Associates, said in a statement last February. 'His appalling treatment of women and fixation on Nazism, evident in abusive texts where he repeatedly calls himself Hitler, expose his motives. We need to stop excusing Ye's behavior. As a father, husband, and employer, he must be held accountable. Ye dared my client to sue, and we will see him in court.' West's visa to Australia was revoked last month in the aftermath of his single titled 'Heil Hitler,' which he released in May. Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Soulja Boy Released from Custody as Gun Charge Rejected by Prosecutors
Soulja Boy was released from custody Tuesday after California prosecutors declined to file charges following his arrest over the weekend on suspicion of being a felon in possession of a firearm. 'A case was declined due to insufficient evidence,' a spokesman with the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office wrote in an email sent to Rolling Stone. The 'Crank That' rapper was released from jail shortly before 2 p.m. local time, according to online records. More from Rolling Stone Sean Combs Denied Bail for Second Time Kanye West Ex-Staffer Seeking $100K in Legal Fees for 'Frivolous' Effort to Block Lawsuit Soulja Boy Arrested on Weapons Charge During Traffic Stop in Los Angeles Soulja Boy, whose real name is DeAndre Cortez Way, was arrested early Sunday when a vehicle he was riding in was pulled over for an alleged traffic violation, an LAPD spokesman said. The car, a Tesla, was stopped because it allegedly had tinted windows, prosecutors revealed in their charge evaluation worksheet obtained by Rolling Stone. '[Officers] discovered a firearm in the rear seat near a suspect. Both the suspect and the driver denied owning the firearm,' the worksheet said. Despite the denial, Way was booked on suspicion of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. The rapper, 35, has a store for his SODMG clothing line on Melrose Avenue, near the location where he was arrested. He spent two nights in jail awaiting the charging decision. Way made headlines in April when a jury awarded one of his former girlfriends $4 million in damages for her claims he assaulted, sexually battered, and harassed her. He previously was convicted of carrying a loaded firearm in a vehicle following his 2014 arrest in L.A.'s San Fernando Valley. Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
"Clankers": A robot slur emerges to express disdain for AI's takeover
AI is everywhere whether you like it or not, and some online have turned to a choice word to express their frustration. Why it matters: Referring to an AI bot as a "clanker" (or a "wireback," or a "cogsucker") has emerged as a niche, irreverent internet phenomenon that illuminates a broader disdain for the way AI is overtaking technology, labor, and culture. State of play: The concerns range from major to minor: people are concerned that AI will put them out of a job, but they're also annoyed that it's getting harder to reach a human being at their mobile carrier. "When u call customer service and a clanker picks up" one X post from July reads, with over 200,000 likes, alongside a photo of someone removing their headset in resignation. "Genuinely needed urgent bank customer service and a clanker picked up," reads another from July 30. Here's what to know: Where "clanker" comes from Context: The word is onomatopoeic, but the term can be traced back to Star Wars. It comes from a 2005 Star Wars video game, "Republic Commando," according to Know Your Meme. The term was also used in 2008's Star Wars: The Clone Wars: "Okay, clankers," one character says. "Eat lasers." Robot-specific insults are a common trope in science fiction. In the TV Show Battlestar Galactica, characters refer to the robots as "toasters" and "chrome jobs." "Slang is moving so fast now that a [Large Language Model] trained on everything that happened before... is not going to have immediate access to how people are using a particular word now," Nicole Holliday, associate professor of linguistics at UC Berkeley, told Rolling Stone. "Humans [on] Urban Dictionary are always going to win." How people feel about AI Anxiety over AI's potential impact on the workforce is especially strong. By the numbers: U.S. adults' concerns over AI have grown since 2021, according to Pew Research Center, and 51% of them say that they're more concerned than excited about the technology. Only 23% of adults said that AI will have a very or somewhat positive impact on how people do their jobs over the next 20 years. And those anxieties aren't unfounded. AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs — and spike unemployment to 10-20% in the next one to five years, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told Axios in May. And the next job market downturn — whether it's already underway or still years off — might be a bloodbath for millions of workers whose jobs can be supplanted by AI, Axios' Neil Irwin wrote on Wednesday. People may have pressing concerns about their jobs or mental health, but their annoyances with AI also extend to the mundane, like customer service, Google searches, or dating apps. Social media users have described dating app interactions where they suspect the other party is using AI to write responses. There are a number of apps solely dedicated, in fact, to creating images and prompts for dating apps. Yes, but: Hundreds of millions of people across the world are using ChatGPT every day, its parent company reports. What we're watching: Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and Jim Justice (R-WV) introduced a bipartisan bill last month to ensure that people can speak to a human being when contacting U.S. call centers. "Slur" might not be the right word for what's happening People on the internet who want a word to channel their AI frustrations are clear about the s-word. The inclination to "slur" has clear, cathartic appeal, lexical semantician Geoffrey Nunberg wrote in his 2018 article "The Social Life of Slurs." But any jab at AI is probably better classified as "derogatory." "['Slur'] is both more specific and more value-laden than a term like "derogative," Nunberg writes, adding that a derogative word "qualifies as a slur only when it disparages people on the basis of properties such as race, religion, ethnic or geographical origin, gender, sexual orientation or sometimes political ideology." "Sailing enthusiasts deprecate the owners of motor craft as 'stinkpotters,' but we probably wouldn't call the word a slur—though the right-wingers' derogation of environmentalists as 'tree-huggers' might qualify, since that antipathy has a partisan cast."
