RPP seeks to know status of Naga pacts from interlocutor Mishra
In a release, RPP asked whether these agreements are still relevant and whether Mishra has managed to bring all the warring factions on board for a final settlement of the Naga issue. "If yes, what is the time frame for this settlement," it asked, saying these are some of the queries that he needs to answer. "Mishra's latest adventurism is akin to putting the cart before the horse," the party said.
RPP also requested Mishra to take a break, "given the constant shifting of goalpost".
The party stated it believed the ongoing Naga-led effort at unity should take precedence.
It said before this elusive factional unity is realised, Mishra should avoid fishing in troubled waters.
Further, it said, the Political Affairs Committee (PAC) constituted by the ruling coalition in Nagaland should be disbanded, saying it serves no purpose other than to peddle the propaganda that the NDPP-BJP coalition govt is doing something.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
14 minutes ago
- Hans India
Sadhvi Pragya Receives Hero's Welcome In Bhopal Following Malegaon Blast Acquittal, Alleges Congress Conspiracy
Former BJP parliamentarian Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur received an enthusiastic homecoming in Bhopal on Sunday, marking her first return to the Madhya Pradesh capital following her acquittal in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case. The controversial religious leader used the occasion to launch a scathing attack on the Congress party, accusing it of orchestrating a deliberate conspiracy and demanding treason charges against the opposition party. Speaking to media personnel after her arrival, Sadhvi Pragya characterized the recent court verdict that cleared her and six other accused individuals as a decisive rebuke to those who attempted to establish what she termed the "saffron terror" narrative. She expressed satisfaction that the judicial outcome had vindicated her position after seventeen years of legal proceedings. The former Bhopal MP argued that the Congress party's approach to the case was driven by electoral considerations and appeasement politics. She alleged that the opposition party deliberately sought to frame the incident within a "saffron terror" framework to serve its political interests and cater to specific voter demographics. In her most serious allegation, Sadhvi Pragya accused the Congress of engaging in treasonous activities through its handling of the case. She claimed that the party's actions constituted a betrayal of national interests and suggested that appropriate legal action should be pursued against Congress leadership for these alleged offenses. The religious leader elaborated on what she described as systematic persecution of Hindu individuals during the investigation process. She alleged that Congress-led authorities deliberately targeted members of the Hindu community, filing fabricated cases and subjecting them to various forms of harassment as part of a broader political strategy. Reflecting on the tragic incident itself, Sadhvi Pragya referenced the September 29, 2008 explosion in Malegaon that claimed six lives and injured approximately 100 people. The blast, caused by an explosive device attached to a motorcycle, occurred in an area with a significant Muslim population, leading to heightened communal tensions at the time. The case gained national prominence when investigators arrested several individuals associated with Hindu right-wing organizations, prompting some Congress leaders to introduce the controversial "saffron terror" terminology into public discourse. This narrative suggested that Hindu extremist groups posed a significant terrorist threat, a characterization that became a major point of political contention. Last month, a special National Investigation Agency court delivered its verdict, acquitting all seven accused individuals after concluding that the prosecution had failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This outcome followed years of legal battles and investigations that had become deeply intertwined with national political debates. Sadhvi Pragya used her Bhopal appearance to claim vindication for her longstanding assertions of innocence. She described the acquittal as a triumph of truth and righteousness over what she characterized as false accusations and political manipulation. In particularly serious allegations, the former MP claimed that investigating authorities had subjected her to torture and coercion in attempts to implicate high-profile political figures. She specifically alleged that investigators pressured her to make false statements against current Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. According to Sadhvi Pragya's account, she resisted these alleged attempts to force her into making fabricated accusations against prominent BJP leaders. She claimed that her refusal to cooperate with what she described as efforts to falsely implicate others resulted in enhanced persecution and mistreatment during her detention. The religious leader, who began her political career through the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, the student organization affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, portrayed her experience as part of a broader pattern of targeting Hindu activists and organizations. Her statements in Bhopal reflect the continuing political ramifications of the Malegaon case, which has remained a contentious issue in Indian politics for over a decade and a half. The case has been cited by various political parties to support different narratives about terrorism, communalism, and law enforcement practices in India. The enthusiastic reception accorded to Sadhvi Pragya in Bhopal demonstrates the continued support she enjoys among certain sections of the Hindu nationalist movement, despite the controversies that have surrounded her throughout her political career. Her return to public prominence following the acquittal may signal her intention to resume an active role in political discourse and organizational activities.
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
China and Russia start joint drills in Sea of Japan
Synopsis China and Russia have commenced "Joint Sea-2025" naval exercises in the Sea of Japan near Vladivostok, scheduled for three days. These drills aim to deepen their strategic partnership and include submarine rescue, anti-submarine operations, air defense, and maritime combat exercises. Following the drills, the two nations will conduct joint naval patrols in the Pacific. Reuters Russian and Chinese naval officers take part in a ceremony marking the start of the upcoming joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan, following the arrival of Chinese military vessels in Vladivostok, Russia, July 31, 2025. Russian Defence Ministry/Russia's Pacific Fleet/Handout via REUTERS China and Russia began joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan on Sunday as they seek to reinforce their partnership and counterbalance what they see as a US-led global economic and political ties, Moscow and Beijing have strengthened their military cooperation in recent years, and their relations have deepened since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The "Joint Sea-2025" exercises kicked off in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and would last for three days, China's defence ministry said in a statement on two sides will hold "submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat".Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, are participating in the exercises alongside Russian ships, the ministry said. After the drills, the two countries will conduct naval patrols in "relevant waters of the Pacific".China and Russia have carried out annual drills for several years, with the "Joint Sea" exercises beginning in year's drills were held along China's southern Chinese defence ministry said Friday that this year's exercises were aimed at "further deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership" of the two has never denounced Russia's more than three-year war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine's allies, including the United States, believe that Beijing has provided support to insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine.
India.com
44 minutes ago
- India.com
Chidambaram Raises Alarm Over Addition Of 6.5 Lakh Voters In Tamil Nadu, Calls It Alarming And Illegal
Senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram has raised alarm over the addition of 6.5 lakh voters in Tamil Nadu, calling it "alarming" and "illegal." Chidambaram's comment comes amid an ongoing tussle between the BJP-led NDA and the opposition over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, which the INDIA bloc claims is an attempt to delete a large section of voters. Nearly 65 lakh names have reportedly been deleted from Bihar's draft voter list, according to data made public in July. "The SIR exercise is getting curiouser and curiouser. While 65 lakh voters are in danger of being disenfranchised in Bihar, reports of 'adding' 6.5 lakh persons as voters in Tamil Nadu is alarming and patently illegal," Chidambaram said in a post on X. Referring to the ECI-led SIR exercise in Bihar, Chidambaram alleged that migrant workers are being unfairly treated in the process, both in terms of exclusion from Bihar and questionable inclusion in other states. "Calling them 'permanently migrated' is an insult to the migrant workers and a gross interference in the right of the electorate of Tamil Nadu to elect a government of its choice. Why should the migrant worker not return to Bihar (or his/her home state) to vote in the State Assembly election, as they usually do?" he added, pointing out that many do return for festivals like Chhath Puja. 'A person to be enrolled as a voter must have a fixed and permanent legal home. The migrant worker has such a home in Bihar... how can he/she be enrolled as a voter in Tamil Nadu?' He directly accused, 'The ECI is abusing its powers and trying to change the electoral character and patterns of states. This abuse of powers must be fought politically and legally.' The Special Intensive Revision in Bihar has come under growing scrutiny from opposition parties, including the Congress and the RJD, who fear that the exercise is being used to selectively remove voters ahead of the upcoming state Assembly polls. The Supreme Court has allowed the SIR to proceed while issuing stern warnings that it will intervene should evidence of mass exclusion arise. The court also recommended that the ECI accept documents such as Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards to broaden access. Tejashwi Yadav, an RJD leader, recently stirred controversy by claiming that his name was missing from the draft roll, prompting the ECI to clarify that his name does appear in the updated list and that no request from him or other RJD leaders had been received to re‑add names.
